How has FRM worked for you?

[Shannon]

USLM 4.x is known to have issues with achieving the level of success that 3.0 did.  Basically, the optimizations are too high strung.  I will need to go back and adjust them for USLM 4.2.  If you want to use USLM, why not go back and use 3.0?  Or switch to a different program for the time being.

Hey Shannon, a bit late, but are you recommending everyone use v3 of USLM over 4.1 when you say it has issues? I'm thinking about using 4.1 USLM again after giving it a break. I had previously used v3 for a few months without much results, but 4.1 gave me decent results within 1 to 2 months. Same thing with my gf who was exposed to it, she had better results with the 4.x version than she was listening to v3 with me over a shared speaker.

Tho to be fair I used v3 over a speaker, whereas I used 4.1 over headphones. Might of had something to do with how effective it was.

Or should I just wait til 4.2 as you say that's one of the next things you're working on?

Thanks

To be specific, for those who don't get good results from the 4.x line, use 3.0 until 4.2 comes out.  And for those who get good results from the 4.x line, use 4.1.

[Zane]

USLM 4.x is known to have issues with achieving the level of success that 3.0 did.  Basically, the optimizations are too high strung.  I will need to go back and adjust them for USLM 4.2.  If you want to use USLM, why not go back and use 3.0?  Or switch to a different program for the time being.

Hey Shannon, a bit late, but are you recommending everyone use v3 of USLM over 4.1 when you say it has issues? I'm thinking about using 4.1 USLM again after giving it a break. I had previously used v3 for a few months without much results, but 4.1 gave me decent results within 1 to 2 months. Same thing with my gf who was exposed to it, she had better results with the 4.x version than she was listening to v3 with me over a shared speaker.

Tho to be fair I used v3 over a speaker, whereas I used 4.1 over headphones. Might of had something to do with how effective it was.

Or should I just wait til 4.2 as you say that's one of the next things you're working on?

Thanks

To be specific, for those who don't get good results from the 4.x line, use 3.0 until 4.2 comes out.  And for those who get good results from the 4.x line, use 4.1.

I have been using USLM3-5.5G since it came out.. I am just listening to 1 loop and believe the things I have experienced and so many that.. I can't write it here.. Because it involves all kinds of metaphysical phenomena. 

I can sense when something good is about to happen.. 

More intuitive. 

USLM-5.5G made things possible.. which people would think is impossible. 

My Intentions are pure and I can now see how you talk about this "will" thing.. I now see it clearly.

[TouchyCat]

I have had a lot of great changes in my life because of FRM, different ways from different versions of it. Remember, FRM is not just a blob, it has different versions for very good reason.  V4.8 is a lot better than 4.7 is a lot better than 4.6 is a lot better than... and so on.

Yeah, I ran DMSI (FRM 4.8) last year for several months and I can feel and see how I am entirely different compares to UMS (FRM 4.6). As in, I am more confident and natural with my upbringing.

You already know that MIR v3 has 44 goals supporting it's primary goal. But I think I forgot to mention that it is sporting an upgraded skeleton script, which should significantly increase the power level of the program over previous 5.75G programs.

The next level of power is here. Now let's see what we can do for making the FRM kick butt.

Not only we are going to experience better and upgraded version of FRM but also the newly enhanced skeleton script! We are getting close to 6G I assume? Would be a great end of year present if DMSI final version is 6G and everyone who bought it while in the experimental state receives a free upgrade