(07-16-2018, 11:34 AM)DarthXedonias Wrote:

(07-16-2018, 10:53 AM)Dmitry Wrote: Have anyone feels any signs of TDI 3.3 already?

I think I have felt TID from 3.3 before only a few times but I'm not sure. I think what I'm mostly feeling right now though is TID from US/LM. I say this because over the last week or so I've been feeling this want to start my college course already online and and feel motivated to finish my degree at the 2-3 month mark instead of going at my own pace and finish at the 6 month mark instead. Like I just got off my job right now and the thought that came through my mind wasn't going home and playing video games or something. It was wishing I was already starting on my courses so I can go home and work on finishing everything up. This is kind of different for me really.

(07-16-2018, 10:53 AM)Dmitry Wrote: Have anyone feels any signs of TDI 3.3 already?

(07-16-2018, 01:27 PM)DarkPlouf Wrote: I might have a BIG fear of getting hurt. Not the usual kind of fear that I imagine people experiment at one point of their life. I've probably a trauma-like, god tiers level of fear of getting hurt.

Just to set the context, I ran DMSI 3.2B 7/8 loops per day, about 4 weeks ago and the effects faded after the 3th/4th day. I decided to take a break at some point and run one loop per day only.
Well the second day after I took the break, I started feeling my "chest" tightening. You know, like when you have emotional pain. It was kinda hard to breathe too. Then the next day I was heading home and guess what the **** happened?
The universe wanted to mess with my feels, or maybe DMSI though it was so much of a good idea to make me bump into the girl that destroyed my soul 3 years ago. She was just as ***** attractive as ever to me. In yoga pants and I swear I could even see the shape of her panties. She still had the same mimics that made me go crazy years ago. My heartbeats started to ramp up and I experienced the same thing that happened 3 years ago when she rejected me: All my energy leaving my body, legs weakening (I could barely stand), chest tightening so much that I felt like I had a giant ball in my throat. Then came the HUGE emotional pain, feeling of grief and regrets. "I wish I had never met her", "I wish I had never ever tried something with her", "I should have just made friends and nothing more than that ever", "women = PAIN".
I swear it hurt like hell and if it wasn't for a certain friend that uplifted me idk what I would have done.
I am VERY VERY VERY afraid of experimenting that pain again and I'm ready to leave EVERYTHING else just not to go through that again. :|

(07-16-2018, 01:28 PM)cataleya Wrote: If I switch from MLS 5.5G to US/LM how long should the break between subs be?

(07-16-2018, 07:13 AM)THolt Wrote:

(07-16-2018, 07:00 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-15-2018, 09:14 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote:

Quote:Reality bending is designed to create a situation in which you make certain adjustments that result in the goals of the program. It's aimed not so much at magnifying the effects of the program, but the effectiveness of the program in achieving its goals. It is for the most part ASS/ART. The magnitude of "luck" is handled by something else.

@Shannon That last line caught my eye so I wanted to ask: Have you learned a lot from when you made LM 4g til now to the point where you can increase the magnitude by a lot?

I can increase the magnitude, but it is as yet somewhat unclear how much.

Quote:Also, I was just curious because I remember you saying that with reality bending there is dangers if you do too much reality bending. I was wondering is there any dangers with increasing the magnitude of "luck" too much?

If pushed too far, there are dangers to manipulating luck too much. They are in fact similar to those of reality bending, but to a lesser degree in most cases. Manipulating your reality must be done with respect for the rules by which reality works, and with an awareness in mind for the universe to always balance itself. It is with these things in mind that we must proceed with appropriate wisdom, restraint, technique and caution in doing so. That is why we at IML take small steps and do not throw caution and safety to the wind. It takes longer, but it is a better result in the end.

Quote:Is there any limits to how much "luck" can be manipulated?

Yes.

Quote:Lastly, can't remember if you said you put LM in the DMSI already but if not will you probably make LM part of the skeleton script to aid in the goals of whatever program it is in? So, might be possible to see it in 3.3 (if it isn't already included in DMSI that is). Sorry if this is too many questions I'm just really interested in knowing this and excited about this subject.

There is a module in the skeleton script that does something similar to what LM does, but which is more appropriate for helping the user achieve the goals of the program they are using. It is not using luck, however.

So will limits on how much luck can be manipulated result in there being what can be manifested using LM/US?

(07-15-2018, 07:43 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-15-2018, 09:12 AM)Darkness Wrote: Shannon could you extensively optimize and refine the cognitive decoherence module. To help the user think super clearly and not be befuddled or have mental lag and be free of the inability to flow in conversation . Because I haven’t used any subs for two months now, and my brain is officially functioning at 100%. Even trivial socializing has improved. I’m not struggling to think, nor is my speech garbled and nonsensical.

What was the last sub you used?

