(12-05-2018, 08:56 AM)Fluffy Wrote:(12-05-2018, 07:45 AM)Hatman Wrote: I might be wrong, but I think "Watson believes that men don't have equality, either." should be shaded in, and "15.5 million women will be married in the next 16 years" should be erased.
The rest of the questions I don't really find that difficult to be honest. I guess you just have to be in the mood to do it. And I agree, if you don't find this topic interesting, it may be more difficult to do.
Hang in there!
Nah that is incorrect, it is only for source A. Also you have to write the answers in a certain way, you don't just answer the questions and write how ever you like.
You want to know my feelings? I just sent this email to my teacher:
"Hey Michelle,
Today I actually sat down to do the Paper 2 Mini Mock: Gender and I am finding it difficult.
One of my concerns is that I have no interest what so ever in the whole gender/feminism thing and I feel like I am being forced to be "involved" in it, as I also noticed the speaking presentation example on paper you gave had that vibe too.
I know you are a woman and the majority of the class are women, so it is understandable why you would choose things like this. But seeing as I am one guy, of just two now, it would be better if there was more of a choice to practise with or them be gender neutral. As I am finding it hard enough as it is, let alone being able to relate to it.
I know at the exams any topic can come up, but my concern is just being able to practise the processes in a way that is not being brainwashed with feminism at the same time.
No disrespect intended. I am just sharing my thoughts as I am trying to do better, do the homework, learn and get better but this stuff really puts me off.
Please take this into consideration.
In the mean time... I do have here a Paper 2 MINI MOCK: BARS, which I will attempt with question 4.
Thanks,
Fluffy"
Double check that. Because you seem to have underlined the answer as well.
"15.5 million women will be married in the next 16 years" is a trick question because source A actually says this: "15.5 million girls will be married in the next 16 years as children"
Would be interesting to hear her response on that one
