![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - dissonance - 08-24-2018 3.2 is def the best so far for me. But maybe it's because it was in 3.2 when I started listening 7 loops a night. 3.1 I was only doing the recommended for testing amount. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-24-2018 (08-23-2018, 03:02 PM)AlphaRomeo Wrote:(08-23-2018, 02:06 PM)kingpill Wrote:(08-23-2018, 11:14 AM)AlphaRomeo Wrote: "...make us all successful and rich FAST" I choose not to give details about the risks because it would give too much information on reality bending and result in assumptions as to what it is, which would be in error and cause problems for a lot of people as a result. Suffice it to say that too much of a good thing is not a good thing. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - blth - 08-24-2018 Hey shannon What will happen if i used 5.5g tech and go back to 5g without a break? What will happen if i used uslm for 10 days and then jump to another 5.5g without a break? Thank you in advance RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-24-2018 (08-23-2018, 08:15 PM)thor2014 Wrote: Is it me or does SM seem to be alot more raw and masculine then DMSI ?. I appreciate DMSI is using more advanced technology however SM seems to really dig deep into your psyche and bring out that raw masculine side which I never experienced with DMSI. Sex magnet is about pure sexual dominance and attraction. Raw sexual attraction that is intended specifically to build on the results and effects of the ALPHA MALE set. It is, therefore, very focused through your masculinity in how it achieves it's goals. DMSI does not specifically tell you to focus through your gender. It does not tell you this directly, because if it is necessary to achieve the design goal, then the Optimus Engine should take care of it. On top of that, SM is attempting to develop, enhance and express a pure sexual energy of raw animality. It is a very polar "one trick pony" type deal. DMSI is doing a lot of things, and self adjusts the effects to the needs of the affected. So YOU may not experience the raw masculine side on DMSI, but if she needs to experience that from you for you to be irresistibly sexually attractive to her, then SHE will experience it as her perception of you. It's like complaining that women don't like your cologne when you wore what you liked, not what they liked. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-24-2018 (08-23-2018, 08:30 PM)bits Wrote:(08-23-2018, 07:06 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Pretty sure Dr. Strangelove requested that before, and it was shot down. Version C - unlikely. Also sure I remember Shannon poking all kinds of holes into that theory, then reopened V1 as a reminder (and V1 failed to impress...again). If V1 was so impressive, we wouldn't have bothered with V2. or 2.x. Or 3.x. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-24-2018 (08-23-2018, 09:50 PM)eternity Wrote: @Shannon @Andrew any plans on opening that affiliate program up? Yes. But we are currently still dealing with a few issues. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-24-2018 (08-24-2018, 03:11 AM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon, RB 5.1 closes a loophole that existed in 5.0 which was allowing certain people to resist RB because they were able to interpret the safety mechanism as being an excuse to refuse execution out of fear, not any real need for the safety it was attempting to provide. 5.1 prevents that issue by adjusting the safeties in much the same way Key #1 corrected the general safeties. It is therefore significantly more effective in many cases. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-24-2018 (08-24-2018, 10:16 AM)THolt Wrote:(08-23-2018, 03:02 PM)AlphaRomeo Wrote:(08-23-2018, 02:06 PM)kingpill Wrote:(08-23-2018, 11:14 AM)AlphaRomeo Wrote: "...make us all successful and rich FAST" BAMM 3.0 is, like BAMM 2.0, going to be designed to achieve the goals of the program in a realistic manner. When I say realistic, I mean, realistic according to the potentials of the technologies in use. V2 was aimed at achievement in 4 to 8 years, and I was fully expecting what happened with people slowly but surely giving up on it. People don't do well with sticking to a goal long term in a lot of cases. But the "why" of it was not expected. In BAMM 3.0, I will be making a lot of adjustments and improvements and bringing a lot of tech to the forefront, and it will probably reduce the amount of time most people will need even more. But until I have it built, we won't know the specifics. Speculation is therefore useless. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-24-2018 (08-24-2018, 02:05 PM)worldpua Wrote: Hey shannon Going from a 5.5G sub to a 5G sub without a break will result in turbulence that will very likely dominate and destroy the effects of the 5G sub for a while. Using two 5.5G subs back to back like that is likely to create turbulence which will cause confusion, exhaustion and a general failure of one or both programs for a while. It may also cause headaches, depending on the person. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - THolt - 08-24-2018 (08-24-2018, 02:17 PM)Shannon Wrote:(08-24-2018, 10:16 AM)THolt Wrote:(08-23-2018, 03:02 PM)AlphaRomeo Wrote:(08-23-2018, 02:06 PM)kingpill Wrote:(08-23-2018, 11:14 AM)AlphaRomeo Wrote: "...make us all successful and rich FAST" With BAMM 2.0 I made progress but I was never able to resolve the deeper issues that prevented me from achieving the goal. If those issues like fear of success were resolved then I think would have a better chance of achieving the goal within the 4-8 year time frame. By the time the program is developed I imagine reality bending will be extremely advanced. Either way I’m excited by what @Shannon is going to do with this program once it comes time. