06-03-2015, 11:25 AM
(06-02-2015, 11:02 AM)RTBoss Wrote: Perhaps some of us are just more receptive - I've always been extremely susceptible to hypnosis. There are something like 10% of the population that are non-responders. I wonder if that applies to all subliminals - powerful or not - as well.
While I don't show my emotions - except anger - on the outside very much, I feel a torrent of emotions on the inside. Before EPHRA, I drank almost daily - just so I wouldn't feel like shit all the time. I just couldn't take it anymore. 3 days into EPHRA, no more desire to drink. No more desire for porn. It was so crazy, and so easy - I just knew subliminals (IML subs, anyway) worked for me.
BIABWS and AoS here I come. Haven't tried a 4G yet, so we'll see how those go...
Humans, as simple as they are in the grand scheme of things, are very, very complex physically and in nonphysical ways.
All of us are receptive to the degree that we can sense the input. What we respond to it with, that's another matter. Every person will respond according to two primary things: their personality/physiology type and their subconscious/conscious programming.
There are four primary personality/physiology types and in combination, many subtypes can arise. These four have various qualities, one of which is likenable to density or weight; Type 1 is the lightest, most easily influenced, and Type 4 is the densest and most difficult to influence. If you map the personality as points which represent various aspects of experience and expression, and assign them to one of these four, you can find for example that a person may have six placements in T1 and one in T4, and you might expect that to mean they are easily influenced. But just the reverse may be true because the density of that single T4 placement may "outweigh" the six T1 placements. It's about like comparing a cubic centimeter of hydrogen to a cubic centimeter of plutonium. Same volume, but huge difference in weight.
The key to my work is figuring out how to get all these different unique combinations of personality/physiology and conscious/subconscious programming to agree and follow a set of instructions. I believe that is possible for everyone; I do not believe everyone will get the same exact results or results at the same speed. It depends on their specific variables. But everyone is capable of choosing to follow a set of instructions. I'm learning how to achieve the state of readiness, willingness and agreement to do so. That's what 6G is.
Currently, I am testing my prototype with some of the most horribly difficult-to-influence personality/physiology types I could find. It is influencing them. At the moment, I am working on making that influence more relatively equal to how it influences the easier personality/physiology types.
Never say never. The key to any problem's solution is in refusing to give up. There is always a way. The question is... will you spend enough time and effort to find that way? And these are also why 6G development is taking so long.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!