![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Theron - 06-23-2018 My first attempt at 6 loops today and my brain was actually hurting by the end of loop 5. and I was feeling nausea. Not sure if it was resistance or overload by the front part of my head and upper jaw wanted to go outside my head!!! It is also very hard to focus and work when playing the US. Never had this problem till now. I had to stop listening to the loops overnight as it messes very badly with sleep. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Fluffy - 06-23-2018 (06-23-2018, 05:57 AM)thor2014 Wrote: Shannon my latest experiences proves without doubt dmsi in its current creation does work sorry if i doubted you. Because you hugged a woman? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - thor2014 - 06-23-2018 (06-23-2018, 08:34 AM)Fluffy Wrote:(06-23-2018, 05:57 AM)thor2014 Wrote: Shannon my latest experiences proves without doubt dmsi in its current creation does work sorry if i doubted you. Yes and I am seeing her tomorrow night for drinks. A girl that you hardly know wouldn't hug you and offer to come for drinks after the end of her shift. I had only spoken to her previously weeks ago. She even felt my hardon and kept pulling me close in. I got the feeling that she wanted to hug me because she wanted to bath in my sexual energy. That's my theory I might be wrong Shannon or others might have more water tight theories. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Fluffy - 06-23-2018 (06-23-2018, 09:33 AM)thor2014 Wrote:I beg to differ. A promiscuous woman would.(06-23-2018, 08:34 AM)Fluffy Wrote:(06-23-2018, 05:57 AM)thor2014 Wrote: Shannon my latest experiences proves without doubt dmsi in its current creation does work sorry if i doubted you. Cool, here's to many more like this and better ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 06-23-2018 (06-23-2018, 12:33 PM)Fluffy Wrote:(06-23-2018, 09:33 AM)thor2014 Wrote:I beg to differ. A promiscuous woman would.(06-23-2018, 08:34 AM)Fluffy Wrote:(06-23-2018, 05:57 AM)thor2014 Wrote: Shannon my latest experiences proves without doubt dmsi in its current creation does work sorry if i doubted you. Agreed. I've gone from coffee to woman's house in less than an hour. It's possible. And I totally agree: hopefully DMSI makes this more and more common with hotter and hotter girls. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 06-23-2018 (06-21-2018, 07:29 PM)Frosted Wrote: Shannon do you believe an ascendant alpha is an alpha who is enlightened? Can you be enlightened but not alpha? Ascendant alpha is a type of enlightenment, but not the type that is commonly discussed religiously. To be an ascendant alpha, you must know and master yourself. Enlightenment in the religious sense is different in a number of ways. It is possible to be both at once, and it is possible for them to be experienced separately. Enlightenment in the religious or spiritual sense will often produce behaviors that are extremely alpha, but appear to be extremely beta because those observing do not understand what is happening. True enlightenment is among other things a very high degree of self mastery in a broad sense. The higher you go on the scale of understanding, by nature, the fewer people around you will understand what you do. And, as a consequence, they will progressively fail to understand what you do because they do not understand the thoughts, understandings, point of view and beliefs that produced those actions. This is why it is said that "there is a fine line between genius and insanity", because true genius can appear to be insanity to someone who cannot understand the "why" behind the resulting choices and actions. Self mastery is alphaness, in its own sense, and as with anything, the higher you go on the scale, the less the masses will recognize what they are seeing as being what it actually is. So for example, the typical image of the "alpha male" is akin to the silverback gorilla. Big, strong, loud and intimidating physically. But this is actually the lowest form of alpha expression possible. The highest form is so far beyond the need to prove anything to anyone that they go completely unnoticed most of the time, unless they want to be noticed. They may, in fact, appear to be betas to those who only understand the silverback style of alpha. To most people, they will simply appear to be lone wolves or relatively nondescript. The only thing that gives them away, usually, is the fact that they do as they please and believe what they do regardless of what others think or say or do. And even that may not be obvious at first glance. The highest levels of alpha never say that they are alpha. They never do the things that everyone is looking for in a "silverback alpha type". They have mastered themselves to a degree that they do not need that sort of display or recognition because they do not have the insecurities that drive it. Zen alpha is a good way to put it. Some of the greatest and most recognized names in history who taught peace were this type of alpha. And many people consider them "enlightened" in the religious and/or spiritual sense. It is possible to achieve a state where "alpha" and "beta" and "sigma" and all the rest cease to apply because the person either has transcended labels or because they have become so highly evolved within themselves that they become something beyond that. There is no competition for the highest levels of alpha, because they simply decline to compete. They don't need to; they have what they need and want regardless. Hope that helps explain it a bit. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 06-23-2018 (06-21-2018, 10:04 PM)Nox Wrote:(06-21-2018, 07:29 PM)Frosted Wrote: Shannon do you believe an ascendant alpha is an alpha who is enlightened? Can you be enlightened but not alpha? Which logically and by definition means they have something to do with one another. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 06-23-2018 (06-22-2018, 05:16 AM)Fluffy Wrote: So.. 2 days of 7 loops of A and I feel like I have had enough lol. I went out to get some food at the super market and I actually noticed less IOI than before which made me feel like all this is silly looking to see if DMSI is doing anything, felt like looking for validation and I do not want to be that guy. What you are experiencing is the result of "going to boot camp". It takes a lot more energy, and it requires a lot more, faster and deeper processing of the H&C script. That's why you feel the way you do. And your response seems to be a very subtle subconscious effort to get you to stop by telling you that Quote:I feel silly for even thinking this will even make a difference, as if women will magically seduce me. I believe the reason 3.1 was good was because it had "Meet them half way", I felt that it made a lot of difference. Waiting to be seduced 100% seems kinda needy and very passive, I know others will disagree as it is not what DMSI is about, but I feel DMSI is programming that mindset into me and it don't feel productive on the seduction side. In other words, it is now clashing directly with your subconscious belief that has held you back from true success so far, which boils down to "man must hunt!". You are defining it as "man must hunt, or he is not a man!", and that leads to the convenient excuse that "Waiting to be seduced 100% seems kinda needy and very passive". Casting it in a negative light. An excuse to stop. Now the problem with your excuse, here, is that nowhere in DMSI do I tell you to be passive in seduction, stop trying to approach or seduce them, or anything along those lines. Your passivity is YOUR CHOICE, and has nothing to do with DMSI. It's designed to give you maximum freedom and diversity of choice and action. Seduce when you like, and let them come to you when you like. In other words, your excuse is, to put it simply, bullshit. Your subconscious wants you to stop using it because it's clashing with previously accepted beliefs and definitions about what and who you are, basically making you the prize that is hunted and competed for instead of being the "man" who does the hunting and competition. But it is false to say that DMSI is stopping you from hunting or seducing. That's your subconscious looking for an excuse - any excuse - to get you to stop. You will have to understand that a man hunts and seduces because he must. But a high value man only hunts and seduces if and when he wants to - because it is fun, not because he must. This boils down to your subconscious knows DMSI is going to win if you keep going. It's afraid, so it's trying to find ways and reasons to convince you to stop. I told you this would happen. Long time ago, before I released 3.2. Guys would start finding really creative and valid sounding "reasons" to stop. The truth is, it's an effort to resist by escape. In other words, it's working. So I suggest you keep going with 7 loops. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Zane - 06-23-2018 Shannon u should save every post u post here.. On Notepad or something.. You could compile a book and earn a fortune... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 06-23-2018 (06-22-2018, 10:16 AM)maxx55 Wrote: So Shannon, just talking specifically about the anti-resistance tech and measures that will be in place in "DMSI final", will there any upgrades between the "3.x final" and 4.x line? I'm not even sure there will be a 4.x line yet, and if there is, I am fully planning for 4.0 to be the "end of the line" for DMSI development. If there is a 4.x line, as you put it, then of course there will be upgrades. Otherwise, how could I consider it a new version number? Quote:Pretty much, if the "final" version for the 3.x line doesn't work for someone, is there any chance the 4.x line would? And for those people are you still going to charge them? If 3.4 doesn't work for someone and a 4.0 is created, it is very likely that it will work for them. And I haven't really set in stone how I would work charging for the hypothetical version 4.0 yet. I of course want to make it fair. So while I am developing to the last version I am contemplating how to do this. I don't have it worked out just yet. Quote:I've had some dreams since being on 3.2A like the ones other members posted about a few pages earlier, but that's it. No noticeable depression. Maybe playing video games more (while still being productive, but not max productive). I just don't want to have invested so much time into this program and not get the results. How many loops are you using? