![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-11-2016 (06-10-2016, 01:43 AM)Light Wrote: Shannon, i wanted to ask you if it is resistence that i am having with the new sub AOSI or something else. I used it now for almost a week. If it's resistance, why would you be seeing the effects of the sub? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-11-2016 (06-10-2016, 06:23 AM)Vincent_Vega Wrote: @ Shannon: how difficult is the wording of your new (and old) technologies? I know that the public scripts of your subs are quite simple to understand for non-native guys, but what about the non-public part of the script? Same level of difficulty? The public scripts are the core of each statement. The metascripting makes them more complex than that, even in 4G. In 5G the metascripting makes them very complex. In 5.5G, extremely complex. And in 6G, it is so complex that it is impossible for even a native English speaker to consciously follow what is being said of they listen to it consciously. That said... the subconscious knows and is capable of a lot more than we think. It has no trouble with understanding even 6G scripting, even at high speeds. So I wouldn't worry about the complexity. The only possible issue is that they may not know the language. But it is also entirely possible that at a subconscious level - they do. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-11-2016 (06-10-2016, 08:24 AM)LeonidasXVI Wrote: (21:47:36) Alpha360: If shannon could produce a sub to learn self hypnosis it would be crazy I think, much more than AOSI because twhen you could almost do anything with your body like having an erection that last for for ever basically until you tell yourself to stop that erection I think Leonidas is right. Learning self hypnosis is a possible goal for a subliminal, but it's not the magic wand you seem to think it is, Alpha. Besides, you already know self hypnosis. What do you think you're doing as you fall asleep, or wake up? Or when you watch TV, or play Video games, or watch movies, or read or drive on the highway and lose track of your environment? All of those things lead to, or are from, self hypnosis. It's just putting yourself in an altered state. You don't need a sub to learn that. You can do that no sweat by reading any of a thousand books or web pages out there and spending some time practicing. And at the end of the day, you would still come back to me because my methods are better and easier. State shifting FTW! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-11-2016 (06-10-2016, 08:25 AM)Freud Wrote: Shannon, if I listen to the ultrasonic at -60dB as recommended I hear a high pitched sound really loud, so I usually have it at around -80dB where I can hear the high pitched noise just a bit but comfortably. That's still good, right? -80 dB is the bare minimum for subliminal detection and comprehension. If that's the case, it is possible to use them at that level of volume, but no lower. I would just use the masked track if that was the case. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-11-2016 (06-10-2016, 09:32 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Shannon, I've been thinking about another thing AOSI should probably have (not sure if you thought of this or not) but that's a direct link to the user from the person of their desire. What I mean by that is, it's great if we can affect them in person, but if we go away and then the charm wears off, the sub won't be that useful as many women (at least ime) like to put a buffer between you and them. Prolly an ASD response. First, Sarge, we have to remember that this is designed for use by men and women. Not just horny guys. Second, we have to remember that while it is possible for me to make the sub do all sorts of things that might make it more effective, a lot of them fall into the classification of dangerous or bad idea for one reason or another, and I can't include that. If you get them hot and bothered and they want you but bang someone else, well then you either didn't have a real chance in the first place or you didn't make it obvious enough that you wanted it. I have learned through many years of experimenting with the subliminal aphrodisiacs with my girlfriends that even when a woman is super hot and ready to the point of desperation, she is unlikely to bang a guy who she is going to be punished socially for having sex with. As in, she has a boyfriend. She gets all hot and wet and starts drooling down her legs for you, and you both know it. But she will 99 times out of 100 go bang her boyfriend instead because it is safe to do that. There is something I can do about that, and I plan to implement a safe version of that in v2, but I cannot and will not resort to taking someone's free will away, ever. So unless at that point you take the initiative to persuade her to have sex, you're likely to have a woman who is easy to persuade, but who needs you to be a potential scapegoat for her if she gets caught. And no matter hat I do, that is likely to always be the case because the vast majority of females have a really hard time taking personal responsibility for themselves on things like that. Because they have a high price to pay, socially, and because... well, because they can get away with shit like that. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-11-2016 (06-10-2016, 09:51 AM)FrostedFake Wrote: Shannon do you think DAOSI and WM would compliment each other? Each one's good in what the other lacks. I think no matter what I say, someone's going to find out the hard way. I wouldn't do it, personally. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-11-2016 (06-10-2016, 01:14 PM)bits Wrote: Shannon Interesting, I had the idea a couple days ago to try to make the aura trigger easier, more frequent and more pleasurable orgasms for women, but I'm not sure if it's possible to limit it to women. If not, it would kill the men's ability to last for anything during sex. Can't have that. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-11-2016 (06-10-2016, 07:34 PM)Womanizer Wrote: Shannon I don't know if you plan on updating maximum learning speed. But I just got the idea of a Genius intelligence sub. When I get to the mind enhancing sub... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-11-2016 (06-10-2016, 11:11 PM)swisston Wrote: Maybe what we need is a sub that allows the easy and painless end of relationships without any hurt feelings for either side. I made that one. I used it on myself. It was back in the 2G days. I may just have to revive and revise it. It was really useful. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-11-2016 (06-11-2016, 08:03 AM)LionKing Wrote: Shannon: is it possible that too much of E2 will prevent stuff from getting processed, maybe because of the state shifting, positive programming, processing instead of executing, or just plain getting tired or bored with the instructions? Would it be better to aim for constant bliss or a bit of contrast between letting stuff come up and then releasing it with the state shifting? I don't think you can have "too much E2". It's best to just let the sub do it's job and get on with your life. Once the script is in place it does not need to be reminded of the goal. What it needs is renewed focus and motivation to act. Which is why you don't stop using it. If you don't like being told what to do, then consider how stupid it is to resist an instruction set that is very obviously only doing things for you to improve your state of health, happiness and success. Makes no sense to resist. But when you stop, after a long time using it, it will have the pile of snowflakes to consider, but it will not be constantly reintegrating them, so focus and motivation will fade. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-11-2016 (06-11-2016, 09:21 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: The new AOSI V2 should be without the gender neutral thing. It should be like '' I am irresistibly sexy.'' ( period ). Rather than '' I am irresistibly sexy to the gender I find most attractive. '' Or '' I project an intense aura of sexual irresistibility '' Rather than '' I project an intense aura of sexual irresistibility to the gender I find most attractive. '' Well, Ray, you're a little late to that party. We had that discussion a while ago and I chose the best way forward. Which works really well, by the way. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jake2015 - 06-11-2016 Shannon, if you ever get the chance, do have a read of my E2 journals in the mens area. Im trying to share all i can and either you can give your insight to it or use it to benefit us all in future subs, or ideally both ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 06-11-2016 (06-11-2016, 12:31 PM)Jake2015 Wrote: Shannon, if you ever get the chance, do have a read of my E2 journals in the mens area. Im trying to share all i can and either you can give your insight to it or use it to benefit us all in future subs, or ideally both Generally I have a hard time keeping up with journals other than my own journal response thread and those of the program I last released. But I will see what I can do. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 06-11-2016 (06-11-2016, 12:10 PM)Shannon Wrote:(06-10-2016, 09:51 AM)FrostedFake Wrote: Shannon do you think DAOSI and WM would compliment each other? Each one's good in what the other lacks. Do you mean doing the option B of AOSI while on a WM run? Or do you mean doing them separately at different times in a persons life too? |