Shannon's Journal Discussion, Volume 7

[Shannon]

why is the recommended volume for OGSFv2 so low? I thought 10/16 was the standard.

Alright, you guys, let's get something straight.  I keep seeing people refer to the instructions as "recommendations".  There is a BIG difference between instructions and "recommendations".  The instructions are what you need to do to make it work.  Recommendations are what is suggested for you to do.  Instructions are not a suggestion.  The only time you should not follow the instructions exactly is when either you have the AutoConfig kick in, or I specifically give you instructions that differ for your personal use.  Got it?

Now, as to why the volume is 5/15:

There is no standard.  The volume is what balances the program and your subconscious mind such that they work together.  As we advance in generation, technology and power levels, the volume will trend lower and lower as a result.  As you see the volume go down, you will know the power, impact, effectiveness, etc. is going up.

We've gone from the best volume being 14/15 to 13 to 12 to 10, then to 9, and finally we are getting into the realm of ~5 because 5.11G is pretty insanely powerful.  For the experimentals I am testing lately, the range seems to be between 2 and 6 out of 15. 

Each program I spend at least a day, and sometimes more than a week under difficult circumstances, calculating what the optimal usage patterns will be for the majority of people.  I do this because as things change and improve, the instructions must also change.  I also do it so that you guys will get the best possible results right off the bat, because I want you to get what you paid for as much as possible.  So remember:

1. Instructions are not recommendations.  
2. Follow the instructions unless you're sure that AutoConfig is telling you to do otherwise, ir I specifically instruct you to do otherwise for your specific case.
3. Expect that as the power/impact/technology/effectiveness levels increase, the volumes that balance them out will decrease.

[Shannon]

Shannon, if Money Magnet is any indication.....man oh man.... imagining what USLM 511.G would and could do ,is inspiring to say  the least. I hope it gets built next  and/or at the very least the 2nd in line to be built!
Self Regenerator...sounds like something that might help you in the future with Anti aging/youthing  is my guess and I did say guess. YOU'D know for shure, of course. sounds intriguing ,thats for shure!!
TJC

That's not what Self Regenerator will be useful for.  But I think you'll really like the concept behind this program, and what it is designed to do.

[Shannon]

@Shannon I've been studying everyday and dreaming deeply in REM sleep at night when I play MLS 5.75.6G!

Question: Will MLS raise my IQ and EQ and to what extent if so is that possible? I'd love to be super smart

I'm learning applied statistics and probability right now, but I don't understand the concepts yet. I've watched all the lecture videos and took plenty of notes but when I try a practice problem, I get it wrong.

If you're executing, MLS is designed to raise your level of intelligence.  We have had reports that it can go up over 10 points (I think I remember a report of something like +16 points?), but I don't know how much is the average or the limit, if there is a limit.  Remember that the IQ numeric value is a logarithmic scale, so it's not a linear increase in IQ.  There is a much more dramatic increase in 10 or 16 points than you might think.  100 is average, and 116 is much less likely to happen than 100 as a result.

Good to hear that you're seeing the program working.  One thing I'd like you to consider is that if learning has not been something you've been good at for whatever reason, you may need to spend some time learning how to learn.  Understanding your learning style and how you learn is going to make a big difference for you, so consider doing some research into learning styles and how to learn.  

Another thing to consider is that understanding something like statistics will depend also on your brain and it's physiology.  For example, I am considered exceptionally intelligent, but when it comes to certain subjects (Math, statistics primarily) I learn very slowly and I also need to be able to apply it in practice to learn it.  In college I was taking math classes 4 (four!) times to get it enough to pass, even with help.  No joke.  But that turned out to be because nobody was teaching me in my learning style.  When I finally had someone start teaching me in my learning style, I passed in one try.

So don't get discouraged, and don't think you're stupid or defective or anything like that.  It just depends on how your brain is wired, and how you learn best.  The biggest factor in learning is, when you get something wrong, it's not a failure; it's an opportunity to understand how NOT to do it, and thus make a step towards understanding how to do it right by examining and understanding what went wrong.

Never be afraid to ask for help and get tutoring if you need it.  Have multiple people explain it if necessary.  Find and work with your particular learning style.  And most importantly... NEVER GIVE UP!  Persistence and perseverance will overcome every obstacle.  I am living proof of that.

