(09-04-2018, 07:19 PM)lano1106 Wrote:

(09-04-2018, 03:05 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(09-04-2018, 10:04 AM)thor2014 Wrote: Shannon\Ben,

Stage 2 on SM has been absolute hell for me. All I am getting is anger, lack of motivation, I have even lost the motivation to meet and date women. When I walk down the road as women approach me they either look down or look side ways like they are looking at something passing by. Clearly they are avoiding my gaze or pretending to look at something else. At one point I was thinking of giving up and going back to DMSI. Is this normal ? especially after I spent months clearing on DMSI.

Thor, you were getting very good results on DMSI. Then you convinced yourself that you could get just as good or better results on SM, and switched. But SM is what, 4 or 5 years old now? 5G? I think that DMSI was too much for your subconscious to resist, so it convinced you to use something it could resist. At first you were getting DMSI bloom, and now you're done with that and getting this.

I didn't say anything because I wanted to see how this would play out, but I was expecting this.

SM requires a calibrated man. You get some of that calibration by using it directly after AM or AM refresher, or you can get it by using the program to completion. This is what happens when you're not calibrated, and possibly resisting.

Going to SM after DMSI is just kidding yourself, in my opinion. That's like trying to go back to Windows 95 after using Windows 7 or later.

Shannon,

In which scenario would using SM makes sense? I guess that there are situations where it makes sense or else Windows 95 wouldn't be on the shelves anymore.

You know, for having being on DMSI for a year with not much results and by being currently on AM6, if AM6 succeeds in positively changing me, I'll be very tempted in taking the same path that Thor took...

Without knowing your answer, I can tell that SM is attractive to me because it is explicit about the traits and skills that it offers and I desire to acquire those. Also, another appeal to SM is that it is a program specifically designed for men. The AM6/SM3 persona is what I want to become. I see sex abundance as a side-effect to who I will become. Maybe that would be silly to go through a 1 year subliminal programs commitment only to get laid...

Maybe if after some time on DMSI, the user has resisted the script. What should this person do? Use DMSI one more year or attempt the SM path?

OTOH DMSI is more opaque on how it delivers its magic and I am not too sure exactly what traits/skills that I am getting with DMSI... Reality Bending is amazing and incredible but it isn't my behavior that is responsible for the result.

Maybe that I am a fool but what I am looking to achieve with your products is to improve my behavior...

(09-05-2018, 03:07 AM)josh84 Wrote: Hi Shannon i have had a bit of a break last few weeks of dmsi should i try it again until 3.3 is released since we have more than 35 days away before 3.3 is released could do another week or 2 of dmsi 3.2 see if anything has changed after the break?

(09-06-2018, 12:30 AM)thor2014 Wrote: I have used both DMSI and SM3 currently on stage 2. Obviously DMSI uses more advanced technology then SM however from my personal experiences so far the effects of SM3 seem to be more powerful then DMSI. I do not want to start a debate on DMSI V SM3 I am just sharing my experiences. I just think that because it was designed for men thats why to me it feels alot more potent.

(09-06-2018, 12:30 AM)thor2014 Wrote: I have used both DMSI and SM3 currently on stage 2. Obviously DMSI uses more advanced technology then SM however from my personal experiences so far the effects of SM3 seem to be more powerful then DMSI. I do not want to start a debate on DMSI V SM3 I am just sharing my experiences. I just think that because it was designed for men thats why to me it feels alot more potent.

(09-06-2018, 03:08 AM)Have at ye Wrote: You guys and your gay dreams.

(09-06-2018, 03:16 AM)Nox Wrote:

(09-06-2018, 03:08 AM)Have at ye Wrote: You guys and your gay dreams.

I also find that idea hilarious. I'm pretty sure more men have gone bi or gay that have used sm than have from using dmsi.

Dmsi skyrockets masculinity imo.

(09-06-2018, 03:32 AM)Have at ye Wrote:

(09-06-2018, 03:16 AM)Nox Wrote:

(09-06-2018, 03:08 AM)Have at ye Wrote: You guys and your gay dreams.

I also find that idea hilarious. I'm pretty sure more men have gone bi or gay that have used sm than have from using dmsi.

Dmsi skyrockets masculinity imo.

What I find most hilarious, actually, is the fact that people do seem to keep harping on the same 'ol, same 'ol ideas/excuse to find reasons why "DMSI is bad for you and should be stopped".

I've had waaaay more crazy/scary dreams when using DMSI than the occasional gay dream. Could totally write a script for the next season of Twin Peaks or something based on them. But - they passed. Stuff had to get worked through, and fear had to be acknowledged and then dealt with.

(09-06-2018, 12:30 AM)thor2014 Wrote: I have used both DMSI and SM3 currently on stage 2. Obviously DMSI uses more advanced technology then SM however from my personal experiences so far the effects of SM3 seem to be more powerful then DMSI. I do not want to start a debate on DMSI V SM3 I am just sharing my experiences. I just think that because it was designed for men thats why to me it feels alot more potent.

(09-06-2018, 11:15 AM)lano1106 Wrote: Shannon,

To me, DMSI and SM3 achieve the same goal by taking different paths. I think that SM3 may have a strong appeal to some of us despite the old technologies because of the story/script that it is telling.

This is subjective but there is no doubt in my mind that products that you created 4-5 years ago are still awesome and passing the test of time.

More technology advances isn't always better. The original Star Wars trilogy is using 40 years old technology but it still my favorite SW movies despite all the SFX candies that Disney can throw in the newest movies...

(09-04-2018, 08:55 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(09-03-2018, 11:06 PM)samba99 Wrote: It will be sad if B17 doesn't achieve design spec

Indeed. Especially since I'm about 95% sure that it COULD. The models seem to be indicating that the only variable that isn't right at this point is...

timing. So B17 might be able to achieve design spec, and I suspect B16 is too, based on what I see it doing, but the timing is wrong, and the circumstances are therefore not going to allow for it to happen unless and until the timing is right.

So if B17 doesn't achieve design spec, it will almost certainly be because the timing is wrong.

But I am 99% sure that no matter what, we will achieve design spec before the end of this year.