05-28-2020, 12:23 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-28-2020, 12:27 PM by JackOfHearts.)
Does that mean we can't say if we are subject to propaganda from our government?
I was watching some video today and saw I missed something very big.
I saw a video in french, they were saying the french government purposely ignore the threat of the virus so that people take the Virus more seriously. The logic was that if the President ignores the threat while showing very threatening numbers about the death rate then the people would start to fear the virus and ask the president to do something about the virus willingly. So he baited the people as he knew they would disagree with him so he started to say the virus is weak, while showing a very powerful virus with fakes numbers in the media and alarming video induced by an already poor health system that has been degrading for a long time.
So if this is true it means the virus is not stronger than any flue virus that we have seen before. And worse according to those video from his youtube channel they purposefully prevented the hospitals to treat the patients, threatening them or directly remove their licence to work for the doctors.
There was a big debate recently on french TV about if chloroquine is safe to use and if it can help patient with the corona virus.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanin...5/fulltext
The problem is that they pretended this could be dangerous and could aggravate patients recovery from the virus.
While in fact according to various articles on internet (search on google a date previous to the virus) chloroquine is known since 1934 and has been use a lot to treat malaria. It's a medicine use a lot in Africa, probably as safe if not safer than common drugs to remove headaches.
Worse it's seems it's officially known that chloroquine was used to treat previous Corona virus since 2003, and this is why according to him the Chinese were testing it, and that they have done a double blind test to prove it recently.
It seems Bill gate is involved as well and were financing the hospital who did a very doubtful research on the effect of chloroquine.
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-W...OPP1156514
The research Brigham did was massively relayed by the French media, but it seems they had some internal problems of finance. But this is who they rely for deciding if chloroquine is safe or not:
https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/fi...ition.html
https://www.brighamandwomens.org/about-b...il?id=3592
The date they started their research is particularly suspicious and also the number of patients and hospitals involved.
But why would the government would do that, according to them it is for selling their stupid Vaccine, Bill gates is known to have invested in Vaccine to save the world. There is various video on youtube about him saying he want to reduce the world population with Vaccine
while ignorin the side effects of his vaccines.
They may also blame the financial crisis on the virus.
I was watching some video today and saw I missed something very big.
I saw a video in french, they were saying the french government purposely ignore the threat of the virus so that people take the Virus more seriously. The logic was that if the President ignores the threat while showing very threatening numbers about the death rate then the people would start to fear the virus and ask the president to do something about the virus willingly. So he baited the people as he knew they would disagree with him so he started to say the virus is weak, while showing a very powerful virus with fakes numbers in the media and alarming video induced by an already poor health system that has been degrading for a long time.
So if this is true it means the virus is not stronger than any flue virus that we have seen before. And worse according to those video from his youtube channel they purposefully prevented the hospitals to treat the patients, threatening them or directly remove their licence to work for the doctors.
There was a big debate recently on french TV about if chloroquine is safe to use and if it can help patient with the corona virus.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanin...5/fulltext
The problem is that they pretended this could be dangerous and could aggravate patients recovery from the virus.
While in fact according to various articles on internet (search on google a date previous to the virus) chloroquine is known since 1934 and has been use a lot to treat malaria. It's a medicine use a lot in Africa, probably as safe if not safer than common drugs to remove headaches.
Worse it's seems it's officially known that chloroquine was used to treat previous Corona virus since 2003, and this is why according to him the Chinese were testing it, and that they have done a double blind test to prove it recently.
It seems Bill gate is involved as well and were financing the hospital who did a very doubtful research on the effect of chloroquine.
Quote:Summary: Coronavirus patients treated with chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine are significantly more likely to experience ventricular arrhythmias than those who were treated with other medications. The study also revealed that out of 100,000 COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized, the 15,000 who received hydroxychloroquine were more likely to have worse health outcomes than those treated with other drugs.
Source: Brigham and Women’s Hospital
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-W...OPP1156514
The research Brigham did was massively relayed by the French media, but it seems they had some internal problems of finance. But this is who they rely for deciding if chloroquine is safe or not:
https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/fi...ition.html
https://www.brighamandwomens.org/about-b...il?id=3592
Quote:We did a multinational registry analysis of the use of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19. The registry comprised data from 671 hospitals in six continents. We included patients hospitalised between Dec 20, 2019, and April 14, 2020, with a positive laboratory finding for SARS-CoV-2. Patients who received one of the treatments of interest within 48 h of diagnosis were included in one of four treatment groups (chloroquine alone, chloroquine with a macrolide, hydroxychloroquine alone, or hydroxychloroquine with a macrolide), and patients who received none of these treatments formed the control group. Patients for whom one of the treatments of interest was initiated more than 48 h after diagnosis or while they were on mechanical ventilation, as well as patients who received remdesivir, were excluded. The main outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality and the occurrence of de-novo ventricular arrhythmias (non-sustained or sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation).
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lance...6/fulltext
The date they started their research is particularly suspicious and also the number of patients and hospitals involved.
But why would the government would do that, according to them it is for selling their stupid Vaccine, Bill gates is known to have invested in Vaccine to save the world. There is various video on youtube about him saying he want to reduce the world population with Vaccine
while ignorin the side effects of his vaccines.They may also blame the financial crisis on the virus.
