Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-25-2016

(11-24-2016, 07:52 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: Hey Shannon

I had another question. I was reading a article about the plasticity of the Human brain. Basically it said the more plastic (Impressionable) your brain is more your able and willing you are to absorb information (Goes for unlearning certain information as well). They explained (along with a few studies) on how to explains how children at a certain age are more easily able to learn a second language than a adult is because their brains are more "plastic". I was wondering if there is a connection between this and subliminals. Does more brain plasticity = more able to absorb the suggestions of the sub and less resistance? I'm just curious if there's a connection there.

Brain plasticity is one factor in determining the speed and ease of influence for subliminals, and it also influences how long lasting the changes are. But it's not all you have to consider.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-25-2016

(11-24-2016, 10:37 PM)James Bond Wrote: Fallout pussy, a sure thing she'll never say no

Unless, of course, you tell them to leave... once they have emotionally and/or sexually imprinted, they will not want to separate.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-25-2016

(11-24-2016, 03:11 AM)jonathan4all Wrote: Shannon just to make sure after DMSI 3.1 and MHS 5.5G , are you gonna start working on MLS 5.5G as you stated before?

I have to build GPR14 and then MHS first. Then MHS.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-25-2016

(11-24-2016, 03:17 AM)jonathan4all Wrote:
(11-23-2016, 05:41 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-23-2016, 02:34 PM)Happylife01 Wrote: so us who using 2.5 will be eligible for free update? thanks shannon, you are the best. you showing us how the real world is. what a powerful advantage we got

Updates ad upgrades are free until the program does what satisfies me that it is achieving the goals sufficiently. So anyone who has purchased a copy of 1.x through 2.5 will get 3.0.1 for free.

Shannon will you be working on 3 series consecutively like 2 series or you will stop it after this release and focus more on other projects? I have plan to use DMSI after 6 months. If you update 3.0.1 to 3.0.2 or more sooner, I would love to buy then instead of buying now to save half of the money. Thanks.

I have a few programs to build after 3.0.1 comes out. The update after 3.0.1 will be 3.1 though.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-25-2016

(11-24-2016, 04:24 AM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: Shannon did your sub using Joint Stereo or Stereo?
Thanks.
And I heard from Andrew or somebody else, I forgot, that you need about 40-50 minutes to build a single stage 4G, and take several weeks until months to build a single 5G program. Correct? Awesome if you did that.

My subs are encoded using Joint Stereo.

Yes, it usually takes about an hour to build a 4G, and weeks to months to build a 5G. 5.5G is also weeks to months, and 6G will be faster (hopefully) because I will have a stable skeleton script.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-25-2016

(11-24-2016, 06:40 AM)Barba Wrote: Shannon can you explain what is your understanding of terms aura and charisma and how they're connected. You don't have aural programming in AM (no mention in AM instructions), probably as it's aimed at internal growth and not attraction, but there seems to be an increase in personal magnetism and charisma that others notice on a person who is doing AM. I've read these come from IDGAF self-centered attitude, but not everybody that is stand-offish comes across as alpha and commands attention. How does AM IDGAF translate to attractive, and is this charisma manifesting without aural programming?

Thanks.

Aura is your personal energy field. Charisma is how likeable and influential your personality is, and how effectively you can get others to do what you want them to with that trait. The two have little in common, unless you attune your aura to enhance your charisma.

No aura in AM, but the increase in charisma is the result of the self sufficiency resulting from AM. Lack of neediness, and basically creating a leader... which others will sense and want to follow... so it's sort of a natural side effect of the goals of AM.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-25-2016

(11-24-2016, 08:17 AM)Aventus45 Wrote: How long would it take to power DMSI v3.0.1 to it's peak?

Don't know. It's not even built yet.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-25-2016

(11-24-2016, 10:11 AM)Dmitry Wrote: Guys, I have some information, worth considering. Anyway, I put it here at your discretion.

Well.

I'm working with clients (as psychologist) and have a very interesting phenomena often occurring...well, at 99% of time.

Here is the deal: people have, what we call a Deep Unconscious Identification Figures (DUIFs). What that mean? Let's say, a person wants to improve his relationship with women but fails at some degree. He used everything possible technique, subs and etc. with little or no positive results. When investigating the cause, I found that that person had something called DUIF. I explain in more details. His uncle is a total anti-sex magnet to women, is 47 years old and have no family, no woman at his side (he is not gay, btw). So... SOMEHOW the client, unconsciously, become identified with his uncle and was not aware about it. His patterns with women also were similar, that his mother often said: "You like your uncle!". When we found out, released the identification with his uncle, he starts to have some interesting results with women, previously considered unavailable in his life.

Before, he tried to work with limiting beliefs and programs but without success. Why? Because that lousy beliefs & programs were not belonged to him, therefore, it was impossible to him to release them. Now, he have a relationship with a girl, he met, by his own words "somehow, doing absolutely nothing unusual, just met her, and here we are".

I think that this information can help you to investigate your own issues with girls.

I'm not suggesting to add it to DMSI right now (it would take a considerable time, and I want to have new DMSI as soon as possible, as you guys) but, nevertheless, its worth considering.

My tests prove that practicing des-identifying DUIFs, and also using DMSI 2.4 / E2 helped me to train myself to dis-identify automatically.

