Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Masterchief - 07-21-2018

Hello Shannon. Hope you've been keeping well, even though you're rushed off your feet doing research and building new subliminals.

I want to share a possible success story so you may be able to get some information from the usage of 3.2, for further development of 3.3. More background information can be found https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Men-s-Journals-Masterchief-s-DMSI-3-2-Journal-

I have started dating a girl at work the last month and got my first kiss. I am not sure where it is going now, as there may me an issue of how much relationship experience we have.

I was wondering whether there was in something in 3.2 which might affect how much experience the user is seen to have. The girl who is interested in me has only been in one serious relationship.

There was some posts from users about issues with younger girls.

So maybe in 3.3 have something about the affected person being ok with the users experience or lack of experience in relationships.

I am not sure if this is covered in 3.2, but two girls in the department have been instrumental in informing the girl was interested in me originally. It makes things a lot easier having a little support team trying to help you in dating one of their colleagues in their department.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - samba99 - 07-21-2018

Shannon in DMSI,

In the facial modules/instructions did you include increase collagen production? If not, can possiblely make it to 3.3? Of course if its safe


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - thor2014 - 07-21-2018

Apologies if this question has already been asked. Can we transition straight to 3.3 from 3.2 when it is finally released.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - samba99 - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 06:26 AM)thor2014 Wrote: Apologies if this question has already been asked. Can we transition straight to 3.3 from 3.2 when it is finally released.

35 days off is instructed.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - AbundanceCH - 07-21-2018

(07-20-2018, 06:34 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-20-2018, 05:34 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: Shannon, you mentioned a few months back you might include scripting to regrow hair/grow thicker hair in dmsi 3.3. Do you still plan to do this?

The first work to stop and reverse hair thinning and graying went into 3.2. I'm guessing that you still want it to be added to by your question?
That's great news that it was added on 3.2 I was not aware of that!

By first work do you mean you will be adding more to the script in regards to thinning hair for 3.3??


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 01:38 AM)Zeroxmachina Wrote: The really interesting thing about time-line distortion is that there are alternate versions of ourselves that are using the sub even if our current trajectory selves won't actually use it at all. Alternate selves, if you will.

And even more interesting is, can the effects of the sub potentially bleed over into other "self-lines"?

I have been getting what I believe to be TID from 3.3, even though I am not planning to use it. Even my girlfriend has noted it. And if I did use it, I'd be using the version for couples, which should only affect her... but today I was getting reactions from at least 5 different women during lunch that I normally do not see without playing DMSI, and only one of them was my girlfriend... who should be the only one affected if I am playing the version for couples...

...which I wasn't even planning to make until 3.4 or later!

This sort of thing has been going on for about a week now, too. Blink


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - DarthXedonias - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 09:36 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-21-2018, 01:38 AM)Zeroxmachina Wrote: The really interesting thing about time-line distortion is that there are alternate versions of ourselves that are using the sub even if our current trajectory selves won't actually use it at all. Alternate selves, if you will.

And even more interesting is, can the effects of the sub potentially bleed over into other "self-lines"?

I have been getting what I believe to be TID from 3.3, even though I am not planning to use it. Even my girlfriend has noted it. And if I did use it, I'd be using the version for couples, which should only affect her... but today I was getting reactions from at least 5 different women during lunch that I normally do not see without playing DMSI, and only one of them was my girlfriend... who should be the only one affected if I am playing the version for couples...

...which I wasn't even planning to make until 3.4 or later!

This sort of thing has been going on for about a week now, too. Blink

@Shannon hmm that does sound interesting because I do remember you saying you wouldn't run it because I think you said you modeled what would happen and it had a high chance of putting your relationship at risk. Also, that your girlfriend would want to run it as well. So either it could probably be TID as far as 3.4 or maybe you might run 3.3 afterward with her having no interest in running it maybe?

Also, glad to hear Sleep Aid might be done then you might work on a focus fire and 3.3. Granted, I would have loved to have US/LM but I understand it would have turned into a bigger project than it was suppose to be. Also, the fact that we might get 3.3 between a month or 2 more than makes up for that anyway. Btw, what is the plan after you make 3.4? Will you just focus solely on getting beast to design spec and farm the tech from it so you can make 6G? Also, I think you said ASC 6G would be the first sub then a custom for the second. Will the custom be released eventually to the public for that one?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 04:16 AM)Williamx25 Wrote:
(07-20-2018, 06:34 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-20-2018, 05:34 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: Shannon, you mentioned a few months back you might include scripting to regrow hair/grow thicker hair in dmsi 3.3. Do you still plan to do this?

The first work to stop and reverse hair thinning and graying went into 3.2. I'm guessing that you still want it to be added to by your question?

Hi Shannon, I will look out for your message to stop my current DMSI 3.2 for the release of DMSI 3.3

Do you have a list of all things that will be incorporated in the new DMSI 3.3? Or do you change the sales page of DMSI 3.2 so it will all be listed there?
If you have a link to the new things of DMSI 3.3 that would be nice. Thumbsup

I have a list, but I'm not making it public beyond what I have already published because:
  • I don't want to generate hype.
  • I don't want to be accused of generating hype.
  • I don't want to give away too much of what I am changing and create placebo effects.
  • I don't want to give away secrets.

