(09-23-2019, 08:33 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2019, 08:26 AM)Have at ye Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2019, 08:23 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2019, 08:19 AM)Have at ye Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah, that's not the same. It's supposed to avoid people who are in relationships of importance to them from being *targeted*. So affected. It won't stop your subc from executing the aura and snipers on people other than your wife, should you be sexually interested in them.
What do you suppose "targeted" means? It means that's what the snipers get triggered by and what they fire at.
Huh. I thought it implied it's going to be pre-filtering people who are in committed relationships from being targeted by the user (or something to this extent), not preventing the user who *is* in a committed relationship from attempting to target people who are outside of the bounds of the relationship.
Because that would indeed by something new. 
The program has a targeting system. The targeting system is designed to focus on those people of the genders/sexes/whatever PC ***** they come up with next that you are sexually attracted to. It is also designed to only target those who fit this criteria if they are not in a committed relationship they want to keep. So in a nutshell, an involved/engaged/married person WILL be possible to target if they do not care about being faithful to and keeping their committed relationship, and will NOT be possible to target if they do.
This is exactly how I understood this.
The debacle we have here is whether it's going to prevent RTBoss from targeting other people than his legally married wife, because that's what has me confused.
If I understand correctly DMSI will target anyone the user finds attractive enough. Unless they choose not to because of their relationship. Those checks and balances are for the affected,not for the user.
It will still encourage the user to have sex with those affected. Given the programming and if it works as planned constant temptations from women actively trying it will require some serious will power.
It's like having box of chocolate in your house that you really like and willing yourself never to eat it.
Doesn't really work in the long term.
(09-23-2019, 08:26 AM)Have at ye Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2019, 08:23 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2019, 08:19 AM)Have at ye Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah, that's not the same. It's supposed to avoid people who are in relationships of importance to them from being *targeted*. So affected. It won't stop your subc from executing the aura and snipers on people other than your wife, should you be sexually interested in them.
What do you suppose "targeted" means? It means that's what the snipers get triggered by and what they fire at.
Huh. I thought it implied it's going to be pre-filtering people who are in committed relationships from being targeted by the user (or something to this extent), not preventing the user who *is* in a committed relationship from attempting to target people who are outside of the bounds of the relationship.
Because that would indeed be something new.
That’s how I’ve been reading that. If you use it when you’re in a relationship, it’s an informed choice, and the consequences are on you. The targets didn’t sign on for it so there is some obligation to limit harm to them and their significant others. That about right?
(09-23-2019, 08:37 AM)Have at ye Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2019, 08:33 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2019, 08:26 AM)Have at ye Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2019, 08:23 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2019, 08:19 AM)Have at ye Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah, that's not the same. It's supposed to avoid people who are in relationships of importance to them from being *targeted*. So affected. It won't stop your subc from executing the aura and snipers on people other than your wife, should you be sexually interested in them.
What do you suppose "targeted" means? It means that's what the snipers get triggered by and what they fire at.
Huh. I thought it implied it's going to be pre-filtering people who are in committed relationships from being targeted by the user (or something to this extent), not preventing the user who *is* in a committed relationship from attempting to target people who are outside of the bounds of the relationship.
Because that would indeed by something new.
The program has a targeting system. The targeting system is designed to focus on those people of the genders/sexes/whatever PC ***** they come up with next that you are sexually attracted to. It is also designed to only target those who fit this criteria if they are not in a committed relationship they want to keep. So in a nutshell, an involved/engaged/married person WILL be possible to target if they do not care about being faithful to and keeping their committed relationship, and will NOT be possible to target if they do.
This is exactly how I understood this.
The debacle we have here is whether it's going to prevent RTBoss from targeting other people than his legally married wife, because that's what has me confused.
This is not DMSI for couples. So should he encounter a woman he is attracted to, and who is open for having sex with a married man and disregarding any relationship strictures she may have on her, she will be targeted. What he does with this in the future is up to him. I never said this program was designed for married men. But it will be interesting to see how this plays out.
Lol the title. Good luck RTBoss! Gotta have balls of steel, blue or not, to run this as married man. Shannon might frame it differently tho, but it will be interesting to see how it plays out nevertheless.
Good luck with that! Curious to see how it will work.
Title: Blue Balls, Back & Bigger Than Ever - DMSI 3.3.2 5.75G- RTBoss- thats one helluva title Man. Wow. Bold Muther....som som',all the best man, hope its all on full blasters for ya ,just where ya want it and where it counts.
Im not even planning any time to Use DMSI and yet last night and this morning I experienced some obvious subconscious TID stuff,from several others,that I wasnt even lookin' for nor did I know I'd even encounter. it was so obvious to me! fascinating. Not gonna say never,but MY money's on UMS1 & and especially UMS2. ALL the best Man!
PS: The comedian once said " its been so long for Me,MY balls arent blue, they're maginta!!" Ha!!
(09-23-2019, 10:40 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: [ -> ]Title: Blue Balls, Back & Bigger Than Ever - DMSI 3.3.2 5.75G- RTBoss- thats one helluva title Man. Wow. Bold Muther....som som',all the best man, hope its all on full blasters for ya ,just where ya want it and where it counts.
Im not even planning any time to Use DMSI and yet last night and this morning I experienced some obvious subconscious TID stuff,from several others,that I wasnt even lookin' for nor did I know I'd even encounter. it was so obvious to me! fascinating. Not gonna say never,but MY money's on UMS1 & and especially UMS2. ALL the best Man!
