![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-11-2016 (06-11-2016, 12:41 PM)dissonance Wrote:(06-11-2016, 12:10 PM)Shannon Wrote:(06-10-2016, 09:51 AM)FrostedFake Wrote: Shannon do you think DAOSI and WM would compliment each other? Each one's good in what the other lacks. I am currently of the opinion that mixing 5.5G with any other subliminal will damage the effects of the other subliminal, and if you try to run two 5.5G's together, it will seriously damage or destroy the effects of both. I am also currently of the opinion that what I say doesn't make much difference, so someone's going to find out the hard way regardless. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jake2015 - 06-11-2016 (06-11-2016, 12:36 PM)Shannon Wrote:(06-11-2016, 12:31 PM)Jake2015 Wrote: Shannon, if you ever get the chance, do have a read of my E2 journals in the mens area. Im trying to share all i can and either you can give your insight to it or use it to benefit us all in future subs, or ideally both Thank you very much. Im giving both E2 and my journal the best I can so no rush. Anytime you have any time, grab a drink, sit back and enjoy and any at all any comments and feedback will be so valuable to me, as I ask lots of questions based on whatever I'm facing at the time. thanks a lot Shannon RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 06-11-2016 (06-11-2016, 12:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:(06-11-2016, 12:41 PM)dissonance Wrote:(06-11-2016, 12:10 PM)Shannon Wrote:(06-10-2016, 09:51 AM)FrostedFake Wrote: Shannon do you think DAOSI and WM would compliment each other? Each one's good in what the other lacks. I was planning to do AM6 again sometime in the future, and WM2 at some point even later; each one I'll be listening to ONLY that sub for a period of 6 months and however long I decide to do AOSI for. I started AOSI a few days ago. Are you saying that I shouldn't do these non- 5.5G subs anymore? What is your definition of "mixing" when you said it there? and "running two 5.5G's together"? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Catman - 06-11-2016 (06-11-2016, 12:49 PM)Shannon Wrote: I am also currently of the opinion that what I say doesn't make much difference, so someone's going to find out the hard way regardless. I am currently of the opinion that you are correct in your current opinion. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 06-11-2016 (06-11-2016, 01:34 PM)CatMan Wrote:(06-11-2016, 12:49 PM)Shannon Wrote: I am also currently of the opinion that what I say doesn't make much difference, so someone's going to find out the hard way regardless. Also agree lol. At first I thought Shannon's opinion was that it was alright to use option B with 5g's as long as one was careful. Now I've seen him say "don't do that" enough times that it is clear to not do it. Kind of a bummer as new toys are fun, but I'm more interested in long term results than brief fun. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jakeb203 - 06-11-2016 I recently tried AOSI with BASE, unfortunately it didn't work out. While AOSI was very effective, it very much disrupted the results of BASE. I had confusion lasting for three days now, also some resistance from AOSI part. I recommend not to do it. Or if you really want to, run AOSI for three months so you won't have any resistance. The subconscious doesn't recognize what the new programmings are and when you don't supply it with it more it becomes a mess. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 06-11-2016 (06-11-2016, 02:41 PM)Jakeb203 Wrote: I recently tried AOSI with BASE, unfortunately it didn't work out. While AOSI was very effective, it very much disrupted the results of BASE. I had confusion lasting for three days now, also some resistance from AOSI part. I recommend not to do it. Or if you really want to, run AOSI for three months so you won't have any resistance. The subconscious doesn't recognize what the new programmings are and when you don't supply it with it more it becomes a mess. I wonder how that would work out. Obviously 5.5 is going to be well entrenched, but will 6 months of a different sub wipe the aura out? Or how long 3-6 months of AOSI would last during other subs. 6 months of AOSI followed by am directly into sm, for example, would the aura be noticeable for the duration? Or would am then 3 months of AOSI into SM be the better option? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 06-11-2016 (06-11-2016, 02:41 PM)Jakeb203 Wrote: I recently tried AOSI with BASE, unfortunately it didn't work out. While AOSI was very effective, it very much disrupted the results of BASE. I had confusion lasting for three days now, also some resistance from AOSI part. I recommend not to do it. Or if you really want to, run AOSI for three months so you won't have any resistance. The subconscious doesn't recognize what the new programmings are and when you don't supply it with it more it becomes a mess. This is very curious, but also very necessary that at least one BASE user try since it was an open question for many of us. Now we know. After my run with E 2 I will very likely go with AOSI or back on with BASE. My business mind was pretty much solidified anyway, but using BASE sort of magnified things to be more obvious (more ambitious, generally larger vision oriented focus etc). Jake, I'm guessing that you're still sticking to BASE or have you decided to pursue AOSI for a full cycle? