Shannon's Journal Discussion, Volume 7

[samba99]

Shannon I have a question,
The reason I am asking you this question is because you are the person developing these programs so you know best.

If I am not mistaken, you currently run MM, my question is why do you choose MM over the premium Maverick?

Maverick is designed to make you reach your highest potential, now theoretically speaking if you reach your highest potential in what you currently doing, then it will directly reflect on your bank account, right?

So what is that makes you use MM instead of Maverick? You mentioned that you created Maverick for yourself, but you never reported any results or use of that program yourself. 

I just want to understand your perspective on what to run and how you make the decision. And using your case as an example, why you didnt choose Maverick to reach your highest potential including in areas of building subliminals, over a program like MM.

Thank you for your time

[Shadow2200]

Just to give some feedback on the latest X4A, I’m not getting much direct IOIs other than some confused stares. However very regularly I will notice women nearby:

-Turn slowly red / blush
-Fan themselves and complain about heat
-Sigh
-Use bathroom

Doesn’t result in direct IOIs compared to DMSI, suppose that’s to be expected if it’s just arousing rather than attracting?

One thing that I’ll say is although DMSI is supposed to make you appear more attractive, to me X4 has a much more noticeable effect on my appearance - my skin gets tighter particularly in the face and I look lower body fat. It also seems to burn more fat passively than DMSI.

Also you mentioned an X2 line to come in about a year or something, is that going to be the same but upgraded again or something different? Would you mind sharing a bit more about your intentions behind it or is it secret?

Still trying to decide internally whether to keep running X4 or go with DMSI… it’s tough, they’re both so good in their own ways!

Going to the bathroom, get that alot

[Ampersnd]

Hey Shannon, 

Your response to a previous question sparked another question. 

So in your shoes, I would take a month off of subliminals and then start over at the beginning, and follow the directions for the prescribed course of time.  A month may seem like a long time, but it will take you about that long to let your subconscious recover from the overload and stop running the program in the background.  It is also long enough to clearly see any "bloom" that may happen.

Noticed that "Bloom" is not in the glossary. I'm guessing that bloom refers to some extending and evolving response to the subliminal programming after stopping the input? Like pedaling your bicycle as much as you can, then stopping and allowing the bicycle's momentum to continue on its own.

With that, would you be willing to add 'bloom' to the glossary?

[Lionstrength]

Hey Shannon,

I have a question/experience that Ben mentioned I should post to ask/tell you;

I've been trying to use Anxiety Relief multiple time but when I do I noticed on the 2-3 run (2days 2/ 4 loops playing on 2days off) while I try to sleep I actually start feel myself go into a mild panic attack and can't sleep where I get stomach issues, nausea, trembling(shakes), chills and worries unwanted energy where I cant sleep and I start to worry about random things. Muscle tension this actually has been on/off throughout the year. I just wanted to know if anybody else gets this is apart of becoming "aware" in order to work through or should I drop Anxiety Relief and go for Life Tune Up or another program to help me work through things; I've been in therapy weekly since april to try to figure out emotional health. On side a note I was playing Anxiety Relief the last hour with those symptoms decided to turn off the program and wrote this email and with in 5 mintues already feel less of a "panic attack". Just writing to see what other people. I think I might use stop using it and place it in the subliminal pile that doen't work for me.

This was written during my "panic attack" after a few days I'm relaxed off the anxiety and wanted to ask if you have heard of this before and/or could it be the chemical shift?

[Sky]

edited, might recommend later

[Shannon]

When I said "something else", I was referring to "some other usage pattern".  Just to be absolutely clear, in case there's any misunderstanding.

It took me I think 3 cycles to get far enough past the internal work to start seeing external results, and only after a month and a half was I confidently able to start drawing conclusions based on results.  So give yourself that time off, look for any bloom, and then give yourself enough time to work through whatever you need to work through in order to get the results.  And of course, if in the end you don't see results - we've got your back.  As usual.

Sounds good.
In the service of being clear, is 1 cycle equal to 1 day on, 1 day off (i.e., two days)? The marketing page doesn't specify, so I wanted to be sure.
I'm happy to take any advice on usage patterns, which right now sounds like 30 days away from any subliminal messaging altogether.
To clarify, I was following your previously-stated guideline of increasing loops on a weekly basis, but that might have been too much, too quickly.

