Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 12-01-2016

Based on Ben's usage patterns, don't expect the files to be linked for about 10-11 hours from now. It's just after 1AM where he's at, and his last login was about 30 minutes ago (yes, I'm stalking you Benny boy!).


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - 4Kingdoms - 12-01-2016

(12-01-2016, 05:34 AM)Shannon Wrote: Oh, I will reiterate one more time... I strongly recommend that everybody do a MINIMUM of 1 week of A (and preferably 4) before using B. Do NOT recommend trying to use them both in a single day. Use each for a week at a time, minimum.
(12-01-2016, 05:50 AM)Aventus45 Wrote: So the B version is going to be the unicorn of the two?

Shannon I can alternate between A and B?

Shannon answered that above your question. (Alternate Weekly)


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 12-01-2016

3 loops of 3.0.1A will work out to 69x3 = 207mins which is 3hours 27mins, don't think I can keep earphones in for that long, it can get annoying even for a trickle stream lover, but hybrid is more power!!!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-01-2016

(12-01-2016, 05:53 AM)RTBoss Wrote: Regarding alcohol not being physically addictive, I must heartily disagree. I used to work in a hospital during college. My job was to sit with patients who were a danger to themselves. Many were alcoholics going through detox. The physical symptoms of withdrawal can be so nasty it can literally kill you. I've been with people who have had no idea who they are, where they were, or unable to construct a coherent sentence because their brains were no longer getting the fuel (poison) it had adapted to. DTS, delirium tremens, is nooooo joke.

Physical addiction, and dosage dependent withdrawal, are hardly the same thing.

When you drink heavily and regularly, you can cause your body to become screwed up and it will require a slow decrease in alcohol consumption to back out of that situation. But that has nothing to do with physical addiction. It's a situation in which you cannot change the body chemistry too radically in too short a period of time without causing imbalances. Push it far enough and those imbalances can result in death - but it is a case where there is a requirement for slow removal of the toxin (alcohol), nothing more.

Go from drinking nothing ever to downing a 20 ounce bottle of liquor and see if that doesn't kill you just as effectively as suddenly and completely stopping a hard drinking long term drinker will. Both are the same situation: they are both a state of too much change for the body to deal with in too short a time.

Alcohol is not physically addictive. It can only be psychologically addictive. And it's misunderstandings like this one that perpetuate these ideas.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-01-2016

(12-01-2016, 06:27 AM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: Shannon,

Pardon me if I rewiring this problem again, Curious...

AP code...
I have been seen this statement:

"I would strongly suggest not pirating my stuff. Those who want to believe they can circumvent or ignore my anti-piracy code don't get a free pass just for being ignorant fools. They just deal with the consequences of their actions in different ways, which they may not be intelligent or aware enough to notice or understand. But rest assured, had they intelligence and wisdom, they would rather pay for it than steal it from me. There is no way around it."

Can you explain more that italic bold statement? Does it mean that people are triggered with code will be destructive in behavior (besides attain the program goal?)?

Thanks.
Sorry to be Thread Starter again about this debateful argument.

That no longer applies. It referred to a previous version of the AP code which is no longer in use, and which was discovered to be somehow missing the code to execute that part. Which is why we now have this new AP code, which will have teeth.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 12-01-2016

(12-01-2016, 06:27 AM)dweller94 Wrote: 3 loops of 3.0.1A will work out to 69x3 = 207mins which is 3 hours 45 mins, don't think I can keep earphones in for that long, it can get annoying even for a trickle stream lover, but hybrid is more power!!!

To me it's more the earphone annoyance than the sound itself. When I hear the same sound for a long time period my brain no longer acknowledge that sound as relevant so I no longer notice it.
3 hours 45m is a new record though. Now I'm hesitating for the non healing version as there is not a much loop to do.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 12-01-2016

(12-01-2016, 06:43 AM)Alpha360 Wrote:
(12-01-2016, 06:27 AM)dweller94 Wrote: 3 loops of 3.0.1A will work out to 69x3 = 207mins which is 3 hours 45 mins, don't think I can keep earphones in for that long, it can get annoying even for a trickle stream lover, but hybrid is more power!!!

