+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - thor2014 - 08-23-2018
Is it me or does SM seem to be alot more raw and masculine then DMSI ?. I appreciate DMSI is using more advanced technology however SM seems to really dig deep into your psyche and bring out that raw masculine side which I never experienced with DMSI.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - bits - 08-23-2018
(08-23-2018, 07:06 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Pretty sure Dr. Strangelove requested that before, and it was shot down. Version C - unlikely. Also sure I remember Shannon poking all kinds of holes into that theory, then reopened V1 as a reminder (and V1 failed to impress...again).
I thought v1 was pretty impressive, didn't 3 guys lose their virginity on it in the first week or so?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - bits - 08-23-2018
(08-23-2018, 08:15 PM)thor2014 Wrote: Is it me or does SM seem to be alot more raw and masculine then DMSI ?. I appreciate DMSI is using more advanced technology however SM seems to really dig deep into your psyche and bring out that raw masculine side which I never experienced with DMSI.
It'd make perfect sense, sm3 is just for men while DMSI is unisex so there are some goals in sm3 that can't be added to DMSI without making ladies unhappy lol
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Raykon - 08-23-2018
SM3 for 3 months and i got two dates, almost three some(was making out and licking there boobs all night) and allot of ioi's from women. I felt incredibly sexy and powerful too.
had a male coworker call me sexy in a joking way when i was shirtless doing traffic stop in construction.
I miss SM, it's strong, however after a few months my AM programming was fading and it started to be be weaker, or i was getting too much resistance and gave up. not sure which.
i'm done more then 3 months of SM 3, but only went up to stage 3
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 08-23-2018
(08-23-2018, 08:30 PM)bits Wrote:(08-23-2018, 07:06 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Pretty sure Dr. Strangelove requested that before, and it was shot down. Version C - unlikely. Also sure I remember Shannon poking all kinds of holes into that theory, then reopened V1 as a reminder (and V1 failed to impress...again).
I thought v1 was pretty impressive, didn't 3 guys lose their virginity on it in the first week or so?
What you suggest is pretty much a new version of AOS, because already BIATBWS 4G had manifestations inside.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - eternity - 08-23-2018
@Shannon @Andrew any plans on opening that affiliate program up?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - thor2014 - 08-23-2018
(08-23-2018, 08:44 PM)Raykon Wrote: SM3 for 3 months and i got two dates, almost three some(was making out and licking there boobs all night) and allot of ioi's from women. I felt incredibly sexy and powerful too.
had a male coworker call me sexy in a joking way when i was shirtless doing traffic stop in construction.
I miss SM, it's strong, however after a few months my AM programming was fading and it started to be be weaker, or i was getting too much resistance and gave up. not sure which.
i'm done more then 3 months of SM 3, but only went up to stage 3
There seems to be a number of people who stopped at stage 3. Am I right in saying you stopped because you jumped on the DMSI bandwagon ?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - samba99 - 08-24-2018
Shannon,
Whats new in reality bending 5.1? In other words, what's new from reality bending 5.0
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - RTBoss - 08-24-2018
(08-24-2018, 03:11 AM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon,
Whats new in OE 5.1? In other words, what's new from OE 5.0
If you're referring to this post (HERE), it refers to RB (Reality Bending) 5.0 having been upgraded to 5.1 - not OE.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - RTBoss - 08-24-2018
(08-23-2018, 08:30 PM)bits Wrote:(08-23-2018, 07:06 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Pretty sure Dr. Strangelove requested that before, and it was shot down. Version C - unlikely. Also sure I remember Shannon poking all kinds of holes into that theory, then reopened V1 as a reminder (and V1 failed to impress...again).
I thought v1 was pretty impressive, didn't 3 guys lose their virginity on it in the first week or so?
I don't recall anyone getting laid at all (which, of course, doesn't mean people didn't).
I remember @ichigo was propositioned, but for whatever reason, didn't have sex.
More people have had sex on 3.1+ than any other version, IIRC. I had put up a poll about 7 or 8 months ago (before release of 3.2).
