![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Rocket13 - 07-15-2018 I cant wait for LM/US RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 07-15-2018 To All I wanted to ask if anyone that is listening to (multiple) 7 loops of 3.2 witnessed at the start an increase in masturbation or behaviour that was being controlled with 1 loop? thanks RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - lano1106 - 07-15-2018 (07-15-2018, 02:27 AM)Nox Wrote: "Just stop AFTER I post my opinion" Well, if I have something intelligent to add to a discussion I will. I don't care if I have the last word or not. But what Thor wrote was too big to remain unanswered. You know picking few negative traits from few individuals and attributing them to some group is or very similar to racism... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-15-2018 (07-10-2018, 07:11 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(07-09-2018, 08:58 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-09-2018, 04:59 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(07-09-2018, 04:45 PM)Benjamin Wrote:Quote:I shall try harder in the future to resist my urge to help, Sarge. It never works. That's a likely cop-out. You can go study logic. Not too many people out there whose brains are wired to be literally unable to comprehend logic. You might be one of them; but you can still go study logic and try. Quote:(07-09-2018, 08:58 PM)Shannon Wrote: I suggest you stop here and now. Instead of being arrogant and snarky, you might want to be appreciative instead. Regardless of what got you results, I have made how many versions of this damned program in a row with only getting paid once per person for it? And because I made you guys a promise. Who else would have done that? Nobody. Anyone else would have just scrapped the project and moved on, regardless of what you guys thought or wanted, promise or not. So whether or not you got results, you should still be appreciating, because this is more than a year of my blood sweat and tears into this program trying to help guys like you. Women are by and large primarily emotional in their thinking, and that makes them irrational in their choices and actions in general. Of course this is a massive generalization, and does not always hold true on the individual level, as we are all a collection of points on a series of spectrums. I have met some consummately logical women, and some incredibly irrational men. Nothing I say here is intended to be degrading of women or sexist. But when you consider this fact that women tend to be more emotive in their thinking and cognition, and it makes them less reliant on logic to find their way, as men are, you can understand why women seem to be a mystery to men, since logic and emotion are mutually exclusive states of awareness. To make things worse, as I said before, everyone is a collection of points on multiple spectrums, so many people who are irrational may believe themselves to be rational, and some part of them may in fact be, at the same time they are predimonantly irrational. Irrational = difficult to predict at best. Therefore, women will often seem to be throwing curve balls at men until and unless you understand the underlying primal- and meta-logic they run on. And in some cases, even understanding that will fail. Quote:My outburst was definitely fueled by losing my FWB and not having any women in the pipeline. I didn't mean to be ungrateful, but some truths had to be said, especially with all the PUA bashing going around. My point of view is one based on having only "studied" PUA for a relatively short time. I found some of it useful, and a lot of it was, for me, a waste of time. I have developed ways to do things that are, for me, superior in results. Some of what I read was very eye opening as to the underlying psychology of the female of the species, and therefore very useful, although not (for me) as a direct application to PUA. I am not current on PUA techniques, and my opinion of them is based on my understanding of what I have been exposed to, which is admittedly not current, as well as why people get into PUA and what the goal of PUA is, in addition to what PUA is doing to the whole of society. If you find it useful, use it. If you think it's the prime mover for you, then that's what you think it is. My goal with DMSI is not to prevent you from using PUA or "hunting" but in making it unnecessary, and the mindset that PUA teaches is based on the assumption that "man must hunt", when that is not true for all men. As common sense dictates, a woman will hunt you to whatever degree she perceives you to have sufficient value to motivate her to do so. That PUA teaches that you MUST hunt, defeats the ability to achieve the proper mindset and frame of reference for achieving the state that DMSI is aiming to achieve. It directly conflicts. It is working against DMSI, and THAT is the beef I have with PUA in this case. Quote:If someone were to bash DMSI to my face, I'd probably res[pond the same way because it has helped. In fact, I've been in contact with a member on another forum who used to be here but was banned. I appreciate that. Quote:I don't hate DMSI, or you Shannon, but I have a strong conviction to the truth and can't abide when people distort what I see as correct for what I see as their own agenda. I have no ill will toward you at all. The only issue I have with you is that we do not have a way to fluidly exchange understanding. I cannot show you what I know and help you understand it, and that understandably frustrates me. At the time of the OP, I was also verging on burnout from building the custom. Even now I am only just beginning to feel like I am getting rested. Quote:Anyhow, sorry if there were hard feelings but I have to speak my truth. That will never change. All I can do is try to learn how to be more tactful and speak the truth without hurting people. No hard feelings. I admire your convictions to speak your truth. But please remember that your truth may not be THE truth, it is your understanding of "the truth" based on your thinking style, and what I keep trying to show you is how you are getting away from the truth by thinking in ways that lead you to arrive at destination points that are further from it, and thus, defeat you or at least delay you in your efforts. Quote:(07-09-2018, 08:58 PM)Shannon Wrote: I am done trying to help you, Sarge. You're not even capable of comprehending when I am trying to help you, never mind appreciate shit. And if you keep going with being snarky and arrogant, I'm going to decide I have finally had enough. If you want to say PUA did it, then stop using DMSI and go do your PUA thing. I don't care what did it for you at this point. I am just tired of your snarky attitude. I appreciate that as well. I apologize for my snarkiness in responding. I was also upset. Now, let's get back to getting you success. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-15-2018 (07-10-2018, 02:13 PM)josh84 Wrote: Hi Shannon, i am listening to 7 loops of 3.2b masked trickling stream, i have a set playlist of wmp of 7 loops so i dont listen to any more loops than that number each night. One thing i notice when listening and i assume its not bad speakers but the subliminal messages behind the trickling stream is listening in bed when everything else is quiet you can hear the trickling stream but also can hear what sounds like crackling noise. I have checked the speakers on other audio sounds and it comes through clear so its not the speakers so im assuming its the messages behind the trickling stream that is making those noises? Crackling from the speaker distortion is caused only from the ultrasonic track being played at too high a volume on speakers that cannot handle it. Masked only tracks cannot cause speaker distortion. I can think of no reason why you should be hearing crackling unless your speaker plug is not fully plugged in to the jack, and moving it around is causing some static. Is the crackling always in the same place? If so, what time is it in the audio? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-15-2018 (07-10-2018, 04:00 PM)kalmah0804 Wrote: Hey Shannon--I've been taking a bit of a break from the forums, so I apologize if this question has already been answered, but I figured it's worth a shot asking, because I think at least someone needs to report this type of stuff: What you describe is going to be one of the following things. 1. There is no connection, and correlation does not equal causation. 2. Your subconscious is afraid of this goal set and is doing what we call "scorched earth resistance tactics". This appears to be one of the most extreme forms of resistance possible, and so much so that we only just discovered it several months ago. It's also a very very rare form of resistance. If it is #1, then stop or go, it won't matter. If it is #2, then you will always have this reaction unless: A) You stop using the program, the perceived "threat" goes away and your subconscious stops doing this. B) You find the right combination of loops to volume and format, and break through it. From what I have seen, you are not really a good candidate for using subliminals in general because of the healing you appear to need. But if you're going to do it anyway, I suggest you stop using anything for a while (1-3 months) and see if the strangeness continues. If after that it is still happening, then it probably indicates no correlation. Otherwise, if it stops, it probably indicates the resistance tactic. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-15-2018 (07-10-2018, 11:14 PM)samba99 Wrote: Shannon, This is not an appropriate place to be discussing this. Please post this sort of thing in the appropriate place in the future. It is currently not very likely to happen on Kindle because of the complexity of the graphics. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-15-2018 (07-11-2018, 01:00 AM)thor2014 Wrote: Shannon does DMSI actually move sexual energy from the testicals to the eyes I can feel it when i gaze into a womans eyes who i really like. DMSI gives you a set of instructions. You do what is necessary to execute or resist those instructions. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-15-2018 (07-11-2018, 02:06 PM)Williamx25 Wrote: I just screwed up my ASRB-Break on 5.5G DMSI 3.2A.... Yes, take the next day off and continue. It will throw off the benefit of the ASRB2 but still be better than not using an ASRB2. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-15-2018 (07-11-2018, 02:14 PM)Williamx25 Wrote:(07-09-2018, 12:03 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-09-2018, 07:20 AM)Lowe Wrote: Hi Shannon, You don't consciously know what the instructions are. They will be executed entirely at the subconscious level. Quote:What do you exactly mean with those instructions? Adjusting body language/ voice tone / eye contact ? Becoming a more attractive man through body language? Or is it the programming that goes right into my subconscious mind? I'm not sure what instructions you are referring to. The script? The program instructions? Something I mentioned? Quote:If approaching girls isn’t executing the instructions, or talking to them, what is it then? Just curious DMSI is designed to make you so sexually attractive that you don't have to approach. It doesn't stop you, but why would it be executing the instructions to approach if the goal is to simply be so attractive that that is not necessary in the first place? Executing the instructions is just that. Those instructions are not public, so you won't know consciously what they are. When you start executing them, however, you should see a drastic change, like Thor did. What you describe sounds like stonewalling. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-15-2018 (07-11-2018, 04:03 PM)dissonance Wrote: Hey Shannon, what do the sexual performance modules in 3.2 do exactly? What aspects do they touch upon/work on? They improve your sexual performances each time you have sex, so that it's not a binary situation, and you can improve at your own non-threatening pace. They are polymorphic, so whatever you need to adjust to achieve your best sexual performance, that is what you'll improve. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-15-2018 (07-12-2018, 07:23 AM)Theron Wrote: @Shannon That is a possibility. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-15-2018 (07-12-2018, 01:26 PM)Have at ye Wrote: My vote would go to US/LM, as I've used this 4g combo in the past with success. I'm really excited at the prospect what this would bring about with the addition of 5.5/almost-6g tech. I was going to start working on US/LM today, but several pages of this thread to read and respond to used up my time. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 07-15-2018 (07-12-2018, 10:50 PM)thor2014 Wrote: Guys, The aura is not powered by sexual energy. It is powered by a wide variety of sources, including sexual energy, food, sunlight and others. Having sex frequently is a natural consequence of executing, so sexual energy is not designed to be the primary energy source. However, whenever it is available, it will be used to whatever degree achieves the goals. |