Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 09-14-2018

(09-14-2018, 11:15 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: Hey @Shannon

Hope youre well, and your lungs are getting better.

Im really upset and lost and so if you could kindly read my journal entry (just posted it, Id really appreciate it).

In summary of that post i have 2 questions:

1) As someone that has semi executed I wanted to remain on flac, but may have to try mp3, is it just as effective and powerful?

2) May I rename the tracks on my phone, as UMOP1, UMOP2, UMOP3, so that I can have 3 mp3s which I may have a chance finally to play (if the app works)?

If the answers to the above are no, then I may just need to ask for a refund because im totally lost and this is really upsetting as this is the SUB i need from the day I joined IML.

thanks in advance as always bro!

Not Shannon, but MP3 is about 3% - 5% less effective than FLAC. And you can rename the files as much you want as far you don't try to reencode the whole thing. From what you wrote, to me at looks at the moment like you are trying to find reasons to not use the sub.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - RTBoss - 09-14-2018

(09-14-2018, 06:30 AM)Williamx25 Wrote: @Shannon

I have this dilemma of deciding what program to run next. I am waiting for DMSI 3.3 and I want to test it out because of the new technology. But my semester in university started and i'm studying alot.

I wanted to try out Maximum Learning Speed 5.5G, but i'm afraid that I will resist it just like I did with DMSI 3.2
MLS has been out for a few years now, and it seems that it's a little bit outdated or something even though it's 5.5G technology. Correct me if i'm wrong.

I'm not sure if I'm gonna stonewall MLS because of the 5.5G technology or limiting beliefs. I was stonewalling DMSI 3.2 because of my body/self esteem / body image. Maybe with studying it will be different because I have alot of confidence in my skills and abilities. I like physics mechanics and mathematics / programming. So maybe the MLS program will do wonders for me.... DMSI was a another story, I need to wait for 6G to help me bypass the stonewalling resistance on the area of women / seduction.

What should I do? Should I just wait for the 6G technology to come out and test it? And just stick with DMSI?

I wish there was a MLS 6G coming out LOL so what do you guys recommend?

MLS 5.5G was just released last year - hardly "old" tech. It does wonders for many. I'd love to run it myself someday. It should be even more effective for people now that Shannon has posted the secondary ASRB of 1 day on to 1 day off.

You may not stonewall MLS as you did DMSI. As you said, body image or other fears may have kept you from experiencing success with DMSI. Who knows, you may execute MLS perfectly.

You can't go wrong by trying - IML has an iron-clad money back guarantee.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-14-2018

(09-14-2018, 07:49 AM)Darwin Wrote: Shannon just wanna say that the cognitive effects of MLS legit worked, and i honestly believe there's a good case for whatever generated the increased intelligence, curiosity and ability to treat failure as valuable learning being in the skeleton of most programs - and definitely in LTU!

What results have you seen?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-14-2018

(09-14-2018, 08:03 AM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon,

How do you see where your life is headed to? Like how can you rationally say, okay based on past events, the future events will most likely turn out to be....

I can see that in every moment, I have almost infinite possible options for what I can do, think, choose, decide. All of them being possible, and all of them existing in some possible "future" as a choice that I made and took.

All things are thus possible, but it is up to you what you decide to do, think, believe, choose, say, etc. Your choices pick the possible "futures" that exist as a result.

I don't base on the past what I think will happen in the future. I base it in the present, and the knowledge that somethings are, and some things are not, within my control.

I don't make forecasts though. I make choices. I choose this outcome, and then I make it happen. I do what leads me to connect where I was when I decided on that future, with that future when it come into being.

I can make forecasts, and in fact I do and I use them to help me guide myself to my goals. But you don't need to make forecasts to achieve your goals. You just have to pick a goal and then work on achieving that goal one step at a time, sure and steady, after having broken the steps to that goal down into small enough steps.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-14-2018

(09-14-2018, 12:41 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:
(09-14-2018, 11:15 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: Hey @Shannon

Hope youre well, and your lungs are getting better.

Im really upset and lost and so if you could kindly read my journal entry (just posted it, Id really appreciate it).

In summary of that post i have 2 questions:

1) As someone that has semi executed I wanted to remain on flac, but may have to try mp3, is it just as effective and powerful?

2) May I rename the tracks on my phone, as UMOP1, UMOP2, UMOP3, so that I can have 3 mp3s which I may have a chance finally to play (if the app works)?

If the answers to the above are no, then I may just need to ask for a refund because im totally lost and this is really upsetting as this is the SUB i need from the day I joined IML.

thanks in advance as always bro!

Not Shannon, but MP3 is about 3% - 5% less effective than FLAC. And you can rename the files as much you want as far you don't try to reencode the whole thing. From what you wrote, to me at looks at the moment like you are trying to find reasons to not use the sub.

Exactly the answer I would have given.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Chris P. Bacon - 09-14-2018

Ok I have a question. That is based more on the electronics side of subs.

