Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 8

[ArmarageX]

Also excited for X4A
(Also - what does X4a actually stand for?? I still dont know till this day.... Sex 4 All?)

Curious though on the test studies of X4A-2000 being a flop.
Based on the stories - alot of women did engage with interest...

Just that the male test subjects were morally in-allowed to progress it further..
So ... it was a flop in terms of - until it fully landed in sex - that the test cant be concluded as successful?
Seemed like it was working well..

Also Curious about the effects from the limited release of SARM 2.0
Whats the reason for SARM 2.0 being pulled off the shop so limitedly? Was it just ridiculously powerful - that it must kept limited?

And how does it work differently to X4A?
And then how do these 2 (SARM / X4A) work differently to
MYSL - Manifest Your Idea Sexual Lover

And based on test results of X4A 2000 vs SARM 2 - how do they compare?

keen to hear more of these test stories - they are really exciting..

[dweller94]

Hi @Shannon
Looks like my last message might’ve been missed, so just dropping it here again. Any idea when we can expect a subliminal for attracting a wife with XYZ qualities in 6G? Or even just an ideal partner like we had in 4G?
I’m looking for a long-term partner within the next two years, so it’d be great to see these available.

[Shannon]

Volumes and usage times are of course dependent on the generation used, the goals of the program and they are influenced by what of the available options that result makes the customer happiest when it comes to modeling the best usage times.  When we have two seriously contradictory factors (the raw power of 6G vs the sensitivity of something like working with GSF) it tends to get a bit hairy.  Less time per day works better because it doesn't push too hard.  I think we're going to see usage times vary between roughly 5 and 30 minutes per day for most types of goals in 6G.  But the numbers will be calculated on a case by case basis.  We shall see.

I was wanting to publish OGSF before 1600.  I'm working  on 1600 right now.  Most of the optimizations and adjustments are done, but I have to go through with a fine tooth comb through every statement and make sure everything is optimized, and optimized fully.  With 6G, once the script is finished, I can usually build it from text to a finished subliminal in about 1-2 days, depending on whether or not I encounter unexpected issues with build, QC check and various other little gotchas I have to be vigilant for.  in 5.11G, this same process required 5 to 7 days.  So X4A-1600 will be available very soon.  I should be finished building it later today or tomorrow, and then I have to build the product description and calculate usage patterns, etc.

The 6G build process is MUCH faster, but I am planning to do no more than 2 to 3 titles a month because I need to spend time learning a new DAW, and I need to start working more rest time into my work flow.  Burning out is not how to accomplish things.

Please remember, however, that developing a script from scratch, or developing a new script addition, is no faster than before.  So with new stuff, or stuff that has to be completely re-worked (AM7, BASE, etc.) it will not be quick.

I get what you mean on the complexity of something like OGSF. Sorry you had to state that, because I was originally going to add into my comment that due to the sensitivity of GSF removal, it makes sense you'd want to "tread lightly" as one progresses to not overwhelm. So truthfully, it made some logical sense to me why OGSF had a lower time. I suspect EPHRA, perhaps OF, will also reflect such smaller times, compared to the majority.

That is mind blowing, @Shannon...I'm so used to "sometime this month"...meaning late in the month etc. This new build is shocking with the speed of implementation. My god. Wow. So next week it will be accessible?...That's jaw dropping, haha. Wow.

I understand the difference to a "from scratch" sub, for sure. It's come in handy that X4A-1511 was already an "advanced" platform to build on to top it up to 6G then.

This is absolutely fantastic news! I can't wait to use 6G next week then...this is amazing, Shannon. Thank you so much! I can't wait to fire it up and experience 6G at last! It's been a jaunt to get here, from my first listen to ASC 5G to convince me this was the place to be for me, many many moons ago now...

I'm about to finish upgrading and adjusting the KSP.  It will be built tonight or tomorrow, depending on how tired I am, and I may be able to get it published the day after that.  How's that for mind blowing?  I spent a LOT of time, YEARS, finding every possible way to optimize the build process in 6G before we got there.

[Shannon]

Also excited for X4A

(Also - what does X4a actually stand for?? I still dont know till this day.... Sex 4 All?)



Curious though on the test studies of X4A-2000 being a flop.

Based on the stories - alot of women did engage with interest...

Multiple women per tester, with one exception, did engage with interest over the course of 3 months of testing.  However, it wasn't as if this happened every day or every time we went out, although one pof the testers had two women responding every time he saw them.

Just that the male test subjects were morally in-allowed to progress it further..
So ... it was a flop in terms of - until it fully landed in sex - that the test cant be concluded as successful?
Seemed like it was working well..