To me it's more the earphone annoyance than the sound itself. When I hear the same sound for a long time period my brain no longer acknowledge that sound as relevant so I no longer notice it.
3 hours 45m is a new record though. Now I'm hesitating for the non healing version as there is not a much loop to do.

Yeah forgot to mention the earphone annoyance, I was hoping for one loop lol, we got three. Get those heals in man, it'll go a long way for all of us!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-01-2016

You get what the models tell me is the best option.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - robstar - 12-01-2016

(12-01-2016, 06:27 AM)dweller94 Wrote: 3 loops of 3.0.1A will work out to 69x3 = 207mins which is 3 hours 45 mins, don't think I can keep earphones in for that long, it can get annoying even for a trickle stream lover, but hybrid is more power!!!

Did I miss something? Are earphones necessary for the hybrid?
PS 207 = 3 hours and 27 minutes.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - eternity - 12-01-2016

(11-30-2016, 09:35 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-30-2016, 09:31 PM)robstar Wrote:
(11-30-2016, 08:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-30-2016, 08:11 PM)Dutchman610 Wrote:
(11-30-2016, 06:16 PM)Shannon Wrote: Stop Smoking is currently in a single stage format. Originally it was a six stage format.

Six stage format worked because it stepped you up gradually. But nobody wanted to buy it because it was $500 a copy.

When I rebuilt it, it was a single stage, for $89.95, but trying to do all that at once isn't working anywhere near as well as before.

Anything is better than nothing, especially if they use it 6 months straight. It still works for some. But it's better in 6 stage format. That's what I have to re-build. That and the latest technological wizardry.
O
I'm wondering why quit smoking, takes a six stage approach to be effective. But, quit alcohol is a single stage? Is one a deep addiction than the other, or is quit alcohol meant to be a six stage also.

First of all, despite popular mythology, alcoholism isn't an addiction and it sure as hell isn't any type of "disease". They'd love to make you think it is, because then you don't have to take responsibility for not buying, opening and drinking it... so someone can make money or have control of you on some sort of "recovery" regimen.

The truth is, alcoholism is self medication, just like smoking, and marijuana and most other drugs, but alcohol isn't physically addictive. It's psychologically very addictive to certain personality and physiology types, though, because they find an easy escape in it.

Stop smoking works best as a six stage approach because there's a lot of different variables to dealing with it than alcoholism. And at some point, "science" will figure that out.

Until then... alcoholism is a choice, but the physical addiction does not exist. The root cause of alcoholism is the seeking to escape guilt, shame, fear and/or self loathing through the effects of alcohol on the brain. The "addiction" is really just a heightened psychological tendency to escapism, and it is enabled and empowered by the "addiction" and "disease" labels. Give that same person a way to deal with whatever they're dealing with through alcohol in another way, deny them their drug of choice, and they'll go straight to that new option because they're still trying to escape, rather than deal with it.

A lot of it has to do with the person's level of emotional maturity. More maturity leads to more likely "recovery" (which is itself a ***** term used to retroactively imply "disease and addiction"). I have witnessed "alcoholics" at all stages of "alcoholism" for decades now, and the ones who keep doing it are the ones who believe they can get away with it, or believe they have no other choice. The rest sober up and move on with life.

In this regard, just as with smoking, it is the beliefs that bind you. Beliefs that you have no other choice, beliefs that you have no need to grow up and take responsibility for your choices and actions because someone else will do it for you, or forgive you, or pat you on the head.

Smoking has a lot of the same thing, and is vastly more socially acceptable. It actually is a legitimate addiction, albeit a much more minor one than people think.

But the real difference between why those two programs are different sizes boils down to two things.

1. Stop Drinking got very good feedback in one stage, and Stop Smoking did not;
2. The people prone to alcoholism have a different physiology and psychology than those who are prone to smoking, but not alcoholism. Different approaches are required for each.

It is going to be that both programs will be rebuilt in 6G. They may be 1, 3 or 6 stages each, it will depend on whatever works best.

Do you not think a "Be addiction free" sub would be possible in 6G rather than multiple different subs?

