+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-25-2016
I'm not going to give my testers placebo effects with expectations.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bogdy - 06-25-2016
(06-25-2016, 08:10 PM)Shannon Wrote: I'm not going to give my testers placebo effects with expectations.
Shannon may you recommend a smartphone suited for ultrasonic? I'm thinking about HTC since it has stereo speakers, but I don't know if it passes the 20 kz test.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-25-2016
(06-25-2016, 08:31 PM)bogdy Wrote:(06-25-2016, 08:10 PM)Shannon Wrote: I'm not going to give my testers placebo effects with expectations.
Shannon may you recommend a smartphone suited for ultrasonic? I'm thinking about HTC since it has stereo speakers, but I don't know if it passes the 20 kz test.
I have been using the Samsung Galaxy series ever since the S2. All of them except the S5, in fact. I happen to know that all of them, 2 through 7, work. But I have no experience with anything else except one low end LG, can't remember the model. All were okay.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 06-25-2016
(06-25-2016, 08:31 PM)bogdy Wrote: Shannon may you recommend a smartphone suited for ultrasonic? I'm thinking about HTC since it has stereo speakers, but I don't know if it passes the 20 kz test.
I don't know about others but I play the silent track from my phone through cheap Logitech computer speakers. It's worked perfectly for LTU, BASE and now for E 2.0
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000R9AAJA/
I only mention these speakers specifically because I've been using them for over a year now and they've done the job for the lowest $$$ I could find (got them for $10 on sale
)
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Minititan - 06-26-2016
Sincerely praying that this is released to testers before Friday. Friday is a massive local event and people from other towns all flood here for the day, busiest day of the year and I'm keen to see the power of DAOSI when surrounded by hundreds of babes.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-26-2016
I was planning to either release it or rework it on the 30th, which is Thursday.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-26-2016
I am starting to get an idea what the optimal usage pattern is in terms of loops per day for DAOSI V2. It seems to consistently show as being between 4 and 8 loops per day, with 4 and 6 being the top picks, and 6 winning more often than anything else. Surprisingly, 1 loop is also showing very well.
9 loops and up consistently shows as being dangerous and problematic so far. Apparently overpowering the aura will result in undesirable reactions from others.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - wolverine_i_am - 06-26-2016
(06-26-2016, 12:34 AM)Shannon Wrote: I was planning to either release it or rework it on the 30th, which is Thursday.
That's so perfect, as I'm sure all of us will be having a big weekend next week.
Hopefully the trials go well!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - kenpachi - 06-26-2016
In Psychic Sexuality (book), he says the "full male regalia", meaning very high sexual energy, is often rejected by the female. It seems a kind of middle ground level of sexual energy is preferable.
I thought the sub could automatically alter your level of sexual energy to adapt to what the person you're trying to attract would require from you?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-26-2016
(06-26-2016, 01:06 AM)kenpachi Wrote: In Psychic Sexuality (book), he says the "full male regalia", meaning very high sexual energy, is often rejected by the female. It seems a kind of middle ground level of sexual energy is preferable.
I thought the sub could automatically alter your level of sexual energy to adapt to what the person you're trying to attract would require from you?
It automatically alters the aura to account for the specific amount and type of energy required by each person being affected. And this feature works well, if today's second observation is any indication. I was sitting in a restaurant surrounded by seven different women, and every single one of them was responding in ways that were obvious, except of course the one sitting behind me who I could not watch.
These females ranged in age from early 20's to late 50's, and included a range of different nationalities, including American, Japanese, Chinese and Philippine.
Yet they all responded in extremely similar ways, and they all responded at almost exactly the same rates of timing!
It would be very hard for me to believe that seven different females from such diverse backgrounds and ages would all give virtually identical conscious and subconscious reactions, and in identical timing, to just one single stimulus. I have been doing experiments with groups of people for years that show that it virtually never happens if they are all exposed to a single subliminal. But this is not a subliminal; this is an energy field, which is designed to adjust to the individual to become what they need it to be to achieve the goal of sexual arousal and attraction.
I can only explain what I saw in the second observation with, "It works." on that point.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Weichi - 06-26-2016
(06-26-2016, 01:17 AM)Shannon Wrote: Yet they all responded in extremely similar ways, and they all responded at almost exactly the same rates of timing!
Speaking of timing ... can you give us an timeframe in which this aura start affecting people in our vicinity?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Raz - 06-26-2016
(06-25-2016, 04:52 PM)Shannon Wrote:(06-25-2016, 07:56 AM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote: Ive seen a few times while I was researching MLS that quite a few users were dissatisfied with the 5G version. What specifically is wrong with it? When will it be fixed or upgraded? I'd assume it takes priority if it really is "broken."
The 5G version of what?
EDIT: I misread that, I thought it said IML instead of MLS. Gotcha.
It's going to be high priority, but not top priority. I have a few things that I need to do first. But we'll fix it.
I'd like to contribute my two cents to this. MLS 5G did not do much for me while I tried it. The MLS module in BASE 2.1 on the other hand is working quite well for me.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 06-26-2016
(06-26-2016, 12:34 AM)Shannon Wrote: I was planning to either release it or rework it on the 30th, which is Thursday.
This wait is going to be a bit harder than I thought. I'm going to have to start planning activities for the entire week just to help speed up the passage of time!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 06-26-2016
Hope I'll have my credit card before next thursday so I can have DAOSI V2 for testing.