It wasn't a flop.  It worked, but the circumstances did not allow me to know if it was worth what I was planning to charge for it.  It was required to have at least one tester receive at least one direct request or invitation for sex that would result in sex if allowed to progress.  Unfortunately, only one of the testers was single, and he was getting results but could not act on them for moral reasons.  This left us with no way to achieve the testing goals, and we ran out of time to continue.

Also  Curious about the effects from the limited release of SARM 2.0

Whats the reason for SARM 2.0 being pulled off the shop so limitedly? Was it just ridiculously powerful - that it must kept limited?

SARM v2.1-B was originally not going to be released at all.  I released it in a limited release because I thought it was a damned shame for it to not be.  But I have reasons for why it was so restricted that I unfortunately can't get into.

And how does it work differently to X4A?

And then how do these 2 (SARM / X4A) work differently to

MYSL - Manifest Your Idea Sexual Lover

X4A is what we call an IEA, which stands for Indirect Exposure Aphrodisiac.  You listen to the subliminal, and then you go out and expose the people you affect to your personal energy field as modulated by X4A.  X4A also has several differences in the specific scripting goals, but the differences are so complex and numerous at this point I can't really get specific right now.  Both are aphrodisiacs, both are creating arousal, both are trying to get to sex, but they use very different approaches and script goals.

SARM is a DEA - Direct Exposure Aphrodisiac.  You have to get the person to be aroused to listen to it directly for it to affect them.

MYSL is a manifestor that seeks to manifest your perfect sexual lover into your life.  It's not an aphrodisiac.

And based on test results of X4A 2000 vs SARM 2 - how do they compare?

keen to hear more of these test stories - they are really exciting..

First, allow me to clarify that SARM v2.1-B was what was available, not v2.  v2 tested out as needing adjustments.  Thus, 2.1-B.

Second, remember that X4A is an IDA and SARM is a DEA.  The ultimate goal is for X4A to work as quickly and intensely as a DEA, but X4A-2000 in 5.11G does not have the same immediate intensity.

SARM is aimed at getting her to initiate sex as quickly as possible.  X4A-2000 is, too, but the deliver approaches make for very different limits.  DEAs are capable of producing more aggressive results because they are directly instructing the subconscious what to do.  X4A and other IEAs are limited by how you use it, how much you execute, and how much you project, as well as how the person responds.  There is a trade off: DEAs are better for creating more intense arousal faster.  IEAs are better for creating more natural and comfortable arousal that is slower, but somewhat more likely to be accepted and acted upon.


SARM v2.1-B compares to X4A-2000 like this.  Exposing a woman to SARM v2.1-B will arouse her and get her to sex 0 to 2 times (depending on circumstances) before the effects wear off.  Then you have to expose her again.  Expose her too soon, and it may not work.  Over time it has a cumulative effect, but it is purely sexual.  She comes to want to have sex with you more over time, but it's just sex unless there is an emotional component already present.

X4A-2000 is less likely to result in sex on the first day, or the second.  But over time, with repeated exposures, it has a cumulative effect, and it seems to induce a sort of bonding with the user that appears to result in her wanting not just sex with the user, but a relationship including sex.  When the goal is just sex, that's not necessarily a good thing.  So I didn't release it based on that as well, since that complicates matters significantly.

[Shannon]

Hi @Shannon
Looks like my last message might’ve been missed, so just dropping it here again. Any idea when we can expect a subliminal for attracting a wife with XYZ qualities in 6G? Or even just an ideal partner like we had in 4G?
I’m looking for a long-term partner within the next two years, so it’d be great to see these available.

Manifestation subs will be coming, but I'm not sure when just yet.  It won't take 2 years though.

[Catman]

I get what you mean on the complexity of something like OGSF. Sorry you had to state that, because I was originally going to add into my comment that due to the sensitivity of GSF removal, it makes sense you'd want to "tread lightly" as one progresses to not overwhelm. So truthfully, it made some logical sense to me why OGSF had a lower time. I suspect EPHRA, perhaps OF, will also reflect such smaller times, compared to the majority.

That is mind blowing, @Shannon...I'm so used to "sometime this month"...meaning late in the month etc. This new build is shocking with the speed of implementation. My god. Wow. So next week it will be accessible?...That's jaw dropping, haha. Wow.

I understand the difference to a "from scratch" sub, for sure. It's come in handy that X4A-1511 was already an "advanced" platform to build on to top it up to 6G then.

This is absolutely fantastic news! I can't wait to use 6G next week then...this is amazing, Shannon. Thank you so much! I can't wait to fire it up and experience 6G at last! It's been a jaunt to get here, from my first listen to ASC 5G to convince me this was the place to be for me, many many moons ago now...

