Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-03-2016

(12-02-2016, 02:36 PM)spiritman Wrote: Quick question, I plan on using the Hybrid Trickling Stream Ultrasonic mp3 file. Is it safe to use headphones with this file? About the volume, do I just put it at a comfortable level?

http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-8249.html


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-03-2016

(12-02-2016, 07:10 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote:
(12-01-2016, 09:35 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-01-2016, 09:15 PM)Have at ye Wrote:
(12-01-2016, 09:11 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote:
(12-01-2016, 09:01 PM)Steven Wrote: I'm embarrassed to say this but I don't know how to check against the md5 hashes. I don't know what to look for or how interpret them or what to compare them to.
Same here. Maybe Shannon can put a sticky somewhere.

If you guys are running Windows, here's an easy-to-use freeware checker: http://www.winmd5.com/

All instructions should be there.

I will try to remember to make a sticky tomorrow.
In case you forget ShannonWink

Should I be worried? I never checked this stuff i don't know how I been listening to subliminals from Shannon for a while. Could I have been doing this in vain?

I made a sticky thread in the FAQ section.

The MD5 hash values are useful in two cases.

1. You get your copy of my subs from a source other than IML or directly from me personally - which of course means you're probably pirating them, and you don;t know if they've been tampered with. An MD5 sum hash will prove mathematically if they are tampered with or not.

2. You want to verify that an audio file you got from IML downloaded without errors.

3. You want to verify file length.

It is extremely unlikely that you got a bad download, but it can and does happen. It is also a way to know whether the files on the server have become corrupt.

If there is an error in the file as a result of download, you will usually see that your player cannot open the file or refuses to play it. If it plays, it will most likely only have an audio glitch contained within a single second of audio. Regardless, only a file that passes the hash check is for sure safe to use, as only such a file is absolutely certainly what I created it to be.

If you haven't been checking, and have experienced no audio glitches, it is very unlikely that you have used my subs in vain.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-03-2016

(12-02-2016, 07:26 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: actually never mind i learned how to do this on a mac.

I'm confused.

I'm currently running base stage 6 mp3. I checked the hash and the number I got for the mp3 is the number on the txt file for stage 6 flac not the mp3. Did the two numbers just get mixed up in the md5hash txt file that was put up for download to verify?

What should i do? my mac terminal is showing my mp3 as ending on the md5 6270

BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).flac
b335f6c7b569bd5db486b87c124c6270 BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).mp3
4613597460e3177439864d208173b051

The values are calculated by a MD5 sum hash program that calculates all files values and outputs them, automatically. I just copy and paste its output.

What you describe is mathematically impossible unless there is a serious bug in the program used to calculate them.

I have never had this issue before, and since it is a cryptographic function, it seems extremely unlikely that there would exist such a bug in the md5sum hash calculator.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-03-2016

(12-02-2016, 07:30 PM)eternitys_child Wrote: I didn't feel any sort of euphoria or morphine drip from 3.0.1a. Does that mean I'm not executing the script?

It would suggest that you're not executing the euphoria section of scripting, at the least.

Direct resistance is correlating more and more with headaches, while execution should correlate with euphoria, or at least a sensation pf pleasantness. To me, the sensation is much like a cross between morphine and a full body massage.

If you get neither effect (headache nor pleasure) this suggests that you may be stonewalling the script. Are you seeing any other results?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-03-2016

(12-02-2016, 08:56 PM)alphabeta35 Wrote: hi Ben/Shannon
i just received a MySql error as i tried to open this page and the error information also included the plain sql query that is being run. this is very dangerous and is giving valuable information to a hacker who wants to attack the forum software and can lead to personal info being leaked to the attacker, besides many other things.
i am sure there is a way to disable detailed error messages and just give basic error response in forum settings or web server settings. i think that setting should be enabled to maximize security.

Thanks for the heads up. We have it under control.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Weichi - 12-03-2016

(12-03-2016, 12:44 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-02-2016, 07:26 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: actually never mind i learned how to do this on a mac.