(07-16-2018, 02:44 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-16-2018, 07:13 AM)THolt Wrote:

(07-16-2018, 07:00 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-15-2018, 09:14 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote:

Quote:Reality bending is designed to create a situation in which you make certain adjustments that result in the goals of the program. It's aimed not so much at magnifying the effects of the program, but the effectiveness of the program in achieving its goals. It is for the most part ASS/ART. The magnitude of "luck" is handled by something else.

@Shannon That last line caught my eye so I wanted to ask: Have you learned a lot from when you made LM 4g til now to the point where you can increase the magnitude by a lot?

I can increase the magnitude, but it is as yet somewhat unclear how much.

Quote:Also, I was just curious because I remember you saying that with reality bending there is dangers if you do too much reality bending. I was wondering is there any dangers with increasing the magnitude of "luck" too much?

If pushed too far, there are dangers to manipulating luck too much. They are in fact similar to those of reality bending, but to a lesser degree in most cases. Manipulating your reality must be done with respect for the rules by which reality works, and with an awareness in mind for the universe to always balance itself. It is with these things in mind that we must proceed with appropriate wisdom, restraint, technique and caution in doing so. That is why we at IML take small steps and do not throw caution and safety to the wind. It takes longer, but it is a better result in the end.

Quote:Is there any limits to how much "luck" can be manipulated?

Yes.

Quote:Lastly, can't remember if you said you put LM in the DMSI already but if not will you probably make LM part of the skeleton script to aid in the goals of whatever program it is in? So, might be possible to see it in 3.3 (if it isn't already included in DMSI that is). Sorry if this is too many questions I'm just really interested in knowing this and excited about this subject.

There is a module in the skeleton script that does something similar to what LM does, but which is more appropriate for helping the user achieve the goals of the program they are using. It is not using luck, however.

So will limits on how much luck can be manipulated result in there being what can be manifested using LM/US?

This question is grammatically confusing. It appears to be missing one or more words.

(07-16-2018, 08:20 AM)Williamx25 Wrote:

(07-15-2018, 08:02 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-15-2018, 12:04 PM)Williamx25 Wrote:

(07-15-2018, 07:50 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-11-2018, 02:14 PM)Williamx25 Wrote: How do I consciously know what the instructions are? Or is it something that I will execute subconsciously?

You don't consciously know what the instructions are. They will be executed entirely at the subconscious level.

Quote:What do you exactly mean with those instructions? Adjusting body language/ voice tone / eye contact ? Becoming a more attractive man through body language? Or is it the programming that goes right into my subconscious mind?

I'm not sure what instructions you are referring to. The script? The program instructions? Something I mentioned?

Quote:If approaching girls isn’t executing the instructions, or talking to them, what is it then? Just curious

DMSI is designed to make you so sexually attractive that you don't have to approach. It doesn't stop you, but why would it be executing the instructions to approach if the goal is to simply be so attractive that that is not necessary in the first place?

Executing the instructions is just that. Those instructions are not public, so you won't know consciously what they are. When you start executing them, however, you should see a drastic change, like Thor did.

What you describe sounds like stonewalling.

I was referring to the instructions that DMSI gives you. I saw you mention that in a few posts. And of course, everything is subconsciously programmed so I can't know/hear them consciously.

I was trying to figure out what the instructions are, but now I understand it. I just have to wait and see how the women flock on to me and escalate sexually with me. I think my resistancev is also partly the fact that I was stressing about ''approaching''. Like when I was out in public or at the gym I got eye contact and I was like: SHIT, I HAVE TO APPROACH, DO SOMETHING? And then I got really confused about everything.. So DMSI is just basically wait until they talk to you and then you can arrange a date and escalate sexually?

I still pussy out when a girl stares in my direction/ have eye contact with a girl
I got male pattern baldness and a very young age (15). So i'm already 10 years bald and I hate it. And my fat body doesn't help aswell lol. THat's my major resistance. I am disgusted by my looks. But i'm working hard in the gym trying to gain muscles and lower in bodyfat.

So you are having a conflict between the goals of DMSI and your self image. I see we will need a self image adjustment module upgrade in 3.3.

Quote:I was walking around with all the PUA stuff in my head, I'm trying to get rid of it, I mean the mindset that a man must hunt etc... I just need women to come to me and then I will sexually escalate.

Once again, DMSI does not stop you from using PUA. It is not required that you do. But, when she must hunt you, it tells her that you have enough options that you don't need to hunt, and your value is percieved to be very high as a result. Men with an abundance of women don't hunt, they select from the offerings. But until you start having women react to the program enough to spark off the social proof that will result when you do, making your interests known isn't necessarily a bad thing. You just want to do it in a way that does not suggest you are of less value than DMSI is telling them you are. As in, don't go sarging the whole damned room. Pick one woman, the most attractive one, and let her and her alone know you are interested, but do it in a way that shows you don't need her, but you do want her. No desperation.

