Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-25-2018 (08-24-2018, 06:40 PM)K-Train Wrote:(08-24-2018, 07:06 AM)K-Train Wrote: [quote='K-Train' pid='204264' dateline='1535085869'] First point: You guys are misunderstanding how DMSI works. All subliminals work this way. All hypnosis is self hypnosis for the same reason: subliminals are a set of instructions, and nothing more. You either choose to execute, or you choose not to. At no time do you ever "relinquish control" to this program. That's about like seeing a grocery list on the table and thinking you have to "give it control" in order to go buy groceries. It's so far off that it's ridiculous. You never relinquish control, and I have stated many times that I will never create a program that takes away your control of yourself. Key #2 will help with this. The fear removal module will help a lot. I'm also working on some special modules right now that should help further, if the Fear Remover doesn't do it all. But I'd like to point out that the fear of death being equated with executing DMSI's instructions is almost certainly the subconscious self resisting changing what it believes to be true, because it has built it's entire world view on those things. If they change or are not true, then the perception of everything must be re-evaluated. In other words, it fears this change as a death because this change would mean that not just one thing changes, but EVERYTHING changes. The whole of the self would have to change in some cases, as well as all of how the outside world was perceived. Taking CatMan as an example, he states again and again, unchangingly that he cannot believe the program will ever work. That it is "too far outside his reality". What he is saying is, "This reality I have created from all of my life experiences and the resulting beliefs I have formed would have to change too drastically for me to feel safe, so I will not allow that to happen." To preserve his reality asit is, he even goes so far as to report results and then in a day or a week, reverse what he said before, and prevent himself from being able to see it or remember it. It conflicted with his reality and it frightened that part of him so much that it was rejected and replaced with what was already there, which was comfortable. Instead of making the incremental improvements and growth steps that would have resulted in him achieving the design goals as others have done, his subconscious has actively sought to un-do all progress and then erase it, deny it, doubt it, etc. in order to maintain the status quo he started with. (Did you know you were doing that, CM?) Thus we have his "I've been using this for 2 years and seen nothing" posts. There are ways past even this, and with 3.3, I will be implementing several new ideas which I believe will at least make good progress. Quote:Also sidebar question: Do you think that US/LM is having a positive benefit on your progress with DMSI? If yes could you please continue running it for the next year so we get more kickass subs? Thanks! USLM is having a positive effect on all areas of my life, but life doesn't revolve around one subliminal. I've been running MIR for a while because my girlfriend was sick. I need to run MHS to help my lungs. I need to test Beast on myself, not just others. And other subs may come along that I want to run, also. You will get more kickass subs regardless, I assure you. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-25-2018 (08-24-2018, 07:34 PM)Jake2015 Wrote: hey @Shannon not sure if you saw this... I don't know. I can speculate on what the models are saying, but I don't know how much it will play out as. I just know that according to the models, in 2019 and beyond, my subs become VERY popular, and the reason for that has to be 6G. And 6G is most likely going to be popular because of fear removal that results in execution. But beyond that, I don't know. Quote:I was reading today about a local guy to me, who has become one of the richest men in the country from his focus, desire, motivation and savviness in business. First of all, BAMM has never been, and never will be, a "get rich quick" scheme. There are ways to get rich quick, but BAMM is focused on becoming a millionaire, not chasing dreams of easy money. For some people, easy money is possible, and for others it is not. BAMM is designed to help you be more likely to succeed and get there faster, but it's designed to work with the user according to what works with and for them as an individual. So fast? Define fast. Maybe? But it's designed around reality. Not pipe dreams. And the reality is, many of us will have to put in a lot of work to achieve the goal. I have been working towards it for about 13 years now. The average self made millionaire takes 12. BAMM certainly helped, but it did not help that V2.0 was not powerful enough to overcome some deep fears I had (and others), and it did not help that circumstances forced me to stop running it for a while. BAMM 3.0 will work faster than 2.0, and be much better at improving your success rate, but in the end, the result is still because of you. There is no magic wand. Quote:I see small successes on the forum with US/LM sub but nothing that shows huge leaps in success or luck so is a sub ever planned that can give all this and more? You see what you take as small successes. That sub is designed to build up over time, and it hasn't been out very long yet. Because of how it's designed, you'll see a lot of what look like smaller successes, not the giant leap in success from "when I started using it" to "when it is fully operational" because you'll