I'm confused.

I'm currently running base stage 6 mp3. I checked the hash and the number I got for the mp3 is the number on the txt file for stage 6 flac not the mp3. Did the two numbers just get mixed up in the md5hash txt file that was put up for download to verify?

What should i do? my mac terminal is showing my mp3 as ending on the md5 6270

BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).flac
b335f6c7b569bd5db486b87c124c6270 BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).mp3
4613597460e3177439864d208173b051

The values are calculated by a MD5 sum hash program that calculates all files values and outputs them, automatically. I just copy and paste its output.

What you describe is mathematically impossible unless there is a serious bug in the program used to calculate them.

I have never had this issue before, and since it is a cryptographic function, it seems extremely unlikely that there would exist such a bug in the md5sum hash calculator.

I think that on a Linux type system the hash is outputed before the name of the file while on Mac it's first the name of the file and after that the hash sum.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AbundanceCH - 12-03-2016

(12-03-2016, 12:44 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-02-2016, 07:26 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: actually never mind i learned how to do this on a mac.

I'm confused.

I'm currently running base stage 6 mp3. I checked the hash and the number I got for the mp3 is the number on the txt file for stage 6 flac not the mp3. Did the two numbers just get mixed up in the md5hash txt file that was put up for download to verify?

What should i do? my mac terminal is showing my mp3 as ending on the md5 6270

BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).flac
b335f6c7b569bd5db486b87c124c6270 BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).mp3
4613597460e3177439864d208173b051

The values are calculated by a MD5 sum hash program that calculates all files values and outputs them, automatically. I just copy and paste its output.

What you describe is mathematically impossible unless there is a serious bug in the program used to calculate them.

I have never had this issue before, and since it is a cryptographic function, it seems extremely unlikely that there would exist such a bug in the md5sum hash calculator.
Something is wrong then here's the proof. To the right highlighted on the txt file are the hd5 values for the flac and mp3 for stage 6. They are backwards or am i reading this wrong?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Weichi - 12-03-2016

(12-03-2016, 02:30 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote:
(12-03-2016, 12:44 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-02-2016, 07:26 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: actually never mind i learned how to do this on a mac.

I'm confused.

I'm currently running base stage 6 mp3. I checked the hash and the number I got for the mp3 is the number on the txt file for stage 6 flac not the mp3. Did the two numbers just get mixed up in the md5hash txt file that was put up for download to verify?

What should i do? my mac terminal is showing my mp3 as ending on the md5 6270

BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).flac
b335f6c7b569bd5db486b87c124c6270 BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).mp3
4613597460e3177439864d208173b051

The values are calculated by a MD5 sum hash program that calculates all files values and outputs them, automatically. I just copy and paste its output.

What you describe is mathematically impossible unless there is a serious bug in the program used to calculate them.

I have never had this issue before, and since it is a cryptographic function, it seems extremely unlikely that there would exist such a bug in the md5sum hash calculator.
Something is wrong then here's the proof. To the right highlighted on the txt file are the hd5 values for the flac and mp3 for stage 6. They are backwards or am i reading this wrong?

In Shannon's file the hash sum is before file name while on your terminal the hash sum is after so the file is good.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - robstar - 12-03-2016

(12-03-2016, 12:21 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(12-02-2016, 09:37 AM)Steven Wrote: Shannon,

I was wondering about the healing and clearing.

There was clearing/healing in v2.2 and v2.4 and this one. Now I was thinking that I would think each time there should be less healing or less intensity because wouldn't all the healing or clearing be cumulative?

So I started thinking about the layers of an onion analogy. But an analogy isn't proof, just an idea or explanation.

So then I started to wonder, is the healing or clear set up to resolve the content (such as the actual issue), and the processes that may have sustained or created the issue(s).

In other words, let's suppose I'm afraid of women who taller than me because when I was in first grade a teacher yelled at me so much I was afraid of that teacher and then my mind translated that into fearing all women who were taller than me. So there is the content of that fear (fear of tall women), but then there is also the processes that might have led to that being developed and sustained such as feeling helpless, thinking I can't protect myself, thinking no one would help me, feeling vulnerable, not being assertive, and so forth.

