Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 03:49 AM)maxx55 Wrote:(05-27-2016, 11:18 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-27-2016, 10:35 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote:(05-27-2016, 09:23 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I've had women get visibly frustrated from my 'rejecting' them (which was really just me not knowing how to seduce her properly aka "dropping the ball") but I've also had women try to help me seduce them. Maybe that's something you could add as well Shannon, persistence on the girl's part. And so long as you don't outright say " no, I'm not interested " ("safe" phrase maybe that breaks them out of the trance? This is too fun to think about) then she'll keep trying. I don't know how I would do something like that through an aura, short of triggering an emotional addiction response. And I'm not sure how I would do that, or if it would be a good idea regardless... that's starting to get into manipulation levels I'm not really sure about. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 07:00 AM)FrostedFake Wrote: Shannon I'm thinking of doing this after WM: 1 month E2, 1 month this AOS 5.5g sub, and then 1 month AM refresher before going into SM3. Do you think I should change the order at all? And do you think that this new AOS subliminal would boost the effects of SM3 or do you think I should just cut it out since I would be only running it for a month (maybe 2 or 3 if it's amazing I guess). Quote:Do you think I should change the order at all? I don't see an issue with that order, but the order is up to you. Quote:And do you think that this new AOS subliminal would boost the effects of SM3 or do you think I should just cut it out since I would be only running it for a month (maybe 2 or 3 if it's amazing I guess AOSI and SM3 will interact in semi-synergystic manner, but they also have distinctly different goals. The overlap is actually relatively small. You may see a boost to one or two of the goals of SM3, but I can't be sure about that. Quote:Edit: do you think it would just be better to run E2 longer instead of adding in the new AOS? From the perspective of gaining the most out of SM3. What would you say would be the most efficient amount of time to dedicate to E2 would be without waiting too long? More time on E2 is never a bad thing. If I were going to choose between some time with E2, AOSI and SM3, or more time with E2 and then SM3, if my goals were to max out SM3 I think I would choose more time with SM3. That said, I can't know exactly how or much AOSI will impact SM3 without real world testing. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 07:48 AM)FrostedFake Wrote: Also I heard there is a mistake in SM3 that is reducing the effect are you planning on fixing that soon? Something Alpha360 said in this thread: http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7091-page-24.html. If there is really a mistake I will hold out then on SM3 probably and maybe run E2 for a longer period and wait for 6g or something. There is no mistake. There is a section of script that is designed correctly to achieve a goal, which has the effect of slightly reducing the effect of the whole in achieving it's goal. Slightly. You guys are so melodramatic and interpretive sometimes. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 08:13 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: Hey Shannon, Ray, I have a really full plate. At least four things that are vastly more important than that - 6G dev, pain relief, MHS and sleep aid. I can't know how long they'll take to build, or if your program would take priority when I am done. So I appreciate the persistence, but you have to understand my point of view also. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 08:39 AM)Darkness Wrote: Shannon please keep aosi as simple as possible, there's no need for emotional high, when this sub is all about irresistible sex appeal. I want this to work thoroughly, not end up being let down. I am planning to keep AOSI true to it's design goals. Whatever woks best. Nobody wants you to be let down, I assure you. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 09:35 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote: Questions for Shannon Here's a direct quote from the current script: "beautiful people of the gender I find sexually attractive, whom I also find sexually attractive" That is the target goal. We don't need to get more specific than that. Quote:2. Will BASE be rebuilt in 5.5g or 6g if at all? And if it will be rebuilt could you please include the overcome procrastination sub in it if you do rebuild it? This is something that should have been already included in my opinion. I still find myself procrastinating a lot even with BASE. I am motivated but procrastinating and maybe because BASE has certainly steered me in the right direction (the ultra motivation module) but by having overcome procrastination in the sub that would only make my results (and everyone's results) be achievable faster. It certainly wouldn't hurt I have plans to eventually I will upgrade it, likely to 6G. OP scripting is already in BASE 2.x. Procrastination is resistance to action based in fear. The issue isn't the OP scripting, it's the EHPRA scripting. V1 is not as effective at dealing with fears as V2 is. The next version will be much more advanced in dealing with fears, and include EHPRA 2+ (whatever is current at the time). That is a ways off yet though. