Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-27-2016 (05-27-2016, 09:23 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I've had women get visibly frustrated from my 'rejecting' them (which was really just me not knowing how to seduce her properly aka "dropping the ball") but I've also had women try to help me seduce them. Maybe that's something you could add as well Shannon, persistence on the girl's part. And so long as you don't outright say " no, I'm not interested " ("safe" phrase maybe that breaks them out of the trance? This is too fun to think about) then she'll keep trying. That doesn't work, unfortunately. Not for this type of program. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-27-2016 (05-27-2016, 10:18 PM)yeah! Wrote:(05-27-2016, 07:36 PM)yeah! Wrote: What are the rules for using MIR and another 5G sub? I think it's hard to know what effect it had based on how hard you were having it getting an accurate reading on his height. Negative values for the checks don't exactly inspire confidence. But I have seen that program produce surprising results in both directions, so who knows. Some people get results even after their plates are fused. Why would you ask for a refund and then buy another copy? That doesn't make sense. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - DarthXedonias - 05-27-2016 (05-27-2016, 09:23 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I've had women get visibly frustrated from my 'rejecting' them (which was really just me not knowing how to seduce her properly aka "dropping the ball") but I've also had women try to help me seduce them. Maybe that's something you could add as well Shannon, persistence on the girl's part. And so long as you don't outright say " no, I'm not interested " ("safe" phrase maybe that breaks them out of the trance? This is too fun to think about) then she'll keep trying. I actually like this idea. One other thing if it isn't too late. I was wondering Shannon if you could make it so that the Aura also gives the woman (though probably applies to men but too a lesser degree) a kinda of "emotional high" if you will. Even though I don't like David Deangelo that much I do remember him saying something that I distinctly agree with, that "emotions are the most addictive drug there is". I think this applies doubly so for women. Since she has this "emotional high" in your presence it would make her want to be around you when she can and she would have the right amount of emotional high that is appropriate at the time (she might have a different type of emotional high when you are having sex then when you two are watching a movie on a date, if that makes sense?). I mainly mention this for the guys who might enjoy being with multiple women but might have a few that they might want to see multiple times (whether dating/or sex). Who just don't want it to be a ONS type of thing only (maybe a multiple girlfriends/FWBs type of thing). I'm thinking obviously the "emotional high" thing would have to adjust to what shes comfortable with as well not to scare her off. Thought I would suggest that, even though I have the feeling it might compound how much clingy or stalkerish the girl might get.. Probably??? Don't know if their might be some other unpredictable consequences as well since we are dealing with influencing a person's emotions, which by their nature are unpredictable at times. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-27-2016 (05-27-2016, 10:35 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote:(05-27-2016, 09:23 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I've had women get visibly frustrated from my 'rejecting' them (which was really just me not knowing how to seduce her properly aka "dropping the ball") but I've also had women try to help me seduce them. Maybe that's something you could add as well Shannon, persistence on the girl's part. And so long as you don't outright say " no, I'm not interested " ("safe" phrase maybe that breaks them out of the trance? This is too fun to think about) then she'll keep trying. Yep. There is a cost to everything. I can run it through the models, though. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 05-27-2016 (05-27-2016, 08:35 PM)Banksy Wrote:(05-27-2016, 08:21 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-27-2016, 07:51 PM)Banksy Wrote:(05-27-2016, 06:41 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-27-2016, 06:09 PM)Banksy Wrote: Maybe it's just my age demographic or where I'm from but when I reject a girl I usually have to face some kind of consequences. "Always" lol it doesn't mean she will always manipulate her boys to go after you and not every women have boys that she manipulate on a daily basis. Your story even if it's true might happen only rarely when you know the girl enough. Even a very crazy immature girl won't go after you when you have rejected her at least when if you don't know her. Very few people are crazy enough to go that far with someone they just met, to be that mad she would have criminal tendency. Most women wouldn't have to confidence to go that far. So your story doesn't make sense unless you know the girl and play her game (manipulation) then at some point she may do it. But first you say that Shannon subliminal would be too powerful without limiter then you say they don't work. You also say you never planned on using any of shannons sub so why are you here? Drama? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 05-27-2016 He is not trying to discrete you, he is just saying what he observed. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Lowe - 05-27-2016 (05-27-2016, 07:51 PM)Banksy Wrote: Lol, I love how it's the guys who get no results or who it seems they got no results who are so passionate and opinionated. Sorry to break it to you guys, but some of you aren't even close to being "alpha", or whatever it is you claim to be. And especially not at a 360% angle. This seems a clear attempt to start a fight to me. What is with such a misdirected insult. Being passionate and opinionated does not mean we claim we are "alpha", it is called people voicing their opinions. If someone does not yet see results, why does it disqualify them from having an opinion? (05-27-2016, 08:35 PM)Banksy Wrote: It really never mattered anyway, I didn’t plan on using this or any of your new subs, because honestly I think it’s a waste of time in my case. They don’t really work… for the majority of people, anyway. Why did you repeatedly asks Shannon to put limiters in AOSI and making a personal case for it then? If it is a waste of time and does not work then why be afraid of how strong its effects can be. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - kenpachi - 05-27-2016 IME, when I reject women in my social circle they either: 1.) Don't speak to me again 2.) Immediately have sex with someone else to try and "hurt" me 3.) Gain new respect and giggle/blush every time they see me I never thought about "fear of being sexy" being a thing, but I can see how it might be for some if they have never been considered sexy before. My fear is more a fear of being open/vulnerable, but being sexy does nothing but improve your life. The fear of it is irrational... but then I guess so is the fear of vulnerability so I can't judge. Which brings me onto: is there any programming in AOSI that helps us become more vulnerable with women? When I get IOIs from women, I'll self-sabotage by telling myself I'm too good for her, or that she's lower value and needy because she's approaching me, but I realize it's me protecting my own ego because I am afraid to be open and be rejected. Will AOSI have anything in there to help with that, or is it outside the scope of the program? Also, will you be releasing the files in FLAC like you did for E2? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-27-2016, 11:27 PM)ALI6NMENT Wrote: So, does AOSI help you act on all this new attention? There is scripting to act on interest and do something with it. Yes, I know and understand that that is. The program isn't about getting you to validate them. It does, however, include self validation. And no, rejection is not handled. It's not really good to assume rejection. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-27-2016, 11:33 PM)yeah! Wrote:(05-27-2016, 10:26 PM)Shannon Wrote:(05-27-2016, 10:18 PM)yeah! Wrote:(05-27-2016, 07:36 PM)yeah! Wrote: What are the rules for using MIR and another 5G sub? I'm not attempting to discredit you at all. I'm simply responding to what I observed. If you don't believe the program got you the desired results, you're welcome to a refund. What I was commenting on is that it is possible that, given your initial difficulties with getting a consistent measurement, that you may not have been able to accurately observe the actual results. That's why I am saying you can adjust body posture up to a centimeter in most cases, and the angle of the measuring device to the wall has to be exact. When I was a kid, I learned that mom was happy when I grew and not happy when I didn't. So I would hold my breath because that made me taller. I'm not saying your kids do that, but it demonstrates how body posture alone can significantly affect height. There was no offense intended, so please, don't take offense at what I said. If, however, you still desire a refund, you should send us an e-mail on the back end. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-27-2016, 11:51 PM)kenpachi Wrote: IME, when I reject women in my social circle they either: More vulnerable? No. That's the sort of thing that is outside the goal boundaries of a program like this. It's designed to generate an aura, not heal you. We have other programs for that. Sounds like you should perhaps run one of them first? Although you may be surprised how the program affects you. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - swisston - 05-28-2016 If it's not too late for a suggestion, could we include a libido booster? I always feel sexier when I am horny. And there's not much point having a sexy aura if you don't feel up to it! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 12:54 AM)swisston Wrote: If it's not too late for a suggestion, could we include a libido booster? I always feel sexier when I am horny. And there's not much point having a sexy aura if you don't feel up to it! There's a very good chance that this will have the side effect of being a libido booster because it's designed to flood you to overflowing with the kind of energy that makes people you are sexually attracted to want to have sex with you. In all the experiments I have done in this direction, that has definitely resulted in an increase in my libdo. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AlphaMind - 05-28-2016 (05-28-2016, 01:01 AM)Shannon Wrote: There's a very good chance that this will have the side effect of being a libido booster because it's designed to flood you to overflowing with the kind of energy that makes people you are sexually attracted to want to have sex with you. By how you described AOSI 5.5G, it's somewhat spectacular. Can't imagine AM/SM/WM/BASE in the next update. In the mean time, let AOSI 5.5G amuse me |