normalize each success in the meantime. It seems by this and your previous question that you're expecting that these programs are a light switch, and that success and wealth exists in an "on/off" state. That is not the case. It's more like a staircase of smaller successes and achievements that lead up to the top. Quote:You spoke eloquently of how making money is about energy which I also tonight realised could be equated with skill. The better the skills we have, the high income skills the more money we can or will make. Such as the entrepreneur I mentioned at the top, who I know had money to begin with to invest but there are many people out there that dont have money at all to be able to invest and multiply to become rich nor the skills to make money or develop and make money. It isn't just skills, it's characteristics and traits. But yes, these equate to energy, and specific and focused energy, and they do help achieve the goals of wealth. That's why BAMM is designed to develop and grow all the right characteristics, traits and skills. Quote:My degree now is a good degree and I will be earning money from it once I graduate but I wont be earning what I consider would make me rich or can make me rich and successful. You might should read things like the Fast Lane Millionaire and other books along those lines. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-25-2018 (08-25-2018, 12:57 AM)thor2014 Wrote:(08-24-2018, 02:21 PM)Shannon Wrote:(08-24-2018, 02:05 PM)worldpua Wrote: Hey shannon A Type A sub (Sleep Aid/Awakener for the 5G versions, which is instant on/instant off tech and designed to do something very simple) does present an opportunity to use that program with another for short periods of time. It will work, but it will still degrade the performance of at least one of the subs being used. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - THolt - 08-25-2018 (08-25-2018, 05:01 AM)Shannon Wrote:(08-24-2018, 06:40 PM)K-Train Wrote:(08-24-2018, 07:06 AM)K-Train Wrote: [quote='K-Train' pid='204264' dateline='1535085869'] If @Shannon designs BAMM 3.0 to achieve the goal in 4-8 years then that is still leaps and bounds faster than the average time it takes for many to become a multi-millionaire. I know people that own businesses and are struggling. Imagine if they had a tool like BAMM 3.0. I think we are very fortunate such a tool exists. Many would kill for something like BAMM 3.0 Like Shannon said, BAMM 2.0 couldn’t get past a lot of the deep fears I have. These fears were very deep and only surfaced after sometime running the program. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - thor2014 - 08-25-2018 Guys, My understanding is ultrasonic silents are designed to be played on speakers. Can they be listened to through ear plugs whilst I watch a movie ? providing the volume is set correctly. Thanks RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-25-2018 (08-25-2018, 07:07 AM)thor2014 Wrote: Guys, Can? Yes. Should? No. In my humble opinion, too many opportunities to have issues. Do people do it regardless? Of course. So if you're going to, make absolutely sure that it's playing, and that the volume is not set to 0 or too high. And remember that volume is not the same with earphones as it is with speakers, because of the location of the audio source relative to the eardrum. If you're playing it on your cell phone, a volume over 12/15 is potentially damaging to the ears, and I suggest a volume of 6 to 9 at the upper end is better than 10-11-12 with headphones. In any case, I recommend against it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - bits - 08-25-2018 (08-24-2018, 02:11 PM)Shannon Wrote:(08-23-2018, 08:30 PM)bits Wrote:(08-23-2018, 07:06 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Pretty sure Dr. Strangelove requested that before, and it was shot down. Version C - unlikely. Also sure I remember Shannon poking all kinds of holes into that theory, then reopened V1 as a reminder (and V1 failed to impress...again). I just want to be clear Shannon, I'm not advocating a return to v1 scripting - i just thought v1 was impressive enough at it's own but I realize not everyone executed that. But again, I am NOT suggesting a return to v1. I'm just wondering if you ever thought about a version without any extras. The reason I ask is because I've noticed a lot of the guys not getting results also tend to have some MGTOW/redpill views on women - not all of them have expressed that but some have. While those groups are correct on some things, they apply all extremes to all women and I can't help but wonder how that's affecting the results especially with filters and snipers. In the MGTOW/redpill world, a low quality woman is often viewed as one who: -is not a virgin -is on social media -likes to flirt with men -cares about how much money a guy makes -has feminist views -is over the age of 30 If DMSI has a filter that is understood by the unconscious as "low quality women" and a guy has mgtow/redpill views on women he's pretty much eliminating 99% of women from ever being effected. It's the same thing with a snipers, it was a long time ago (2.1?) when you mentioned the exact parameters but I remember something along the lines of it targeting women who were mature, self actualized, confident, non-needy, and compatible on a spiritual, emotional, and mental level (or something along those lines) and just remember thinking to myself "no such woman under the age of 60 exists" which obviously isn't true, but I do believe 90%+ of women (and men) under 30 would be disqualified which is probably the age range of most DMSI users. Then there