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - DarthXedonias - 08-24-2018 (08-24-2018, 02:13 PM)Shannon Wrote:That would actually explained a lot. On 3.1 I could very often feeling the RB working or when it was changing something. I got to 3.2 and I could feel the RB at all. I just assumed it was due to my "I don't care" attitude having some influence on it, which it might still have, but if it was using the safeties as a loophole that would make a lot of sense as well.(08-24-2018, 03:11 AM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon, RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - K-Train - 08-24-2018 (08-24-2018, 07:06 AM)K-Train Wrote: [quote='K-Train' pid='204264' dateline='1535085869'] I've noticed the EXACT same thing. V3.2 generates/generated a lot of fear in me. My anxiety would ratchet up. I found that most of the fear in my life centered around death. I would sometimes visualizes myself holding lady death's hand and looking her in the eyes and saying "I'm not afraid of you". By releasing this fear of death I also found it easier to execute DMSI. Quote:I believe the reason for this is because part of the subconscious for some people equates losing/relinquishing control to DMSI as dying. Almost EVERY person is wired to avoid death and survive but I believe that people who are "resistant" have this subconscious "survival program" running in overdrive. The reality is that death is unavoidable and a necessary step that all of us will eventually take. When the subconscious realizes this and begins treating death as something natural it relaxes so to speak and this is when DMSI is able to work its magic because the instructions are no longer seen as a threat. Shannon in regards to this post from Kingpill's journal, does Key #1 or Key #2 address the subconscious identifying the relinquishing of control/compliance to DMSI's instrunctions with death? As someone who has had issues with "being told what to do" I can most certainly attest to sometimes equating "loss of control" with dying. My results with DMSI improved drastically when this was overcome and I believe it may hold an important key to improving the results for others. Also sidebar question: Do you think that US/LM is having a positive benefit on your progress with DMSI? If yes could you please continue running it for the next year so we get more kickass subs? Thanks! *This was a copy and paste from Kingpill's journal. This post was supposed to be here originally but I posted it in the wrong journal. Consider this a request for the return of the 'delete post' button. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 08-24-2018 hey @Shannon not sure if you saw this... @Shannon With Beast17 and all the new things that you are going to put into 3.3, how far do you think you are from removing resistance of all kinds once and for all and from reaching 6G? I was reading today about a local guy to me, who has become one of the richest men in the country from his focus, desire, motivation and savviness in business. I know you created BAMM which is old tech and therefore unlikely to ever work on me but would the 6G BAMM make us all successful and rich fast? I see small successes on the forum with US/LM sub but nothing that shows huge leaps in success or luck so is a sub ever planned that can give all this and more? You spoke eloquently of how making money is about energy which I also tonight realised could be equated with skill. The better the skills we have, the high income skills the more money we can or will make. Such as the entrepreneur I mentioned at the top, who I know had money to begin with to invest but there are many people out there that dont have money at all to be able to invest and multiply to become rich nor the skills to make money or develop and make money. So is skills, the developement of skills, or the foresight to see an opportunity and take it something you have thought would be great in a sub such as BAMM, or success etc. I have wasted my life and not earned anything for it nor been able to see where or how I can make lots of money or what skills I already posses that can make me money. My degree now is a good degree and I will be earning money from it once I graduate but I wont be earning what I consider would make me rich or can make me rich and successful. Ive no idea how others have done it, some with unscrupulous means of cos and some with talent and some with pure hard work and luck, so is there such a thing as working smart not hard and yet achieving? just a nightly rant lol thanks bro! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - thor2014 - 08-25-2018 (08-24-2018, 02:21 PM)Shannon Wrote:(08-24-2018, 02:05 PM)worldpua Wrote: Hey shannon I will share my personal experiences when mixing 5.5 and 5G subs. I was using DMSI over night and occasionally using the awakener 5G early mornings to wake me up. However after using the awakener I would immediately go back to DMSI and use 2 loops. Now this might be a special case but it worked for me with a combination of these two specific subs. I am not trying to say Shannon is wrong I am just sharing my experiences. |