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 06-23-2018 (06-23-2018, 03:11 AM)stefioan Wrote: @Shannon I am sharing and tagging you as this might be useful for you. That is likely a measure of when your subconscious was "very busy processing" the subconscious instructions and trying to execute them enough to focus on something else more than reading. Thanks for the info. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 06-23-2018 (06-23-2018, 04:25 AM)Williamx25 Wrote: @Shannon Lucid dreaming is not going to interfere with the program unless you are directing your dreams to contradict the instructions it is giving you. It is also done while you sleep, meaning that interrupting state shifting from the program isn't a concern. Quote:I also practiced Astral Projection. Not a concern. Quote: Also a mind shifting state... Can I still practice this or should I completely stop and wait until the program is over? I did not achieved a lucid dream or astral projection during the program. But I was practicing it before I started this program on monday june 18th. State shifting while conscious should be avoided while you are in a situation in which the instruction set can or otherwise would be executing. Quote:Could somebody give me advice? Shannon perhaps? I quit meditating because of the mind shifting thing I want to follow the exact instructions. No substance abuse, no cigarettes, no alcohol, just me and my program. 1 loop per day. We have opened it up to whatever number of loops per day you like. The result is that many have found that 6-7 loops a day is much better for them in breaking through their resistance. One loop per day is what the models gave me as being best because it is a significantly powerful program, and not everyone will be able to handle, or needs, more than that. For the general populace, 1-2 loops should suffice. For the rest, most of you here for example, 1-2 loops a day is going to be what you use to prepare yourself to be ready for more loops. Most people here are here because they're exceptions to the general populace in some way; not getting the results they want, or not getting all the results yet. It skews the way things look, but you guys are not the general populace. So don't get the idea that the models were wrong; they're giving me data for the majority and over long periods of time to give me an accurate view of the Big Picture. You guys tend strongly to be outliers, not the "average person". So feel free to try upping your loops one per week until you start seeing changes. And keep in mind, sometimes the first signs of success are a very strong desire to quit, and/or a very clever "argument" as to why you should. Don't. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 06-23-2018 (06-23-2018, 05:38 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: @Shannon What number of loops is effective depends on the person. The majority will see best results at 1-2 loops a day. But you guys usually are not part of "the majority". You guys who post here are usually part of the outliers group, who are coming back to post because you aren't getting the results and you want to understand why and know what to do about it. Jumping straight to ~7 loops a day/etc. would be rather a shock to the average person, even a resistant person, because they would have either never been exposed before or because they weren't prepared for it. So starting at 1 loop and working your way up as necessary is still a good idea. This does not help me improve 3.3+, really. The things that I was planning to do to lower this value for everyone are still going to be done. This really only gives me an idea how much I need to reduce it at this time for those of you who are unusually resistant. Quote:I feel from what im reading in the journals, that track A and track B seem to be providing the same effects/results is that the case and thus is there a need to have 2 tracks going forward? I do not get anything like that from reading the journals. I see a clear and obvious distinction and I see that each has it's strengths, and both are beneficial, especially when used correctly and in concert. Until and unless I see otherwise, we will have A and B sides. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 06-23-2018 (06-23-2018, 05:57 AM)thor2014 Wrote: Shannon my latest experiences proves without doubt dmsi in its current creation does work sorry if i doubted you. You need not apologize, everyone doubts me. And only with proof do we come to change that doubt into acceptance. So keep proving it to yourself, and I will keep working to make it more obvious in how well it works. Doubting me does not hurt me. Skepticism, reasonable skepticism, is a good thing. It's when you shut your mind down so hard that nothing can persuade you to change, that is not so good. |