When I gave you the instructions to do a shortening of time off and then additive loops per day on, it was because that was my best option.  There are some things I have a very hard time figuring out about how the 5.11G tech affects certain people, and that was the combined best option and best way to know if my direction was correct.  It appears that it is not, so we need to take the other path instead.

Yes, a cycle of MM is 1 day on, 1 day off.  In the above, where I said it took me 3 cycles to get past the internal work, I mis-spoke.  That should have been 3 months.

[Shannon]

Just to give some feedback on the latest X4A, I’m not getting much direct IOIs other than some confused stares. However very regularly I will notice women nearby:

-Turn slowly red / blush
-Fan themselves and complain about heat
-Sigh
-Use bathroom

Doesn’t result in direct IOIs compared to DMSI, suppose that’s to be expected if it’s just arousing rather than attracting?

What you're seeing is what happens when a woman becomes sexually aroused by a stranger at he highest speed she can be without scaring her.  I'll tell you more about the bathroom in a minute.  The confused stares are her expression confusion as to why she would suddenly be so aroused, and by you, when other people in your looks range have not aroused her or have not aroused her like this in the past.  In other words, she's encountered a unicorn, but hasn't yet figured it out.

One thing that I’ll say is although DMSI is supposed to make you appear more attractive, to me X4 has a much more noticeable effect on my appearance - my skin gets tighter particularly in the face and I look lower body fat. It also seems to burn more fat passively than DMSI.

X4A-1511 uses a huge amount of energy.  That is a possible result.

Also you mentioned an X2 line to come in about a year or something, is that going to be the same but upgraded again or something different? Would you mind sharing a bit more about your intentions behind it or is it secret?

X4A-2000 is a new branch of the X4A line, with the script significantly expanded over what is in X4A-1xxx line.  I'm expecting it to be available in 6 to 12 months.  I'm trying to steer it towards achieving more active, direct, overt and blunt responses from those affected, without taking away free will.  

Still trying to decide internally whether to keep running X4 or go with DMSI… it’s tough, they’re both so good in their own ways!

Indeed.  I was having a great time with X4A-1511.  I wish I could keep running it.

EDIT: Almost forgot about the bathroom thing. In my experience, when a woman goes to the bathroom in response to an aphrodisiac, it will be for one of the following reasons:

- She needs to escape in order to prevent herself from doing something she thinks will cause her regret, shame, etc.
- She needs to compose herself to be able to handle the arousal without acting on it.
- She needs to masturbate.

That last one usually is given away because she'll stay in the bathroom longer than normal, and she'll be seemingly unaffected by the previous source of arousal and "reset" after leaving the bathroom.

[Shannon]

Shannon I have a question,
The reason I am asking you this question is because you are the person developing these programs so you know best.

If I am not mistaken, you currently run MM, my question is why do you choose MM over the premium Maverick?

Because at this time, I have a limited amount of resources to spend on a subliminal regarding time, and my most pressing need is to get past some financial hurdles within me, and otherwise.

Maverick is designed to make you reach your highest potential, now theoretically speaking if you reach your highest potential in what you currently doing, then it will directly reflect on your bank account, right?

Sure.  But it's designed to be a long term run, and not directly focused on increasing bank account.

So what is that makes you use MM instead of Maverick? You mentioned that you created Maverick for yourself, but you never reported any results or use of that program yourself.

 

It just so happens that the design of Maverick was set before I knew I would have the specific conditions and restrictions I have, which force my hand as to what I most need to run right now.  Behind the scenes, IML is in a state of major changes taking place, and it's difficult to deal with without having a specific type of focus and help getting past specific issues I am dealing with subconsciously.  MM works better than Maverick for that situation.

I just want to understand your perspective on what to run and how you make the decision. And using your case as an example, why you didnt choose Maverick to reach your highest potential including in areas of building subliminals, over a program like MM.

Thank you for your time

Life likes to throw me curve balls.    We'll get to Maverick.  Right now I need help turning the Titanic and righting the ship.

[Shannon]

Hey Shannon, 

Your response to a previous question sparked another question. 

So in your shoes, I would take a month off of subliminals and then start over at the beginning, and follow the directions for the prescribed course of time.  A month may seem like a long time, but it will take you about that long to let your subconscious recover from the overload and stop running the program in the background.  It is also long enough to clearly see any "bloom" that may happen.

