Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-29-2016

(11-29-2016, 10:54 PM)coldfact Wrote:
(11-29-2016, 04:31 PM)Shannon Wrote: I am astonished at how losing MIR 2.1 has hit me so hard.
Hey Shannon - I absolutely hate losing code I have worked ages on... I feel your pain. Have you considered using DropBox for all of your scripts? (automated backup) Or maybe just regular source control (e.g. GitHub) to force you to save versions as you build? Then these 'accidents' are very easy to correct.

Also... I assume with the loss of MIR, that MHS will be delayed? (since it would have benefited from much of the MIR work)

DropBox is not secure. I have concluded that I am going to create an encrypted container for the scripts and such, which will be in DropBox, and work on the programs from within it.

Had that idea several hours ago.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - cfact - 11-29-2016

(11-29-2016, 11:00 PM)Shannon Wrote: DropBox is not secure. I have concluded that I am going to create an encrypted container for the scripts and such, which will be in DropBox, and work on the programs from within it.

Had that idea several hours ago.
I am comfortable with their security measures - https://www.dropbox.com/en/help/27 - you should definitely switch on two-step verification - but I can understand if you are not. The downside with your approach is that the entire encrypted container will be backed up, not individual files - so not as simple to "roll back" to previous versions of a file. But that is the trade off for security.
Maybe a compromise is something like https://www.boxcryptor.com/en/dropbox - keeps individual files encrypted.

But your container approach would already give you peace of mind - you always know that all container changes are automatically backed up...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-29-2016

(11-29-2016, 11:13 PM)coldfact Wrote:
(11-29-2016, 11:00 PM)Shannon Wrote: DropBox is not secure. I have concluded that I am going to create an encrypted container for the scripts and such, which will be in DropBox, and work on the programs from within it.

Had that idea several hours ago.
I am comfortable with their security measures - https://www.dropbox.com/en/help/27 - you should definitely switch on two-step verification - but I can understand if you are not. The downside with your approach is that the entire encrypted container will be backed up, not individual files - so not as simple to "roll back" to previous versions of a file. But that is the trade off for security.
Maybe a compromise is something like https://www.boxcryptor.com/en/dropbox - keeps individual files encrypted.

But your container approach would already give you peace of mind - you always know that all container changes are automatically backed up...

Security is always a compromise between convenience and security. We have tried everything... even boxcryptor. It didn't work for us, although I don;t remember why right now.

I can live with an encrypted container being backed up, I will still keep multiple external disks for backup separately on a periodic basis.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RoaringLion - 11-29-2016

i imagine Shannon doesn't even want the possibility of Dropbox employees being able to access his trade secrets, also government agencies and hackers.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-29-2016

(11-29-2016, 11:18 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-29-2016, 11:13 PM)coldfact Wrote:
(11-29-2016, 11:00 PM)Shannon Wrote: DropBox is not secure. I have concluded that I am going to create an encrypted container for the scripts and such, which will be in DropBox, and work on the programs from within it.

Had that idea several hours ago.
I am comfortable with their security measures - https://www.dropbox.com/en/help/27 - you should definitely switch on two-step verification - but I can understand if you are not. The downside with your approach is that the entire encrypted container will be backed up, not individual files - so not as simple to "roll back" to previous versions of a file. But that is the trade off for security.
Maybe a compromise is something like https://www.boxcryptor.com/en/dropbox - keeps individual files encrypted.

But your container approach would already give you peace of mind - you always know that all container changes are automatically backed up...

Security is always a compromise between convenience and security. We have tried everything... even boxcryptor. It didn't work for us, although I don;t remember why right now.

I can live with an encrypted container being backed up, I will still keep multiple external disks for backup separately on a periodic basis.

You should try keeping a copy on your phone, even the FBI can't get into iPhones these days. There's an app for iPhone called "downloads" you can drag and drops files from your computer, and it's password protected... if you have an iPhone. Or you could buy one of those thin USBs and wear it as a necklace, I've thought about that when it comes to my app development projects.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bits - 11-29-2016

What about ironkey? expensive but maybe a 8gb/16gb would be enough for scripts?

http://www.ironkey.com/en-US/encrypted-storage-drives/


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - hunk - 11-29-2016

(11-29-2016, 05:52 PM)Genesis Wrote: Shannon, I sent you healing energy. Got your pic btw, this makes it easy for me. Please work at your own pace and never mind the naysayers.

