(07-16-2018, 01:27 PM)DarkPlouf Wrote: I might have a BIG fear of getting hurt. Not the usual kind of fear that I imagine people experiment at one point of their life. I've probably a trauma-like, god tiers level of fear of getting hurt.

Just to set the context, I ran DMSI 3.2B 7/8 loops per day, about 4 weeks ago and the effects faded after the 3th/4th day. I decided to take a break at some point and run one loop per day only.
Well the second day after I took the break, I started feeling my "chest" tightening. You know, like when you have emotional pain. It was kinda hard to breathe too. Then the next day I was heading home and guess what the **** happened?
The universe wanted to mess with my feels, or maybe DMSI though it was so much of a good idea to make me bump into the girl that destroyed my soul 3 years ago. She was just as ***** attractive as ever to me. In yoga pants and I swear I could even see the shape of her panties. She still had the same mimics that made me go crazy years ago. My heartbeats started to ramp up and I experienced the same thing that happened 3 years ago when she rejected me: All my energy leaving my body, legs weakening (I could barely stand), chest tightening so much that I felt like I had a giant ball in my throat. Then came the HUGE emotional pain, feeling of grief and regrets. "I wish I had never met her", "I wish I had never ever tried something with her", "I should have just made friends and nothing more than that ever", "women = PAIN".
I swear it hurt like hell and if it wasn't for a certain friend that uplifted me idk what I would have done.
I am VERY VERY VERY afraid of experimenting that pain again and I'm ready to leave EVERYTHING else just not to go through that again. :|

(07-16-2018, 02:55 PM)THolt Wrote:

(07-16-2018, 02:44 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-16-2018, 07:13 AM)THolt Wrote:

(07-16-2018, 07:00 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-15-2018, 09:14 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: @Shannon That last line caught my eye so I wanted to ask: Have you learned a lot from when you made LM 4g til now to the point where you can increase the magnitude by a lot?

I can increase the magnitude, but it is as yet somewhat unclear how much.

Quote:Also, I was just curious because I remember you saying that with reality bending there is dangers if you do too much reality bending. I was wondering is there any dangers with increasing the magnitude of "luck" too much?

If pushed too far, there are dangers to manipulating luck too much. They are in fact similar to those of reality bending, but to a lesser degree in most cases. Manipulating your reality must be done with respect for the rules by which reality works, and with an awareness in mind for the universe to always balance itself. It is with these things in mind that we must proceed with appropriate wisdom, restraint, technique and caution in doing so. That is why we at IML take small steps and do not throw caution and safety to the wind. It takes longer, but it is a better result in the end.

Quote:Is there any limits to how much "luck" can be manipulated?

Yes.

Quote:Lastly, can't remember if you said you put LM in the DMSI already but if not will you probably make LM part of the skeleton script to aid in the goals of whatever program it is in? So, might be possible to see it in 3.3 (if it isn't already included in DMSI that is). Sorry if this is too many questions I'm just really interested in knowing this and excited about this subject.

There is a module in the skeleton script that does something similar to what LM does, but which is more appropriate for helping the user achieve the goals of the program they are using. It is not using luck, however.

So will limits on how much luck can be manipulated result in there being what can be manifested using LM/US?

This question is grammatically confusing. It appears to be missing one or more words.

Shannon
I hastily wrote that. My bad

I meant to ask will there be limits in what can be manifested using LM?

(07-16-2018, 01:28 PM)cataleya Wrote: If I switch from MLS 5.5G to US/LM how long should the break between subs be?

(07-16-2018, 03:30 PM)THolt Wrote:

(07-16-2018, 02:55 PM)THolt Wrote:

(07-16-2018, 02:44 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-16-2018, 07:13 AM)THolt Wrote:

(07-16-2018, 07:00 AM)Shannon Wrote: I can increase the magnitude, but it is as yet somewhat unclear how much.


If pushed too far, there are dangers to manipulating luck too much. They are in fact similar to those of reality bending, but to a lesser degree in most cases. Manipulating your reality must be done with respect for the rules by which reality works, and with an awareness in mind for the universe to always balance itself. It is with these things in mind that we must proceed with appropriate wisdom, restraint, technique and caution in doing so. That is why we at IML take small steps and do not throw caution and safety to the wind. It takes longer, but it is a better result in the end.


Yes.