is all of the extra things that aren't directly related to the aura, things like caffeine, hormone optimization, etc and what effects that has on DMSI. These are unlikely to have as much effect as filters/snipers on DMSI execution as they are for the users own sake but they must still be having an effect. For example hormone optimization, all hormones start off with cholesterol of which 80% is produced in the liver but some people have issues can't produce enough so their body shifts away from optimal hormone levels to necessary hormone levels in order to balance out other things like metabolism, collagen growth, wound/injury repair, etc. For such a person to execute the hormone optimization part of the scripts would result in tiredness, brain fog, and very little extra energy for the aura to use. I know you don't implement every request, and I'm guilty of suggesting my own requests, but there must have been at least 100+ requests by now and I'm estimating that you've added at least 10 of them to DMSI plus all the extras that you've added on your own accord. I just can't help but wonder what effect it's all having. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-25-2018 (08-25-2018, 07:53 AM)bits Wrote:(08-24-2018, 02:11 PM)Shannon Wrote:(08-23-2018, 08:30 PM)bits Wrote:(08-23-2018, 07:06 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Pretty sure Dr. Strangelove requested that before, and it was shot down. Version C - unlikely. Also sure I remember Shannon poking all kinds of holes into that theory, then reopened V1 as a reminder (and V1 failed to impress...again). There is no such filter. There is a design to cause the program to focus most on those people you find most attractive sexually, according to how sexually attractive they are to you. Quote:It's the same thing with a snipers, it was a long time ago (2.1?) when you mentioned the exact parameters but I remember something along the lines of it targeting women who were mature, self actualized, confident, non-needy, and compatible on a spiritual, emotional, and mental level (or something along those lines) and just remember thinking to myself "no such woman under the age of 60 exists" which obviously isn't true, but I do believe 90%+ of women (and men) under 30 would be disqualified which is probably the age range of most DMSI users. Your memory is not in line with what is in DMSI. It's designed to cause you to rate each individual along about 63 different considerations, according to how attractive that individual is to you on that specific consideration, and then react accordingly. So if her intelligence really matters to you, and she's really dumb, you won't rate her high on intelligence and the program will be less responsive to her; but at the same time, if her (pick a physical feature) is really, really attractive to you, you will rate that very highly and the program will again react accordingly. Quote:Then there is all of the extra things that aren't directly related to the aura, things like caffeine, hormone optimization, etc and what effects that has on DMSI. These are unlikely to have as much effect as filters/snipers on DMSI execution as they are for the users own sake but they must still be having an effect. For example hormone optimization, all hormones start off with cholesterol of which 80% is produced in the liver but some people have issues can't produce enough so their body shifts away from optimal hormone levels to necessary hormone levels in order to balance out other things like metabolism, collagen growth, wound/injury repair, etc. For such a person to execute the hormone optimization part of the scripts would result in tiredness, brain fog, and very little extra energy for the aura to use. Caffeine isn't in the script. The script does have a module designed to cause you to shift state to the optimal state of mind for successfully achieving the goals of the program, which is tied to a module designed to "autopilot" you to the goal. Caffeine, alcohol, nicotine and recreational drugs all physically override that state shifting and interfere with it and autopilot. Probably not as much as your fears, but they do. Everything that has gone into DMSI is a subsystem that supports achieving the end goal of the program. Autopiloting, state shifting, hormone optimization (which results in the appropriate amount of the hormones that make you sexually active and attractive, such as testosterone for men, and estrogen for women, which also helps you be active and more attractive, plus aids the pheromone optimizer, and which negative side effects of have been removed by not just the OE, but specifically a module designed to do that), etc. Everything in the script is a support system and a step to achieving the goals of the program. We don't take one giant step just because you're projecting an aura, we are using every possible step up we can all at once. Quote:I know you don't implement every request, and I'm guilty of suggesting my own requests, but there must have been at least 100+ requests by now and I'm estimating that you've added at least 10 of them to DMSI plus all the extras that you've added on your own accord. I just can't help but wonder what effect it's all having. The effect it's having is that every version of the program is getting better, more powerful, more successful, more effective. It may not always look that way, but here's what's happening. For some people, it's enough, and they achieve the design goals. For some people, it triggers some fears and some execution. These people get some results, but their fears hold them back. For some people, it triggers more and