![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 03:23 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: Maybe we should start a thread with a poll about this question once and for all: Maybe you could have two separate subs for different opinions on this. It would probably only be a small tweak. I don't think you can 'educate' men into enjoying the sexual interest of other men, just as you probably can't 'educate' gay men into enjoying the sexual interest of women. I personally would not welcome the interest of men, just as I wouldn't particularly enjoy the interest of obese women with moustaches. Or am I being narrow minded and in need of education there? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 05-26-2016 It's not what I mean here, I didn't say to enjoy it but to not be fearful about it. Or the see the attention from gay men as something positive because it means you are attractive, it doesn't mean that you are going to spend time with them. You just tell them you are not interested. To me the main reason people are asking to remove unwanted attention from men do it because they are fearful or they don't have enough assertiveness to deal with those unwanted attention. There are guys here who are also complaining about unwanted attention from ugly women. Just be assertive enough and remove the fear. Education is required because when fear is involved the person doesn't think objectively, he is irrational. To me there is no good reason to remove the attraction from gay dudes, there is more profit to let gay dudes hit on us. All the request comes from fear or lack of assertiveness (lazyness) or ignorance. edit: The main thing I want here is to remove the statement that deals with the unwanted attention, it doesn't mean we will enjoy the attention or become gay. It's a limitation just as the limitation about age. here is the the part in the BIABW script: "If I am male, I now project an extremely powerful aura which completely, obviously and continuously prevents and removes all forms of unwanted attention and interest from other males." This is a big limitation to me, and it may also create problems with your males friendship. If I read that correctly it says all forms, it may well create some limitation with friendship. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - wolverine_i_am - 05-26-2016 Shannon won't be doing separate subs. He already stated it cause it takes time to record different versions. With the gay men thing, trust me, I am very open-minded and support any kind of sexual orientation or gender identity. People can do whatever they like as long as all parties are consenting. However I've had instances when I was out, guys would make moves and it's really uncomfortable. I don't care if it's verbal flirting, but being really physical freaks me out. I am really assertive and tell them to stop, but I'm still creeped out. I guess a lot of it has come from bad experiences in school where there were gay kids who would make inappropriate moves and bully other guys including myself. So every time something happens, negative thoughts resurface. I vote to repel the genders that we aren't sexually attracted to. I really don't think it would affect or lessen female attraction that much to be honest. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SouthPaw - 05-26-2016 Shannon also has to think about his future customers and the ones that don't write much or at all in the forum. Sooo, if let's say 11 out of 9 say they like being checked out and fantasized by men, that really doesn't say much. And I would like to add that making women extremely wet and this stuff is just perverted and no healthy man would want that. We still want to live our normal lifes and have normal interactions. Not everyone is desperate. I find how Shannon described it is how it should be "become as sexy and attractive as you can be". Of course without things going out if control which will just backfire. Unconditional love, gratitude, deservedness and any other positive and healthy additions are always good. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 04:50 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: It's not what I mean here, I didn't say to enjoy it but to not be fearful about it. Or the see the attention from gay men as something positive because it means you are attractive, it doesn't mean that you are going to spend time with them. You just tell them you are not interested. I'm not fearful, and I have a few gay male friends. I'm in no need of education, thanks. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 05-26-2016 Try to fit in as many of CatMan's suggestions as possible please Shannon (mainly the abundance mindset and girls becoming addicted part :p)! Reading it, I totally thought it read like a mini AM/SM combo, but that's GREAT for people who haven't done the full 6 stage programs. The only thing that I could add would be to KNOW either psychically or on an energetic level that the girl (in my case) wants to have sex. Also, knowing if they are dominant or submissive would be nice. And DEFINITELY adding in manifestations of a wide variety of hot girls (again, in my case) to quickly and effortlessly come into your life as lovers, FWBs, and MLTRs (They constantly approach you too). I think that's the biggest thing ![]() If the manifestations I suggested are added in, I know I will totally get this sometime down the line! Edit: Also, if you could make it so that the fully accomplished goals of the program rewrite our past memories to make us believe that we've always been that sexy and hot and attractive, that'd be awesome too! I know you said you were working on that technology somewhere. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 04:54 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: Shannon won't be doing separate subs. He already stated it cause it takes time to record different versions. When he did OF and OGSF he said it was a minor change to the script, which didn't take long. Surely this change would also be fairly minor. I agree about discouraging interest from men when you aren't interested in them though. It has nothing to do with fear at all: It's just unpleasant and a waste of everyone's time. And if some women are less attracted to me because I'm not embracing my gay side, or getting enough social proof from adoring gay men, I couldn't give a damn personally. I'm better off without women like that. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 04:54 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: Shannon won't be doing separate subs. He already stated it cause it takes time to record different versions."Freak out", "creeped out", it's based on fear as I just said. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 05:15 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: "Freak out", "creeped out", it's based on fear as I just said. You can be freaked out by something without being scared of it. Like I said before, obese women with moustaches create no fear in me whatsoever, but the thought of sleeping with one would freak me out. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Breeze - 05-26-2016 I don't understand why is it so difficult to say, "No, I am not interested." And move on. Not that anybody is going to break into your house and rape you. lol RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 05:07 AM)terry44 Wrote:(05-26-2016, 04:54 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: Shannon won't be doing separate subs. He already stated it cause it takes time to record different versions. I think the script telling "...sexually attractive to people of the gender I am attracted to" takes already care of this. So if someone isn't attracted to men there will be no interest. Regarding some other suggestions: The 4G script includes already the follow statement: I now make myself absolutely irresistible sexy at all levels of my mind, body and emotions and in all ways, to beautiful women. This should already take care of the details HOW you become sexually attractive. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 04:59 AM)SouthPaw Wrote: Shannon also has to think about his future customers and the ones that don't write much or at all in the forum. Sooo, if let's say 11 out of 9 say they like being checked out and fantasized by men, that really doesn't say much.You are derailing the subject or you doesn't understand. No one say they liked being checked out and it's not what I'm talking about. What I'm talking about is to make the sub less bloated and remove a limitation. The goal of the sub to begin with is not to remove unwanted attention from males, it's about being sexy/attractive. If I go even further Shannon could create a sub specifically to remove unwanted attention from males but I don't think he has the time and most people would be able to deal with it without any sub because it is a trivial thing to being with. Edit: A question someone could ask himself is the following: if Shannon would create a sub specifically to remove unwanted attention from men would you use it, would you waste your time with that when you could use another sub? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Multiworld - 05-26-2016 I agree about discouraging interest from men,because it is a waste of time when you have women on your mind,I think thats the ticket,focus on attracting women would be good but you know however Shannon makes it,we'll buy it! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 05-26-2016 (05-26-2016, 05:23 AM)Multiworld Wrote: I agree about discouraging interest from men,because it is a waste I like your signature about imagination. Too bad I cant visualize or imagine. Thats why I am trying to get Shannon to produce a sub built to develop one's imagination. Man the things I'dbe able to do if I had an imagination. I think it would be amazing. When I was able to, I once visualized something then my mind kept on repeating " I am wonderful & perfect ". I was putting off good vibes because my mom would start complimenting me over things I was doing likew washing the dishes, then my sister started smiling at me. Then my mind ws affirming " People like me ". Then I was in such a good mood that I started thinking about everything I want to accomplish. All we need is positive thoughts to get women to like us. |