EDIT: Here's a link to that poll, where 3.1 blows everything else out of the water. I wonder how 3.2 would do in a similar poll.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 08-24-2018
(08-24-2018, 03:44 AM)RTBoss Wrote:(08-23-2018, 08:30 PM)bits Wrote:(08-23-2018, 07:06 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Pretty sure Dr. Strangelove requested that before, and it was shot down. Version C - unlikely. Also sure I remember Shannon poking all kinds of holes into that theory, then reopened V1 as a reminder (and V1 failed to impress...again).
I thought v1 was pretty impressive, didn't 3 guys lose their virginity on it in the first week or so?
I don't recall anyone getting laid at all (which, of course, doesn't mean people didn't).
I remember @ichigo was propositioned, but for whatever reason, didn't have sex.
More people have had sex on 3.1+ than any other version, IIRC. I had put up a poll about 7 or 8 months ago (before release of 3.2).
Well, there was chaos, but he could get laid anyway. And it was definitely not his virginity.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - RTBoss - 08-24-2018
(08-24-2018, 03:55 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:(08-24-2018, 03:44 AM)RTBoss Wrote:(08-23-2018, 08:30 PM)bits Wrote:(08-23-2018, 07:06 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Pretty sure Dr. Strangelove requested that before, and it was shot down. Version C - unlikely. Also sure I remember Shannon poking all kinds of holes into that theory, then reopened V1 as a reminder (and V1 failed to impress...again).
I thought v1 was pretty impressive, didn't 3 guys lose their virginity on it in the first week or so?
I don't recall anyone getting laid at all (which, of course, doesn't mean people didn't).
I remember @ichigo was propositioned, but for whatever reason, didn't have sex.
More people have had sex on 3.1+ than any other version, IIRC. I had put up a poll about 7 or 8 months ago (before release of 3.2).
Well, there was chaos, but he could get laid anyway. And it was definitely not his virginity.
Oh yeah! That's right, when he slept with his friend's girl behind his friend's back. Lol. Totally forgot. He got laid on a few different versions.
I think a few different ppl lost their V-card on DMSI 3.0.1+
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Kol - 08-24-2018
Alright, besides the fighthing ghosts kind of reoccuring theme, which get really old ( fighthing ghosts aka wtf am I resisting, fighting and why? ) im now wonder the following:
Has anyone on DMSI felt their bone structure change? Like, for example, feeling their jaw "mutate" ( in my case, feeling fangs growing out?)
I was hesitating to post this cuz it can come across as to far out there, but its the 3rd time I feel my jaw change, like fangs coming out, and in turn divd deeper in my instincts aswell as reptilian brain ( possibly )
I remember kingpill bringing up the vampire thingie.
Maybe its astral shifting, idk. I like it an sense
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - THolt - 08-24-2018
(08-23-2018, 03:02 PM)AlphaRomeo Wrote:(08-23-2018, 02:06 PM)kingpill Wrote:(08-23-2018, 11:14 AM)AlphaRomeo Wrote: "...make us all successful and rich FAST"
For every overnight/fast success there is almost always years, if not decade(s) of hard (and smart) work being done that lead to that success which for outside lookers SEEM to be overnight/fast success (since they fail to see the work that was put in for that success to manifest).
Now, I´m not Shannon but I would guess that while he will be able to create a sub that will significantly cut the time that is required for riches and success to manifest, you will still need to do your part in the world...and success very rarely happens FAST. Depending on how you define being rich/successful of course.
If my memory serves me, Shannon has said that becoming millionaire/even billionaire is possible to be manifested FAST via extreme reality bending but the price/consequences of doing so is extremely risky and dangerous, and he will not go to such lengths with it since it´s not safe. Anyway, I would be interested to hear Shannon´s thoughts as well on what he thinks on how far he can push the limits while still keeping it safe.
What kind of risks would it entail?
You have to ask Shannon about that. I would like to hear as well, but for some reason I have a feeling that he won´t be awfully detailed if he chooses to answer.
I would imagine @Shannon could make you successful faster with BAMM 3.0 via reality bending but it would consume more energy. I recall Shannon saying a few weeks ago that a goal such as BAMM's would require vast amounts of energy to accomplish. Now BAMM 3.0 might make it easier and faster but the energy expenditure would still be significant. As for pushing reality bending, i'm not sure how much energy that would require but likely a lot. And of course before anything, it has to be safe.
It will be interesting to see how Shannon manages to accomplish this safely. +