![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-22-2016 (03-22-2016, 01:29 AM)Benjamin Wrote:Quote:I recently thought this girl was into me. She was suggesting we do things together and hangout with me. Constantly asking my preferences about sex. I once had a "friend" of mine with whom I worked, tell me that a rather lovely woman with whom we both worked was his girlfriend when he noticed me admiring her as she walked by one day. Because of that, I dropped it, figuring there was no place for me to advance. Two years later, I get a phone call from her, and during that conversation, she reveals to me that she never dated him, nor did he ever even ask her out. We quickly started dating, and had a 4 year relationship. Cockblock indeed. Let her tell you she's not interested... and taken. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-22-2016 (03-22-2016, 02:28 AM)AlphaReal Wrote: Shannon... more like guide the user to rewrite the past in a strictly positive light and see it for what it is, a learning about oneself and toughening experience. There is value in it afterall that way. That is something to think about. The actual implementation, however, is a bit tricky. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ffaux - 03-22-2016 Would MHS help with things like a ruptured disk that sometimes "magically" heal by the body itself but doesn't have a known fix or path to rehabilitation/recovery otherwise? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - zudoshichi - 03-22-2016 (03-21-2016, 07:32 PM)Shannon Wrote:(03-21-2016, 12:36 PM)Jakeb203 Wrote: Hey Shannon, Since 6G technology will be so advanced according to the description, I guess BASE will be rebuilt as well? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 03-22-2016 Shannon, this is such an early question, but I'll ask anyway. After I finish E2 and I completely self-generate that thought process, would it be to my advantage to run ASC 6G before doing multiple AM6 runs (assuming AM7 isn't out by then, it is I'll do AM7 instead) OR would it best to just go straight to AM6/AM7? I'm enjoying the results of taking your recommendation to do E2 (I'll post more in detail later this week), so I'm asking for another recommendation. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 03-22-2016 (03-22-2016, 01:29 AM)Benjamin Wrote:Quote:I recently thought this girl was into me. She was suggesting we do things together and hangout with me. Constantly asking my preferences about sex. yeah seriously wtf lol what a twat RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-22-2016 (03-22-2016, 03:46 AM)ffaux Wrote: Would MHS help with things like a ruptured disk that sometimes "magically" heal by the body itself but doesn't have a known fix or path to rehabilitation/recovery otherwise? I can't know what it will help with ahead of time. That information will only come from observing the results of use by many people. People are a complex dynamic system, and every one is different mentally, physically, emotionally, etc. While I am pretty good now with self optimizing polymorphic and self amplifying scripting, I am neither a medical doctor nor an expert in the physiology of the body. What I can say is this. If there is a way for the self to heal it, the program will be designed to cause that response from the self - if the self is accepting and executing the script. Beyond that... we shall see. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-22-2016 (03-22-2016, 05:25 AM)zudoshichi Wrote:(03-21-2016, 07:32 PM)Shannon Wrote:(03-21-2016, 12:36 PM)Jakeb203 Wrote: Hey Shannon, 6G is extremely advanced. So advanced, in fact, that the resultant necessity for comparable complexity means that it will not be, nor will it be possible to, use it to rebuild everything, or to rebuild things "just because". It currently takes me 1-2 months to build a single stage 5.5G program. Compare that to typically a few days with 5G. Now consider that 5.5G uses 5 backport 6G technologies, and 6G has an array of 42+ of them. I haven't even finished counting them, that's just how many I have documented so far. There are likely to be well over twice that number when I finish the documentation process. So the question is, "Does BASE really need to be re-built? Or is it doing the job already?" So far I don't see a critical need to rebuild it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-22-2016 (03-22-2016, 12:27 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Shannon, this is such an early question, but I'll ask anyway. After I finish E2 and I completely self-generate that thought process, would it be to my advantage to run ASC 6G before doing multiple AM6 runs (assuming AM7 isn't out by then, it is I'll do AM7 instead) OR would it best to just go straight to AM6/AM7? I can't know how long it will take to build ASC 6G, or AM7. Or what other programs I will be building in between. I am hoping to build MHS 5.5G and then build Breast Enlargement in 5.5 or 6G, while building ASC in 6G and using the knowledge I gain from doing so in BE. That said... I suggest that if ASC 6G is out when you finish E2, try it for a bit. If not, well, AM6 is six months and then you can re-assess. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 03-24-2016 I hope, when it's eventually built, DAOS + BIATBWS will be like Life Tune Up having several different modules in it. Like modules for sex appeal, sexual confidence, raw animal magnetism, attractiveness, health, aura/energy of gorgeous good-looks, aura of the rawest sexuality, self-esteem, rate yourself a 20 out of 10, self-esteem/self-respect, be a high quality man etc....The Best you can up with. That will be so worthwhile, it would rock ! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 03-24-2016 Hey Shannon, since EPRHA 2.0 has the C/SAM (I think that's it) tech in it, can we run it for more than 21 hours? In my experience, it's best to run it as much as possible. I have yet to exceed 21 hours though. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Nox - 03-24-2016 Will the new max healing speed be like the other programs in that longer duration use (3-6 months) will result in a permanent state, and only need occasional refreshers? I could definitely see that being my next subliminal after EHPRA 2.0 if that's the case. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-25-2016 (03-24-2016, 11:52 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: I hope, when it's eventually built, DAOS + BIATBWS will be like Life Tune Up having several different modules in it. Like modules for sex appeal, sexual confidence, raw animal magnetism, attractiveness, health, aura/energy of gorgeous good-looks, aura of the rawest sexuality, self-esteem, rate yourself a 20 out of 10, self-esteem/self-respect, be a high quality man etc....The Best you can up with. That will be so worthwhile, it would rock ! When the time comes, we shall see. But this is not high on my list of priorities right now. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 03-25-2016 (03-24-2016, 01:14 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Hey Shannon, since EPRHA 2.0 has the C/SAM (I think that's it) tech in it, can we run it for more than 21 hours? In my experience, it's best to run it as much as possible. I have yet to exceed 21 hours though. C/SMA - Conscious/Subconscious Mind Alignment Technology. When you sleep, the conscious mind shuts down. CSMA does not work without a conscious mind to align with and to. But other modules ensure that the results remain effective while you sleep. You can theoretically run EHPRA 2.0 for 24 hours a day if you can handle it, since it has 20:2 ratio of audio to silence. I would consider such intensive usage experimental though. 21 hours a day is a good max. |