![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - NoLimit - 08-21-2018 (08-21-2018, 08:31 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(08-21-2018, 08:21 AM)NoLimit Wrote:(08-21-2018, 04:06 AM)kingpill Wrote: You gotta 'risk creepy'. Girls like having sex with 'badboys' or 'f**kboys' with not 'cool respectable guys'. Those are the ones they will settle down with after having all their fun. Tyler isn't that bad looking and he is running beard game, there are girls attracted to this. Also he needs to sell his product... just saying. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 08-21-2018 Looks and status definitely come into play and definitely help, there's no denying that. But looks and status main function is eliciting a certain feeling in a woman which can be replicated with programmes like DMSI. And really, looks (though IDK about status which though, is easier to fabricate using social proof etc) are mostly subjective on upbringing/environment than anything else. Create a strong enough emotional impression on a woman and anchor the feeling she gets from a 'hot guy' onto you, it should do the trick. I guess this is why PUA people who are good at what they do say that 'looks dont matter'. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Zeroxmachina - 08-21-2018 (08-21-2018, 01:45 AM)thor2014 Wrote:(08-21-2018, 12:21 AM)Zeroxmachina Wrote:(08-20-2018, 06:24 PM)Jake2015 Wrote:(08-17-2018, 02:22 PM)kingpill Wrote:(08-17-2018, 11:40 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: I always make a girl feel happy. Nah I live in a land where I get laid and don't lean on excuses because I actually understand women, your results may vary though. I dunno, it may be because I actually have 'game' or whatever it's called. What do I know though I'm just a person that got hit by a semi truck,maybe that's hot to women *shrugs*, what I'm noticing however is how dull the people who complain about looks seem to be, one thing women do tell me is that most of guys they meet can't really hold a conversation. For the thousandth time I will say this: women are MENTAL creatures. They operate from the mind and emotional state,period. Someone said women liked the Beatles cause of looks, no women liked the Beatles because they were the Beatles, if they were just 4 guys walking down the street no one would think twice about them. Of course a boring guy needs to rely on looks, he has nothing else. Nor did I say that they don't matter at all, I said in actuality they are secondary to what sort of feelings and thoughts you can create. If you don't know how to talk to women, hell yeah you'll have to rely on being 'hot' or whatever, but don't sit here and tell me it's "100% about looks" when I know it isn't. Also maybe you folks should actually do some research on "belief systems" and "limiting beliefs", You're already on a sub forum but the type of comments I see on a regular basis indicate a general lack of knowledge of the subconscious and why and how it directly creates the reality we experience. Sheesh... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Catman - 08-21-2018 Hi Shannon! So glad you had a great trip man. Happy to have you back and to hear you're working on V3.3 today ![]() EDIT: Oops, I must have accidentally clicked on a chatterbox thread and posted this there by mistake. I meant to post this in Shannon's thread and can't delete this post. My bad. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - KingDavid93 - 08-21-2018 Hi Shannon, What other programs incorporate and/or will incorporate Reality Bending technology? Also are you planning to further upgrade the RB technology or is V 5.0 the end of the line? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-21-2018 Okay, so I have just finished catching up on this thread. In order to be maximally productive today, I will not attempt to answer all possible posts that I have read. Instead, if you want your question answered, please re-post it, and I will answer it as time allows. I will be working on 3.3 now. As for the looks vs game argument (which is what it boils down to), you guys are trying to oversimplify things a LOT, and that's why some of you swear by X and some of you swear by -(X). If you were taking into account all variables you would be able to see when each point of view has value and why. I have been working on this problem for a LONG time, and I can tell you, there are literally hundreds of things women/females consider when choosing what to respond to you with. I would say that after all that I have seen and done, ZeroX comes closes to what I have found to be true. But women, like men, consider ALL of these things. And each one has a different amount of weight for each different female. So some women are "all about looks" and some are focused on energy, money, fame, status, fun and so forth. But ANY woman can be persuaded to change her mind in ANY direction, given the right actions and reactions from the male. The thing is, 99.999999999% of the time, the guy does not know all of what he needs to know to understand what he needs to do to achieve that end result. That is what DMSI is trying to do for you. It is all about her perception of you and what her programming dictates that she does n response to that perception. And there are ways to communicate value/interesting-ness, without ever talking to her or even notice her. Women, and men, are not black and white. They're not simple. They are all different. You can't say "all women/men/gays/straights/bis/whatever" are any one thing, because they're all unique individuals. And you have to take that into account. Off to work, now. And thank you all for the birthday wishes. I had a blast on my birthday. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-21-2018 (08-21-2018, 09:24 AM)KingDavid93 Wrote: Hi Shannon, RB is in the skeleton script. Sop everything I have made since it was introduced. I don't remember everything off the top of my head. RB will be improved every time I find a way to do so. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - freerad98 - 08-21-2018 Quick tip for everyone running iPhone/iPad with iOS 11.x: To get the Music app to stop playing (subs) after a certain amount of time, click on Clock icon > Timer, set your time, click "When Timer Ends", scroll all the way to the bottom and select "Stop Playing". Use this to prevent too many loops while sleeping, etc. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-21-2018 Just FYI: DMSI 3.3 now is operating with Reality Bending 5.1. Just thought that might interest you guys. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - freerad98 - 08-21-2018 @Shannon I can't seem to find it anywhere. What is the primary ASRB for B (and A) side US/LM? TIA RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-21-2018 (08-21-2018, 10:34 AM)freerad98 Wrote: @Shannon The primary ASRB ratio isn't necessary to know for execution of the program, but if you want to know what it is, look at the ultrasonic track. In this case, for A side, it is 20 minutes of audio to 2 minutes of silence (20:2), and 30:3 for B side. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Leo1990 - 08-21-2018 Hi @Shannon when I first tried 3.2A I immediately got effects and executed (to the best of my knowledge) for approx 1-2hrs. However, after more runs and more time elapsed, this stopped. A few weeks ago, I stopped for 2 weeks and tried side A again and immediately started to execute, but after the 1st run this diminished once again. Can you help me understand what is going on? Is it diminishing returns or something? Thanks RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 08-21-2018 (08-21-2018, 11:31 AM)Leo1990 Wrote: Hi @Shannon when I first tried 3.2A I immediately got effects and executed (to the best of my knowledge) for approx 1-2hrs. However, after more runs and more time elapsed, this stopped. It's a resistance reaction that overrides the execution response over time. It is most likely resistance to putting in the effort required, or a delayed resistance to achieving the goals of the program. I have not had anyone report this type of resistance before, to the best of my recollection. How many loops were you using when this happened? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - sushi521 - 08-21-2018 Hey Shannon, how is the testing on the mystery sub going? |