[GreekGod22]

why is the recommended volume for OGSFv2 so low? I thought 10/16 was the standard.

Alright, you guys, let's get something straight.  I keep seeing people refer to the instructions as "recommendations".  There is a BIG difference between instructions and "recommendations".  The instructions are what you need to do to make it work.  Recommendations are what is suggested for you to do.  Instructions are not a suggestion.  The only time you should not follow the instructions exactly is when either you have the AutoConfig kick in, or I specifically give you instructions that differ for your personal use.  Got it?

Now, as to why the volume is 5/15:

There is no standard.  The volume is what balances the program and your subconscious mind such that they work together.  As we advance in generation, technology and power levels, the volume will trend lower and lower as a result.  As you see the volume go down, you will know the power, impact, effectiveness, etc. is going up.

We've gone from the best volume being 14/15 to 13 to 12 to 10, then to 9, and finally we are getting into the realm of ~5 because 5.11G is pretty insanely powerful.  For the experimentals I am testing lately, the range seems to be between 2 and 6 out of 15. 

Each program I spend at least a day, and sometimes more than a week under difficult circumstances, calculating what the optimal usage patterns will be for the majority of people.  I do this because as things change and improve, the instructions must also change.  I also do it so that you guys will get the best possible results right off the bat, because I want you to get what you paid for as much as possible.  So remember:

1. Instructions are not recommendations.  
2. Follow the instructions unless you're sure that AutoConfig is telling you to do otherwise, ir I specifically instruct you to do otherwise for your specific case.
3. Expect that as the power/impact/technology/effectiveness levels increase, the volumes that balance them out will decrease.

Got it, thanks for clarifying.

[Sky]

@Shannon I've been studying everyday and dreaming deeply in REM sleep at night when I play MLS 5.75.6G!

Question: Will MLS raise my IQ and EQ and to what extent if so is that possible? I'd love to be super smart

I'm learning applied statistics and probability right now, but I don't understand the concepts yet. I've watched all the lecture videos and took plenty of notes but when I try a practice problem, I get it wrong.

If you're executing, MLS is designed to raise your level of intelligence.  We have had reports that it can go up over 10 points (I think I remember a report of something like +16 points?), but I don't know how much is the average or the limit, if there is a limit.  Remember that the IQ numeric value is a logarithmic scale, so it's not a linear increase in IQ.  There is a much more dramatic increase in 10 or 16 points than you might think.  100 is average, and 116 is much less likely to happen than 100 as a result.

Good to hear that you're seeing the program working.  One thing I'd like you to consider is that if learning has not been something you've been good at for whatever reason, you may need to spend some time learning how to learn.  Understanding your learning style and how you learn is going to make a big difference for you, so consider doing some research into learning styles and how to learn.  

Another thing to consider is that understanding something like statistics will depend also on your brain and it's physiology.  For example, I am considered exceptionally intelligent, but when it comes to certain subjects (Math, statistics primarily) I learn very slowly and I also need to be able to apply it in practice to learn it.  In college I was taking math classes 4 (four!) times to get it enough to pass, even with help.  No joke.  But that turned out to be because nobody was teaching me in my learning style.  When I finally had someone start teaching me in my learning style, I passed in one try.

So don't get discouraged, and don't think you're stupid or defective or anything like that.  It just depends on how your brain is wired, and how you learn best.  The biggest factor in learning is, when you get something wrong, it's not a failure; it's an opportunity to understand how NOT to do it, and thus make a step towards understanding how to do it right by examining and understanding what went wrong.

Never be afraid to ask for help and get tutoring if you need it.  Have multiple people explain it if necessary.  Find and work with your particular learning style.  And most importantly... NEVER GIVE UP!  Persistence and perseverance will overcome every obstacle.  I am living proof of that.

Thank you, Shannon!

I'll work on figuring out on learning how to learn. I am hoping MLS will show me the way and direct me to learn in the best way possible for me. In the past, math and statistics were the hardest for me. I was always better at reading, but stopped being a voracious reader in 7th grade due to no one else reading at lunch time in school. I still read fantasy books from time to time, but won't have time for that right now with my graduate program. I'll be reading lecture slides and textbooks (if there is time to read textbooks).