There is a module in the skeleton script that does something similar to what LM does, but which is more appropriate for helping the user achieve the goals of the program they are using. It is not using luck, however.

So will limits on how much luck can be manipulated result in there being what can be manifested using LM/US?

This question is grammatically confusing. It appears to be missing one or more words.

Shannon
I hastily wrote that. My bad

I meant to ask will there be limits in what can be manifested using LM?

@Shannon see above revised question

(07-16-2018, 03:32 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-16-2018, 03:30 PM)THolt Wrote:

(07-16-2018, 02:55 PM)THolt Wrote:

(07-16-2018, 02:44 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-16-2018, 07:13 AM)THolt Wrote: So will limits on how much luck can be manipulated result in there being what can be manifested using LM/US?

This question is grammatically confusing. It appears to be missing one or more words.

Shannon
I hastily wrote that. My bad

I meant to ask will there be limits in what can be manifested using LM?

@Shannon see above revised question

You won't be manifesting using LM. But there are limits on what LM can do, yes. Not necessarily because the program isn't powerful enough, but because there are limits in other directions that must be considered.

(07-16-2018, 07:05 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-16-2018, 03:52 AM)Runitonce Wrote: I emailed support and was told to post here since there's a better chance of it being viewed by Shannon.

I did AM6 for 2 years, DMSI 3.1 for few months, 3.2b for few weeks without any negative side effects. I recently started 3.2A and i'm experiencing pain in the back of the head that lasts all day. Once i stop using dmsi, the pain goes away after 2 days. Once i start using dmsi again, it comes back. It's not a headache like feeling but more like a head injury pain feeling and pressure pain like your head is in a vice clamp. Support believed it was due to healing? Should i continue using dmsi 3.2a or discontinue? Thanks.

This sounds like a reaction to the fear this program generates which results in a pain being experienced as an effort by the subconscious to express itself, either in how afraid it is of this change, or the perception of some danger, or the resistance it has (stop, or I'll make you suffer).

I cannot know for sure what the pain is from, but if I was a gambling man, I would put my money on the latter.

As to whether you should continue, that is up to you.

(07-16-2018, 03:15 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-16-2018, 10:53 AM)Dmitry Wrote: Have anyone feels any signs of TDI 3.3 already?

I have had some interesting experiences that I have been wondering about, which could be TID... but I was not planning to run 3.3, so I'm not sure what to think.

(07-16-2018, 03:42 PM)Shannon Wrote: Upon commencement of the work on US/LM, it becomes abundantly clear that I am going to have to re-think making this program as a focusfire, as it almost certainly cannot be made in 3 statements or less. To do this correctly may be in the 20 to 40 statements region, unless I can find some way to condense all that into one to three statements, which honestly seems unlikely. I am going to have to think on this.

(07-16-2018, 11:25 PM)Dmitry Wrote: Had some interesting ideas in the morning:

1) Implement quantum healing modules in H&C of 3.3/3.4. Quantum healing techniques work as magic in private and group therapy. It will be interesting to see how it can be implemented in subliminals.

2) Create Elixir of Youth 5.5G (EOY 5.5G) (maybe in focusfire format). Sub intended to preserve youth/young states in user (detox of course and etc, healthy foods and etc.), look young at possible degree, heal the belief system about being young/healthy, heal all secondary gains (subC hidden agenda) to be/look older. In men users it can automatically increase testosteron levels. This sub can be very similar to MHS, MIR. I think that female users will be greatful for this one and it will be good for business in general.

3) Improve Will Power and implement improved learning & unconscious and conscious modelling of succesfull people (appropriate to title goals).

4) Improve "accessing higher levels of knowledge" & Field & Morphogenic fields to download & access the needed information to accomplish sub goals.

5) If a user is experienced in using different healing & coaching methods (nlp, hypnosis, system constellation, quantum psychology and etc.) then direct the H&C modules to use this knowledge to heal & clear faster and more effective. If it is already implemented - then make it more obvious.

6) Implement binaural entrainment. If DMSI is in experimental stage anyway, why not give it a try?

Ok for now

(07-16-2018, 07:17 AM)Shannon Wrote: The sexual performance module is a rock vs. a hard place for me. If I am too agressive (3.1), people either get insane results or they reverse resist and shut down completely. If I try to do what will work for everyone (3.2) those of you who are not getting enough sexual frequency will complain because it isn't working fast enough.