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-11-2016 (06-11-2016, 01:33 PM)dissonance Wrote:(06-11-2016, 12:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:(06-11-2016, 12:41 PM)dissonance Wrote:(06-11-2016, 12:10 PM)Shannon Wrote:(06-10-2016, 09:51 AM)FrostedFake Wrote: Shannon do you think DAOSI and WM would compliment each other? Each one's good in what the other lacks. I have, ever since 5G came out, stated that it is too much to run 5G with anything else. 5.5G is much, much more powerful, demanding and energy hungry. I thought it might be possible to use it a little bit at a time (Option B) with something else, but it proves to be much too powerful to do that. So, when I say that I mean, do not try to run two 5.5G programs at the same time, at all. No option B, no excuses, no justifications. One 5G and up at a time, period. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 06-11-2016 ( Sloow Robot Voice) I Hear and I obey...Yab-ba- Da-ba- Do! ALL joking aside ,I'd like to re-affirm what Shannon just said... yawl KNOW damn well if the man whose created these positive monstrosaties ,says dont damn use the good 5.5G shit with nothin' else ,dont use the 5.5G good shit with NOTHIN' ELSE! Personally fer me ,one barbequed ass is enough I dont even want that. IN this sense I dont need to learn the HARD way.PLEASE take heed! thanx for the re-it...Shannon. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 06-11-2016 (06-11-2016, 07:08 PM)Shannon Wrote:(06-11-2016, 01:33 PM)dissonance Wrote:(06-11-2016, 12:49 PM)Shannon Wrote:(06-11-2016, 12:41 PM)dissonance Wrote:(06-11-2016, 12:10 PM)Shannon Wrote: I think no matter what I say, someone's going to find out the hard way. Thanks for the clarification. I'll still do AM6 and WM2 later in the future then. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 06-11-2016 Disclaimer: I don't own Indigo Mind Labs, the following is just my OPINION from a strictly scientific/observational perspective based off my own observations as well as my interpretation of the scientific method. I'm intrigued by the addition of a female tester. So far, we've seen stuff from just the guys which is fine with me, since that gives me a better baseline. Theoretically, if Shannon has the new goods in AOSI V2 then a female tester should get more approaches (assuming she's heterosexual) because males in the West are encouraged to approach. It'll be good to for any ladies thinking about buying AOSI. If AOSI V2 is being tested I hope there is also a male tester due to the difference in societal conditioning that men and women undergo. Point blank, a male (who's heterosexual) and is trying to get women to approach him will probably have a harder time than a woman trying to get men to approach her. At least that's how it looks on paper. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - LionKing - 06-12-2016 (06-11-2016, 12:17 PM)Shannon Wrote: If you don't like being told what to do, then consider how stupid it is to resist an instruction set that is very obviously only doing things for you to improve your state of health, happiness and success. Makes no sense to resist. Me: Ok.. Its time to move on with it, I want to succeed in life. Mum: You should be successful. Me: Yes. Mum: You know that one trauma, you'd probably feel better if you let that go. Me: Yes, I guess you're right. Mum: You know, you really want to let it go. Me: Yes, agreed. Mum: You should let it go. Me: Yes. Mum: Be sure to let it go. Me: Yes... Mum: Its gonna go much better if you let it go Me: Yes yes, I'm trying, could you leave me be for a moment? Mum: You realize its not good for you, let it go already Me: I'm not doing a single thing before you stfu and leave me be! Mum: Its much better to let i.... Me: (shuts the door on her) Me: (annoyed, need to calm down for a while and forget about her) Me: (...) Me: Ah. Ok, now where was I.. Yes that crap - letting go of it now. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jakeb203 - 06-12-2016 (06-11-2016, 04:13 PM)heavysm Wrote:(06-11-2016, 02:41 PM)Jakeb203 Wrote: I recently tried AOSI with BASE, unfortunately it didn't work out. While AOSI was very effective, it very much disrupted the results of BASE. I had confusion lasting for three days now, also some resistance from AOSI part. I recommend not to do it. Or if you really want to, run AOSI for three months so you won't have any resistance. The subconscious doesn't recognize what the new programmings are and when you don't supply it with it more it becomes a mess. For me having an aura of some sorts is far less important than having mind integrated with business. The first is about temporary satisfaction, the latter is about long term happiness. So without any doubt I will keep up with BASE. |