Noticed that "Bloom" is not in the glossary. I'm guessing that bloom refers to some extending and evolving response to the subliminal programming after stopping the input? Like pedaling your bicycle as much as you can, then stopping and allowing the bicycle's momentum to continue on its own.

With that, would you be willing to add 'bloom' to the glossary?

Done.

[Shannon]

Hey Shannon,

I have a question/experience that Ben mentioned I should post to ask/tell you;

I've been trying to use Anxiety Relief multiple time but when I do I noticed on the 2-3 run (2days 2/ 4 loops playing on 2days off) while I try to sleep I actually start feel myself go into a mild panic attack and can't sleep where I get stomach issues, nausea, trembling(shakes), chills and worries unwanted energy where I cant sleep and I start to worry about random things. Muscle tension this actually has been on/off throughout the year. I just wanted to know if anybody else gets this is apart of becoming "aware" in order to work through or should I drop Anxiety Relief and go for Life Tune Up or another program to help me work through things; I've been in therapy weekly since april to try to figure out emotional health. On side a note I was playing Anxiety Relief the last hour with those symptoms decided to turn off the program and wrote this email and with in 5 mintues already feel less of a "panic attack". Just writing to see what other people. I think I might use stop using it and place it in the subliminal pile that doen't work for me.

This was written during my "panic attack" after a few days I'm relaxed off the anxiety and wanted to ask if you have heard of this before and/or could it be the chemical shift?

So to be clear, this result would not be happening if it didn't work for you.  If it didn't work for you, you would be experiencing the same exact thing that listening to silence would result in: no change.  For you to be getting that response, it means the program is doing its job, but the tuning is incompatible with your unique circumstances.  The result is that it is not achieving anxiety relief because of the tuning mismatch.  Normally, if it is used by someone who is within the range it and the usage patterns are tuned for, which is the vast majority of people, it will produce the intended results.  For people with unusual levels of emotional personality component, unusual levels of sensitivity, unusual levels of fear and/or unusual levels of trauma, it may be that the experience is only able to accomplish part of the job it's designed to do based on those usage patterns.

So: let us find the usage patterns that work for you!

First I note that this program's description does not appear to have a volume specified.  For me to be able to help you, I need to know what you're playing it on, if you're using headphones and or earbuds, and what volume settings you're using, along with format you're using (Masked, Ultrasonic or Hybrid).  Then I can find a way to adjust the usage patterns (tuning) for you to get the desired results.

[KingDavid93]

Hi @Shannon

You said the following above:

X4A-2000 is a new branch of the X4A line, with the script significantly expanded over what is in X4A-1xxx line. I'm expecting it to be available in 6 to 12 months. I'm trying to steer it towards achieving more active, direct, overt and blunt responses from those affected, without taking away free will.”

How does that description of it taking on a more active role and achieving more direct, overt and blunt responses differ exactly from DMSI

Or are you perhaps planning on meshing the two together?

Thusly creating the effect that your presence arouses them and they find you irresistibly attractive, etc

[London1]

Maybe a bit of increased hunger and tiredess yea.
But nothing in terms of reactions.
How would I adjust usage pattern if I'm not excecuting?

Okay, so increased hunger and tiredness, but no outward reactions tells me that either you're fighting it, or you're just not seeing what it's doing.  The former seems plausible, since if I recall, you have had trouble with that before using my subs, yes?

The latter comes down to simply being observant enough and knowing what to look for.  Of course it's not hard to see some of the results I have gotten, but even my results take some time to realize what's going on.  If this is the case, then learning body language and training yourself to be more observant may be helpful.  It took me some time and effort, and I got my training because being a photographer demanded it.

As to your wife... it is entirely possible that your wife may experience the effects of it and reject them, or refuse to respond.  My GF responded subconsciously, but consciously denied noticing anything.  She is famous for resisting and shutting down direct exposure (audio) and indirect exposure (auric) subliminal aphrodisiacs. In her case, she does this because the parts of her receiving the input are simply being stubborn.  I have found ways to get past that response, but they're not out of testing stage yet.

Also, a woman you're in a long term relationship with may become rather polar in her responses to you regarding sex and other aspects of the relationship, depending on the personality pair that the two of you represent, how long you've been together and how you have chosen to respond to one another over time.  If she hates you, or holds a grudge, or hates sex, or has traumas regarding sex, or is angry with you, or has developed some sort of negative association to sex with you specifically somehow, etc. she may be resistant to sex with you.  And depending on how strong willed she is, or how high or low her sex drive is in general, this may be sufficient to shut down sex regardless.

