Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - lokko - 06-25-2016 I want v2 for us alreadyyy RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 06-25-2016 Chakras aren't allegorical, they're just rather haphazard and you can create your own so it's not an exact system when dealing with higher than base functions. The Hindu system seems to be very poetic and breadcrumbs than the Chinese alchemical system. And kundalini is actually my main concern when it comes to these subs. I want the benefits (Shannon's subliminals are very effective and detailed) but I don't want to trigger kundalini if possible. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RisingSon - 06-25-2016 (06-25-2016, 07:11 AM)Nox Wrote: Chakras aren't allegorical, they're just rather haphazard and you can create your own so it's not an exact system when dealing with higher than base functions. The Hindu system seems to be very poetic and breadcrumbs than the Chinese alchemical system. And kundalini is actually my main concern when it comes to these subs. I want the benefits (Shannon's subliminals are very effective and detailed) but I don't want to trigger kundalini if possible. You seem a little conflicted. That's a personal problem. Some of us have the inverse goal in mind. If you are scared of your kundalini then don't embrace your sexuality fully and stop all meditation or choose a slow route of cultivation like Tai Chi. Surely, don't listen to THE KING/QUEEN OF ALL SEX SUBS, DAOSI V@!!! Hehe... Sort of curious how the @ symbol could appear as a coiled serpent... Really, most people don't have the right intent, knowledge, or level of purification when coming at Kundalini so when it erupts with negative side effects to a person's mental/physical health or whatever due to repression, blockages, and disease the spiritually inept are quick to cast blame and create fear. Actual Kundalini experiences are quite rare, by the way. I've observed that the real ones require a person to have significant spiritual protection and it greatly alters perception of this reality FOREVER. Seek truth and the rest will come naturally at it's own pace. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 06-25-2016 (06-25-2016, 06:47 AM)jacksonchandra Wrote: DAOSI I think It plays the sacral, solar plexus and third eye chakra. Third eye chakra doesn't overall mean only in spiritual things. One of the third eye chakra aspect that governs our life flow is how we "see" the world. We create our world by our thoughts. If we see the world as label as beautiful, it is what you will create. And so the opposite. And our belief is in the third eye chakra. With subconscious reprogramming, we "refresh" and "replace" with the new one, and our life circumstance also change. Hey Sarge... This is "as above, so below" being expressed through the lens of a different mental / spiritual discipline. You'll find it in almost every belief system. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 06-25-2016 (06-25-2016, 07:34 AM)RisingSon Wrote:(06-25-2016, 07:11 AM)Nox Wrote: Chakras aren't allegorical, they're just rather haphazard and you can create your own so it's not an exact system when dealing with higher than base functions. The Hindu system seems to be very poetic and breadcrumbs than the Chinese alchemical system. And kundalini is actually my main concern when it comes to these subs. I want the benefits (Shannon's subliminals are very effective and detailed) but I don't want to trigger kundalini if possible. Kundalini isn't what you think it is. But you're correct that true kundalini experiences are rare. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Bookstacks DC737 - 06-25-2016 Ive seen a few times while I was researching MLS that quite a few users were dissatisfied with the 5G version. What specifically is wrong with it? When will it be fixed or upgraded? I'd assume it takes priority if it really is "broken." RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Natious - 06-25-2016 BAMM 6g, I wonder how much that's gonna cost. 25 large? Take's a millionaire? Another thing I was thinking about is that the following years might be a huge leap in evolution (don't know if I expressed my idea properly). Awesome to be alive at such a time. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bogdy - 06-25-2016 (06-25-2016, 07:47 AM)Nox Wrote:(06-25-2016, 07:34 AM)RisingSon Wrote:(06-25-2016, 07:11 AM)Nox Wrote: Chakras aren't allegorical, they're just rather haphazard and you can create your own so it's not an exact system when dealing with higher than base functions. The Hindu system seems to be very poetic and breadcrumbs than the Chinese alchemical system. And kundalini is actually my main concern when it comes to these subs. I want the benefits (Shannon's subliminals are very effective and detailed) but I don't want to trigger kundalini if possible. Can you explain what kundalini is? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 06-25-2016 (06-25-2016, 09:01 AM)bogdy Wrote:(06-25-2016, 07:47 AM)Nox Wrote:(06-25-2016, 07:34 AM)RisingSon Wrote:(06-25-2016, 07:11 AM)Nox Wrote: Chakras aren't allegorical, they're just rather haphazard and you can create your own so it's not an exact system when dealing with higher than base functions. The Hindu system seems to be very poetic and breadcrumbs than the Chinese alchemical system. And kundalini is actually my main concern when it comes to these subs. I want the benefits (Shannon's subliminals are very effective and detailed) but I don't want to trigger kundalini if possible. That's actually a super deep question, and can get very personal and weird honestly. More than happy to answer questions in pms, but know that it will be a rule 4 violation in advance RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - waahbeta - 06-25-2016 Considering the achievements in 5.5G. I'd seriously like an update to SSF. I've used ssf fir over 6 months with no improvement. Just bought the Ephra 2, and I can feel the effects like mindfulness I. E recognizing negative thought as soon as they appear n removing them and sexual Dreams RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-25-2016 (06-25-2016, 04:38 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:(06-24-2016, 09:37 PM)Shannon Wrote: A long time ago, I started trying to develop a computerized predictive model for helping me figure things out faster. Instead, for example, of trying 30 million variations of something, it helps me narrow down my efforts by showing me what will probably happen if I use each option. I use algorithms I developed myself. Beyond that, I'm keeping it a secret. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-25-2016 (06-25-2016, 05:19 AM)Nox Wrote:(06-25-2016, 01:24 AM)Shannon Wrote: The "powering up" process for this one is very interesting. First, it seems to play teasingly with and flicker on and off superficially on my face and chest. Then it settled "on" my lungs. Then it entered my lungs, and then filled them and my upper abdomen. Next, I felt hints of energy in my breath, but it's not very obvious unless you're really paying attention and looking for it. Then I started feeling it going down into my root chakra and after that it's overflowed my chest into my face and head. It's designed to work with energies, not areas. Your subconscious decides which energies best fit the bill, and how to manipulate them to achieve the program goal safely. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-25-2016 (06-25-2016, 05:45 AM)RTBoss Wrote:(06-25-2016, 03:14 AM)Shannon Wrote: I'm not going to go into details as to how the first test went aside from to say that. I am pleased with what happened. Ben's not talking. Not without my say so. We need a little more time yet. Still determining loops to use. So far only one at a time. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-25-2016 (06-25-2016, 07:56 AM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote: Ive seen a few times while I was researching MLS that quite a few users were dissatisfied with the 5G version. What specifically is wrong with it? When will it be fixed or upgraded? I'd assume it takes priority if it really is "broken." The 5G version of what? EDIT: I misread that, I thought it said IML instead of MLS. Gotcha. It's going to be high priority, but not top priority. I have a few things that I need to do first. But we'll fix it. |