![]() |
|
Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol.9 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol.9 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-9) |
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol.9 - ArmarageX - 12-31-2025 Zomg its X4A 2600! (Checking in this forum first thing in new year - was wondering - what was that Christmas surprise Shannon said was coming....? - but - havent checked forum since ages) (Cuz when Shannon was sick and doesnt speak - forum was less interesting for a while ahaha) Hope your'e feeling better @Shannon . Just want to thank you for an updated X4A.. You deserve a cheer on this - seeing that the fourm hasnt cheered much yet on it... Maybe everyones off on holidays (like how i was away until now) - and only realised the new release now... Appreciate you for hearing my old pleas - i dont know if others were plea-ing - but i was definitely a plea-er for more X4A And i feel heard.. Love X4A. Appreciate you for revisiting and upgrading the script - knowing 1600 was released not far ago...Excited to start rocking it! Random thought - cuz (as an ecom seller myself) - whether you've thought about - setting up some reviews system on your products.. Cuz i feel by now - there could've been a batch of X4A reviews collated already - across the past generations... And new products - can build on top of leveraging even old generation reviews.. to help ... promote upgraded versions? Or just in general - having products with star reviews as an ecommerce principle... (It can technically be curated to show only the positive reviews if need) Or maybe collating testimonials to add to product description.. - and carry across old generation testimonials even - why not.. Just thought that might help with improving sale conversions.. I know you have some heavy hitting scripts in the past - locked away for being too powerful .. Hope you dont mind us keep nudging ya to continue iterating / unleashing its full force! Let us deal with the ethics hehe - you just provide the best possible weapon. Excited for when X4A one day reaches the level of just slaying everyone on the field.. Please dont gate-keep that variant Anyways - im just happy and excited. A nice dose of happiness to kickstart the new year. Thanks Shannon! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol.9 - Shannon - 01-01-2026 (12-31-2025, 11:35 PM)ArmarageX Wrote: Zomg its X4A 2600! Sorry about that. I've been over the sickness for a while now, but my girlfriend demanded that I take a break for the holidays, and then after that I started doing some experiments that have been really REALLY interesting. Been focused on developing that, building new experimentals based on preliminary results, trying to find ways to test them and working on understanding what I am seeing them accomplish. I have to identify exactly what is doing what here yet, but the results I am getting so far suggest something important has happened. It could be two different things, and depending on which one it is, it would mean something completely different. I have enough data points going in the same direction now to be confident this is statistically significant, and now I'm going to try to figure out which of the two possible explanations we are dealing with. Quote:Hope your'e feeling better @Shannon . Just want to thank you for an updated X4A.. Thank you for that. The forum does tend to get quiet when I am away. And I am noticing that most people don't report their results much, if at all, anymore. The number of people reporting on here vs our customer base and repeat customer base is a very big difference. X4A-2600 went through a lot of testing behind the scenes. I had planned to publish it for over a year. But it's not always when I want that things get published for various reasons. I personally enjoyed X4A-2000 (5.11G) a lot and 2600 should be significantly better. I do listen, but again... I'm not always free to do whatever I want, or do it in whatever time frame I want. Quote:Random thought - cuz (as an ecom seller myself) - whether you've thought about - setting up some reviews system on your products.. At one point, someone set up a review system without asking me what I wanted regarding that. I disscovered it, and decided to let it run for a while. What I discovered was that next to nobody was reviewing anything except for people who were mad at us fornot allowing us to be scammed by them... so all we were getting was 1 and 2 star reviews, and next to nobody was reviewing us. I shut it down. I think a review system is only useful for products that are more easily understood than what we offer here in general, partly because of the fact that we get a lot of people coming from YouTube or other sellers who assume that our experience will be the same, and they assume they can use it however they want and get bad results and then get mad at us for "having bad products". When in fact the issue was that they didn't read and follow the directions, used it at way too loud a volume, played it all night long, massively overloaded their subconscious, etc. So I'm not real keen on reviews systems. We started the forum as a way and place for people to do reviews that we could interact with and have others comment on. Not that I want to change or delete