But for the time being, I'm pretty sure the issue we most need to deal with is how to get you to execute more freely.  Are you using it according to the instructions exactly?  And, have you noted anything on your days off?

I've decided not to bother with this. I'm going to do what I should be doing. OGSF

[NOMAD]

Just to give some feedback on the latest X4A, I’m not getting much direct IOIs other than some confused stares. However very regularly I will notice women nearby:

-Turn slowly red / blush
-Fan themselves and complain about heat
-Sigh
-Use bathroom

Doesn’t result in direct IOIs compared to DMSI, suppose that’s to be expected if it’s just arousing rather than attracting?

What you're seeing is what happens when a woman becomes sexually aroused by a stranger at he highest speed she can be without scaring her.  I'll tell you more about the bathroom in a minute.  The confused stares are her expression confusion as to why she would suddenly be so aroused, and by you, when other people in your looks range have not aroused her or have not aroused her like this in the past.  In other words, she's encountered a unicorn, but hasn't yet figured it out.

One thing that I’ll say is although DMSI is supposed to make you appear more attractive, to me X4 has a much more noticeable effect on my appearance - my skin gets tighter particularly in the face and I look lower body fat. It also seems to burn more fat passively than DMSI.

X4A-1511 uses a huge amount of energy.  That is a possible result.

Also you mentioned an X2 line to come in about a year or something, is that going to be the same but upgraded again or something different? Would you mind sharing a bit more about your intentions behind it or is it secret?

X4A-2000 is a new branch of the X4A line, with the script significantly expanded over what is in X4A-1xxx line.  I'm expecting it to be available in 6 to 12 months.  I'm trying to steer it towards achieving more active, direct, overt and blunt responses from those affected, without taking away free will.  

Still trying to decide internally whether to keep running X4 or go with DMSI… it’s tough, they’re both so good in their own ways!

Indeed.  I was having a great time with X4A-1511.  I wish I could keep running it.

EDIT: Almost forgot about the bathroom thing.  In my experience, when a woman goes to the bathroom in response to an aphrodisiac, it will be for one of the following reasons:

- She needs to escape in order to prevent herself from doing something she thinks will cause her regret, shame, etc.
- She needs to compose herself to be able to handle the arousal without acting on it.
- She needs to masturbate.

That last one usually is given away because she'll stay in the bathroom longer than normal, and she'll be seemingly unaffected by the previous source of arousal and "reset" after leaving the bathroom.

...or she needs to clean up. Back in my college days, I had a mini-makeout session with my gf of the time. After I gave her that last kiss before class, she said, "Great...now I have to go wipe again." (It was the 2nd time that day.) My wife has made similar comments.

[Shannon]

What you're seeing is what happens when a woman becomes sexually aroused by a stranger at he highest speed she can be without scaring her.  I'll tell you more about the bathroom in a minute.  The confused stares are her expression confusion as to why she would suddenly be so aroused, and by you, when other people in your looks range have not aroused her or have not aroused her like this in the past.  In other words, she's encountered a unicorn, but hasn't yet figured it out.



X4A-1511 uses a huge amount of energy.  That is a possible result.


X4A-2000 is a new branch of the X4A line, with the script significantly expanded over what is in X4A-1xxx line.  I'm expecting it to be available in 6 to 12 months.  I'm trying to steer it towards achieving more active, direct, overt and blunt responses from those affected, without taking away free will.  


Indeed.  I was having a great time with X4A-1511.  I wish I could keep running it.

EDIT: Almost forgot about the bathroom thing.  In my experience, when a woman goes to the bathroom in response to an aphrodisiac, it will be for one of the following reasons:

- She needs to escape in order to prevent herself from doing something she thinks will cause her regret, shame, etc.
- She needs to compose herself to be able to handle the arousal without acting on it.
- She needs to masturbate.

That last one usually is given away because she'll stay in the bathroom longer than normal, and she'll be seemingly unaffected by the previous source of arousal and "reset" after leaving the bathroom.

...or she needs to clean up. Back in my college days, I had a mini-makeout session with my gf of the time. After I gave her that last kiss before class, she said, "Great...now I have to go wipe again." (It was the 2nd time that day.) My wife has made similar comments.

Yes, I forgot that one, didn't I?  Thank you.