(02-23-2016, 07:52 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: I'm for polyamory myself. The girls I meet, they would probably be the same in one way or another. That's why I don't wanna be restricted to just 'single women'. In reality, a huge percentage of women are already involved or seeing somebody - but at the same time still available. I've experienced it too much as I've been on numerous dates with girls who apparently have a bf.

(02-22-2016, 11:00 PM)heavysm Wrote:

(02-22-2016, 10:43 PM)Trend Wrote: Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover 5G should be the next update for BASE !!!

But you're likely to become good with money while using BASE, so do you really need a partner who is financially wealthy? As a BASE user, I don't need my partner to particularly be wealthy.

Also, wouldn't such a sub be most useful for others to use so they can attract BASE users into their lives? Lol

(02-23-2016, 08:05 PM)Trend Wrote: Personally, if Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover 5G is in the works, Shannon, I can forward you payment for the order right now, even before you get started on it so we can be clear that this is not a bu#!$#!t request.

Thanks.

(02-23-2016, 08:13 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(02-23-2016, 08:05 PM)Trend Wrote: Personally, if Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover 5G is in the works, Shannon, I can forward you payment for the order right now, even before you get started on it so we can be clear that this is not a bu#!$#!t request.

Thanks.

Doesn't sound bad, I got a slight addition however: Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover Who Shares Her Money With You 5G

(02-23-2016, 07:33 PM)essy Wrote: I'm all for having multiple lovers. Would I want them under one roof? I think not. The only point I want to make about your comments is the one-sidedness a lot of men have when it comes to polyamory. They want to have multiple women and yet they expect those women to stay 'loyal'. It's a two way street.

(02-23-2016, 08:46 PM)AlphaRomeo Wrote:

(02-23-2016, 07:33 PM)essy Wrote: I'm all for having multiple lovers. Would I want them under one roof? I think not. The only point I want to make about your comments is the one-sidedness a lot of men have when it comes to polyamory. They want to have multiple women and yet they expect those women to stay 'loyal'. It's a two way street.

I´m not gonna read my whole original post since it was very long, but I would not want them under one roof either living together. That´s why its perfect sexual circle, not harem. Also, I definitely don´t expect all of them to be loyal for the rest of my/their life and if they start to desire different kind of set up I hook them up to circle of friends that fits their desire, often polyamory, and fill the funnel with new women to replace those who leave the circle. The purpose of polygyny is not to f around with women or for them to f around, but to f with them and those who are into polygyny they are happy to do that. That´s how the set up Im describing works.

All I´m saying that there definitely IS a lot of women who WANT to be in a POLYGYNY (not polyamory) relationship where they share only one man. These are mainly lesbian by their nature but who has also bi-interest to degree that they want one man to run the show. Again, like I said it sounds unbelievable to many men but I happen to know people who does this and like I said there is tons of people out there for every kind of arrangement so no, it´s not two way street in case of polygyny, it is based on consent of all adults involved and I was NOT talking about polyamory. By definition polygyny is on man and multiple women and the term exists because that kind of lifestyle exists. The purpose of the suggested program is to manifest YOUR perfect sexual circle. Since there is a lot of women who ARE interested to live in polygyny the program would seek and manifest those if that is what the user want. If he/she wants polyamory (which is what you did describe) or even polyandry kind of set up then the program would seek out for that.

(02-23-2016, 08:05 PM)Trend Wrote: As an entrepreneur, it takes a lot of energy and costly mistakes before things are going in your favor; you're obviously not there yet, so you do need a wealthy partner

I think David DeAngelo or Dan Pena was mentioning that when two people are pursuing the same goal, it's the equivalent of your effort multiplied 5 times than if you'd be doing it by yourself; who would be better to have around getting you through your downfalls than the one person you trust being part of your life and such.

Then, after you have the $$$ and everybody's happy, you can go on a tangent ... large-breasted nymphomaniac lover, flat-chested with the midget kinky soul-mate and such.

Personally, if Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover 5G is in the works, Shannon, I can forward you payment for the order right now, even before you get started on it so we can be clear that this is not a bu#!$#!t request.

Thanks.

(02-24-2016, 02:54 AM)Kol Wrote: Shannon,

If I finish ASC and start AM 6.0, how much time off should I take between subs?

(02-24-2016, 12:01 AM)heavysm Wrote: Lol i guess you've never seen my BASE thread then. My monthly income goal is around $40k and I'm about a fifth there after first run of BASE. I'm really self reliant so I just don't need my partner to be wealthy, but i suppose a lot of other users here want that. To each his own, then.

I'm not at $40k a month, obviously, but I'm comfortable enough to not need wealth in my partner to be happy. That's all.

My larger point here, though...do the MYP subs work that well for committed / longer term relationships? I was under the impression that they work sort of haphazardly; you get multiple options and potentials for manifesting partners, but the results are more generalized. You aren't likely to manifest the woman of your dreams (whatever that means for you - or even multiple partners over time), but you might find lots of potential options who generally fit your preference, though not exactly.

I get that there are a ton of factors here, but the general idea is that the 'limit' of the MYP subs is that it can help you manifest lots of potential options for partners who sort of fit your preference (big boobs, but perhaps not as attractive face/ body) but it can't really bring in candidates you might have serious long term affinity with (at least it hasn't yet for any user i know of). Or am i wrong on that?

(02-24-2016, 02:26 PM)Trend Wrote: If you're only limiting yourself to $40k/month, it's ok then; misunderstanding on my part