Reminds me of my Reiki group healing sessions we used to do ages ago. Is Shannon's pic publicly available? I could chime in as well.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-29-2016

Every company has trade secrets, there's always going to be a risk when it comes to security. I'm sure companies spend a lot of money protecting their secrets. If I were you, encrypted hard drive and safety deposit box. If someone tried to rob the bank, they probably wouldn't know or care what to do with it. But unless you have like a billion dollar corporation as your competitor, I don't think you should be that worried about it. As someone recently said, most people think these things are as good as magic.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-29-2016

(11-29-2016, 11:28 PM)bits Wrote: What about ironkey? expensive but maybe a 8gb/16gb would be enough for scripts?

http://www.ironkey.com/en-US/encrypted-storage-drives/

I have dropbox on my phone. I also have an encrypted USB key. I started my backup routine (backing up to all these devices) and ended up with this...

So it's not for trying.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-29-2016

(11-29-2016, 11:37 PM)Cozy Wrote: Every company has trade secrets, there's always going to be a risk when it comes to security. I'm sure companies spend a lot of money protecting their secrets. If I were you, encrypted hard drive and safety deposit box. If someone tried to rob the bank, they probably wouldn't know or care what to do with it. But unless you have like a billion dollar corporation as your competitor, I don't think you should be that worried about it.

Except that the more security I have the more time I have to spend on security. If I back up to a USB key, 2 external drives, and swap out a third from a safety deposit box, how much time is that out of my time for building and all the rest I have to do?

Keeping multiple forms of backup already takes time.

Encrypted backups take more time.

Making backups that are kept up to date, more time.

And having off-site backup, even more time.

While I had an office away from home, it was easy. I would just swap out a hard disk and bring it home every so often.

But, I guess a safety deposit box is going to be a necessity... and a lot more time making and maintaining backups.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-29-2016

(11-29-2016, 11:42 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-29-2016, 11:37 PM)Cozy Wrote: Every company has trade secrets, there's always going to be a risk when it comes to security. I'm sure companies spend a lot of money protecting their secrets. If I were you, encrypted hard drive and safety deposit box. If someone tried to rob the bank, they probably wouldn't know or care what to do with it. But unless you have like a billion dollar corporation as your competitor, I don't think you should be that worried about it.

Except that the more security I have the more time I have to spend on security. If I back up to a USB key, 2 external drives, and swap out a third from a safety deposit box, how much time is that out of my time for building and all the rest I have to do?

Keeping multiple forms of backup already takes time.

Encrypted backups take more time.

Making backups that are kept up to date, more time.

And having off-site backup, even more time.

While I had an office away from home, it was easy. I would just swap out a hard disk and bring it home every so often.

But, I guess a safety deposit box is going to be a necessity... and a lot more time making and maintaining backups.

Or just buy a USB key for every new script, label it and make a deposit.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-29-2016

(11-29-2016, 11:47 PM)Cozy Wrote:
(11-29-2016, 11:42 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-29-2016, 11:37 PM)Cozy Wrote: Every company has trade secrets, there's always going to be a risk when it comes to security. I'm sure companies spend a lot of money protecting their secrets. If I were you, encrypted hard drive and safety deposit box. If someone tried to rob the bank, they probably wouldn't know or care what to do with it. But unless you have like a billion dollar corporation as your competitor, I don't think you should be that worried about it.

Except that the more security I have the more time I have to spend on security. If I back up to a USB key, 2 external drives, and swap out a third from a safety deposit box, how much time is that out of my time for building and all the rest I have to do?

Keeping multiple forms of backup already takes time.

Encrypted backups take more time.

Making backups that are kept up to date, more time.

And having off-site backup, even more time.

While I had an office away from home, it was easy. I would just swap out a hard disk and bring it home every so often.

But, I guess a safety deposit box is going to be a necessity... and a lot more time making and maintaining backups.

Or just buy a USB key for every new script, label it and make a deposit.

Yeah, because I don't already have to replace dead USB keys a couple times a year...

they are not exactly reliable.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-30-2016

Hmm, I've had USBs that have lasted me years, and I use them regularly.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-30-2016

(11-30-2016, 12:05 AM)Cozy Wrote: Hmm, I've had USBs that have lasted me years, and I use them regularly.

Windows and USB keys... and USB cables... apparently don't like me. I replace my USB keys from failure to mount, and loss of data, two or three times a year. I have three of them on my keychain right now, and only one works. I have to buy another.

Not impressed with them as a single source of data storage so far. Maybe if I spent more money I would be. But I'm not buying cheap stuff now...