I think I learn best by doing to be honest. My fear of failure used to be so strong that I would give up on math pretty easily. That, and I just used to think I'm not intelligent whatsoever because I couldn't understand math and stats without intense effort and tutoring. I like putting in effort, but it seems effort is easier to put in when I believe I'll be successful at learning if I keep trying.

I think your explanation of intelligence redefined the definition of intelligence for me and how I view myself. I didn't realize I could be considered intelligent if I wasn't strong in math and stats and STEM in particular, which is what I've always wanted to be good at. I desperately want to learn math, stats, and programming to reach my career goals. My grad program told the students that we have high IQ as that's one of the factors that got us admitted into the program, so that boosted my self-confidence dramatically. I've also learning a database programming language like SQL on my job, so that's improved my self-confidence as well!

Another thing you said that made me think about intelligence differently is how you wrote about how my brain and its physiology would affect how fast I learn applied statistics and probability. I hope my brain and its physiology can change in terms of neuroplasticity to help me grow towards learning Stats, math, and programming in python faster.

I talked with a doctor in my program and he said that intelligence is not changeable after a certain age and that you can get better at learning a particular subject by just putting in more effort to learn that particular subject. However, what you're saying and what the subliminal page for MLS is saying is that IQ can grow. What is the truth, exactly? I guess what you're doing is different because you're attempting something like intelligence boosting and improved learning capability and enjoyment through a method that no one else is doing or has conceived of. Wheres, in western thought, they talk about the growth mindset versus the static mindset. I've been watching a podcast by Andrew Huberman, a stanford professor in neurobiology and opthamology, that recently said neuroplasticity is possible in adults through making mistakes consistently to train your brain to learn faster and improve its neuroplasticity. He has a podcast that I listen to. All in all, I don't believe what that doctor told me and tend to believe that IQ can be improved through hard work in studying by making mistakes and learning from them, physical exercise, and proper sleep. If there are any fallacies in my thinking that you want to correct in response to what I just wrote or if you have anymore information on learning to disseminate, that would be greatly appreciated. If not, no worries. Your previous response made me feel much better and gives me hope and excitement for learning.

Did people see an increase in IQ after one run or was it multiple runs of MLS?

[kserenyi]

@Shannon
Do you know if the Awakener program will interfere with other programs? I'm specifically using Money Magnet right now.

[Shannon]

[quote="Shannon" pid='261432' dateline='1693634879']

If you're executing, MLS is designed to raise your level of intelligence.  We have had reports that it can go up over 10 points (I think I remember a report of something like +16 points?), but I don't know how much is the average or the limit, if there is a limit.  Remember that the IQ numeric value is a logarithmic scale, so it's not a linear increase in IQ.  There is a much more dramatic increase in 10 or 16 points than you might think.  100 is average, and 116 is much less likely to happen than 100 as a result.

Good to hear that you're seeing the program working.  One thing I'd like you to consider is that if learning has not been something you've been good at for whatever reason, you may need to spend some time learning how to learn.  Understanding your learning style and how you learn is going to make a big difference for you, so consider doing some research into learning styles and how to learn.  

Another thing to consider is that understanding something like statistics will depend also on your brain and it's physiology.  For example, I am considered exceptionally intelligent, but when it comes to certain subjects (Math, statistics primarily) I learn very slowly and I also need to be able to apply it in practice to learn it.  In college I was taking math classes 4 (four!) times to get it enough to pass, even with help.  No joke.  But that turned out to be because nobody was teaching me in my learning style.  When I finally had someone start teaching me in my learning style, I passed in one try.

So don't get discouraged, and don't think you're stupid or defective or anything like that.  It just depends on how your brain is wired, and how you learn best.  The biggest factor in learning is, when you get something wrong, it's not a failure; it's an opportunity to understand how NOT to do it, and thus make a step towards understanding how to do it right by examining and understanding what went wrong.

Never be afraid to ask for help and get tutoring if you need it.  Have multiple people explain it if necessary.  Find and work with your particular learning style.  And most importantly... NEVER GIVE UP!  Persistence and perseverance will overcome every obstacle.  I am living proof of that.

Thank you, Shannon!

