(06-24-2016, 01:55 PM)Shannon Wrote: The DAOSI V2 will have an ASRB ratio of 5:2.

(06-24-2016, 02:08 PM)Shannon Wrote: Now I have an interesting issue. The ASRB ratio is going to force this program to be different than hat you're used to. Either I can have the masked tracks be contiguous, but not use vocoding (just volume differencing), or I can use vocoding, but have the masked tracks disappear every 5 minutes for 2 minutes.

Either one will work, but if you want masked instead of ultrasonic, one is going to be a lot less easy to listen to.

(06-24-2016, 02:10 PM)RTBoss Wrote:

(06-24-2016, 01:55 PM)Shannon Wrote: The DAOSI V2 will have an ASRB ratio of 5:2.

So for every 20 minutes of subliminal there will be 8 minutes of silence, correct?

(06-24-2016, 02:13 PM)CatMan Wrote:

(06-24-2016, 02:08 PM)Shannon Wrote: Now I have an interesting issue. The ASRB ratio is going to force this program to be different than hat you're used to. Either I can have the masked tracks be contiguous, but not use vocoding (just volume differencing), or I can use vocoding, but have the masked tracks disappear every 5 minutes for 2 minutes.

Either one will work, but if you want masked instead of ultrasonic, one is going to be a lot less easy to listen to.

In that case, it seems contigious is likely the most practical. Otherwise, that could be annoying, people could be woken up often when the tracks restart. I remember that's why you purposely have had the masked tracks continue on during ASRB breaks.

(06-24-2016, 01:41 PM)Shannon Wrote: The only thing you need is enough emotional passion and focus. It can be pleasurable or terrifying, but if you have enough emotional passion (read: energy concentration input) and focus, it will work, as long as the rest of the variables are also done correctly.

This is why people succeed in manifesting their worst fears much more often than what they really wish they had.

(06-24-2016, 03:16 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:

(06-24-2016, 01:41 PM)Shannon Wrote: The only thing you need is enough emotional passion and focus. It can be pleasurable or terrifying, but if you have enough emotional passion (read: energy concentration input) and focus, it will work, as long as the rest of the variables are also done correctly.

This is why people succeed in manifesting their worst fears much more often than what they really wish they had.

lol, you're being ahead of your time again, Shannon.

In the particular discipline of mental alchemy that I study (the one referenced in my username), practitioners are JUST NOW (seriously, like in the last few months) starting to openly acknowledge that you can use any kind of emotion -- pleasurable or terrifying -- to charge and send off an intent. Before, they either ignored the role of emotion or relied on positive feelings (laughter and comedy) to handle everything.

Here's an interesting story:

I was in a huge argument with a colleague last year because I was experimenting with charging... pictorial depictions of affirmations (trying not to break rule #4 if that even applies) with negative emotions and she almost lost her sh*t. Told me the universe was going to explode or some crap. Recently, when I told her that the manifestation came to pass AND it seemed more profound, she outright called me a liar.

(06-24-2016, 03:31 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(06-24-2016, 03:16 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:

(06-24-2016, 01:41 PM)Shannon Wrote: The only thing you need is enough emotional passion and focus. It can be pleasurable or terrifying, but if you have enough emotional passion (read: energy concentration input) and focus, it will work, as long as the rest of the variables are also done correctly.

This is why people succeed in manifesting their worst fears much more often than what they really wish they had.

lol, you're being ahead of your time again, Shannon.

In the particular discipline of mental alchemy that I study (the one referenced in my username), practitioners are JUST NOW (seriously, like in the last few months) starting to openly acknowledge that you can use any kind of emotion -- pleasurable or terrifying -- to charge and send off an intent. Before, they either ignored the role of emotion or relied on positive feelings (laughter and comedy) to handle everything.

Here's an interesting story:

I was in a huge argument with a colleague last year because I was experimenting with charging... pictorial depictions of affirmations (trying not to break rule #4 if that even applies) with negative emotions and she almost lost her sh*t. Told me the universe was going to explode or some crap. Recently, when I told her that the manifestation came to pass AND it seemed more profound, she outright called me a liar.

It's actually very ancient knowledge. Just not common knowledge, because it's only relatively recently that this knowledge is being released to the general public. It's time for it to be public. But I was trained in this more than 2 decades ago, and its origins trace back into and gets lost in the mists of time. The furthest back any of my instructors could trace it was to between approximately 6,000 and 10,000 years ago. You just have to have had access to those "in the know". They are not exactly very common - yet.

I think you are misunderstanding something. You can use negative emotions etc. to power causality manipulation and get a positive result, but it is much less desirable to do so. Just because you did it once and it does not seem to have had any negative impact means nothing. Causality manipulation does not play by normal rules of time and space. The strictures on using negative energy are there because of literally thousands of years of experience, passed down from Master to Apprentice, and of course every apprentice tries to break the rules.

The "way it works" is not always easily observable or easily understood. Your actions, even when the energy you are manipulating is neutral or positive, can have negative end results. Negative energy can have positive results. It's not just the polarity of energy you use to power it, it's also how you control the rest of the manipulation and achieve your goals with it.

I cannot recommend enough avoiding negative energy and emotions as an engine for your causality manipulations. But of course just because my first instructor told me not to do it, doesn't mean I didn't have to learn why the hard way, just like every other apprentice.

I just hope you don't make the mistakes I made before I really understood. They were very, very costly. I have seen a number of people win the Darwin award using causality manipulation in negative ways without a real understanding of what they are doing and the rules and laws they are interacting with.

My advice: avoid negatives.