more fear, and they get "no results" or they get small results that they then either shut down, deny happened, etc. Each version brings us closer to the goal, and thus more and more fear is being generated as a result, which means more and more resistance. So for example, 3.2 achieved the design goal more than 3.1, but a lot of guys report less good results from 3.2 which shows MORE resistance because the program is MORE powerful and MORE likely to achieve the design goal, which triggers MORE fear, and thus MORE resistance. But what most of you see is, "3.2 isn't as good as 3.1 was, we're going backwards". No, we're going forwards, and this produces more of a desire to escape that fact, stonewall, etc. This is also why in 3.3, I must primarily deal with the fear removal aspect of it, because right now, there isn't much else we can do while we have not dealt with that aspect of it. In spite of the theories some of you have, it is fear and only fear that now separates us from complete success. Yes, there is improvement to be made in various other directions like energy sourcing and auric modulation, but even right now, if I was to successfully add fear removal to 3.2 and call it 3.3, and that fear removal worked, the program would be good enough that we wouldn't have to keep going. And that's what I am expecting from 3.3, that we won't really need to keep going except to make it the best it can possibly be for most of you. I know that 3.4 will be a step up from 3.3 (unless I spend a long time building 3.3), and depending on how things work out, if there is a 4.0, that it will be better than 3.3/3.4, whichever is the end of the 3.x branch. That's not necessarily because 3.3/3.4 don't work, but because they don't work as well as they could. My goal in all this is the best possible 6G skeleton script. Otherwise I would have trashed DMSI long ago as not worth my time and just started building subs and dealt with whatever refund requests we got. I want the absolute best 6G possible, so I have stuck it out, even when sometimes I wanted to pull my (non-existent) hair out, quit, etc. Things are not always what they appear to be at face value, as you can see by how it looks at a glance like things are going backwards, when in fact they are advancing. Each step reveals more of what stands in the way of success, and each step shows me how to take the next step, but it is always a step forward. You as well as everyone else will simply have to trust that I know what I am talking about and that I know what I am doing, and we will allow the results to speak for themselves when the time comes. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Kol - 08-25-2018 @Shannon I seem to have some sort of memory loss going on. I can pass three days and not recall which day I started the next loop on multiple ocassions. My guess its because of the h/c and reality bending. Wanted to give you this feedback as it is kinda funny but also slightly hard to keep yrack on the 7 days on 1 day off and such. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-25-2018 (08-25-2018, 10:00 AM)Kol Wrote: @Shannon That could not result from the reality bending. It has nothing to do with the healing and clearing. It sounds like a creative attempt to disrupt your proper use of the program by the subconscious to me. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 08-25-2018 Anyone here on DMSI that have their own business? If so: How has it affected your relationship with your clients/customers? Are people more willing to buy your service/products? Has your motivation levels changed? Have you had any ideas/insights on how to scale your business? I'm starting a business soon that I tried once before. I want to know if DMSI will cause any additional changes in addition to what I will already be doing conciously. Last time, I was mildly successful. Now I know what/how to do things better and how to motivate myself more so than before. With the right amount of hard and smart work as well as increased self accountability, I should be way more successful than last time. I was wondering how/if DMSI could add to this. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - thor2014 - 08-25-2018 (08-25-2018, 12:03 PM)kingpill Wrote: Anyone here on DMSI that have their own business? If so: When I was on DMSI I definitely was more likeable to everyone around me. It also helped me communicate my ideas in a more coherent manner. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 08-25-2018 (08-25-2018, 12:09 PM)thor2014 Wrote:(08-25-2018, 12:03 PM)kingpill Wrote: Anyone here on DMSI that have their own business? If so: Interesting, people liking me and being able to communicate more congruently would definitely help. Thanks. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 08-25-2018 (08-25-2018, 12:09 PM)thor2014 Wrote:(08-25-2018, 12:03 PM)kingpill Wrote: Anyone here on DMSI that have their own business? If so: I've noticed a twofold effect: 1) In general, people do seem to like me more. Some actually feel drawn to me (not always for sexual reasons, I mean), and act accordingly. [EDIT: Also, I've noticed an increase in people coming to me for advice on various matters, usually either in professional or emotional matters. Some male acquaintances do seem to have started treating me like a "surrogate dad" of sorts, and come asking for advice on life in general and women in particular. Whether I actually give them advice, or point them, for instance, in the direction of these subs, depends on whether I trust them or not.] 2) Insecure people start hatin', and usually begin avoiding my presence after a time. |