I'll work on figuring out on learning how to learn. I am hoping MLS will show me the way and direct me to learn in the best way possible for me. In the past, math and statistics were the hardest for me. I was always better at reading, but stopped being a voracious reader in 7th grade due to no one else reading at lunch time in school. I still read fantasy books from time to time, but won't have time for that right now with my graduate program. I'll be reading lecture slides and textbooks (if there is time to read textbooks).

MLS will help you learn, but it is not currently designed to help you learn how to learn.  I will have to rectify that in the next version.  So go do some research on how to learn, and various different learning styles.

I think I learn best by doing to be honest. My fear of failure used to be so strong that I would give up on math pretty easily. That, and I just used to think I'm not intelligent whatsoever because I couldn't understand math and stats without intense effort and tutoring. I like putting in effort, but it seems effort is easier to put in when I believe I'll be successful at learning if I keep trying.

I learn best by doing also.  Using the knowledge makes for a great way to learn, and it's also the most practical way to learn.  Find ways to use what you're trying to learn in ways that matter so you have a real and valuable reason to keep going when you are finding it challenging to figure things out.

I think your explanation of intelligence redefined the definition of intelligence for me and how I view myself. I didn't realize I could be considered intelligent if I wasn't strong in math and stats and STEM in particular, which is what I've always wanted to be good at. I desperately want to learn math, stats, and programming to reach my career goals. My grad program told the students that we have high IQ as that's one of the factors that got us admitted into the program, so that boosted my self-confidence dramatically. I've also learning a database programming language like SQL on my job, so that's improved my self-confidence as well!

A big point that you need to understand is that A) we don't really know what "intelligence" is; B) there are many different types of "intelligence", which significantly complicates the matter; and C) measuring "intelligence" is a much more difficult thing to do accurately than science lets on.  At this time, science only knows how to roughly estimate a small subset of types of intelligence in specific ways that may or may not be the most accurate, effective or useful ways to do so.

Furthermore, knowledge does not equal intelligence.  It is closer to accurate to say that understanding how to use knowledge optimally is more akin to intelligence.

Another thing you said that made me think about intelligence differently is how you wrote about how my brain and its physiology would affect how fast I learn applied statistics and probability. I hope my brain and its physiology can change in terms of neuroplasticity to help me grow towards learning Stats, math, and programming in python faster.

Neuroplasticity is not necessarily all of what I am referring to with physiology affecting learning and learning speed, but in essence, learning is limited by how fast your brain can physically re-wire itself, as well as how much it needs to do so for you to be able to do, remember or comprehend that particular thing.  This last part is why physiology is so important.  If you have an area of the brain that is required to be able to do X, and that part of your brain is less developed than average because of your particular type of physiology, then it will be more challenging and slower for you to learn or do X than it would be for someone who happens to have that part of their brain more developed.  But in both cases, almost always, development can be achieved and in both cases, the same level of end development can be achieved.  It just requires more time and perseverance if you start from a less developed state.  Much like the difference between counting to 100 starting from 0 or from 36 will take different amounts of time, but in both cases you can eventually count to 100.

I talked with a doctor in my program and he said that intelligence is not changeable after a certain age and that you can get better at learning a particular subject by just putting in more effort to learn that particular subject. However, what you're saying and what the subliminal page for MLS is saying is that IQ can grow. What is the truth, exactly? I guess what you're doing is different because you're attempting something like intelligence boosting and improved learning capability and enjoyment through a method that no one else is doing or has conceived of. Wheres, in western thought, they talk about the growth mindset versus the static mindset. I've been watching a podcast by Andrew Huberman, a stanford professor in neurobiology and opthamology, that recently said neuroplasticity is possible in adults through making mistakes consistently to train your brain to learn faster and improve its neuroplasticity. He has a podcast that I listen to. All in all, I don't believe what that doctor told me and tend to believe that IQ can be improved through hard work in studying by making mistakes and learning from them, physical exercise, and proper sleep. If there are any fallacies in my thinking that you want to correct in response to what I just wrote or if you have anymore information on learning to disseminate, that would be greatly appreciated. If not, no worries. Your previous response made me feel much better and gives me hope and excitement for learning.

