08-12-2013, 10:38 AM
http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-2290.html
That link should have some info on this, otherwise Shannon can elaborate.
That link should have some info on this, otherwise Shannon can elaborate.
(08-12-2013, 08:59 AM)G Locker Wrote: Hi ! I'm considering to give your programs a try, but as I know a bit about audio coding I wondered whether the 'subliminal addition' to the masking tracks is not degraded by the lossy audio coding that is employed generating the mp3 tracks ?
To be more specific: mp3 and other 'lossy' audio coding schemes use psychoacoustic models to remove (or rather, not encode) audio information that is - according to the model - imperceptible by the average human ear. As I assume the 'subliminal message' is added to the masking audio track in such a way that it is indeed 'masked' by the masking audio track, using 'lossy' audio encoding (mp3, mp4, aac etc.) would close to remove all subliminal added sounds... It would make sense to use a full audio version like CD, in which the subliminal audio is kept intact - any reports that these are actually more effective ?
So this is not a question about the effectiveness of hearing subliminal audio messages, but on the technology used to get those messages to the listener in the first place. I couldn't find an answer when I searched the forum ...