It's possible. We shall see. But since alcoholism isn't an addiction...

Shannon, while we have disagreed about addiction in the past, I've learned over time that you were definitely right about a lot of things. I'm replying to this post since it's somewhat relevant.

I know you are busy with a whole bunch of more important things, but do you think you can describe what you mean when you say alcoholism isn't an addiction?

I combated drug addiction and alcoholism for 10 years, and finally got sober on thanksgiving day 2014. (Nov 27 marked my 2 years of being completely substance free, and that was no small feat!!!!!) I also quit nicotine Nov 2015 so I have 1 year free of that addiction. I do agree that alcoholism and cigarette addiction are NOT the same thing, so I guess we're just referring to an issue of semantics when I say my addiction to alcohol was an addiction.

And for the record, I'm 100% your subs had a HUGE impact on the rapid development of me from the inside out. Between am6, OF5G and E2, and other outside help that I have sought, I went from being the black sheep of society to a highly respected member of society.

You have really helped change my life Shannon, to a magnitude you wouldnt be able to fathom unless you knew the before and after versions of me. And for that I express my deepest gratitude for you and your work, and for what you contribute to this world.




EDIT : never mind I jumped the gun and didn't see that you already wrote a detailed response. I heavily disagree with what you say about alcoholism, but we can agree to disagree on that. I wonder if "alcohol is not physically addictive" is a statement with a different meaning? of semantics? Delerium tremens is a thing. I have experienced it. I've seen people seize out in front of me from not detoxing properly. One guy busted his head on the concrete from an alcohol withdrawal induced seizure. If that doesn't constitute as physical addiction, I'm at a loss for words and the comprehension of the subject has gone way beyond my understanding

Double edit: just thoroughly read that you described my first edit in a previous post. Well, my beliefs about the subject are quite certainly heavily influenced by personal experience. That being said, Shannon, though being a master in the field of the human mind, understanding of a subject like this would be vastly different between someone like you, being on the outside looking in, vs me, being on the inside looking out. Kind of like cancer. I know you've beaten it. Only you know, first hand, all of what it entails. Even if I learned all about it, the science, the medicine, the bodys reaction to it.... not having the actuak experience of having cancer and beating it would leave a little hole in my comprehension of the subject compared to you, who knows the science, medicine, body's reaction to it, ALONG with first hand experience of it.

Regardless, I'm sure the discussion we can get into about this can take up a lot of time and we all just want dmsi out already Big Grin I still respect your opinion on the subject and I will readily drop my belief in the subject if a superior one is presented to me (which thus far has not been available, in my years of experience)


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 12-01-2016

(12-01-2016, 07:20 AM)robstar Wrote:
(12-01-2016, 06:27 AM)dweller94 Wrote: 3 loops of 3.0.1A will work out to 69x3 = 207mins which is 3 hours 45 mins, don't think I can keep earphones in for that long, it can get annoying even for a trickle stream lover, but hybrid is more power!!!

Did I miss something? Are earphones necessary for the hybrid?
PS 207 = 3 hours and 27 minutes.

No, you can play the hybrid on speakers as long as minimum output is 20khz, I wanted to use hybrid with earphones only for max impact lol

My bad 3 hours 27mins, where did I get the 45 from..


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - freerad98 - 12-01-2016

(12-01-2016, 07:31 AM)dweller94 Wrote: ..snip
My bad 3 hours 27mins, where did I get the 45 from..

207/60 = 3.45 hrs = 3 hrs 27 mins Smile



RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 12-01-2016

(12-01-2016, 07:43 AM)freerad98 Wrote:
(12-01-2016, 07:31 AM)dweller94 Wrote: ..snip
My bad 3 hours 27mins, where did I get the 45 from..

207/60 = 3.45 hrs = 3 hrs 27 mins Smile

When you divide by 100 hahaha I need to sleep.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AriGold - 12-01-2016

Hey Shannon,
if something is blocking me to attract my perfect xy, what program would be best to release the blockage?
How long do I have to use the program?
How will I know when the blockage is removed without using AYP for 8 months again to find myself at the same blockage?