I have had to take a break from AM6 for the last 2 1/2 days to run MIR due to illness. I have been playing MIR Ultrasonic FLAC on my cheap $60 kindle fire for the last 2 days. Just a few hours ago I decided to switch and run it from my laptop to my analog tube headphone amp to my headphones, and I can feel the sub working more effectively.

Why would this be? Is it the crappy little tablet that doesn't have the ability to utilize the full potential of FLAC? Is my laptop that much better for playing subs? Is my analog headphone amp actually working to produce better audio as it is supposed to do.

My goal is to narrow down the possible issues. I bought that crappy little tablet to play subs so I wouldn't kill my laptop quicker by playing subs all night. So it would suck if that was it. I can actually hear the ultrasonic subs, which isn't exactly a good thing because they're not the greatest thing to hear all night and take some getting use to. Nevertheless, I cant with my ears hear an increase in audio clarity because anyone who can actually hear US will know that its almost impossible to hear a noticeable increase in the sound. It's like saying one combination of forks and knives on plates produces a MORE irritating sound than another pair.

Anywho, thoughts?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 09-14-2018

Ok, I just got in a fight with a guy because he could not get a girl wen I'm around. I was not trying to hit on her. Will auric shield help with this? Thanks Shannon, I can clearly see how much more attractive I am getting compared to people around me. The point where they feel like they have to pick physical fights with me to prove how masculine they are.


Dmsi is so clearly and obviously working that no guy seems to be able to pull girls when I'm around


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 09-14-2018

(09-14-2018, 03:56 PM)kingpill Wrote: Ok, I just got in a fight with a guy because he could not get a girl wen I'm around. I was not trying to hit on her. Will auric shield shel with this? Thanks Shannon, I can clearly see how much more attractive I am getting compared o people around me to. The point where they feel like they have to pick physical fights with me to prove how masculine they are.

Fortunately, there are some additions planned for 3.3 to help with this side of things, I think.

Because, seriously, some people... Big Grin

Auric shielding will help with people of this ilk sending "bad vibes" your way, either consciously or subconsciously, and trying to influence your progress negatively through such. It won't stop some moron from trying to pick a fight, though. But, like I said, I remember Shannon having something planned for 3.3 to help with this.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 09-14-2018

(09-14-2018, 04:01 PM)Have at ye Wrote:
(09-14-2018, 03:56 PM)kingpill Wrote: Ok, I just got in a fight with a guy because he could not get a girl wen I'm around. I was not trying to hit on her. Will auric shield shel with this? Thanks Shannon, I can clearly see how much more attractive I am getting compared o people around me to. The point where they feel like they have to pick physical fights with me to prove how masculine they are.

Fortunately, there are some additions planned for 3.3 to help with this side of things, I think.

Because, seriously, some people... Big Grin

Auric shielding will help with people of this ilk sending "bad vibes" your way, either consciously or subconsciously, and trying to influence your progress negatively through such. It won't stop some moron from trying to pick a fight, though. But, like I said, I remember Shannon having something planned for 3.3 to help with this.

I hope this is true. It's a real problem and needs a solution for sure.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-14-2018

(09-14-2018, 03:29 PM)Wharrgarbl Wrote: Ok I have a question. That is based more on the electronics side of subs.

I have had to take a break from AM6 for the last 2 1/2 days to run MIR due to illness. I have been playing MIR Ultrasonic FLAC on my cheap $60 kindle fire for the last 2 days. Just a few hours ago I decided to switch and run it from my laptop to my analog tube headphone amp to my headphones, and I can feel the sub working more effectively.

Why would this be? Is it the crappy little tablet that doesn't have the ability to utilize the full potential of FLAC? Is my laptop that much better for playing subs? Is my analog headphone amp actually working to produce better audio as it is supposed to do.

My goal is to narrow down the possible issues. I bought that crappy little tablet to play subs so I wouldn't kill my laptop quicker by playing subs all night. So it would suck if that was it. I can actually hear the ultrasonic subs, which isn't exactly a good thing because they're not the greatest thing to hear all night and take some getting use to. Nevertheless, I cant with my ears hear an increase in audio clarity because anyone who can actually hear US will know that its almost impossible to hear a noticeable increase in the sound. It's like saying one combination of forks and knives on plates produces a MORE irritating sound than another pair.

Anywho, thoughts?

There are several possible reasons, but the two most likely are:

1. The "crappy little kindle" is using crappy hardware that does a crappy job of translating the high quality audio data into high quality audio, or...
2. One is louder than the other. Volume = results with MIR.

I understand that you are using both with headphones, correct?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-14-2018

(09-14-2018, 03:56 PM)kingpill Wrote: Ok, I just got in a fight with a guy because he could not get a girl wen I'm around. I was not trying to hit on her. Will auric shield shel with this? Thanks Shannon, I can clearly see how much more attractive I am getting compared o people around me to. The point where they feel like they have to pick physical fights with me to prove how masculine they are.u


Dmsi is so clearly and obviously working that no guy seems to be able to pull girls when I'm around

Auric shielding may or may not help with this, probably not. It's designed to protect you from negative energy, not negative actions and reactions. So the negative energy they send your way for being too awesome for them to pull chicks in your vicinity will be filtered out, but the punch that follows it won't be. For example.

