Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 04-02-2016 (03-25-2016, 12:15 AM)Shannon Wrote:(03-24-2016, 07:27 PM)Nox Wrote: Will the new max healing speed be like the other programs in that longer duration use (3-6 months) will result in a permanent state, and only need occasional refreshers? I could definitely see that being my next subliminal after EHPRA 2.0 if that's the case. With this being an "as needed" sub and your mention of it being awesome for combining with EHPRA 2.0, will we be able to use it for as needed issues while not having to delay or discontinue EHPRA 2.0 use? Obviously we can't use them together and have them playing simultaneously, but turning on the MHS for a few hours a day while not having to stop nightly usage of EHPRA 2.0 would be amazing. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 04-02-2016 What are the pros & cons of building a subliminal that is heavily focused on external changes/manifesting ? Like if you build a subliminal, lets call it Luxurious Lifestyles and it focuses on attracting friends that are wealthy & fun-loving, attracting wealth in superabundance, attracting compliments on your success, attracting a successful business etc..(external changes). If a sub is focused on that what are the pros & cons ? I know that sometimes, attracting things to you can take up a lot of energy in a person. So a sub created to attract only cannot exist because it would use up too much energy in a person ? What are the pros & cons ? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 04-02-2016 (04-01-2016, 12:58 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: Shannon my ears are ringing with a very high almost indiscernable high pitch and my hearing is muffled. This happened after I cleaned my ears, I think the sound of me cleaning my ears triggered this and its from subs. Should I quit listening or switch to US only? I lowered the volume a bit a week ago and that seemed to help but I don't think listening to TS at any volume will help, save for levels that would diminish results greatly. If you are using masked subs, there is no possible way to get those effects shy of using them at a hugely obviously overly loud volume. Ultrasonics may have something to do with tinnitus, but I'm only sure right now that it's correlated to listening at very high volumes that nobody would normally use unless they were crazy. I would say switch to masked only for a while, if you're still having this problem, and see what happens. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 04-02-2016 (04-02-2016, 07:29 AM)Nox Wrote:(03-25-2016, 12:15 AM)Shannon Wrote:(03-24-2016, 07:27 PM)Nox Wrote: Will the new max healing speed be like the other programs in that longer duration use (3-6 months) will result in a permanent state, and only need occasional refreshers? I could definitely see that being my next subliminal after EHPRA 2.0 if that's the case. I am not sure what the answer to that question is right now. I haven't been able to test for that yet because I am not finished developing it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 04-02-2016 (04-02-2016, 01:07 PM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: What are the pros & cons of building a subliminal that is heavily focused on external changes/manifesting ? Like if you build a subliminal, lets call it Luxurious Lifestyles and it focuses on attracting friends that are wealthy & fun-loving, attracting wealth in superabundance, attracting compliments on your success, attracting a successful business etc..(external changes). If a sub is focused on that what are the pros & cons ? I am not sure I understand your question, but I'll try to answer. A manifestation sub is limited by the amount of energy that it can be fed by, and that is limited by the amount of energy you can consciously and/or subconsciously control and direct, no matter what the source is. Given these limits, there will never be a sub that can "focuses on attracting friends that are wealthy & fun-loving, attracting wealth in superabundance, attracting compliments on your success, attracting a successful business etc." all at once and make it happen quickly. You're talking about huge changes to yourself and your life and lifestyle. The change must be equal to or less than the energy given to do the work (make the change). That's a basic fact of reality. You cannot get more return than you put energy in to achieve the return. The pros and cons - well, pros are that you can do more with an active manifestation and it is more powerful and faster acting. The cons are that it is still not guaranteed to work - although they should be much more likely to work - and you are still limited by how much energy would be required to achieve the goal. There are two factors: energy and time. So we can express it like this: Speed and certainty is equal to energy over time. SC = E/T If we need a million units of energy to achieve the goal, then we can only achieve that goal if we expend at least 1 million units of energy focused on achieving that goal. If the energy source can supply that energy all at once, you can theoretically expend it all, all at once, and immediately and absolutely manifest your goal. But, realistically, the energy, every single unit, must be controlled, focused and directed. This is limited by how much you can control, focus and direct per unit of time. So if you can control, focus and direct 200 units of energy per unit of time, then you will need at least 1,000,000/200 units of time to achieve the goal. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SouthPaw - 04-02-2016 Shannon this is how I listen to masked. The first while touching the speaker and the second is from where I listen. Is this good, safe and effective? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - "Q" - 04-03-2016 Incorporating 'unconditional love' in all future releases! It seems like most of us here are well-clued-up about the importance of love for the effectiveness of the subs and life in general, From what has been written and communicated about love in the history of mankind, it seems like love is the real 'biggie', the ultimate secret, the be-all and end-all! So, wouldn't it be a good thing to include an element of unconditional love in any and all future releases (if it is not already included) to supplement or drive it? Imagine how smooth the sub journey would be if it were included! Imagine how "loving" the manifestation process would be, or the healing process. Imagine how love could positively help with the core three issues that people seem to be concerned with - health, wealth and romantic-love RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Lowe - 04-03-2016 Do you measure loudness at the source, or from where you are sitting when listening? That is the only explanation I can think of. Perhaps you should go see a doctor to be sure of what is happening. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 04-03-2016 (04-03-2016, 03:36 AM)FrostedFake Wrote: Shannon I want to believe you but it can't be anything else it has to be the subs. I don't have it super loud just as loud as laptop speakers from 2006 can go. Like I said its -55db max I might post a frequency picture if I can. I can't say as I have an easy time believing it would be -55 dB at max for laptop speakers. My laptop can blow my ears out. I can achieve + dB values with it using ultrasonics. But as I say, if you use masked, then it cannot be the masked subs any more than it would be the sound of your experience walking down the street, driving or doing anything else. Only ultrasonics have the potential for giving tinnitus, unless you can somehow prove me wrong - and I seriously doubt that. Try using the ultrasonics atound -65 at your point of listening. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 04-03-2016 Shannon, is it fine for me to listen to isochronic tones/binaural beats while I listen to EPRHA 2.0? Do I need to limit how often or long I do it? I wanted to do an isochronic tone root chakra meditation, but only if it didn't interfere with the sub. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 04-03-2016 (04-03-2016, 05:28 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Shannon, is it fine for me to listen to isochronic tones/binaural beats while I listen to EPRHA 2.0? Do I need to limit how often or long I do it? Isochronic tones and binaural beats are a form of state shifting. If you use them with the program, there will be a clash of what the brain is being instructed to do, and at best, this will wither neutralize both or cause major confusion. Definitely don't do it. Either turn EHPRA 2.0 off for a half hour, use the tones/beats, and then turn it back on, or pick one. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 04-03-2016 @FrostedFake: Yeah man, I used to listen to masked subliminals with speakers on either side of my bed, very low volume and for whatever reason when I woke up in the night might ears would ring momentarily. Even happened with the ultrasonics (although perhaps not as suprising). Bottom line, when you use the ultrasonics you can put them at a loooooow volume on your phone/ipod/whatever and you'll still get benefits. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Natious - 04-04-2016 Measured the loudness of ultrasonic at it was at -55dB, is that still within the safe range? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Vincent_Vega - 04-04-2016 (04-01-2016, 07:57 AM)Vincent_Vega Wrote: Shannon, may you answer this question? Push |