So, use it at your discretion.

This is already planned for inclusion in 3.1 or later. But thanks for the suggestion.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Life - 11-25-2016

(11-25-2016, 12:05 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-24-2016, 10:37 PM)James Bond Wrote: Fallout pussy, a sure thing she'll never say no

Unless, of course, you tell them to leave... once they have emotionally and/or sexually imprinted, they will not want to separate.

That's the price we pay for indulging the idea of having sex with these emotionally unstable women in the first place. Sex magnet problems


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - robstar - 11-25-2016

(11-25-2016, 12:11 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-24-2016, 06:40 AM)Barba Wrote: Shannon can you explain what is your understanding of terms aura and charisma and how they're connected. You don't have aural programming in AM (no mention in AM instructions), probably as it's aimed at internal growth and not attraction, but there seems to be an increase in personal magnetism and charisma that others notice on a person who is doing AM. I've read these come from IDGAF self-centered attitude, but not everybody that is stand-offish comes across as alpha and commands attention. How does AM IDGAF translate to attractive, and is this charisma manifesting without aural programming?

Thanks.

Aura is yur personal energy field. Charisma is how likeable and influential your personality is, and how effectively you can get others to do what you want them to with that trait. The two have little in common, unless you attune your aura to enhance your charisma.

No aura in AM, but the increase in charisma is the result of the self sufficiency resulting from AM. Lack of neediness, and basically creating a leader... which others will sense and want to follow... so it's sort of a natural side effect of the goals of AM.

Does dmsi aura have charisma enhancement? If not I feel that may be the missing ingredient for maximum results, it's designed to make us sexually attractive, but it needs more social attractiveness to really get women to produce us.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-25-2016

(11-24-2016, 07:52 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: They explained (along with a few studies) on how to explains how children at a certain age are more easily able to learn a second language than a adult is because their brains are more "plastic".

While the brain plasticity theory may be true, I've seen that some experts have said recently that the capacity for learning a language is no different between children and adults. The difference is that children put forth the interest and effort to learn new things presented to them, and many adults just lack the willingness to put the effort in to learn, so-to-speak.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - 4Kingdoms - 11-25-2016

(11-24-2016, 07:52 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: They explained (along with a few studies) on how to explains how children at a certain age are more easily able to learn a second language than a adult is because their brains are more "plastic".
(11-25-2016, 07:48 AM)RTBoss Wrote: While the brain plasticity theory may be true, I've seen that some experts have said recently that the capacity for learning a language is no different between children and adults. The difference is that children put forth the interest and effort to learn new things presented to them, and many adults just lack the willingness to put the effort in to learn, so-to-speak.

I've spoken to teens and young adults that learned a new language in school and told me they have forgotten what they learned and don't speak it anymore.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 11-25-2016

Shannon,

Today a thought occurred to me.

The reset effect in DMSI v3.0.1 seems imperative. So in a sense the affected resets and then puts the user in a category/role of ... let's say "must **** now and forever".

1) The reset might best be complementary based on the role/category, which could include a reset of the user in the mind of the affected, as well as the affected self-reseting to a compatible category that would be congruent with fulfilling the goals of the program repeatedly. In the words, the affected would re-categorize (redefine their role) themselves relative to the user.

2) Now what seems to me is that it would be important for the new category/role to be reinforced or reiterated. But I don't know how, other than by an every day object like the phone. Such as every time the affected sees their phone (or any phone for that matter), they feel impatient to engage in reciprocal/complementary roles with the user that are congruent with fulfilling the goals of the program repeatedly.

3) "The affected self-reseting themselves relative to the user." What also occurred to me is that the affected reset their role relative to the user. In other words, (I know it's supposed to be gender neutral) it's occurred to me that many people have some sort of top down processing that occurs when they put themselves into a role. It's like a meme. Defenses are by passed. Rather than individual behaviors explicated, the desired behaviors are implied by the role. Let's say the affected resets themselves (e.g., self-resets) to "significant other of the user". Now that would imply a series of behaviors. Perhaps it would vary from person to person, but there would be a common overlap based on cultural consensus of what the role/category is of a "significant other".

4) I'm not suggesting the affected self-reset to "significant other" rather that was just a concrete example to demonstrate. But there must be some sort of role/category that could be inserted that is complementary/reciprocal based on how the user is reset and cast into a category/role in the mind of the affected.

5) Such a reset effect may also be helpful for the user, in that the user self-resets their ideas of the affected, as well as themselves relative to the affected. In other words, suppose the healing isn't done and the user thinks a perfect 10 is out of their league. The reset could be done inside the user in such a way to effectively achieve the goals of the program repeatedly, where the user resets their role relative to the effected and the affected's role relative to the user. However I would think it would have to be done such that the user behaves in a socially appropriate and restrained manner to be effective and "stay out of trouble" while the effect is manifesting in external reality.

6) This reset/re-categorization/"casting into a new role" effect would also have to be compatible to other parts of the script. For example, the "sharing the user" module. The reset/re-categorization/"casting into a new role" would have to be accomplished so that the affected are accepting of (or perhaps even happy about) sharing the user, be it in that moment, with other people they know, with other people they don't know, etc.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 11-25-2016

When is DMSI scheduled to be released ? A few days from now ?