(09-30-2015, 08:06 PM)dissonance Wrote: Hey Shannon, how do you know that the phrases in the subliminals aren't being sped up too fast? I'm sure you know what samples are and sample rate etc. I'm imagining that there comes a point where if it is fast enough, the words would be squeezed into fewer samples, and then eventually the phrases would become incoherent, because they are "blocky". What I mean is like pretend you squeeze a digital image smaller and smaller, it will eventually become proportionally incomprehensible if you zoom in on the image to view it (like the subconscious would to "hear" the sped-up phrases in subs), because pixels can only be so small. Do you know what I mean by all this?

(09-30-2015, 08:06 PM)dissonance Wrote: Hey Shannon, how do you know that the phrases in the subliminals aren't being sped up too fast? I'm sure you know what samples are and sample rate etc. I'm imagining that there comes a point where if it is fast enough, the words would be squeezed into fewer samples, and then eventually the phrases would become incoherent, because they are "blocky". What I mean is like pretend you squeeze a digital image smaller and smaller, it will eventually become proportionally incomprehensible if you zoom in on the image to view it (like the subconscious would to "hear" the sped-up phrases in subs), because pixels can only be so small. Do you know what I mean by all this?

(09-30-2015, 11:20 PM)CatMan Wrote:

(09-30-2015, 08:06 PM)dissonance Wrote: Hey Shannon, how do you know that the phrases in the subliminals aren't being sped up too fast? I'm sure you know what samples are and sample rate etc. I'm imagining that there comes a point where if it is fast enough, the words would be squeezed into fewer samples, and then eventually the phrases would become incoherent, because they are "blocky". What I mean is like pretend you squeeze a digital image smaller and smaller, it will eventually become proportionally incomprehensible if you zoom in on the image to view it (like the subconscious would to "hear" the sped-up phrases in subs), because pixels can only be so small. Do you know what I mean by all this?

The subs are tested with predictive models beforehand. So, if that was true, the testing would make it obvious that it's too much data, too fast to process accurately and would result in poor results. I wouldn't worry about such a thing in this case .

(09-30-2015, 04:16 AM)CatMan Wrote: I really hope he doesn't put some limiter or whatever on it, making it silent for a portion of the track. If it's so powerful and that exhausting, the people who go against the rules will do it once, then realise it's stupid and stop. I don't like the idea of listening to my sub and being as diligent as I am, only to be inadvertently listening to silence the whole time. Not cool. Let us ration our listening time ourselves, we're all adults.

(09-30-2015, 04:16 AM)CatMan Wrote: Bring on SM4 lol. I seem to need it.

(09-30-2015, 01:04 PM)waahbeta Wrote: 6G more sounds at accomplishing PE which the earlier versions couldn't (although they did but with expections). So cheers for the guys who wanted it.
Height Gain is what I am expecting right since I ve read about the not so limitations of 6G. Let's see if it actually is one of 6Gs

(10-01-2015, 02:59 PM)Broski Wrote: Shannon, have you done any testing with 6G on people with extremely stubborn and resistant personality types? Im curious with how powerful 6G is sounding if it is able to overcome even the most resilient of individuals.

(10-02-2015, 12:53 AM)Achiever Wrote: 1.Shannon,how much time until you start producing the 6-stagers? The magnets? Will you first build the Alpha set, or the Magnets?

2.From what you say I conclude 6G will be incredibly efficient in overcoming resistance and being long term programming.Is that so? 3 hours maximum listening a day? That must be powerful,many,many times more powerful than 5G .