(12-03-2016, 12:46 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(12-02-2016, 07:30 PM)eternitys_child Wrote: I didn't feel any sort of euphoria or morphine drip from 3.0.1a. Does that mean I'm not executing the script?

It would suggest that you're not executing the euphoria section of scripting, at the least.

Direct resistance is correlating more and more with headaches, while execution should correlate with euphoria, or at least a sensation pf pleasantness. To me, the sensation is much like a cross between morphine and a full body massage.

If you get neither effect (headache nor pleasure) this suggests that you may be stonewalling the script. Are you seeing any other results?

(12-03-2016, 12:47 AM)Shannon Wrote: Much to my shock and surprise, however, the models repeatedly and consistently have shown me that it is not running BAMM 2.0 that best leads to my financial goals in the long term, but running DMSI 3.0.1-A. I do not (yet) understand this, but I do know that when the models give the same exact answer 26 times in a row... it is 99.999999999999999% likely to be correct.

(12-03-2016, 12:37 PM)yeah! Wrote:

(12-03-2016, 12:47 AM)Shannon Wrote: Much to my shock and surprise, however, the models repeatedly and consistently have shown me that it is not running BAMM 2.0 that best leads to my financial goals in the long term, but running DMSI 3.0.1-A. I do not (yet) understand this, but I do know that when the models give the same exact answer 26 times in a row... it is 99.999999999999999% likely to be correct.

But BAMM would have played a massive part in the creation of DMSI and so it is (probably along with all the other foundational script) still responsible. Maybe all that BAMM foundation, combined with the newer optimus engine is whats at work.

(12-03-2016, 08:45 AM)eternitys_child Wrote:

(12-03-2016, 12:46 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(12-02-2016, 07:30 PM)eternitys_child Wrote: I didn't feel any sort of euphoria or morphine drip from 3.0.1a. Does that mean I'm not executing the script?

It would suggest that you're not executing the euphoria section of scripting, at the least.

Direct resistance is correlating more and more with headaches, while execution should correlate with euphoria, or at least a sensation pf pleasantness. To me, the sensation is much like a cross between morphine and a full body massage.

If you get neither effect (headache nor pleasure) this suggests that you may be stonewalling the script. Are you seeing any other results?

Well I felt the aura for sure the first night, and I phased in and out of consciousness both nights while listening, eventually getting knocked out by the sub.

Yesterday was a really jacked up day for me and I was depressed because of life events not going my way, so I may well could have over ride the morphine drip with the depression.

I've never stonewalled your programs, and I think it may be too early to tell but I'll keep going. I have like no desire to go out and meet women which is odd, considering I was the complete opposite the day before running 3.0.1

(12-03-2016, 01:09 PM)RTBoss Wrote:

(12-03-2016, 08:45 AM)eternitys_child Wrote:

(12-03-2016, 12:46 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(12-02-2016, 07:30 PM)eternitys_child Wrote: I didn't feel any sort of euphoria or morphine drip from 3.0.1a. Does that mean I'm not executing the script?

It would suggest that you're not executing the euphoria section of scripting, at the least.

Direct resistance is correlating more and more with headaches, while execution should correlate with euphoria, or at least a sensation pf pleasantness. To me, the sensation is much like a cross between morphine and a full body massage.

If you get neither effect (headache nor pleasure) this suggests that you may be stonewalling the script. Are you seeing any other results?

Well I felt the aura for sure the first night, and I phased in and out of consciousness both nights while listening, eventually getting knocked out by the sub.

Yesterday was a really jacked up day for me and I was depressed because of life events not going my way, so I may well could have over ride the morphine drip with the depression.

I've never stonewalled your programs, and I think it may be too early to tell but I'll keep going. I have like no desire to go out and meet women which is odd, considering I was the complete opposite the day before running 3.0.1

Man, this is exactly how I felt on most of the DMSI iterations up to 2 weeks into V2.4 - then click!

It's the clearing/healing. You'll go through some shit, not want to go out...then when you clear whatever it is that's holding you back, you'll get out there. Trust me. I can't wait to go out now.

(12-03-2016, 04:56 AM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: Shannon, subliminal text and visual subliminal (images, photos, etc.)

Which one is the most impact of the subconscious mind or brain?

I bet the visual one. But maybe you know something more.

(12-03-2016, 02:30 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote:

(12-03-2016, 12:44 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(12-02-2016, 07:26 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: actually never mind i learned how to do this on a mac.

I'm confused.

I'm currently running base stage 6 mp3. I checked the hash and the number I got for the mp3 is the number on the txt file for stage 6 flac not the mp3. Did the two numbers just get mixed up in the md5hash txt file that was put up for download to verify?

What should i do? my mac terminal is showing my mp3 as ending on the md5 6270

BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).flac
b335f6c7b569bd5db486b87c124c6270 BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).mp3
4613597460e3177439864d208173b051

The values are calculated by a MD5 sum hash program that calculates all files values and outputs them, automatically. I just copy and paste its output.

What you describe is mathematically impossible unless there is a serious bug in the program used to calculate them.

I have never had this issue before, and since it is a cryptographic function, it seems extremely unlikely that there would exist such a bug in the md5sum hash calculator.

Something is wrong then here's the proof. To the right highlighted on the txt file are the hd5 values for the flac and mp3 for stage 6. They are backwards or am i reading this wrong?