Allow me to bring up a point about modern science (and scientists) that is widely misunderstood, overlooked or ignored.  Science likes to believe it knows what it's talking about, and those who "do science" like to think so as well.  The issue is that human limitation and egotism often get in the way of the facts, and this results in human scientists making a critical error when they share their knowledge.  That error is to forget that what they currently "know" is not the end-all, be-all of what there is to know, and that we are constantly learning more, which usually proves that what we currently think we know is either wholly or partially in error.  So when a doctor tells you something like "intelligence is not changeable after a certain age", what s/he should be saying to be accurate is, "As far as we currently know and understand, intelligence is not changeable after a certain age, but it may be that it is in fact changeable at any age and we may simply not know how to make that possible right now."

Notice how HUGE of a difference there is in what was said in both cases.  Scientists and people in positions of authority like to project confidence and authority, so they tend to make absolute statements.  The truth is, if you look at the history of science, there is a VERY high probability that whatever we believe to be true now will be shown to be partially or wholly false in the future.  This is why people like Elon Musk, who understand this fact, say things like "start with the assumption that you are wrong in whatever you believe, and over time, try to be less wrong".  Currently, science assumes it is right, and resists changing that to admit truths that disagree; the correct approach is to assume you are wrong, and then seek to be less so.  

We don't know what we don't know.  So remember that because of that, it is theoretically true that ANYTHING is possible, and we just don't know how to do or achieve it yet.  In my life, starting from that perspective has allowed me to do things that others told me were "simply impossible".  You'll find that is a common thread among people who do things that were said to be impossible before they did them.

Did people see an increase in IQ after one run or was it multiple runs of MLS?

IIRC, it was within a single run-through, but I haven't heard a report on this in years, so I may not be remembering this correctly.

[Shannon]

@Shannon
Do you know if the Awakener program will interfere with other programs?  I'm specifically using Money Magnet right now.

In general, it will not, as long as it is not over-used.  It shifts state of awareness only, and if you only use it for the minimum amount of time necessary to wake up in the morning, for example, it will be fine.  I don't recommend trying to use it for extended periods of time to stay awake instead of sleeping while you are using another program.

[Sky]

[quote="Shannon" pid='261432' dateline='1693634879']

If you're executing, MLS is designed to raise your level of intelligence.  We have had reports that it can go up over 10 points (I think I remember a report of something like +16 points?), but I don't know how much is the average or the limit, if there is a limit.  Remember that the IQ numeric value is a logarithmic scale, so it's not a linear increase in IQ.  There is a much more dramatic increase in 10 or 16 points than you might think.  100 is average, and 116 is much less likely to happen than 100 as a result.

Good to hear that you're seeing the program working.  One thing I'd like you to consider is that if learning has not been something you've been good at for whatever reason, you may need to spend some time learning how to learn.  Understanding your learning style and how you learn is going to make a big difference for you, so consider doing some research into learning styles and how to learn.  

Another thing to consider is that understanding something like statistics will depend also on your brain and it's physiology.  For example, I am considered exceptionally intelligent, but when it comes to certain subjects (Math, statistics primarily) I learn very slowly and I also need to be able to apply it in practice to learn it.  In college I was taking math classes 4 (four!) times to get it enough to pass, even with help.  No joke.  But that turned out to be because nobody was teaching me in my learning style.  When I finally had someone start teaching me in my learning style, I passed in one try.

So don't get discouraged, and don't think you're stupid or defective or anything like that.  It just depends on how your brain is wired, and how you learn best.  The biggest factor in learning is, when you get something wrong, it's not a failure; it's an opportunity to understand how NOT to do it, and thus make a step towards understanding how to do it right by examining and understanding what went wrong.

Never be afraid to ask for help and get tutoring if you need it.  Have multiple people explain it if necessary.  Find and work with your particular learning style.  And most importantly... NEVER GIVE UP!  Persistence and perseverance will overcome every obstacle.  I am living proof of that.

Thank you, Shannon!

I'll work on figuring out on learning how to learn. I am hoping MLS will show me the way and direct me to learn in the best way possible for me. In the past, math and statistics were the hardest for me. I was always better at reading, but stopped being a voracious reader in 7th grade due to no one else reading at lunch time in school. I still read fantasy books from time to time, but won't have time for that right now with my graduate program. I'll be reading lecture slides and textbooks (if there is time to read textbooks).

MLS will help you learn, but it is not currently designed to help you learn how to learn.  I will have to rectify that in the next version.  So go do some research on how to learn, and various different learning styles.