Now the fear of women who are taller than me may get resolved, but with all those other processes in play... what if a dog starts acting vicious towards me and charges me (but doesn't bite me)... there are still those processes (feeling helpless, thinking I can't protect myself, thinking no one would help me, feeling vulnerable, not being assertive, and so forth) that leave me open to developing a fear of dogs.

So to me it would seem important to clear or heal the processes that cause fears in the first place so no new fears develop so we don't need to keep healing endlessly. Eliminate the processes that create fears, and then no more fears are created and the remaining ones are picked off one by one... or eliminate what sustains the remaining fears and then they all collapse as a group.

I hope I'm making sense.

Does the healing or clearing in DMSI address both the processes and content of what needs to be healed?

The healing and clearing does whatever is necessary to achieve the goals of the program, within the parameters given to shield the conscious mind and emotions from any unpleasant effects of the process.

Alright, so if I'm having panic attacks, would it heal and clear the causes of the panic attacks since they would be a hindrance in achieving the goals of the program? If that's the case it may be a better fit for me than E2, since with the enhanced technology it is faster and more powerful.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 12-03-2016

(12-03-2016, 03:43 AM)robstar Wrote: Alright, so if I'm having panic attacks, would it heal and clear the causes of the panic attacks since they would be a hindrance in achieving the goals of the program? If that's the case it may be a better fit for me than E2, since with the enhanced technology it is faster and more powerful.

Only if they're directed related to women/sex etc. I suspect.

However, I can comment on panic attacks themselves relating to subs. My brother suffers from them badly, and has Lorazepam on hand when I take him out in case the panic attacks (paranoia) set in. I've had him running E2 for a little over 2 months now, and two weekends in a row now the last two times, no Lorazepam used!!! Smile That has never happened before, mind you. Every time out the paranoia set in sooner or later annoyingly ruining the whole night. Now, even if it does happen, playing the sub gets rid of it relatively quickly, within minutes. Before the Lorazepam, he wouldn't have been able to go out with me, it wasn't practical and usually ended in a hospital visit due to the paranoia. I'm keeping him on E2 until E3 debuts, or a revision of E2 to bring it up to DMSI power levels.

E2 is tailor made for dealing with that kind of thing. I'd recommend E2 over anything else. It gets the job done for that, period.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - robstar - 12-03-2016

(12-03-2016, 03:49 AM)CatMan Wrote:
(12-03-2016, 03:43 AM)robstar Wrote: Alright, so if I'm having panic attacks, would it heal and clear the causes of the panic attacks since they would be a hindrance in achieving the goals of the program? If that's the case it may be a better fit for me than E2, since with the enhanced technology it is faster and more powerful.

Only if they're directed related to women/sex etc. I suspect.

However, I can comment on panic attacks themselves relating to subs. My brother suffers from them badly, and has Lorazepam on hand when I take him out in case the panic attacks (paranoia) set in. I've had him running E2 for a little over 2 months now, and two weekends in a row now the last two times, no Lorazepam used!!! Smile That has never happened before, mind you. Every time out the paranoia set in sooner or later annoyingly ruining the whole night. Now, even if it does happen, playing the sub gets rid of it relatively quickly, within minutes. Before the Lorazepam, he wouldn't have been able to go out with me, it wasn't practical and usually ended in a hospital visit due to the paranoia. I'm keeping him on E2 until E3 debuts, or a revision of E2 to bring it up to DMSI power levels.

E2 is tailor made for dealing with that kind of thing. I'd recommend E2 over anything else. It gets the job done for that, period.

