Post Reply 
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
Yesterday, 04:27 PM
Post: #3501
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(Yesterday 03:19 PM)Shadow2200 Wrote:  So DMSI 3.2 should be vastly stronger than 3.1

That's the goal.

Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator

The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.)
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Yesterday, 04:29 PM
Post: #3502
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(Yesterday 04:07 PM)... Wrote:  Shannon, side question. What did you want to do to improve ASC again?

Make it work. Smile What I'm going to do is basically develop the 6G skeleton script, which is to say, there are literally hundreds of facets to that answer, and I really can't even remember them all.

I want 6G ASC to produce genuine confidence. ASC 5G was created before I understood some key principles, which allow for the result to be only surface level confidence.

Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator

The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.)
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Shannon's post:
Messiah Complex
Yesterday, 04:30 PM
Post: #3503
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(Yesterday 04:10 PM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote:  I imagine you're not reporting on anything going on with MLS to combat hype, correct?

I'm not reporting on anything because I ran into an issue that requires me to develop something to overcome it. I've been developing that something. Not very exciting to talk about, though. Just working on a way to overcome this particular challenge. Should be done in a couple days, and then normal development can resume.

Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator

The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.)
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Yesterday, 04:43 PM
Post: #3504
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(Yesterday 04:29 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:07 PM)... Wrote:  Shannon, side question. What did you want to do to improve ASC again?

Make it work. Smile What I'm going to do is basically develop the 6G skeleton script, which is to say, there are literally hundreds of facets to that answer, and I really can't even remember them all.

I want 6G ASC to produce genuine confidence. ASC 5G was created before I understood some key principles, which allow for the result to be only surface level confidence.

Would you say AM6 develops some of that genuine self confidence?

I can resist everything except temptation
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Yesterday, 04:47 PM
Post: #3505
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(Yesterday 04:43 PM)... Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:29 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:07 PM)... Wrote:  Shannon, side question. What did you want to do to improve ASC again?

Make it work. Smile What I'm going to do is basically develop the 6G skeleton script, which is to say, there are literally hundreds of facets to that answer, and I really can't even remember them all.

I want 6G ASC to produce genuine confidence. ASC 5G was created before I understood some key principles, which allow for the result to be only surface level confidence.

Would you say AM6 develops some of that genuine self confidence?

Given that you use it for long enough to allow it to achieve it's goals, absolutely.

Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator

The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.)
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Yesterday, 04:59 PM
Post: #3506
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(Yesterday 04:47 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:43 PM)... Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:29 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:07 PM)... Wrote:  Shannon, side question. What did you want to do to improve ASC again?

Make it work. Smile What I'm going to do is basically develop the 6G skeleton script, which is to say, there are literally hundreds of facets to that answer, and I really can't even remember them all.

I want 6G ASC to produce genuine confidence. ASC 5G was created before I understood some key principles, which allow for the result to be only surface level confidence.

Would you say AM6 develops some of that genuine self confidence?

Given that you use it for long enough to allow it to achieve it's goals, absolutely.

DO you think people like the earlier daos because those subs worked on a surface level. They adapted to the user rather than the other way around? which is why some people see better conscious results. I don't believe its the case but it just seems like maybe that's why some people are going through what they are (resistance, running).

If a sub works subconciously, how can it only produce surface results

I can resist everything except temptation
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Yesterday, 05:13 PM
Post: #3507
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(Yesterday 04:59 PM)... Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:47 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:43 PM)... Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:29 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:07 PM)... Wrote:  Shannon, side question. What did you want to do to improve ASC again?

Make it work. Smile What I'm going to do is basically develop the 6G skeleton script, which is to say, there are literally hundreds of facets to that answer, and I really can't even remember them all.

I want 6G ASC to produce genuine confidence. ASC 5G was created before I understood some key principles, which allow for the result to be only surface level confidence.

Would you say AM6 develops some of that genuine self confidence?

Given that you use it for long enough to allow it to achieve it's goals, absolutely.

DO you think people like the earlier daos because those subs worked on a surface level. They adapted to the user rather than the other way around? which is why some people see better conscious results. I don't believe its the case but it just seems like maybe that's why some people are going through what they are (resistance, running).