I think I learn best by doing to be honest. My fear of failure used to be so strong that I would give up on math pretty easily. That, and I just used to think I'm not intelligent whatsoever because I couldn't understand math and stats without intense effort and tutoring. I like putting in effort, but it seems effort is easier to put in when I believe I'll be successful at learning if I keep trying.

I learn best by doing also.  Using the knowledge makes for a great way to learn, and it's also the most practical way to learn.  Find ways to use what you're trying to learn in ways that matter so you have a real and valuable reason to keep going when you are finding it challenging to figure things out.

I think your explanation of intelligence redefined the definition of intelligence for me and how I view myself. I didn't realize I could be considered intelligent if I wasn't strong in math and stats and STEM in particular, which is what I've always wanted to be good at. I desperately want to learn math, stats, and programming to reach my career goals. My grad program told the students that we have high IQ as that's one of the factors that got us admitted into the program, so that boosted my self-confidence dramatically. I've also learning a database programming language like SQL on my job, so that's improved my self-confidence as well!

A big point that you need to understand is that A) we don't really know what "intelligence" is; B) there are many different types of "intelligence", which significantly complicates the matter; and C) measuring "intelligence" is a much more difficult thing to do accurately than science lets on.  At this time, science only knows how to roughly estimate a small subset of types of intelligence in specific ways that may or may not be the most accurate, effective or useful ways to do so.

Furthermore, knowledge does not equal intelligence.  It is closer to accurate to say that understanding how to use knowledge optimally is more akin to intelligence.

Another thing you said that made me think about intelligence differently is how you wrote about how my brain and its physiology would affect how fast I learn applied statistics and probability. I hope my brain and its physiology can change in terms of neuroplasticity to help me grow towards learning Stats, math, and programming in python faster.

Neuroplasticity is not necessarily all of what I am referring to with physiology affecting learning and learning speed, but in essence, learning is limited by how fast your brain can physically re-wire itself, as well as how much it needs to do so for you to be able to do, remember or comprehend that particular thing.  This last part is why physiology is so important.  If you have an area of the brain that is required to be able to do X, and that part of your brain is less developed than average because of your particular type of physiology, then it will be more challenging and slower for you to learn or do X than it would be for someone who happens to have that part of their brain more developed.  But in both cases, almost always, development can be achieved and in both cases, the same level of end development can be achieved.  It just requires more time and perseverance if you start from a less developed state.  Much like the difference between counting to 100 starting from 0 or from 36 will take different amounts of time, but in both cases you can eventually count to 100.

I talked with a doctor in my program and he said that intelligence is not changeable after a certain age and that you can get better at learning a particular subject by just putting in more effort to learn that particular subject. However, what you're saying and what the subliminal page for MLS is saying is that IQ can grow. What is the truth, exactly? I guess what you're doing is different because you're attempting something like intelligence boosting and improved learning capability and enjoyment through a method that no one else is doing or has conceived of. Wheres, in western thought, they talk about the growth mindset versus the static mindset. I've been watching a podcast by Andrew Huberman, a stanford professor in neurobiology and opthamology, that recently said neuroplasticity is possible in adults through making mistakes consistently to train your brain to learn faster and improve its neuroplasticity. He has a podcast that I listen to. All in all, I don't believe what that doctor told me and tend to believe that IQ can be improved through hard work in studying by making mistakes and learning from them, physical exercise, and proper sleep. If there are any fallacies in my thinking that you want to correct in response to what I just wrote or if you have anymore information on learning to disseminate, that would be greatly appreciated. If not, no worries. Your previous response made me feel much better and gives me hope and excitement for learning.

Allow me to bring up a point about modern science (and scientists) that is widely misunderstood, overlooked or ignored.  Science likes to believe it knows what it's talking about, and those who "do science" like to think so as well.  The issue is that human limitation and egotism often get in the way of the facts, and this results in human scientists making a critical error when they share their knowledge.  That error is to forget that what they currently "know" is not the end-all, be-all of what there is to know, and that we are constantly learning more, which usually proves that what we currently think we know is either wholly or partially in error.  So when a doctor tells you something like "intelligence is not changeable after a certain age", what s/he should be saying to be accurate is, "As far as we currently know and understand, intelligence is not changeable after a certain age, but it may be that it is in fact changeable at any age and we may simply not know how to make that possible right now."

