![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - DavisMind91 - 09-27-2018 (09-27-2018, 05:08 AM)RTBoss Wrote: Why don't you guys start a discussion thread in the product discussion section? That way Shannon doesn't have to comb back through this thread, and instead can just go to the LTU 5.5G thread when the time comes for him to read all of your ideas. Good idea but we may already be too far gone here lol. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - jesseb - 09-27-2018 Shannon I had a question about a scary experience with AM6 Stage 3 but I assume you don't read everyone journal. Can you private message so that I can ask in private, even though I wrote in my journal. Thank You RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - RTBoss - 09-27-2018 (09-27-2018, 10:49 AM)jesseb Wrote: Shannon I had a question about a scary experience with AM6 Stage 3 but I assume you don't read everyone journal. Can you private message so that I can ask in private, even though I wrote in my journal. Thank You Shannon doesn't private message, and PM'ing Shannon is disabled. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - lano1106 - 09-27-2018 (09-27-2018, 10:49 AM)jesseb Wrote: Shannon I had a question about a scary experience with AM6 Stage 3 but I assume you don't read everyone journal. Can you private message so that I can ask in private, even though I wrote in my journal. Thank You I have read it. I agree that this is strange. It feels a little bit like what you see in the fight club movie with Brad Pit... @Shannon I have a question too about AM6 program. I'm toward the end of stage 2 and I have been feeling sad, a little bit unmotivated and I sleep more than usual for many days now. I have never suffered from a depression but if someone would ask me how I think a depression feels like, I would say that what I am feeling now could pretty much be it.... Is feeling that way could be a potential effect of the program when it is stirring stuff in my mind to accomplish its goal? Or this is completely not possible and I need find an explanation elsewhere? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Ricardo - 09-27-2018 (09-24-2018, 04:24 PM)Benjamin Wrote:(09-24-2018, 02:36 AM)Nox Wrote:(09-23-2018, 09:55 PM)Ricardo Wrote: [quote='Shannon' pid='206245' dateline='1537723243'] I'm still here and I still stand by my assertions. I'm only trying to add perspective to the issue. The way any criticism is met with such hostility , especially from Shannon does rather prove my points I'm afraid. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - MasterEnki - 09-27-2018 (09-27-2018, 05:14 AM)DavisMind91 Wrote:(09-26-2018, 09:27 PM)MasterEnki Wrote:(09-26-2018, 08:52 PM)DavisMind91 Wrote:(09-26-2018, 08:13 PM)MasterEnki Wrote: I reckon the new LTU should focus on emotional wellbeing, positive thinking, uplifting mindset(s) and the like. Such as E2, PTPA, USLM, Overcome Procrastination, Happiness and Joy, Gratitude, old LTU, etc. (pretty certain Shannon is already planning on adding all these). TBH, I’m kinda biased. I am pretty fit / ripped. I am already obsessed with gym training. I already have a healthy diet. I also go running every second day (3 - 4 times a week). I do a bit of swimming when weather / circumstances allow for it. And financially, I’m barely just making ends meet. But I’m staying out of debt. I pay my bills / rent first, and buy my groceries / supplements, and then I’m broke. I don’t drink, nor do I go out to any social venues, since I can’t afford either. I spend my weekends reading, watching TV, meditating, walking to the beach (I live on the coast) and so on. I also own my own weights and bench, a doorway pull-up bar and some paralettes. So my gym training is free (apart from what I paid years ago when I bought the gym equipment). I also avoid alcohol to maintain maximum fitness / gym results. The ideal LTU for me would not have those things in it. But, I know a lot of people are lazy and don’t exercise, eat junk food nonstop, binge drink, etc. So I can see that your suggestions are useful to a lot of potential LTU users. Also, someone with good emotional well-being would likely avoid drugs / alcohol, since they naturally experience the highs while sober / straight. Someone with good emotional well-being can easily handle the lows while sober / straight. The typical addict lacks emotional well-being, or is emotionally damaged. The typical addict binge drinks / takes drugs to mask and ignore the emotional lows / pains (and they crave the highs, that they lack naturally). LTU 5.5g should be good whatever Shannon decides, since he likes to aim for high standards in his work. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - DavisMind91 - 09-27-2018 (09-27-2018, 02:21 PM)MasterEnki Wrote:(09-27-2018, 05:14 AM)DavisMind91 Wrote:(09-26-2018, 09:27 PM)MasterEnki Wrote:(09-26-2018, 08:52 PM)DavisMind91 Wrote:(09-26-2018, 08:13 PM)MasterEnki Wrote: I reckon the new LTU should focus on emotional wellbeing, positive thinking, uplifting mindset(s) and the like. Such as E2, PTPA, USLM, Overcome Procrastination, Happiness and Joy, Gratitude, old LTU, etc. (pretty certain Shannon is already planning on adding all these). I knew you were biased the moment you responded to my original post. But your bias is unfair to everyone else who needs to improve areas of their life, beyond just the physical. Kudos on keeping up with the gym, but life isn't all about working out. As far as finances go, it's obvious by your own admission that you need improvement in that area which I somehow figured before you even posted it. With that being said, this is a community of sub users, and I'll say it again, we're talking about TOTAL life overhaul, not just a couple areas. for example, even if money isn't all that important to you, wouldn't it be good to have aid from the new LTU to help improve your finances so that you're no longer broke after spending on the necessities? You could also afford to go out more and have a chance to improve your social skills, which improving in both these areas could help make a more holistically happy and functional person, which ultimately seems to be the goal of LTU. Guess time will tell what gets added. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Moud - 09-28-2018 Question for Shannon If someone was exposed to a series of subs for a very long time (around 2 years) that had some very very negative effects, what would be the best and fastest was to undo that damage? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Kol - 09-28-2018 I love it when Shannon updates his own journal. His writing gives me a huge sense of liberation and gets my mind going lol RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 09-28-2018 Agree with Kol. Also, I had to agree with Shannon and can't believe we're still on the "looks matter" BS arguments. I'll say it again: I'm an 8 looks-wise and have always had trouble with women. If it was looks they wanted I'd be swimming in it, but I'm not, so obviously it's something else. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Hatman - 09-28-2018 (09-28-2018, 07:08 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Agree with Kol. Also, I had to agree with Shannon and can't believe we're still on the "looks matter" BS arguments. Looks matter WAY less than most think. To add to that, beauty is HIGHLY subjective. You might be a 10 to one person, and at the same time a 5 to another, and vice versa. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-28-2018 (09-27-2018, 01:40 PM)Ricardo Wrote:(09-24-2018, 04:24 PM)Benjamin Wrote:(09-24-2018, 02:36 AM)Nox Wrote:(09-23-2018, 09:55 PM)Ricardo Wrote: [quote='Shannon' pid='206245' dateline='1537723243'] I have demonstrated that your conclusions and assertions are based in faulty logic. I am not giving you any more or less hostility than you are giving me. And your "proof of your points" is, again, based in faulty logic. You can't get snarky with me because I disagree with you and my points won't conveniently "just go away" and then claim I'm getting hostile with you when I return exactly the same tone and level of snark you gave me. I'm not being hostile when I do that, I am trying to make you aware of what you are doing by giving you the same. It's entirely unnecessary to be snarky to me. We are adults. We can have a civil discourse. I have explained in detail in my journal why you do not get results from DMSI, and why the logic that results in this state is faulty. Given that, your core argument is therefore faulty and so are your conclusions drawn from it. Including this one: Quote:The way any criticism is met with such hostility , especially from Shannon does rather prove my points I'm afraid. Which, by the way, smacks of snark and superiority. You don't want to see the reality I am creating with DMSI, slowly and surely. But it is there, and it is going to be grown into something much bigger, stronger and more obvious. Whether or not you are willing to admit it, see it, or get on board with it. You cannot say DMSI doesn't work, when we have multiple times over multiple versions each now seen it work in ways that were without a doubt the user doing what DMSI was instructing them to do. At this point, the only thing holding us back is fear based resistance. Unfortunately some of you, including you, Ricardo, are so afraid of this change that you are simply refusing to see it. You can't revise history with refusal to see what happened. It happened. It is what it is. And whether or not you personally get on board with it, or let it happen for you, it still has happened for multiple others, multiple times, with multiple versions. And DMSI is getting more and more powerful with each version. These are facts. Not opinions. "It doesn't work" is an opinion based on refusal to accept and see the reality of what has actually taken place. Denial is not just a river in Egypt, my friend. But I still hold out hope for even you to achieve the goals of DMSI. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Amann - 09-28-2018 @Shannon As you mentioned in your Journal...Ricardo would need to adjust his belief system if he wanted to see any change....would Universal Detox help him with that? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 09-28-2018 Just had a quick read of Shannon's journal about looks. I feel looks don't seem to matter to women that are either yes ugly or women that are older. By older I mean approx 30+. Women from the age of 18-30 will have the minorities for whom beyond looks what truly matters in a relationship is values and morals however for the majority what they find as the perfect man usually is the proverbial Prince charming, the quarterback etc. If this wasn't the reality of life then movies wouldn't make movies of such. Having been to many universities in my lifetime so far I have always come to the conclusion based on observations that women above 18 always seek out good looking men as their mate for sex and a relationship. They only during a relationship will then consider other factors beyond looks which is the same for men too on the whole. Above 30+ approx women tend to forgo men's looks based on what level of a provider and safety provider he can be as for them the body clock is ticking yet if they could get the whole package ie good looks too they will go for that. A key requirement for many women has been grooming and grooming means congruence to the image that male is trying to exhibit. As long as he groom's as best as he can he raises up the image ladder in her eyes if he is indeed what she finds attractive. I found when I was good looking I got more attention than no2 as an older less attractive male. My personality has improved my opinions have matured and I have become a better man for it but body image matters and counts. Of cos this is all my current belief system and I welcome DMSI to change this in any way possible to allow me to attract higher sexier classier women than normal but my current world view is based on my years of observations. Excuse any typos as I am typing from my phone and also haven't had time to read all posts as time is scarce for me once again. Ps: I just finished reading all of the journal entry from Shannon and didn't see if this realisation from Shannon means that he can now include something else into DMSI which will work on changing this new "fear/lack of new belief acceptance" that he has had an epiphany about? |