(12-03-2016, 08:45 AM)eternitys_child Wrote:

(12-03-2016, 12:46 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(12-02-2016, 07:30 PM)eternitys_child Wrote: I didn't feel any sort of euphoria or morphine drip from 3.0.1a. Does that mean I'm not executing the script?

It would suggest that you're not executing the euphoria section of scripting, at the least.

Direct resistance is correlating more and more with headaches, while execution should correlate with euphoria, or at least a sensation pf pleasantness. To me, the sensation is much like a cross between morphine and a full body massage.

If you get neither effect (headache nor pleasure) this suggests that you may be stonewalling the script. Are you seeing any other results?

Well I felt the aura for sure the first night, and I phased in and out of consciousness both nights while listening, eventually getting knocked out by the sub.

Yesterday was a really jacked up day for me and I was depressed because of life events not going my way, so I may well could have over ride the morphine drip with the depression.

I've never stonewalled your programs, and I think it may be too early to tell but I'll keep going. I have like no desire to go out and meet women which is odd, considering I was the complete opposite the day before running 3.0.1

(12-03-2016, 12:21 PM)Trend Wrote:

(12-03-2016, 12:47 AM)Shannon Wrote: Much to my shock and surprise, however, the models repeatedly and consistently have shown me that it is not running BAMM 2.0 that best leads to my financial goals in the long term, but running DMSI 3.0.1-A. I do not (yet) understand this, but I do know that when the models give the same exact answer 26 times in a row... it is 99.999999999999999% likely to be correct.

Hi Shannon,

I was wondering if you could explain in more detail, please, what do you mean about these models you're referring to.

What they are, how do you implement them and how you found them; when you have the time to do so, of course.

Just find the whole thing fascinating; maybe I can pick up a thing or two.

Many thanks.

(12-03-2016, 12:46 PM)CatMan Wrote:

(12-03-2016, 12:37 PM)yeah! Wrote:

(12-03-2016, 12:47 AM)Shannon Wrote: Much to my shock and surprise, however, the models repeatedly and consistently have shown me that it is not running BAMM 2.0 that best leads to my financial goals in the long term, but running DMSI 3.0.1-A. I do not (yet) understand this, but I do know that when the models give the same exact answer 26 times in a row... it is 99.999999999999999% likely to be correct.

But BAMM would have played a massive part in the creation of DMSI and so it is (probably along with all the other foundational script) still responsible. Maybe all that BAMM foundation, combined with the newer optimus engine is whats at work.

Exactly, I've said before that BAMM probably helped create 6G to begin with. It's really a matter of time now for it's design goal to be achieved. I have zero doubt in my mind that full 6G and all the programs you create with it will make you an appreciated, and rich man, thus fulfilling BAMM's design goal.

(12-03-2016, 05:31 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Hey Shannon!

I know it's only been a few days since 3.0.1 has been out but I noticed something. Back on 2.4, I could tell that something was happening in my mind when I used either the masked or the ultrasonic track, both had effects that I noticed. With 3.0.1 A, I could feel my mind doing something with the masked track, but barely feel anything using the hybrid track.

Is it possible that the hybrid track doesn't effect me/has less effect than if I would run a masked only or ultrasonic only track? I'd find that weird if were the case as I didn't think it was possible.

Thanks in advance.

(12-03-2016, 09:15 PM)eternitys_child Wrote:

(12-03-2016, 01:09 PM)RTBoss Wrote:

(12-03-2016, 08:45 AM)eternitys_child Wrote:

(12-03-2016, 12:46 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(12-02-2016, 07:30 PM)eternitys_child Wrote: I didn't feel any sort of euphoria or morphine drip from 3.0.1a. Does that mean I'm not executing the script?

It would suggest that you're not executing the euphoria section of scripting, at the least.

Direct resistance is correlating more and more with headaches, while execution should correlate with euphoria, or at least a sensation pf pleasantness. To me, the sensation is much like a cross between morphine and a full body massage.

If you get neither effect (headache nor pleasure) this suggests that you may be stonewalling the script. Are you seeing any other results?

Well I felt the aura for sure the first night, and I phased in and out of consciousness both nights while listening, eventually getting knocked out by the sub.

Yesterday was a really jacked up day for me and I was depressed because of life events not going my way, so I may well could have over ride the morphine drip with the depression.

I've never stonewalled your programs, and I think it may be too early to tell but I'll keep going. I have like no desire to go out and meet women which is odd, considering I was the complete opposite the day before running 3.0.1

Man, this is exactly how I felt on most of the DMSI iterations up to 2 weeks into V2.4 - then click!

It's the clearing/healing. You'll go through some shit, not want to go out...then when you clear whatever it is that's holding you back, you'll get out there. Trust me. I can't wait to go out now.

Went out today anyway. This hot girl really irked me when she used her good looks to get something for free at the restaurant, and looked over at our friend, looked into his eyes, and said "there are perks to being pretty". That drove me insane lol.

But no real response from girls as far as aura, or as far as manifestation.

Maybe I am stonewalling. Rare, but possible. I don't have increased hunger either. Hopefully it's just the clearing taking priority. Currently listening for the 3rd night's session, and I am feeling like a baseball bat hit my head and I'm about to go unconscious after only listening for 15 min