Notice how HUGE of a difference there is in what was said in both cases.  Scientists and people in positions of authority like to project confidence and authority, so they tend to make absolute statements.  The truth is, if you look at the history of science, there is a VERY high probability that whatever we believe to be true now will be shown to be partially or wholly false in the future.  This is why people like Elon Musk, who understand this fact, say things like "start with the assumption that you are wrong in whatever you believe, and over time, try to be less wrong".  Currently, science assumes it is right, and resists changing that to admit truths that disagree; the correct approach is to assume you are wrong, and then seek to be less so.  

We don't know what we don't know.  So remember that because of that, it is theoretically true that ANYTHING is possible, and we just don't know how to do or achieve it yet.  In my life, starting from that perspective has allowed me to do things that others told me were "simply impossible".  You'll find that is a common thread among people who do things that were said to be impossible before they did them.

Did people see an increase in IQ after one run or was it multiple runs of MLS?

IIRC, it was within a single run-through, but I haven't heard a report on this in years, so I may not be remembering this correctly.

Thank you, Shannon!  I'll keep all of this in mind.

[ncbeareatingman]

Shannon, if Money Magnet is any indication.....man oh man.... imagining what USLM 511.G would and could do ,is inspiring to say  the least. I hope it gets built next  and/or at the very least the 2nd in line to be built!
Self Regenerator...sounds like something that might help you in the future with Anti aging/youthing  is my guess and I did say guess. YOU'D know for shure, of course. sounds intriguing ,thats for shure!!
TJC

That's not what Self Regenerator will be useful for.  But I think you'll really like the concept behind this program, and what it is designed to do.

 OK. sounds interesting, definitely ,interesting, Dr. Frawn-kun-steen:-)  sounds almost like the "Borg" regenerator, downtime.
511G-6G resistance is futile !!  Lookin forward.

[Shannon]

That's not what Self Regenerator will be useful for.  But I think you'll really like the concept behind this program, and what it is designed to do.

 OK. sounds interesting, definitely ,interesting, Dr. Frawn-kun-steen:-)  sounds almost like the "Borg" regenerator, downtime.
511G-6G resistance is futile !!  Lookin forward.

Technically, it is not designed specifically to "regenerate", and you'll see what I mean when I release more information.  That is a likely end result, however, and I simply don't know what else to call it right now, so... better a name that isn't perfect than no name at all.  We can always change what we call it later, if need be.  The end result is going to be a better, healthier you.  "Self Improvement" is already in use, and "Self Healthification Improvenator" doesn't seem to flow off the tongue very well.    More when I'm ready to work on it.

[ncbeareatingman]

 OK. sounds interesting, definitely ,interesting, Dr. Frawn-kun-steen:-)  sounds almost like the "Borg" regenerator, downtime.
511G-6G resistance is futile !!  Lookin forward.

Technically, it is not designed specifically to "regenerate", and you'll see what I mean when I release more information.  That is a likely end result, however, and I simply don't know what else to call it right now, so... better a name that isn't perfect than no name at all.  We can always change what we call it later, if need be.  The end result is going to be a better, healthier you.  "Self Improvement" is already in use, and "Self Healthification Improvenator" doesn't seem to flow off the tongue very well.    More when I'm ready to work on it.

 Agreed Shannon, but it sounds better and healthier than  "Bacon-Nator" Sam-mitch"  or The Red Hot Chilli Peppers "Californi-cation" routine, but maybe  it'll give ya a lot more energy. than the RHC tune,implied,yoo! Thanks for the update!!

[Have at ye]

Sounds like OED is going to tackle the issue in a very complex manner!

[Shannon]

Sounds like OED is going to tackle the issue in a very complex manner!

More accurately, it is going to tackle an issue that is very complex in the simplest manner possible.  Which, because the specifics of the issue will vary from person to person, will be very complex regardless.  This may end up being the most complex and long script I have ever built, depending on what goes into it.  Currently, that "honor" belongs to OGSF v2 at roughly 450 pages of script.  I am really hoping it doesn't get as long as, or longer than that.

There are currently 26 different goals in the list.  I'm looking for every possible aspect of what could cause this issue that is also something I can influence.  It's not a simple issue.