I don't think they are related to women/sex, but Shannon said anything that would interfere with the goals of the program. They definitely interfere because they make me barely want to leave the house, and hinder my ability to socialise. I know E2 is great, I've been on it two weeks now, but hey, if there is any chance DMSI could also help with this, I'd rather run it!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 12-03-2016

(12-03-2016, 03:54 AM)robstar Wrote:
(12-03-2016, 03:49 AM)CatMan Wrote:
(12-03-2016, 03:43 AM)robstar Wrote: Alright, so if I'm having panic attacks, would it heal and clear the causes of the panic attacks since they would be a hindrance in achieving the goals of the program? If that's the case it may be a better fit for me than E2, since with the enhanced technology it is faster and more powerful.

Only if they're directed related to women/sex etc. I suspect.

However, I can comment on panic attacks themselves relating to subs. My brother suffers from them badly, and has Lorazepam on hand when I take him out in case the panic attacks (paranoia) set in. I've had him running E2 for a little over 2 months now, and two weekends in a row now the last two times, no Lorazepam used!!! Smile That has never happened before, mind you. Every time out the paranoia set in sooner or later annoyingly ruining the whole night. Now, even if it does happen, playing the sub gets rid of it relatively quickly, within minutes. Before the Lorazepam, he wouldn't have been able to go out with me, it wasn't practical and usually ended in a hospital visit due to the paranoia. I'm keeping him on E2 until E3 debuts, or a revision of E2 to bring it up to DMSI power levels.

E2 is tailor made for dealing with that kind of thing. I'd recommend E2 over anything else. It gets the job done for that, period.

I don't think they are related to women/sex, but Shannon said anything that would interfere with the goals of the program. They definitely interfere because they make me barely want to leave the house, and hinder my ability to socialise. I know E2 is great, I've been on it two weeks now, but hey, if there is any chance DMSI could also help with this, I'd rather run it!

I don't think they are, either. I can tell you're trying to run it and rationalising a reason to jump to it. That's why I posted to help you see you have the golden ticket in your hands already, bud. I'm just saying what works, and I've seen it first hand, to get rid of your issues. Ultimately it's your choice, just trying to help you make the right choice for panic attacks (paranoia). My previous post is an amazing testimony of E2, proof of it clearly removing very serious entrenched panic attacks (paranoia) after only 2 months of listening and I'm sure most people don't have them as bad as my brother does or DID perhaps is more accurate of the two at this point. If that doesn't sway you, then fair enough.

Panic attacks (paranoia) will ruin everything and it can happen at any time seemingly out of nowhere. I've seen first hand how much of life that panic attacks (paranoia) rob from you and those around you. I hope you get them sorted.

I know you want DMSI...it's the flavour of the month. I was just speaking about proof I've witnessed about E2 removing VERY VERY serious panic attacks (paranoia) after 2 months of listening that either require reliance on medication to control or hospitalisation...to tell you E2 is very effective at dealing with them. I'm supremely impressed so far with his run on E2, if it works for HIS panic attacks (paranoia), I'd wager they'd work for anyone's!

Hopefully for you, Shannon will tell you the answer you wish to hear...If not, the good news is, you already have an amazing program that is able to remove these panic attacks (paranoia) in time.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - 4Kingdoms - 12-03-2016

(12-03-2016, 04:56 AM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: Shannon, subliminal text and visual subliminal (images, photos, etc.)

Which one is the most impact of the subconscious mind or brain?

I bet the visual one. But maybe you know something more.

http://www.businessballs.com/vaklearningstylestest.htm
vak - visual, auditory, kinesthetic - learning styles model and free self-test
Have you ever taken this test? Teacher's use it to find out the best way a child absorbs information that is being taught to them.

Since you are drawn to the visual, you are probably a visual person.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - 4Kingdoms - 12-03-2016

(12-03-2016, 08:16 AM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: Hmm. Great. I have been test myself like this before. I were visual. 50 percents visual 30 percents kinesthetic and twenty percent auditory.
But, does text also images?
(12-03-2016, 08:17 AM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: I am just wonder about subliminal that flashes the text and images.

That would be considered visual because you are using your eyes to read the text.
Is it more effective than Shannon's subliminals? Probably not.
Is it effective for you? Probably so because you are a visual person.