If a sub works subconciously, how can it only produce surface results

Earlier subs allowed for results that were much easier to get, much easier to see in some cases and much less demanding of genuine personal responsibility and improvement on the part of the user. It's easy to make a person feel confident. It's another story entirely to actually get them to the point of genuinely being confident.

The newer subs are not all requiring the sort of incredibly deep adjustments and improvements that DMSI is, but then, they're not all requiring those because they're not attempting to get results that defy a lifetime of social hypnosis either. I demonstrated with MIR and MHS that the technology base works well and doesn't always require soul crushing changes to achieve the goals. It's the goal that dictates that is required to achieve that goal. Pick a challenging goal, and expect to have a challenge.

ASC does not only produce surface results. The surface results are a result of subconscious changes. But the sub is not correcting the other subconscious programming that may contradict it, and in some cases, eventually that other programming undermines it and causes it to fail.

The goal of 6G is to cause whatever changes are being sought to be propagated through the whole of the person, so they are real and genuine and long term or permanent at every level. Not just the high subconscious and the conscious awareness.

It's easy to create a temporary change in behavior. It's not so easy to create a universal, permanent change. And since universal and permanent is what actually gets you your miney and time's worth, that's what I am aiming to develop.

Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator

The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.)
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like Shannon's post:
Bookstacks DC737, Shadow2200, eternity, apollolux, ReeZoX, Alpha360
Yesterday, 05:28 PM
Post: #3508
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
Thanks for making that post and shedding some light on the difference between 5.5 technology and the previous technologies we've used.

It's been a series of frustration for me personally as I experience positive change and then cycle through various depressions or emotional healing that I feel I've already been through, even while using past subliminals.

I can tell some deep changes are taking place as what I'm attracting is changing as well. I seem to have had a knack for attracting women who were as depressed and anxious as I was and am finding that lessening to an insane degree. It's a bit painful to "Level-Up" especially when I feel that I'm consciously getting the results that I intended to get, but I understand it's all necessary in life.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Yesterday, 05:28 PM
Post: #3509
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
What can overcome a lifetime of social hypnosis? That's the question.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Yesterday, 05:32 PM (This post was last modified: Yesterday 05:33 PM by Ultrasonic King.)
Post: #3510
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(Yesterday 05:13 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:59 PM)... Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:47 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:43 PM)... Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:29 PM)Shannon Wrote:  Make it work. Smile What I'm going to do is basically develop the 6G skeleton script, which is to say, there are literally hundreds of facets to that answer, and I really can't even remember them all.

I want 6G ASC to produce genuine confidence. ASC 5G was created before I understood some key principles, which allow for the result to be only surface level confidence.

Would you say AM6 develops some of that genuine self confidence?

Given that you use it for long enough to allow it to achieve it's goals, absolutely.

DO you think people like the earlier daos because those subs worked on a surface level. They adapted to the user rather than the other way around? which is why some people see better conscious results. I don't believe its the case but it just seems like maybe that's why some people are going through what they are (resistance, running).

If a sub works subconciously, how can it only produce surface results

Earlier subs allowed for results that were much easier to get, much easier to see in some cases and much less demanding of genuine personal responsibility and improvement on the part of the user. It's easy to make a person feel confident. It's another story entirely to actually get them to the point of genuinely being confident.

The newer subs are not all requiring the sort of incredibly deep adjustments and improvements that DMSI is, but then, they're not all requiring those because they're not attempting to get results that defy a lifetime of social hypnosis either. I demonstrated with MIR and MHS that the technology base works well and doesn't always require soul crushing changes to achieve the goals. It's the goal that dictates that is required to achieve that goal. Pick a challenging goal, and expect to have a challenge.

ASC does not only produce surface results. The surface results are a result of subconscious changes. But the sub is not correcting the other subconscious programming that may contradict it, and in some cases, eventually that other programming undermines it and causes it to fail.

The goal of 6G is to cause whatever changes are being sought to be propagated through the whole of the person, so they are real and genuine and long term or permanent at every level. Not just the high subconscious and the conscious awareness.

It's easy to create a temporary change in behavior. It's not so easy to create a universal, permanent change. And since universal and permanent is what actually gets you your miney and time's worth, that's what I am aiming to develop.