reviews, but that I want to be able to talk to the reviewers and have other people talk to them also. You see what's happening here. Only showing positive reviews doesn't seem like a good marketing strategy, but getting attacked by scammers fornot letting them scam us, and people who are absolutely clueless about what makes my subs different and how to use them, because they expect YouTube subliminals, isn't helpful. Ben does collect testimonials to put on the product descriptions. But here's the thing. I have been focused on developing the tech and making the subs work as best they can before I start really advertising, because I want to make as many customers happy as possible when we go big time. And that isn't far away. I think we're hitting the end of the line on development. I'd been hoping that would happen when 6G first came out, but there have been some things that have been discovered since thn regarding how to overcome resistance, and I have been following that rabbit hole in the background. Once that's done we just need to develop a good advertising campaign for one great product, and we're off to the races. Quote:I know you have some heavy hitting scripts in the past - locked away for being too powerful .. I don't lock scripts away for being too powerful. I lock them away for being too dangerous. If they produce good results, I take what made the results happen and incorporate it into the Skeleton Script. But some of the specific experimental titles have goals that are either not useful to the general public, or that would produce results that would cause problems for IML or various others. That's not something I will release, but you guys always benefit regardless. X4A development did not stop with the 2000 branch. But the development on this title has been very slow and painful in some ways. There will be more to come in the future, but I have a LOT of work to do before that happens. And for a while now, and a while into the future, I do not have time for it. Today, I begin focused development of AM7. I have been trying for many months now to develop it while building other things, and something always goes wrong. So I have decided that it is time to just bite the bullet and focus on AM 7 and only AM 7 until it gets done. I hope you enjoy 2600. As much as I enjoyed 2000, 2600 should be noticeably better, but I can't run it. You'll have to report and let me know how it goes. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol.9 - Shannon - 01-01-2026 (12-26-2025, 02:04 AM)dragonslayer Wrote:(12-10-2025, 08:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: MLS cannot come out in the next few days. I built BROP v2 in order to prepare for MLS, and now in the next few days I have to get the script ready for build. Then it has to be built, and I have to do the description and usage patterns. It'll be a week at least, since I am already working on something else at the moment (Christmas surprise). But it should be coming this month. If you have Major Depressive Disorder, I would think that you'd want to find a solution to that. At this time, the best option for that will be PTSD Recovery Aid, using the CPTSD instructions. EHPRA + DRS `6G is a good choice, but you're not going to get results if you aren't using it. If you stop using it, I suggest you go back and do another run-through after a month off if you don't want to get PRA v1. I don't know how you would expect to get results from something like X4A-2600 or US 5.11G if you are dealing with MDD. But I suppose boredom isn't hel;ping. MLS 6G will be released in January 2026. Ultra Success will be updated sometime after AM7 gets finished. AM7 is my next focus. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol.9 - Shannon - 01-01-2026 (12-28-2025, 05:48 AM)callie Wrote:(12-10-2025, 08:54 PM)Shannon Wrote: I will be looking at releasing UH in 6G, but I have to make some checks first to make sure it can be aligned and balanced properly. I really don't know when. I don't know how long it will take to build AM 7, and that has been getting put off for various reasons for way too long now. So that's the next build, come hell or high water. UH is one of those that is very difficult to balance between physical and emotional healing though, and no matter what I do, it won't be optimized for everyone. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol.9 - Shannon - 01-01-2026 (12-30-2025, 07:26 AM)Shadow2200 Wrote: PayPal payment still allowed? PayPal is the only payment system we have at the moment. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol.9 - Shannon - 01-01-2026 (12-31-2025, 02:45 PM)Frosted Wrote: @Shannon For PTSDRA I want to try CPTSD instructions to see how they affect me compared to the regular ones. Should I wait until I finish this run through, or is it okay to switch now for a bit and then decide which one to continue with? You should finish your current cycle at least. The run-through isn't necessarily required for this, but you don't want to go switching back and forth either. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol.9 - Shannon - 01-01-2026 (12-17-2025, 10:24 AM)Sky Wrote: Will MLS 6G have laser like focus/concentration and ultra motivation/overcome procrastination in it? I’m in sore need of that for learning. @Shannon MLS will be the same as the previous MLS, with the exception that it will be upgraded to 6G scripting standards, optimized and it will have the addition of BROP and possibly MLS. I have the version with BROP built and awaiting a chance for me to finish calculating the usage patterns. The version with BROP and FRM may or may not get built, depending on circumstances. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol.9 - Shannon - 01-01-2026 (12-18-2025, 09:58 AM)StridingStrider Wrote: Shannon, PRA has EHPRA and OGSF. Thus, it will be doing more, in more ways and in more directions. OGSF will enable EHPRA and vice versa. So I fully expect that it would be superior to EHPRA by itself. Quote:I liked though that EPHRA seemed to cause people to approach me and try to fix things. Should I expect that on PTSD aid considering it has the EPRAHA incorporated into it? I'm not sure why that would be happening when you run EHPRA, but since PRA has the same script of EHPRA in it, it certainly could happen that way. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol.9 - ncbeareatingman - 01-01-2026 Edited. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol.9 - Shannon - 01-01-2026 (12-19-2025, 03:18 AM)Rois83 Wrote:(12-08-2025, 05:04 AM)Shannon Wrote: I think it is.I said it because when I was looking for ways to heal the brain, I read Brain Optimizer and thought it wasn't for healing. Then I read the description and thought it had some healing aspects, but it's focused on optimizing it. I'm wondering if for example people with head trauma would find this name appealing. Brain Optimizer seeks to cause the brain to be healed to whatever degree is helpful, necessary and possible. It isn't aimed at people who have brain trauma, because healing isn't the focus of the program, and therefore hyping this aspect for people who have major healing requirements doesn't seem to make sense. If you're interested in major brain healing then BROP would be less good than OPH v2. MLS will have BROP, but why would that make the healing module in BROP heal the brain faster? On the contrary, the script of MLS is very long and complex, and I would expect that to distract from the healing focus and make it slightly slower. Quote:Quote:I was surprised when I read that your resources are limited. I assumed that with the new technology business was booming, but I guess "believing" in subs is still a high barrier. One of the big ones is, I want to finish developing the tech for overcoming resistance. I thought I was done with that when I published 6G, but there have been discoveries in that direction since then. I believe I am about finished, but it's not done yet. Another is that I was planning to try to do clinical double blind trials. Quote:IMO, believing that you will only have one chance to do it right is limiting you. It's not how things work, it will depend only on how you structure your deal. Alright, then here's what we'll do. If you're still interested and willing, let Ben know that I'd like you to be able to communicate directly with me via our normal channels of internal communication. Thank you for your interest in helping. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol.9 - Frosted - 01-01-2026 (01-01-2026, 02:58 PM)Shannon Wrote:(12-31-2025, 02:45 PM)Frosted Wrote: @Shannon For PTSDRA I want to try CPTSD instructions to see how they affect me compared to the regular ones. Should I wait until I finish this run through, or is it okay to switch now for a bit and then decide which one to continue with? Okay thank you for the reply. ION, excited to see that AM7 is taking focus! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol.9 - GreekGod22 - 01-02-2026 (01-01-2026, 03:03 PM)Shannon Wrote:Would it also be superior if one has run the latest OGSF already and wants to run E7 soon?(12-18-2025, 09:58 AM)StridingStrider Wrote: Shannon, I’m considering either E7 or PRA as my next sub. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol.9 - Shannon - 01-03-2026 (01-02-2026, 12:53 AM)GreekGod22 Wrote:(01-01-2026, 03:03 PM)Shannon Wrote: PRA has EHPRA and OGSF. Thus, it will be doing more, in more ways and in more directions. OGSF will enable EHPRA and vice versa. So I fully expect that it would be superior to EHPRA by itself.Would it also be superior if one has run the latest OGSF already and wants to run E7 soon? PRA is a gift, because it includes multiple titles in one and the price did not go up. PRA v2 (not due out any time soon, by the way) looks like it's going to have so many different titles in it that it will not be reasonable for me to keep that price point. PRA also includes E7 and OGSF. Having run OGSF does not mean that that is the focus while running E7. In E7 it will focus you on the script of EHPRA, and in PRA you will get the focus on both of them. PRA is still superior. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol.9 - ncbeareatingman - 01-03-2026 PRA v2 (not due out any time soon, by the way) looks like it's going to have so many different titles in it that it will not be reasonable for me to keep that price point. WTH ? Theres going to be another version of PRA as in PRA v2? Holy smokes Man! Many different titles in it? Huh? Stunned. I Know that will be awhile in coming forth, but dang.... what a program to be !! |