PS: The comedian once said " its been so long for Me,MY balls arent blue, they're maginta!!" Ha!!
You too? I’m getting it left and right, it’s weird. I may run it at some point when I don’t have more important important issues to deal with, but that’s months down the road at best. It seems to be somehow rubbing off on us anyway.
Hi RT,
Nice to see you back posting again. You definitely entertained me with your past journal, and I will be reading this one too.
What happened with USLM4/4.1 for you ? Last I read, you were not in a good place. Did anything improve ? I have not run USLM4.1. I have been running UMS for the past 2 1/2 months and I don't have anything major to report, so I can't say it is working for me.
(09-23-2019, 09:30 PM)Rossignol17 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi RT,
Nice to see you back posting again. You definitely entertained me with your past journal, and I will be reading this one too.
What happened with USLM4/4.1 for you ? Last I read, you were not in a good place. Did anything improve ? I have not run USLM4.1. I have been running UMS for the past 2 1/2 months and I don't have anything major to report, so I can't say it is working for me.
Hi @
Rossignol17,
Thanks for following. Hopefully DMSI this go round will make for an entertaining journal.
USLM 4.1 - much like 4.0 - started off fine. Then, my emotions tanked to the point where I had to stop the program. It wasn't something I could push through to overcome. Life was miserable for me. I don't know if I'm unique in the phenomenon, but I didn't see anyone else talking about it. In fact, we didn't really see anyone talking about 4.0/4.1 at all.
I look forward to trying out USLM 4.2 after another DMSI run. We'll see how that goes.
Sorry to hear UMS hasn't been very effective for you, especially considering others are having decent runs with it.
(09-24-2019, 05:27 AM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2019, 09:30 PM)Rossignol17 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi RT,
Nice to see you back posting again. You definitely entertained me with your past journal, and I will be reading this one too.
What happened with USLM4/4.1 for you ? Last I read, you were not in a good place. Did anything improve ? I have not run USLM4.1. I have been running UMS for the past 2 1/2 months and I don't have anything major to report, so I can't say it is working for me.
Hi @Rossignol17,
Thanks for following. Hopefully DMSI this go round will make for an entertaining journal.
USLM 4.1 - much like 4.0 - started off fine. Then, my emotions tanked to the point where I had to stop the program. It wasn't something I could push through to overcome. Life was miserable for me. I don't know if I'm unique in the phenomenon, but I didn't see anyone else talking about it. In fact, we didn't really see anyone talking about 4.0/4.1 at all.
I look forward to trying out USLM 4.2 after another DMSI run. We'll see how that goes.
Sorry to hear UMS hasn't been very effective for you, especially considering others are having decent runs with it.
I ran USLM4 and posted a few times about it. Unlike the previous version, it was not effective for me and seemed to make me angry and frustrated most of the time. I questioned whether or not it was working for anyone else using it, but I never got any replies.
With UMS, I posted a few questions about it, but the only reply I ever got was from Ben. I kind of lost interest in posting because of lack of results and lack of replies. However, I am still using it and hoping for a breakthrough.
I hope you will have great success with the new DMSI. The title of your thread is great.........really makes me laugh !
Looking forward to reading about your run RT. All the best.
Continuing this on my thread, so we don't junk up Findingme's journal anymore than we already have.
(09-27-2019, 05:38 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ] (09-27-2019, 05:16 AM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ] (09-27-2019, 03:52 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]LOL...damn.
I was literally going to roast him on that.
Oh well.
*Starts playing "Hello darkness...my old friend..."*
Go roast Paul for always calling DMSI "DAMSI."
That one's still available. 
"DAMSI"?! Wow, that's a new take on it.
I remember the "Dimsee" variation, never heard of "DAMSI".
I'm just curious what the acronym stands for with him then...
Damn
All
Members
Should
Imbody
?
Maybe he's making a statement about how we should imbody the script and execute it. Hmm. Interesting, but let's try again, maybe there's a darker meaning...
Then again...I'm reminded of the last time I dug deep into something here LOL, this post is an oldie but a goodie, enjoy bro: https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-What-...9#pid97249
I was thinking...
Develop
A
Mammalian
Sexual
Irritation
(09-27-2019, 06:06 AM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]Continuing this on my thread, so we don't junk up Findingme's journal anymore than we already have.
(09-27-2019, 05:38 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ] (09-27-2019, 05:16 AM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ] (09-27-2019, 03:52 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]LOL...damn.
I was literally going to roast him on that.
Oh well.
*Starts playing "Hello darkness...my old friend..."*
Go roast Paul for always calling DMSI "DAMSI."
That one's still available.
"DAMSI"?! Wow, that's a new take on it.
I remember the "Dimsee" variation, never heard of "DAMSI".
I'm just curious what the acronym stands for with him then...
Damn
All
Members
Should
Imbody
?
Maybe he's making a statement about how we should imbody the script and execute it. Hmm. Interesting, but let's try again, maybe there's a darker meaning...
Then again...I'm reminded of the last time I dug deep into something here LOL, this post is an oldie but a goodie, enjoy bro: https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-What-...9#pid97249
I was thinking...
Develop
A
Mammalian
Sexual
Irritation
Intriguing theory!
Perhaps it could be:
Deciphering
Anything
May
Sum
Insanity
Which is basically what my previous link showed, insanity, LOL:
https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-What-...9#pid97249
Tried to make fun of those kooky tin foil things online.
(seriously though...there's a lot of evidence there in that post about the REAL Benjamin, and his two cronies...check it out before "THEY" take it down)