Quote:What do you mean with stonewalling? Like hard resistance?

Refusing to execute.

Quote:I'm going to increase my loops to 8 hours, i'm going to get those sleepheadphones, I need to crush and push through this resistance at all costs. Even if I have to listen 10 hours a day. So be it....

I think you have will have to work on this forever. Everything needs to get upgraded to 10G or something. Maybe 50G. Or make a script that will equal 1 hour of listening to 1000 hours of listening lol.

I am not going to work on this forever, regardless of what the last version does. I am going to push it as far as I can, and then stop. It's been 5 years now working to just upgrade 5G to 6G, and most of the progress is not visible to you guys because I haven't taken it out of Beast yet. There will be a HUGE jump when I do. And we are not far off at all from when I finish developing beast.

6G is the end of the line for the foreseeable future, but just FYI: 1 hour of 5.5G current already is about 1000 hours of listening compared to a 3 or 4G. What we need isn't more hours, it's the rest of the modules that get us past the resistance. Beast 16 is doing a really good job of that so far; not perfect, but good enough that testing it requires a lot of care.

DMSI 3.3 will be a large improvement over 3.2, just as 3.2 was over 3.1, and 3.1 was over 3.01. But it is likely to be either 3.4 or 4.0 where the biggest jump in power occurs. I'm only going to be mining Beast for the technology after it achieves design spec. We are getting close. Did a test yesterday that really surprised me, and formal testing is coming up shortly as well.

Thank you for extensive reply. That clear up alot of things for me.

So 6G is the end line for the foreseeable future, that means all of your products will end at 6G? What's left is tweaking the modules in order to get 99% past the resistance am I right? That sounds awesome, you are really doing an outstanding job Shannon. I appreciate your work!

Quote:For us beta testers of DMSI 3.2, will we get all of our upgrades for free or do you have to charge an x amount for the either 3.4 / 4.0 version? The latest version that will come out for DMSI?

Quote:Also will you use Beast 16 or 17 for the development of the last definite version of our DMSI? I can imagine that will drive up the costs of course.

Quote:I can't wait until it all comes out! I'm definitely saving up! If I want to run 3 different products: DMSI, AM, MLS, with each 35 days of rest in between. Will the other programs stay permanent in my subconscious? So when i'm running maximum learning speed I also get all the benefits from Alpha Male and DMSI ?

(07-16-2018, 08:29 AM)Morgul Wrote:

(07-15-2018, 08:05 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-15-2018, 01:33 PM)Morgul Wrote:

(07-15-2018, 08:15 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-14-2018, 03:23 AM)Morgul Wrote: Shannon says to not try to clear things on our own (or at least not with any mind programming, or mind altering, no EFT tapping...), and let the sub do it, to not interfere. But I never follow that advice for long, because to me it's more important to become free, successful, and have what I want, than to wait and see how the subliminal solves it all subconsciously. I can't wait that long, I am committed to myself and my life.

So by doing that you invalidate the ability to know what DMSI is and is not doing, and slow me down from achieving the development it needs. That is a big part of the problem we have here, I never know if what you guys report is DMSI or something else you're doing that I don't know about.

I give those instructions for good reasons. Disregarding them slows down development. That's why we are stretching on into years now.

I'm not using DMSI, I didn't buy it yet. And most probably, even I'm curious, I won't do so unless a version of it is released, that is compatible with having an exclusive relationship with loyalty. What I'm using now is WM, the original version, doing stage 5 now. Now that I think, I will put it on my signature as many people do, it can prevent misunderstandings.

But because of my calling for healing and evolution, and the integrity with my coaching work, I will be unavoidably touching within things related to what the subliminals are doing. I simply cannot not use and be good at the tools that my clients pay me to teach them and help them with. Also in order to properly help them, I must grow at all costs, it can't be in any other way.

So yes, I don't count as a valid user to observe results from. Sorry for that. But I was doing it correctly before, years ago, while I could, when I wasn't forced to improve faster.

I'm not worried about you being a valid user, because you're not using an experimental. But if you give advice that detracts from my ability to gather useful data from those who are using the experimental, it makes things harder for me. They are already ridiculously difficult. I want people who are using DMSI to use it alone so I can see what IT does and does not do, not have to guess if it was DMSI or any of whatever other things they are doing/taking/trying/etc.

That's correct, I just edited that post to make it clear that what I shared I do, shouldn't be done by those using DMSI or any other experimental or test programs.

(07-16-2018, 10:37 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: Is the US/LM focus fire sub a part of DMSI? Or it's own sub completely separate from it? Thanks.

(07-16-2018, 10:53 AM)Dmitry Wrote: Have anyone feels any signs of TDI 3.3 already?

(07-16-2018, 11:37 AM)sushi521 Wrote: Hey Shannon, is US/LM 5.5g more effective than the current BAMM for achieving wealth/success?