Awesome, but you can't say that no one hasn't seen results from ASC. Pretty sure everyone has seen changes from DMSI also. I'm sure you've already considered balancing all the factors to make the best program. I trust in the method and the products. It's just when you're seeing real life positive changes coming from these subs to be grateful for it's hard not to believe in your mind and subs. Its just that when some guys are only focusing on improving sex life, desperation can kick in for this tech to work. Which is why I respect that DMSI A works on everything. So B might be just the closest thing to satisfy direct conscious results towards attracting women but it's all dependant on A which incorporates both healing and attraction. I'm just saying making a sub user feel like they are attracting more women with the IOI's and whatever could cause them to consciously and subconciously stick with a program. Which i'm sure it also does. But just think of this as a reminder

I can resist everything except temptation
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Yesterday, 05:47 PM
Post: #3511
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(Yesterday 05:28 PM)Shadow2200 Wrote:  What can overcome a lifetime of social hypnosis? That's the question.

To upgrade the lowest levels of the operating system, you have to work at the lowest levels. That's what I'm doing with 5.5/6G. The resistance and self sabotage and all that? It's coming from those parts of you running the old code that's the most basic foundation for all of why you have the issues you're trying to change. The very same code that eventually asserts the results that cause what should be a permanent change to fade with time.

So we are going to effectively perform an in-place upgrade. Right down to the bare metal, if necessary.

Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator

The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.)
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Yesterday, 05:51 PM
Post: #3512
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(Yesterday 05:32 PM)... Wrote:  
(Yesterday 05:13 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:59 PM)... Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:47 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:43 PM)... Wrote:  Would you say AM6 develops some of that genuine self confidence?

Given that you use it for long enough to allow it to achieve it's goals, absolutely.

DO you think people like the earlier daos because those subs worked on a surface level. They adapted to the user rather than the other way around? which is why some people see better conscious results. I don't believe its the case but it just seems like maybe that's why some people are going through what they are (resistance, running).

If a sub works subconciously, how can it only produce surface results

Earlier subs allowed for results that were much easier to get, much easier to see in some cases and much less demanding of genuine personal responsibility and improvement on the part of the user. It's easy to make a person feel confident. It's another story entirely to actually get them to the point of genuinely being confident.

The newer subs are not all requiring the sort of incredibly deep adjustments and improvements that DMSI is, but then, they're not all requiring those because they're not attempting to get results that defy a lifetime of social hypnosis either. I demonstrated with MIR and MHS that the technology base works well and doesn't always require soul crushing changes to achieve the goals. It's the goal that dictates that is required to achieve that goal. Pick a challenging goal, and expect to have a challenge.

ASC does not only produce surface results. The surface results are a result of subconscious changes. But the sub is not correcting the other subconscious programming that may contradict it, and in some cases, eventually that other programming undermines it and causes it to fail.

The goal of 6G is to cause whatever changes are being sought to be propagated through the whole of the person, so they are real and genuine and long term or permanent at every level. Not just the high subconscious and the conscious awareness.

It's easy to create a temporary change in behavior. It's not so easy to create a universal, permanent change. And since universal and permanent is what actually gets you your miney and time's worth, that's what I am aiming to develop.

Awesome, but you can't say that no one hasn't seen results from ASC. Pretty sure everyone has seen changes from DMSI also. I'm sure you've already considered balancing all the factors to make the best program. I trust in the method and the products. It's just when you're seeing real life positive changes coming from these subs to be grateful for it's hard not to believe in your mind and subs. Its just that when some guys are only focusing on improving sex life, desperation can kick in for this tech to work. Which is why I respect that DMSI A works on everything. So B might be just the closest thing to satisfy direct conscious results towards attracting women but it's all dependant on A which incorporates both healing and attraction. I'm just saying making a sub user feel like they are attracting more women with the IOI's and whatever could cause them to consciously and subconciously stick with a program. Which i'm sure it also does. But just think of this as a reminder

Oh, to be sure, I am not saying nobody got results from ASC, or that nobody got long term or permanent results. The goal, though is to make it permanent and effective for everybody.

