![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 You guys don't get it. Releasing a dangerous subliminal to ANYONE puts my entire business at risk. Especially if someone "shares" it. (Piracy being such an unpleasant word and all.) Not saying that it would be shared, but in today's world, I can't afford to and will not risk my business because you want to play with something that has been flagged as dangerous. I'd be glad to let you burn yourself if you wanted to be foolish, if it wasn't just as likely to burn me. Safe, effective, useful. Always. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - gtavmofo - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 03:41 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote:(05-28-2016, 02:22 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-28-2016, 12:20 PM)gtavmofo Wrote: Talking of upgrades any chance of a upgraded ASC Shannon, 5.5G with all the trimmings ect? Hey there ncbeareatingman I saw a few old posts in Shannons original journal about you using ASC4G were the results epic? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ImFreeman - 05-28-2016 I was thinking, being sexually irresistible can cause different problems for women than for men. Men really do not have a substantial probability of being raped, women on the other hand DO have a much higher probability than men of being raped (much higher). Maybe for a woman being too much of a sexual irresistible person can become unsafe for them ? I don't know if Shannon is limiting it to protect the female users, or what, but this is the kind of thing that we end up losing trying to make one program fit to everyone. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 06:09 PM)Shannon Wrote: You guys don't get it. Releasing a dangerous subliminal to ANYONE puts my entire business at risk. Especially if someone "shares" it. (Piracy being such an unpleasant word and all.) Not saying that it would be shared, but in today's world, I can't afford to and will not risk my business because you want to play with something that has been flagged as dangerous. I'll be honest. If you told me to sign a waiver to test it out (which you wouldn't, I know) stating that I assume full responsibility for whatever went down by testing AOSI...I'd sign it willingly. Of course that's coming from three sources: over eagerness, selfishness and a feeling of curiosity. That said, I understand your point of view especially thanks to DarthXenodias and I apologize. @DarthXenodias: Your example is one of the reasons why I'm apologizing because I work in an environment VERY similar to yours so your statement really hit home. To make matters worse...my BOSS is very attractive so if I turned her down I'd be in deep sh!t. @ImFreeman: I'm still leaning towards the "gender neutral" AOSI but...your statement definitely has some validity. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jakeb203 - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 06:23 PM)ImFreeman Wrote: I was thinking, being sexually irresistible can cause different problems for women than for men. Men really do not have a substantial probability of being raped, women on the other hand DO have a much higher probability than men of being raped (much higher). Yes, particularly for women living in rough neighborhoods, or for those who are constantly traveling. Too much sexual attractiveness may not be a good thing in this case. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 06:12 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: What would you say is a better balance Shannon? Running E2 for 2 months or just 1 month? The longer I run it the farther away I get from my WM state and the more I go from a WM state to a E2 state before entering SM3. E2 will "unravel" YOU, get you to release and outgrow all the crap that needs to be released and outgrown, and get you to make yourself ready to be rebuilt in whatever way you want. More time is better. You can't be focused on pussy when you're trying to heal. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 06:09 PM)Shannon Wrote: You guys don't get it. Releasing a dangerous subliminal to ANYONE puts my entire business at risk. Especially if someone "shares" it. (Piracy being such an unpleasant word and all.) Not saying that it would be shared, but in today's world, I can't afford to and will not risk my business because you want to play with something that has been flagged as dangerous. Collective answer from forum members: "B-b-b-but what about muh d*ck???" lol, everyone's assuming that the models were predicting an aura that would just melt panties off. just as likely that the models are saying that your body would burn out trying to produce the aura. i'm on stage 4 of my second AM6 run. yesterday, I messed up the playlist on my phone and ended up running s3 and s4 back-to-back all day. that night, my head felt like it was going to explode, I was up all night twisting and turning in bed, and I was experiencing the most ridiculous, undirected rage at EVERYTHING. lesson learned, follow the freaking directions. i for one, wouldn't run an unsafe version of 5.5g tech. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 06:23 PM)ImFreeman Wrote: I was thinking, being sexually irresistible can cause different problems for women than for men. Men really do not have a substantial probability of being raped, women on the other hand DO have a much higher probability than men of being raped (much higher). I didn't think of that, but now that you mention it, it could be a concern. I definitely thought it was a concern when he said anyone of any age could use it. If I was a teenager and knew about this, I'd use it. You could have it so it only effects those who are a minor if the user is a minor and only those 18+ if over 18 (or whatever respective legal age is in said country). Don't know if it'd be tricky though. Also if Shannon did have an unofficial version I'd totally be interested. I'd go with the legal version first for 3 months and if it's not as unchained as I'd like, try the unofficial one. Seriously, like if there was some legal contract we could sign to alleviate any responsibility from Shannon for testing the sub, I'd do it. It sounds to crazy not to know what it'd be like! Even if guys started following me around (which I wouldn't want) and elderly women tried to fondle me (still don't want), at least I'd be able to say "Well now I know that he was right. I'd better stop using this". Back to reality, he is keeping the goal the main focus and it will be 5.5G so it should be extremely blatant and effective regardless. With E2, I knew within a week that something definitely was changing. AOSI should be even more pronounced! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 06:23 PM)ImFreeman Wrote: I was thinking, being sexually irresistible can cause different problems for women than for men. Men really do not have a substantial probability of being raped, women on the other hand DO have a much higher probability than men of being raped (much higher). I have to say I am doubly astonished. Men get raped much more than you realize. It's just a very under-reported crime because most guys are too ashamed to admit it, report it or ask for help. I'm not limiting it. I'm following our company guidelines: Safe, effective, useful. This is how we stay in business. I am doing what common sense dictates. I am preventing you and those around you, and me, from getting hurt. There is no "loss" because it's an all in one approach. I would take this very same approach if it were six versions. Why is it so hard for you guys to comprehend that me releasing something I know is unsafe is wrong, bad business, and ILLEGAL? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 06:31 PM)K-Train Wrote:(05-28-2016, 06:09 PM)Shannon Wrote: You guys don't get it. Releasing a dangerous subliminal to ANYONE puts my entire business at risk. Especially if someone "shares" it. (Piracy being such an unpleasant word and all.) Not saying that it would be shared, but in today's world, I can't afford to and will not risk my business because you want to play with something that has been flagged as dangerous. If I told you to sign a waiver, I still risk the program getting into the hands of someone who didn't. I still risk something happening to you. I still risk a lot of things. And whether or not it works or hurts YOU doesn't tell me if it hurts someone else. Please understand that. Curiosity, selfishness, etc. are not going to get you something dangerous from me. Ever. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 06:36 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: Collective answer from forum members: "B-b-b-but what about muh d*ck???" Shannon stated the models were pointing to AOSI being "TOO EFFECTIVE". So yeah the forum members (myself included) started thinking with our d!cks but when a subliminal's primary goal is to produce an aura of sexiness and attract people and the creator says it works to well...shit. Man I don't care, that statement combined with years and years of cartoons and watching Love Potion #9 several times does something to you. ![]() (05-28-2016, 06:47 PM)Shannon Wrote: If I told you to sign a waiver, I still risk the program getting into the hands of someone who didn't. I still risk something happening to you. I still risk a lot of things. And whether or not it works or hurts YOU doesn't tell me if it hurts someone else. Of course, I'm not arguing with that. If this was my business I wouldn't risk it either IF I was in your situation. But I was just being honest with how I was feeling. Normally I wouldn't even question your judgement on this as you know but hey, I'm human too and this new tech even has ME pumped more than usual. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 06:48 PM)K-Train Wrote:(05-28-2016, 06:36 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: Collective answer from forum members: "B-b-b-but what about muh d*ck???" In this case, it is likely that "too effective" likely means one of the following:
Whatever one or more of those, it is not going to happen. "Too effective" means we went past the sweet spot at the peak and broke something. Not on my watch. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 06:48 PM)K-Train Wrote:(05-28-2016, 06:36 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: Collective answer from forum members: "B-b-b-but what about muh d*ck???" Yeah that's what happened. If Shannon didn't say it worked "too well" and just said that the models said the current script was "unsafe" then it wouldn't have gotten as much attention probably. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 I am still tweaking AOSI, and I have a couple more additions to try out. It's getting better and better. |