(05-25-2016, 01:53 PM)RTBoss Wrote:

(05-25-2016, 02:22 AM)Shannon Wrote: All 5.5G single stage programs will be the same price: $114.95.

For those of us who already own AOS & BIABWS 4G, is the a discount to upgrade to the 5.5G title? If so, how does that work?

(05-24-2016, 10:15 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(05-24-2016, 09:06 PM)Darkness Wrote:

(05-24-2016, 08:46 PM)apollolux Wrote:

(05-24-2016, 05:53 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(05-24-2016, 05:45 PM)apollolux Wrote: I'm also not a fan of AOS+BIABWS 5.5G being "gender neutral" since that might dilute its efficacy over something more direct.

Yeah, because you aren't smart enough to know the difference, right? lol

Let's see how hard this really is.

Gender specific version:

Quote:I now make myself irresistibly attractive sexually to beautiful women.

Gender neutral version:

Quote:I now make myself irresistibly attractive sexually to beautiful people of the gender I am sexually attracted to.

They mean and say exactly the same thing, except that doing a gender specific version takes 2-3 times more time. Gender neutral works for any gender and any sexual preference in just one program.

Oh ye of little faith. Or in this case, common sense. When are you guys going to figure out that yes, I actually do know what I'm doing?

My concern isn't over your knowledge or skill set, it's about processing. I know that you insist the subconscious mind can process a much larger and denser amount of data than the conscious mind can, and I know that consciously "beautiful women" can be equivalent to "beautiful people of the gender I am sexually attracted to," but "women" is objectively simpler to understand (i.e. takes less energy and effort to process successfully) than "people of the gender I am sexually attracted to," takes less time to input which allows the space that would have been occupied by the longer statement to be instead occupied with other script, and there's less likelihood of the qualifiers after "people" being ignored or downplayed by a potentially lazy subconscious.

Also, with another processing analogy, "beautiful women" may result in one set of neural pathways firing to associate the prompt with the mind's recollection of beautiful women, while "beautiful people of the gender I am sexually attracted to" may take more time and/or effort to process because it may process in parts, drilling down like the more general "beautiful people" first then having to expend effort (however significant or insignificant) to filter to those "of the gender I am sexually attracted to," potentially processing that in parts like "of the gender I am" (which is male in this example) then having to process "sexually attracted to" and expend more effort linking the two clauses together to make the proper filter.

I'm not trying to belittle your efforts, Shannon, I'm simply looking to present an alternative argument for simpler, more overt and obvious wording based on the fact that it's not quite conclusive how the subconscious definitively and undisputedly processes data, though you without question seem to have come the closest of anyone I've encountered so far to finding out that answer. Also, I would think the trade off of writing a shorter script that would only need a Find & Replace All to change "women" to "men" would be more beneficial than writing a longer script that is gender neutral.

I agree

Is there a way to make the new AOS just focus on the goal of sexiness. With the Biatbw for all genders to use it, have the suggestion be : becoming irresistibly attractive sexually . Nothing else please.

Let's say that you are a heterosexual male, and we give you a program that generates an aura focused on becoming irresistibly attractive sexually".

This is relatively specific, but it allows for situations like:

* You attract gay men.
* You attract bisexual men.

This leads to a lot of unwanted and uncomfortable attention and we have already seen this happen in the past, which is why I specified "beautiful women" in the past, and will not leave the script ambiguous enough to achieve the same result, either way in the next version.

(05-25-2016, 05:38 PM)stratos Wrote: yeah +1 for having dudes hit on you, the ladies love it.

(05-25-2016, 03:35 AM)"Q Wrote:

(05-25-2016, 01:07 AM)Shannon Wrote:

Quote:Just kind of curious why an ego balancer is needed?

Simply put, because too much sexiness, too much awesomeness, and too much self confidence leads one to become either unattractive to, or intimidating to, the people you want to attract. We want to attract, not repel.

Would using statements along the lines of "gratitude" and "appreciation" be an effective (and positive) way to balance the ego in this instance? For myself, I know that gratitude & appreciation brings me right back down to earth when it comes down to an inflated ego (read: arrogance), but it does it in an organic, positive way.

(05-25-2016, 07:40 AM)FrostedFake Wrote:

(05-25-2016, 12:18 AM)Shannon Wrote: I don't yet know what six stage 5.5Gs will cost, if I make any

If you do, WM2 HAS to be the first upgraded :p. I know you'll probably just skip straight to 6g but 5.5g 6 stagers would still be insane.

(05-25-2016, 01:53 PM)RTBoss Wrote:

(05-25-2016, 02:22 AM)Shannon Wrote: All 5.5G single stage programs will be the same price: $114.95.

For those of us who already own AOS & BIABWS 4G, is the a discount to upgrade to the 5.5G title? If so, how does that work?

(05-25-2016, 06:27 PM)yeah! Wrote: 6 months AOS 5.5G vs 1 run SM3.

Which do you think would be better? Can SM3 compete with this new sub?

(05-25-2016, 08:16 PM)LeonidasXVI Wrote: Will AOSI include OGSF or E2? To clear out whatever is stopping from achieving Aura of Sexual Irresistibility. If it doesn't focus away from the main goal, hopefully.