When it comes down to it, A is designed to enable B to work. If A is not working on what B is supposed to be doing, then there's still something in there fighting to prevent A and B from working. When that something has stepped out of the way for good, the effects of B will be felt on A or B. B is provided to allow you to get more bang for your buck, so to speak, since the script is shorter and more focused. But in the end, the results you get depend on your own execution of the script that is in B, which is also in A. If that's not happening, then we need to make the healing and clearing script more powerful, faster acting and/or more difficult to resist. Which is why I have been beefing up that script in each release.

Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator

The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.)
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Yesterday, 05:52 PM
Post: #3513
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(Yesterday 05:35 PM)Messiah Complex Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:29 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(Yesterday 04:07 PM)... Wrote:  Shannon, side question. What did you want to do to improve ASC again?

Make it work. Smile What I'm going to do is basically develop the 6G skeleton script, which is to say, there are literally hundreds of facets to that answer, and I really can't even remember them all.

I want 6G ASC to produce genuine confidence. ASC 5G was created before I understood some key principles, which allow for the result to be only surface level confidence.
Please Shannon keep it free. I heard ASC will be 6G free sample for those who want to test 6G before they actually buy a more complex subliminal title (AM, SM,etc.)

Where did I ever say it would not be free? The goal of ASC 6G is exactly what you said: a free, full power sample. Why would I charge for it?

Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator

The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.)
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Shannon's post:
Messiah Complex, eternity, maxx55, terry44
Yesterday, 05:55 PM (This post was last modified: Yesterday 06:01 PM by Zane.)
Post: #3514
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
Shannon is it possible for u to add 1 or 2 statements in subs to avoid Tinnitus? My Ears are ringing since 2015.

"We never lose our demons we simply learn to live above them."
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Yesterday, 06:03 PM
Post: #3515
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(Yesterday 05:55 PM)Zane Wrote:  Shannon is it possible for u to add 1 or 2 statements in subs to avoid Tinnitus? My Ears are ringing since 2015.

That's already in there. When I have gotten the main goals further along, I'll go back and see about how to make that work better - if it's possible.

Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator

The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.)
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Shannon's post:
eternity
Yesterday, 06:13 PM
Post: #3516
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
Can tell by the writing, Shannon's motivated to get some work done tonight Smile

I can resist everything except temptation
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Today, 01:08 AM (This post was last modified: Today 01:12 AM by dissonance.)
Post: #3517
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 2
(Yesterday 12:19 PM)Shannon Wrote:  
(Yesterday 10:51 AM)Samba99 Wrote:  
(Yesterday 10:12 AM)Shannon Wrote:  
(Yesterday 10:00 AM)Samba99 Wrote:  
(Yesterday 09:21 AM)Shannon Wrote:  You tried to create resistance? And now you're suggesting that others do the same? Seriously?

The only suggestion that everyone should/must follow is the ones you outlined. I do not suggest anyone to follow what I do. Obviously I am different than anyone. I am just saying what I observe. The sex that I had was with a girl I know she was very attracted to me. So it wasn't like something I worked on. Also creating a resistance on subconscious level is not easy. I would highly doubt anyone would think to do this.

After all we are in a testing phase and I find this interesting. I am just basically testing the power of DMSI on many parts.

Creating resistance intentionally on the subconscious level is not something most people would think to try. Until you post it on a public forum. Thus suggesting that others try it.

I understand where you are coming from, but trying to resist DMSI even more, before we overcome resistance, is only making my job harder.

I am sorry if my post somehow indicated that. In the other hand I realized how powerful 3.1 is. The manifestations work like a charm. I think you already passed the hard part of DMSI. Now I understand why you felt 3.2 could possibly be the final.

Basically, 3.1 pushes DMSI over the tipping point. It was necessary to place a rather complex and extensive set of scripting that is interactive within itself such that resistance is dealt with in a rather interesting way. But that is the framework for allowing the building of something much more powerful in that direction.

What kind of additions or changes will make it even more powerful in that direction? Is it possible to sort of say or mention without giving away secrets/methods etc? And where in line is DMSI 3.2 in your queue of sub-creation tasks? Tongue
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

Return to TopReturn to Content