All Bulls**t Aside, Who's Actually Getting Laid with DMSI

[ncbeareatingman]

I'm aware that I am in the minority here when I vote that it improved my sex life enormously.  I am also aware that most people won't believe me simply because I created it.  But the fact is, DMSI (3.1, no less) changed my sex life forever.

Now I know of at least one and possibly two others who can say the same.  

That means it does work, but for the majority it's not there yet.

CatMan has a lot of issues to work through to get there and a lot of guys do, apparently.  That's why we have seven versions out and another one?  two?  three? on the way.  But I can't work on DMSI and nothing else.  So DMSI isn't being phase out or killed, I'm just branching the development so I don't burn out and have zero desire to work on DMSI anymore.  Which is currently close to the case.

You think it's easy to be in my position?  It's the most ambitious goal I could find, making DMSI work, and I took it on because I knew it would make 6G the best it could be.  But transitioning from 5G to 6G, we are passing through a zone that nobody has ever gone through before, where the subs are starting to really touch nerves and that is making it hard for people to get results sometimes.

Remember that all of what I build in 5.5G must be rebuilt in 6G because of this.

When we touch those nerves, we are doing things nobody has ever done before.  We don't know those nerves are there.  We don't exactly approach them slowly.  We are trying to achieve the goal, and in doing so, find the reasons why nobody else ever has.  This is new territory for subliminals, and we don't always know how to achieve the goals.  That is also why we have 5.5G.  Identify the problem areas and fix them.

The reason I started working toward 6G and the reason I decided to work 6+ years on transitioning to 6G is that 5G didn't work like I wanted it to.  And during the process of getting to 6G we are going to have various different things happen that we didn't want to happen, partly because the technology is new and therefore may either be consciously misunderstood (as you don't know what's in the script) or because it does work and that reveals that something else needs to be improved to compensate or balance it.

You guys think I don't know we need to keep working?  Why would I spend 6+ years now working on 6G if I didn't know that?

It's not that I'm trying to shelf DMSI.   It's that I was starting to burn out, I needed to use something else to keep going and I had to develop new technologies to be able to advance it.  Development has continued in other subs, and when I work my way back to DMSI we will merge the updates with the DMSI skeleton script.

The biggest issues I have had with working on DMSI are the threat of burnout - who among you could do this job?  None, because if you could you would - and because I needed to advance the FRM significantly and finish the Magnus Engine.

The Magnus Engine is finished and the FRM is significantly further along.  But FRM is so deep and so complex and so challenging that it takes me months now to work out any advancement options at all.  When I release DMSI-Next, do you want it to work?  I do too.  So I'm focusing on the key factor that's been preventing it from working, both for the user and the affected: FEAR.

I expect that within the next 6 months I'll be finished with FRM.  Right now I'm just getting back to work on UMS and the CHA because I'm not spending 99.99997% of my time taking care of everyone else.  13 days of straight 100% GOGOGOGOGO to the point of exhaustion.  I took yesterday off and I'm taking today off and then I'm working on both UMS and CHA until they're done.  Then on to DMSI.

I want it to work for you every bit as much as you do.  The fact is, it can work for you all in the future, if I do the right things.  But this isn't necessarily going to happen on your choice of timelines or mine.  It's going to be delayed by things outside of my control and the fact that I can't discover the solution to overcoming fear at the wave of a wand.  You guys want the end result, but you're not really considering what has to go into it.  Nobody in history has ever done what I'm doing right now, which is to invent a solution to fear itself. You think reverse engineering how to solve fear is simple?  I'd wager nobody in history has done it before because it's not!

So chill.  I know you guys need to be getting better results with DMSI.  It's not doing what I want either.  I know you're getting antsy about the current version being long in the tooth.  I know you want the next thing to try.  Trust me, I'd love to be able to just drop everything and work on it after some of my recent advancements.  But I can't.  There's other stuff in the way, both concerning subliminals and out in the real world, that I have to deal with first.

Be patient.  It's coming.  I think you guys will appreciate the changes I make in 3.3.2(?).  I'm going to implement at least FRM 4.6, add the completed Magnus Engine and tune it to what should be optimal levels of power, and I'm going to adjust the aura to create that dreaded comfort that CM thinks is a terrible idea in the affected.  Sorry, CM, but they need it, and the FRM too.  We need them to be making decisions based on what they really are choosing of their own free will, not based on fear.  That's pretty much what's stopping us at this point I think.

Anyway, don't get your panties in a twist.  5.5G exists because the programs were not achieving the results I wanted.  I know about it.

 First off I wanna say "F***kin' A! Shannon!"
 I feel all points here and hearts shared and the concerns there of ,are indeed valid.
 One of the other fears to be removed goes something like this,"what if you actually got all the leg,P**sy,ass,ya wanted? what if you got all that you wanted and then some, Men? Is there a fear of becoming bored,,burned out on it,temporarily tired of it,fearing too much of it,or fear of too much of a good thing? Seems to me an even more advanced version of FRM  would handle all of that with perhaps some additional scripting to address the abouve,when and where needed of course.
Obviously USLM4 and LTU5 are clearly working and are way more advance now than the pervioius version,so again,stating the obvious,would that not stand to reason that a program such as AM7,BAMM and DMSI future versions would be equally as 'way more advanced' if not even more so? peace to all,may ya all get what chew want in even deeper higher ways than before!!