I'm about to finish upgrading and adjusting the KSP.  It will be built tonight or tomorrow, depending on how tired I am, and I may be able to get it published the day after that.  How's that for mind blowing?  I spent a LOT of time, YEARS, finding every possible way to optimize the build process in 6G before we got there.

It's honestly so shocking, exactly.

What you said about taking years to get to this level of speed and precision reminds me of a meme I've seen and resonated with within business circles. Someone always wanting a cheap deal because something "only takes minutes to make"...and the business owner says "you're paying for the YEARS to get to this point...not the minutes to create it". It's so true.

Thank you so much for the impending X4A-1600. I can't wait. Finally I'll be able to fire up 6G and see what it's like at long last. The reports so far have been a bit smaller in number than I figured there would be, but what I HAVE read...has been intriguing to say the least. Looking forward to getting on the 6G train in a couple days or so!

[Shannon]

I'm about to finish upgrading and adjusting the KSP.  It will be built tonight or tomorrow, depending on how tired I am, and I may be able to get it published the day after that.  How's that for mind blowing?  I spent a LOT of time, YEARS, finding every possible way to optimize the build process in 6G before we got there.

It's honestly so shocking, exactly.

What you said about taking years to get to this level of speed and precision reminds me of a meme I've seen and resonated with within business circles. Someone always wanting a cheap deal because something "only takes minutes to make"...and the business owner says "you're paying for the YEARS to get to this point...not the minutes to create it". It's so true.

Thank you so much for the impending X4A-1600. I can't wait. Finally I'll be able to fire up 6G and see what it's like at long last. The reports so far have been a bit smaller in number than I figured there would be, but what I HAVE read...has been intriguing to say the least. Looking forward to getting on the 6G train in a couple days or so!

Being able to publish faster is going to mean that the library grows relatively quickly, and more reports will come over time.    Especially as I publish some of the more universally desired titles, like X4A-1600.

Speaking of that, I remember someone asked what X4A stands for, and I think I forgot to answer.  It stands for eXperimental Audio Aphrodisiac Arousal Amplifier.

[dweller94]

If I'm running the new 6g OSC and the ultrasonic track is giving me results would there be any harm in running the hybrid or is that ONLY if you are not getting results,

[4Kingdoms]

If I'm running the new 6g OSC and the ultrasonic track is giving me results would there be any harm in running the hybrid or is that ONLY if you are not getting results,

https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-OSC-6...#pid266874

OSC does not use AutoConfig.  We will only enable that in 6G if the standard mode needs it.  I don't think it will.  So the rule of thumb for 6G is, always use Ultrasonic unless you have a very good reason why you can't.  If you do, then use Masked format for at least a month and ONLY if that fails to produce results, then try Hybrid.  I believe that Hybrid is almost always going to be overkill in 6G.  If that turns out to be the case, we will discontinue it.  For now, we are still discovering 6G.

[GreekGod22]

How much do you guys think that engaging in porn/ masturbation affects subliminal results? Considering that it’s a form of energy drainage.

[Frosted]

How much do you guys think that engaging in porn/ masturbation affects subliminal results? Considering that it’s a form of energy drainage.

Definitely with a program like X4A where your sexual energy is important. Other than that, I’m sure it has some kind of effect since everything is connected, and chronic porn use is generally unhealthy.

[4Kingdoms]

https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Shann...#pid266912

Just a heads up: the 3G and 4G subliminals are going to be taken down permanently in the not too distant future. Get them while you can.

---

https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Shann...#pid266931

X4A-1600 is sitting on my hard drive. I'm currently trying to determine what the usage patterns are. It will probably end up being published tomorrow because I have to do the usage patterns and the description edits, and I haven't started the description edits yet. Usage time is being refined.

[Shannon]

How much do you guys think that engaging in porn/ masturbation affects subliminal results? Considering that it’s a form of energy drainage.

How much depends on a lot of variables.  What the goal of the title is, how it achieves that goal, the program's generation, your personality, your physiology, your personal history of experiences, and what you have come to believe at various stages of your life, among other things. 

But with masturbation  being such a popular response to fear that is triggered by some of the subliminals, I would say it's definitely viewed as a way of lessening the effectiveness of the subliminals by the resistant parts, so that should tell you something.

[samba99]

Shannon,

Which sub can help the individual to present them self in the most authentic and real version to others? Especially socially, and when around new people etc.
I wish if I can just be myself all the time, infront of anyone, regardless of who they are.
I just want to be me, especially for introverts. It seems lately society is able to control population easier that before, with instagram and tiktok, they can manipulate masses and steer them in any direction.
So again, how can we be free? Or authentic. Especially with these root deep beliefs that against society like not believing religion to the letter etc