Subliminal Talk

(11-02-2016, 03:53 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-02-2016, 03:46 PM)Blink Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-02-2016, 03:11 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-02-2016, 02:08 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]Also, hatred is not the strong absence of love, but the strong presence of hatred.

I was actually about to chime in and say the same thing. Hate and love are two manifestations of the same energy, just vibrating at different wavelengths (if you want to visualize it and can't understand the abstract). Both love and hatred involve an intense emotional investment in the entity of interest. The absence of love is apathy.

The question that no one wants to answer or confront is why women respond stronger sexually (regardless of whether they want a long-term relationship or a one time fling) to the dark, "hate" energy than to the much more positive love energy.

Sarge and I don't agree on everything, but he's definitely not off or wrong about this.

If you consider that love and hatred are exactly opposite things, and if they actually are the manifestations of the same energy, I think the 2 statements would be equivalent.

But imagine a man speaking and acting with full passion towards something. Wouldn't you say that's an attractive trait? Maybe it's rare to find, and I'm not actually implying that when I ask the question, so just wondering. But it makes sense to me. The thing is, I think hatred is more accessible and easier to generate, whether it's because as a society we've made it so, or because it's the path of the less resistance, I'm not sure.

I think it may be because it shows that, on some level, you care. Indifference (as Duke mentioned) is the worst thing (results-wise) you can "be" towards someone else.

The intensity of hatred shows how much you care, and why I think hatred works better than love is because love is what most people inhabit when trying for approval.

Man, that's not love.

(11-02-2016, 03:58 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-02-2016, 03:53 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-02-2016, 03:46 PM)Blink Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-02-2016, 03:11 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-02-2016, 02:08 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]Also, hatred is not the strong absence of love, but the strong presence of hatred.

I was actually about to chime in and say the same thing. Hate and love are two manifestations of the same energy, just vibrating at different wavelengths (if you want to visualize it and can't understand the abstract). Both love and hatred involve an intense emotional investment in the entity of interest. The absence of love is apathy.

The question that no one wants to answer or confront is why women respond stronger sexually (regardless of whether they want a long-term relationship or a one time fling) to the dark, "hate" energy than to the much more positive love energy.

Sarge and I don't agree on everything, but he's definitely not off or wrong about this.

If you consider that love and hatred are exactly opposite things, and if they actually are the manifestations of the same energy, I think the 2 statements would be equivalent.

But imagine a man speaking and acting with full passion towards something. Wouldn't you say that's an attractive trait? Maybe it's rare to find, and I'm not actually implying that when I ask the question, so just wondering. But it makes sense to me. The thing is, I think hatred is more accessible and easier to generate, whether it's because as a society we've made it so, or because it's the path of the less resistance, I'm not sure.

I think it may be because it shows that, on some level, you care. Indifference (as Duke mentioned) is the worst thing (results-wise) you can "be" towards someone else.

The intensity of hatred shows how much you care, and why I think hatred works better than love is because love is what most people inhabit when trying for approval.

Man, that's not love.

I'm not going to argue with you on this stuff RT. It's obvious we have different perspectives.

If love is caring for people, wanting them to succeed, and helping them and supporting them, then that is what I was talking about. It doesn't work for me.

However, if that's not your definition of love, it might be helpful if you shared.

What we call love is sometimes not love, that's what RTBoss said I think. For example one of my Ex thought love was jealousy which mean that if I wasn't jealous of her sleeping around it meant that I wasn't in love with her.
For some love is the fear of losing someone, for some it is approval seeking which is not love either.
Which means someone may seems to care for you but it's not love, it may be because that person has no one else in her life so she cares for you.

There is a law/theory that I learn not long ago that says you become what you hate/love. The focus is so important that your consciousness adapt to this object you think about day and night.
So regardless of the means (hatred/love) in the big scheme behind life the result is the same.

After 2 days of running V2.5 I already see more attraction than 2.4. I went to a party last night and a random girl came up to me wanting to take a selfie to put on her story...This was really random and I don't think it's ever happened before. She kept looking at me and smiling all night, but she really wasn't attractive at all...just my luck because she was REALLY attracted. Other than that more smiles and IOI's than 2.4, but I haven't felt as confident and carefree as 2.4 either, but I just started running 2.5, so maybe that will change.

I have been running DMSI V2.5 for the past few days and hear is what I've noticed.

• The flow state is great. I feel witter than on any other version and I'm in a good mood for the most part, as well as in an almost a meditative state sometimes when talking to people and going about my day. 2.5 is smooth. I felt like 2.4 was before, but this is different. V2.4 would be about 6/10 on flow state and V2.5 8.5/10.

•Mentally I feel a little less confident or I ruminate more about things on 2.5 than 2.4, typically when alone. I've felt pretty confident in public though, It's just when I have time to think that I've been overthinking things.

• I was seeing more reactions on 2.4 right before I stopped and started using 2.5, but I still think It's amazing how fast I started seeing reactions on 2.5 and how frequent they are becoming. I'm getting eye fucked by a lot of girls, where they smile and their eyes sort of glow. I like this! For example, the girl I buy cigarettes from at the gas station will comment on healthiness of them and I always flirt with her. She tends to give me these eyes the most

• Men are still being respectful like on all the versions and go out of their way to help me.

I don't know what to think about the sniper. Idk if this qualifies, but I had a girl sit next to me in a lecture hall at school the other day and we started talking to each other.

It's a huge hall and I was the only person in my row, seated in the middle, and she sat right beside me. She even initiated and said hi. We talked and I flirted with her, before the speaker showed up and I asked her what made her want to sit next to a guy like me. She said "you seemed mysterious and peaked my interest".

After the lecture, She ended up asking for my # and I gave it to her. This wasn't the first time, but It's the first time a girl approached me and got mine. The other time I approached the girl and then she got my # from a friend when I was wearing pheromones... So maybe DMSI works even better than those. I think it has a shot in future versions based off what I have seen in my trials.

And just to be clear I haven't used pheromones on DMSI V2.5. I ran out of Wolf, awhile back and haven't really had the urge to get more because of this program lol. I do think it might be a deadly combo to test out though. Lastly I'm hyped up for V3, if not for the results it may get me then for the newly added tech. Plus, the ability to test these different versions is fun.