![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Spiritman - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 02:04 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-28-2016, 09:35 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote: 2. Will BASE be rebuilt in 5.5g or 6g if at all? And if it will be rebuilt could you please include the overcome procrastination sub in it if you do rebuild it? This is something that should have been already included in my opinion. I still find myself procrastinating a lot even with BASE. I am motivated but procrastinating and maybe because BASE has certainly steered me in the right direction (the ultra motivation module) but by having overcome procrastination in the sub that would only make my results (and everyone's results) be achievable faster. It certainly wouldn't hurt I am curious when BASE does get upgraded to 6G, will the people who bought BASE in 5G get a discount some kind? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 All six stagers have the policy that we give a 50% discount for single generation upgrades. So from 5th Gen to 6th Gen, yes, you will get a 50% discount when the later version is released. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Spiritman - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 02:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: All six stagers have the policy that we give a 50% discount for single generation upgrades. So from 5th Gen to 6th Gen, yes, you will get a 50% discount when the later version is released. Thanks for the clarification Shannon! I am curious when BASE does get an upgrade, what plans do you have to change or add to the program? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 09:35 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote: 2. Will BASE be rebuilt in 5.5g or 6g if at all? And if it will be rebuilt could you please include the overcome procrastination sub in it if you do rebuild it? This is something that should have been already included in my opinion. I still find myself procrastinating a lot even with BASE. I am motivated but procrastinating and maybe because BASE has certainly steered me in the right direction (the ultra motivation module) but by having overcome procrastination in the sub that would only make my results (and everyone's results) be achievable faster. It certainly wouldn't hurt + 1 for this. Even though maximum productivity is in BASE, somehow i really think it was missing the whole "overcome procrastination" aspect. BASE is going to be straight up insanity in 6G though, and I look forward to it ![]() (05-28-2016, 02:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: All six stagers have the policy that we give a 50% discount for single generation upgrades. So from 5th Gen to 6th Gen, yes, you will get a 50% discount when the later version is released. What's funny about this is that even if it's discounted, we don't yet know what six stage 6G pricing is, so it could very well be that a six stage sub is $1000+, in which case a 50% discount puts it essentially the same as the pricing for the 5G level. I already have my $115 set aside for Ultimate Writer (or more, if UW turns out to be 6G since 2017 feels like the year it will be out) (05-28-2016, 02:08 PM)Shannon Wrote: I have already had to reject the five best script options so far because they were apparently TOO effective. I don't always know specifically what the warning responses from the models indicate specifically, especially in VLT pings, but I do know that I have a healthy respect for the accuracy of the models. I don't have any desire to cross that line. What does "too good" and possibly going into the "danger zone" mean? In terms of AOSI what does that mean? I only ask because i can't fathom a sub being too good or effective. It either hits the mark or it doesn't. But you're the subliminal master here, so I'll let you enlighten me ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Spiritman - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 03:21 PM)heavysm Wrote:(05-28-2016, 09:35 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote: 2. Will BASE be rebuilt in 5.5g or 6g if at all? And if it will be rebuilt could you please include the overcome procrastination sub in it if you do rebuild it? This is something that should have been already included in my opinion. I still find myself procrastinating a lot even with BASE. I am motivated but procrastinating and maybe because BASE has certainly steered me in the right direction (the ultra motivation module) but by having overcome procrastination in the sub that would only make my results (and everyone's results) be achievable faster. It certainly wouldn't hurt That is why I am saving money right now so when BASE and AM get upgraded, I will have the money for them. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ImFreeman - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 02:08 PM)Shannon Wrote: I have already had to reject the five best script options so far because they were apparently TOO effective. I don't always know specifically what the warning responses from the models indicate specifically, especially in VLT pings, but I do know that I have a healthy respect for the accuracy of the models. I don't have any desire to cross that line. What would this "danger zone" entail that you want to avoid?. I thought you were going all out take no prisoners on this one, but you are limiting it! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 02:22 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-28-2016, 12:20 PM)gtavmofo Wrote: Talking of upgrades any chance of a upgraded ASC Shannon, 5.5G with all the trimmings ect? Shannon if/when you Upgrade ASC to 6 G (and by the way zero pressure from me,Im having the deepest time and the most healing,uplifting time with E2 6 day in,and no bullshit its changing my life.) I suggest an 'ego balancer' to be included in ASC 6g to level out,smooth out possilbe bulldozing folks... liken it to an over does of testosterone driven proverbial Bull in a China shop. tha tcould be understating it seeing as how very POWERFUL 5.5 is. Im lovin E2. humble thanx. does not suffice. alas its all I have now but thankful tears. I swear Man!!! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AlphaRomeo - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 02:04 PM)Shannon Wrote: [quote='AbundanceCH' pid='111047' dateline='1464456956'] BASE in (likely)6G in the future updates!! Now, THAT`S the best news I have read in a long time on this forum. I realize it is wayyyyyyyy in the future , but something definitely worth to wait...while I keep running the current 5g version (and maybe some others after it) in a meanwhile. I donĀ“t know about others who are interested in BASE, but I much rather wait however long it takes to have it as full blown 6G than have any amount of hurry to have it as 5.5g (since, I reckon that similarly to future AM and magnets, as you have stated, it does not make sense to build it as 5.5g and later as 6g again). Shannon, please take your time with this...I know your hands are full of work for the next year(+)/years anyways. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 05-28-2016 Like the rest, I want to know what was so "dangerous" about the off the chain script for AOSI Shannon? It sorta sounds like the models were like "Oh no, it's dangerous", but it doesn't explain why (at least that's what it seemed from your post) All I can say is I hope the final release version is still off the chain and "dangerous" enough to please me if I run it lol. No holds barred! All out! Unleashed! With sexy power levels over 9000 please! LOL, but seriously! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - DarthXedonias - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 05:05 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Like the rest, I want to know what was so "dangerous" about the off the chain script for AOSI Shannon? It sorta sounds like the models were like "Oh no, it's dangerous", but it doesn't explain why (at least that's what it seemed from your post) When he mentioned that it could go into "danger zone" levels it didn't take me long to imagine why he might limit it to a "certain" degree. Just to give you a example, I work at a movie theater where the majority of the workers are female (including the managers). Can you imagine how bad things might get if I firmly, but "gently" waved off the advances of 1 or more of the female managers at my job and they didn't take it the right way? I mean might not affect someone who's already working for themselves as much but someone who works around mostly females? I can imagine scenarios where that might not end well. Whether her accusing you of sexual harassment out of scorn or her then making your life at your job a living hell. Not even pointing out that one of my female managers is already "quite" naturally flirty with the guys and she is married with 2 kids. Not saying I completely agree with it being limited but I do see the reasons why he might do so to a "degree". There's also the fact that if he did do a off the walls version most of us might use this new found power with responsibility but some of us might not. He could put something in it to make the user use his skills responsibly but I doubt most of the community would want Shannon to be the "moral police" as it were. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 05:05 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Like the rest, I want to know what was so "dangerous" about the off the chain script for AOSI Shannon? It sorta sounds like the models were like "Oh no, it's dangerous", but it doesn't explain why (at least that's what it seemed from your post) I'm not going to release anything that I know would cause anyone problems. You, me, or anyone else. Basically when the models give that signal, it means that it would result in some sort of problem, and the degree of severity that was being indicated was not something I take lightly. Who knows what it would be specifically? I'm just not going to do something I know will turn out negatively. That said... it'll be as powerful as I can make it without having it blow up in our faces. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 05:33 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote:(05-28-2016, 05:05 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Like the rest, I want to know what was so "dangerous" about the off the chain script for AOSI Shannon? It sorta sounds like the models were like "Oh no, it's dangerous", but it doesn't explain why (at least that's what it seemed from your post) You could get MOAR POWER by pushing your car to 10k+ RPMs, but you could also get 4 or six or eight holes in your hood too. MOAR POWER!!! isn't always wise, safe or reasonable. We are going to keep it safe, effective and useful. As always. The only limits will be what is safe, effective and useful. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 If I wanted to use AOSI to enhance SM3, and use E2 for less time, versus use E2 for more time, not use AOSI and had the same goal of enhancing SM3, I would choose more time with E2. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 03:41 PM)ImFreeman Wrote: [ +1 Gotta agree with this. I was hoping this thing would pump out an aura that was maxed out. That was the point of making AOSI more general so that it wouldn't limit the aura (by more general I mean a version that's usable by people of various genders and/or sexual orientations). Shannon, you should send me a copy of the AOSI version that you feel is too powerful. I'll conduct some tests and let you know what I find. I'm sure other guys wouldn't mind field testing the "too strong" version either. EDIT: Didn't see the other posts, disregard the first paragraph...but I'm dead serious about the 2nd. |