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 10:29 AM)maxx55 Wrote:(05-28-2016, 09:58 AM)DarthXedonias Wrote:(05-28-2016, 03:49 AM)maxx55 Wrote: Please let us know if you add in the emotional high! I have already had to reject the five best script options so far because they were apparently TOO effective. I don't always know specifically what the warning responses from the models indicate specifically, especially in VLT pings, but I do know that I have a healthy respect for the accuracy of the models. I don't have any desire to cross that line. So the key is balancing it on the edge of "too good" so that we achieve maximum effect, without going into the danger zone. I've long since challenged myself to the same thing. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 11:08 AM)ALI6NMENT Wrote: So will this sub change my personality as well and in how I socialise, humour, flirting, body language, vibe, etc The sub is not designed to change your personality. It will help you improve yourself in all the right ways to enable the generation of, projection of and enjoyment of the intended aura. Self confidence, self worth, self love, self validation, self respect, all the internal support. How that affects the rest, and how the energy you're absorbing affects the rest, that is up to how you respond to it. Quote:Does this sub do it in a way that leaves it all up to my subconscious to decide how and what apart of my being it changes? So I change on all levels and in always possible for me to experience what this sub is intended to bring about. No, it significantly involves your conscious mind as well. But the primary goal of the sub is not to change you, but to source and project a specific energy. The changes it is aimed at making are to support you in achieving and enjoying the results thereof. Quote:I am thinking of active manifestation and passive manifestation in terms of conscious manifestation and subconscious manifestation. The subconscious mind is primarily responsible for manifestation. Active in this sense does not mean conscious or subconscious. The conscious is involved, but only to the degree that such involvement is helpful and useful. It can potentially derail the manifestation if it is too involved. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 12:20 PM)gtavmofo Wrote: Talking of upgrades any chance of a upgraded ASC Shannon, 5.5G with all the trimmings ect? 6G only. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Womanizer - 05-28-2016 Approximately when do you plan on releasing the new DAOSI? June , july? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - DarthXedonias - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 02:08 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-28-2016, 10:29 AM)maxx55 Wrote:(05-28-2016, 09:58 AM)DarthXedonias Wrote:(05-28-2016, 03:49 AM)maxx55 Wrote: Please let us know if you add in the emotional high! I actually laughed at this. I got a flashback to that old movie "Love potion #9" which proved there can be real problems associated with being "too good" at attracting the opposite sex. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 02:27 PM)Womanizer Wrote: Approximately when do you plan on releasing the new DAOSI? June , july? I plan on releasing it in a few days or less. I just had a few new things come to mind for consideration for addition while I was at lunch, so I'm looking into those right now. I also have to see whether the script is more effective with or without the naturalizer. Then once I have a very high quality response from the models, it's build time. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 05-28-2016 This is a really popular topic. I don't remember seeing this much byzz about anything else on this site. As for the "male-centric" posts, well, I am bi myself, but I was of course detailing the effect Id like to have on females. I don't think manipulation is a danger since even having a slight emotional effect could, under that paradigm, be considered manipulation. Heck, smiling at someone could be seen as manipulation. It's not the tool but how you use it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 02:27 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote:(05-28-2016, 02:08 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-28-2016, 10:29 AM)maxx55 Wrote:(05-28-2016, 09:58 AM)DarthXedonias Wrote:(05-28-2016, 03:49 AM)maxx55 Wrote: Please let us know if you add in the emotional high! Yes, really disappointing, too, because some of the script options I had to reject were positively off the chain. Which is, I guess, why they triggered the warnings. Real let down, but safety first. |