I'm going to try to modulate this reaction, but it may not be something I can do much about. I have in mind to try to get them to wing you instead, but we'll see what is possible when the time comes.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Chris P. Bacon - 09-14-2018

(09-14-2018, 05:06 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(09-14-2018, 03:29 PM)Wharrgarbl Wrote: Ok I have a question. That is based more on the electronics side of subs.

I have had to take a break from AM6 for the last 2 1/2 days to run MIR due to illness. I have been playing MIR Ultrasonic FLAC on my cheap $60 kindle fire for the last 2 days. Just a few hours ago I decided to switch and run it from my laptop to my analog tube headphone amp to my headphones, and I can feel the sub working more effectively.

Why would this be? Is it the crappy little tablet that doesn't have the ability to utilize the full potential of FLAC? Is my laptop that much better for playing subs? Is my analog headphone amp actually working to produce better audio as it is supposed to do.

My goal is to narrow down the possible issues. I bought that crappy little tablet to play subs so I wouldn't kill my laptop quicker by playing subs all night. So it would suck if that was it. I can actually hear the ultrasonic subs, which isn't exactly a good thing because they're not the greatest thing to hear all night and take some getting use to. Nevertheless, I cant with my ears hear an increase in audio clarity because anyone who can actually hear US will know that its almost impossible to hear a noticeable increase in the sound. It's like saying one combination of forks and knives on plates produces a MORE irritating sound than another pair.

Anywho, thoughts?

There are several possible reasons, but the two most likely are:

1. The "crappy little kindle" is using crappy hardware that does a crappy job of translating the high quality audio data into high quality audio, or...
2. One is louder than the other. Volume = results with MIR.

I understand that you are using both with headphones, correct?

Correct I am using headphones that are decently good.

The volume is pretty much the same. That is one good thing about hearing US.

Interestingly enough I found it odd that the effectiveness of MIR just wasnt there this time around so I played it on max volume on my tablet for 3 loops or so. Not much difference in effectiveness with volume increase. Now it was effective as I still had increased hunger on it and increased tiredness compared to usually being sick, in which case I can just keep going all day and might feel bad but fatigue is not very noticeable. But when I play US or hybrid on flac from my laptop it feels like, for lack of a better term, that part of my brain becomes "arrested" by the sub. I just wasn't noticing that response until I started playing loops on my laptop. Now it's quite likely that I was still experiencing that sensation but just not enough to register. It's just that the difference was startling enough to warrent notice.

Sad, I may have to see if the phone plays flacs better.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 09-14-2018

(09-14-2018, 05:09 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(09-14-2018, 03:56 PM)kingpill Wrote: Ok, I just got in a fight with a guy because he could not get a girl wen I'm around. I was not trying to hit on her. Will auric shield shel with this? Thanks Shannon, I can clearly see how much more attractive I am getting compared o people around me to. The point where they feel like they have to pick physical fights with me to prove how masculine they are.u


Dmsi is so clearly and obviously working that no guy seems to be able to pull girls when I'm around

Auric shielding may or may not help with this, probably not. It's designed to protect you from negative energy, not negative actions and reactions. So the negative energy they send your way for being too awesome for them to pull chicks in your vicinity will be filtered out, but the punch that follows it won't be. For example.

I'm going to try to modulate this reaction, but it may not be something I can do much about. I have in mind to try to get them to wing you instead, but we'll see what is possible when the time comes.
I understand, thanks for the reply Shannon. Funnily enough, the encounter made him look bad but girls for some reason were more catering to me so clearly somehow, the auric shield is working to some degree. Maybe thats TID though.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 09-14-2018

(09-14-2018, 06:46 PM)kingpill Wrote:
(09-14-2018, 05:09 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(09-14-2018, 03:56 PM)kingpill Wrote: Ok, I just got in a fight with a guy because he could not get a girl wen I'm around. I was not trying to hit on her. Will auric shield shel with this? Thanks Shannon, I can clearly see how much more attractive I am getting compared o people around me to. The point where they feel like they have to pick physical fights with me to prove how masculine they are.u


Dmsi is so clearly and obviously working that no guy seems to be able to pull girls when I'm around

Auric shielding may or may not help with this, probably not. It's designed to protect you from negative energy, not negative actions and reactions. So the negative energy they send your way for being too awesome for them to pull chicks in your vicinity will be filtered out, but the punch that follows it won't be. For example.

I'm going to try to modulate this reaction, but it may not be something I can do much about. I have in mind to try to get them to wing you instead, but we'll see what is possible when the time comes.
I understand, thanks for the reply Shannon. Funnily enough, the encounter made him look bad but girls for some reason were more catering to me so clearly somehow, the auric shield is working to some degree. Maybe thats TID though.

I don't think it's the shield's work, it's just that the guy proved himself to be an insecure ass, and thus actually further showed your high value to any female bystanders - simply through the fact of trying to challenge it in the most moronic way possible. Big Grin