When I publish the description page, I will update it as appropriate.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 04:44 AM)SexyKorths Wrote:
(06-19-2018, 05:22 PM)Shannon Wrote: Pregnancy and subs depends on the sub. For example, you don't want to use DMSI while pregnant. It's going to interfere with your hormonal balances. You wouldn't want to use breast enlargement or reduction, either. UD might flood the body with toxins while expelling them, and of course that should not be used during pregnancy for that reason.

Self esteem, anxiety relief aid, and the like would be usable and possibly beneficial. It just depends on the sub.

When in doubt - don't.
Greetings, old pheromonetalk-friend! Drinks

Greetings!

Quote:My ex-wife is pregnant in month 5-6 & suffers of low self esteem, confidence, veganism, anorexia, anxiety, drugs & negative thinking/u name it, all her life.

Have played Emotional Pain Relief Aid for her last couple months & before that she was esposed for my listening to maximum learning speed 5G until my OCD got to bad & I dropped out of med school.

For these last 3 months I am gonna sell my computer so I can afford one of your newest tech sibliminals, but: Will she benefit most from "Self Esteem 5.5G" or "Anxiety Relief Aid 5.5G" or "Positive Thinking, Positive Attitude 5.5g"? The impression I get is that the "Self Esteem 5.5G" would have the greatest positive impact for her & therefore be most beneficial for the baby, but I don't know if my logical reasoning is correct in this matter(Have Aspergers myself).

Any advice or input before purchase would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance! Thumbsup
Friendly Regards from SwedenPirate,
Korths Smile

In your shoes, and presuming you are already using E2 without the desired results, I would look at Self Esteem and Life Tune Up.

LTU is very old technology by now, but still a very good program, and less expensive.

Self esteem is not going to solve everything you talk about, but it is a very good program for what it does, and you can't go wrong with it.

Either of those options should be good.

If you are using V1 of EHPRA, you might want to try V2 instead.

Cheers, and again, congratulations on the baby!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 04:46 AM)Masterchief Wrote: Hello Shannon. Hope you've been keeping well, even though you're rushed off your feet doing research and building new subliminals.

I want to share a possible success story so you may be able to get some information from the usage of 3.2, for further development of 3.3. More background information can be found https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Men-s-Journals-Masterchief-s-DMSI-3-2-Journal-

I have started dating a girl at work the last month and got my first kiss. I am not sure where it is going now, as there may me an issue of how much relationship experience we have.

I was wondering whether there was in something in 3.2 which might affect how much experience the user is seen to have. The girl who is interested in me has only been in one serious relationship.

There was some posts from users about issues with younger girls.

So maybe in 3.3 have something about the affected person being ok with the users experience or lack of experience in relationships.

I am not sure if this is covered in 3.2, but two girls in the department have been instrumental in informing the girl was interested in me originally. It makes things a lot easier having a little support team trying to help you in dating one of their colleagues in their department.

The effect on the affected is basically designed to trigger irresistible sexual arousal, party by creating an energy field that causes the affected to perceive you that way. If that means they assume a specific amount of experience for you to be that exceptional, then that's what will probably happen. The aura does have a reset button so to speak, but if she is assuming you will do X and you don't, you may not end up where you want to be.

It is obvious that DMSI is likely helping (interest and assistance), but isn't triggering her enough to move on her own and may not be overcoming her internal assumptions and limiting beliefs. A lot of women assume that if a guy doesn't do what they expect, he's not interested, or he's not what they thought (assumed) he was. I have seen women shoot themselves in the foot and kick themselves right out of perfectly good relationships dozens of times by assuming things like this and then either being closed minded or never realizing how they were self limiting and destroyed their chances.

V3.3 is going to see a lot of work on the aura and should help with this significantly.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 05:20 AM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon in DMSI,

In the facial modules/instructions did you include increase collagen production? If not, can possiblely make it to 3.3? Of course if its safe

Specifically scripting an increase in collagen production seems unusually specific. Why ask for that?

This should be covered in two different directions by things like the Optimus Engine.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 08:06 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote:
(07-20-2018, 06:34 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-20-2018, 05:34 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: Shannon, you mentioned a few months back you might include scripting to regrow hair/grow thicker hair in dmsi 3.3. Do you still plan to do this?

The first work to stop and reverse hair thinning and graying went into 3.2. I'm guessing that you still want it to be added to by your question?
That's great news that it was added on 3.2 I was not aware of that!

By first work do you mean you will be adding more to the script in regards to thinning hair for 3.3??

I had not been planning to, but if it is still necessary, I can.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - samba99 - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 10:24 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-21-2018, 05:20 AM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon in DMSI,

In the facial modules/instructions did you include increase collagen production? If not, can possiblely make it to 3.3? Of course if its safe

Specifically scripting an increase in collagen production seems unusually specific. Why ask for that?

This should be covered in two different directions by things like the Optimus Engine.

Because improving facial structure, ex: to look younger, healthier, sexier... Got to do with collagen. I thought DMSI may already have that in it


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-21-2018

(07-21-2018, 11:21 AM)samba99 Wrote:
(07-21-2018, 10:24 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-21-2018, 05:20 AM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon in DMSI,

In the facial modules/instructions did you include increase collagen production? If not, can possiblely make it to 3.3? Of course if its safe

Specifically scripting an increase in collagen production seems unusually specific. Why ask for that?

This should be covered in two different directions by things like the Optimus Engine.

Because improving facial structure, ex: to look younger, healthier, sexier... Got to do with collagen. I thought DMSI may already have that in it

That is covered under "make yourself sexually irresistible".