(11-23-2016, 04:43 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Post: #165RE: Keith's journey with Emotional Pain Relief and healing aid
RE: Shannon's Journal, Volume 2
"Just optimized the celebrity effect to an insane degree in DMSI."(Keith excitement Insert:WTF!!??)

Keith's response: holy shit Man...thats incredible a celeb' effect? wow. could that not be included in a number of subs including attract your perfect Lover/boyfreind/girlfriend/soul mate,any # of the love/romance related titles but also in success oriented titles as well Shannon? Like Ultra Success-Money Magnet/Luck magnifier,ect???? an aura of _______ you name it along with the celebrity effects

#2) as of the 18th,of this month, makes 6 months into E2 and rolling. wow....E3 man oh man what to look forward to in 2017

(11-23-2016, 05:11 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(11-22-2016, 11:39 PM)Benjamin Wrote:

Quote:I'm strongly opposed to this, and I'm pretty sure Shannon will never add such a thing. It would basically prevent you from ever getting the highest quality women, because broken women go for broken men. Next to that, it would be another way your subconscious prevents dealing with any issues one may have directly. It's the subconscious way of saying "I can remain broken and can still get women, so I don't have to deal with the issues". It's a very high price to pay for validation.

Don't worry, he's probably trolling just like his suggestion in the other thread.

Shannon definately knows better than to add dumb suggestions like those.

" He" is not trolling.

"He" may have aspergers and if that's the case, "he" may have to be sexless his entire life because of some stupid miscommunication issue that "he" has no control over.

I also don't appreciate being assumed I'm a troll CO stantly when I have real concerns. That's just ignorant and disrespectful.

Furthermore, if Shannon isn't willing to make the sub work with a person's flaw (my reason for making the suggestion) then perhaps he should step up the socializing aspect of his subs, because after however many years I've been doing them I have nothing to show for it yet in that area.

Clearly something is missing in the programs.

(11-23-2016, 05:28 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(11-23-2016, 05:11 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(11-22-2016, 11:39 PM)Benjamin Wrote:

Quote:I'm strongly opposed to this, and I'm pretty sure Shannon will never add such a thing. It would basically prevent you from ever getting the highest quality women, because broken women go for broken men. Next to that, it would be another way your subconscious prevents dealing with any issues one may have directly. It's the subconscious way of saying "I can remain broken and can still get women, so I don't have to deal with the issues". It's a very high price to pay for validation.

Don't worry, he's probably trolling just like his suggestion in the other thread.

Shannon definately knows better than to add dumb suggestions like those.

" He" is not trolling.

"He" may have aspergers and if that's the case, "he" may have to be sexless his entire life because of some stupid miscommunication issue that "he" has no control over.

I also don't appreciate being assumed I'm a troll CO stantly when I have real concerns. That's just ignorant and disrespectful.

Furthermore, if Shannon isn't willing to make the sub work with a person's flaw (my reason for making the suggestion) then perhaps he should step up the socializing aspect of his subs, because after however many years I've been doing them I have nothing to show for it yet in that area.

Clearly something is missing in the programs.

Sarge, "he" is RisingSon. And RisingSon very likely doesn't have Asperger's. I think you're thinking this was directed as you being the referenced person, but it's RisingSon.

And Sarge, blaming the program is only going to give you an excuse not to try. While it is my responsibility to figure out the instruction set that works, you also have to be willing to execute it and try outside that as well.

(11-23-2016, 05:38 AM)K-Train Wrote: Sarge I think in your specific situation you need someone watching you interact with women in real-time because as it stands now it's extremely difficult to "diagnose" the issues you're experiencing without being there. One of the things that benefited me was having good friends around (some better than others) who could point certain things out when I missed them while I was out. As smart and wise as Shannon is there's only so much you can truly tell someone. I'm the same way in certain areas especially since I'm a tactile visual learner. Sometimes I literally need someone to point something out and break shit down. You may need the same.

(11-23-2016, 05:39 AM)brightike Wrote: Shannon, complete aside to the discussion of late has anyone tried using GPR during a workout? Do you think that's risky?

(11-23-2016, 01:58 AM)Shannon Wrote: Trust in my wisdom on this... you will want to stop for a week before switching.

(11-23-2016, 05:39 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(11-23-2016, 05:28 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(11-23-2016, 05:11 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(11-22-2016, 11:39 PM)Benjamin Wrote:

Quote:I'm strongly opposed to this, and I'm pretty sure Shannon will never add such a thing. It would basically prevent you from ever getting the highest quality women, because broken women go for broken men. Next to that, it would be another way your subconscious prevents dealing with any issues one may have directly. It's the subconscious way of saying "I can remain broken and can still get women, so I don't have to deal with the issues". It's a very high price to pay for validation.

Don't worry, he's probably trolling just like his suggestion in the other thread.

Shannon definately knows better than to add dumb suggestions like those.

" He" is not trolling.

"He" may have aspergers and if that's the case, "he" may have to be sexless his entire life because of some stupid miscommunication issue that "he" has no control over.

I also don't appreciate being assumed I'm a troll CO stantly when I have real concerns. That's just ignorant and disrespectful.

Furthermore, if Shannon isn't willing to make the sub work with a person's flaw (my reason for making the suggestion) then perhaps he should step up the socializing aspect of his subs, because after however many years I've been doing them I have nothing to show for it yet in that area.

Clearly something is missing in the programs.

Sarge, "he" is RisingSon. And RisingSon very likely doesn't have Asperger's. I think you're thinking this was directed as you being the referenced person, but it's RisingSon.

And Sarge, blaming the program is only going to give you an excuse not to try. While it is my responsibility to figure out the instruction set that works, you also have to be willing to execute it and try outside that as well.

Yes I thought it was me because my post was included in the quote Zen responded to, and Ben after that.

I'm not blaming the program, and I'm not "not trying", and I'm definitely not outright stonewalling the program because I've gotten approached and such BUT, like it or not, the socializing aspect is where I consistently drop the ball, so that tells me it needs to be beefed up.

I'm also understandably frustrated that it's more complicated for me. Seems so easy for everyone else but if I just " do my thing" it doesn't end well.

(11-23-2016, 05:42 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:

(11-23-2016, 05:38 AM)K-Train Wrote: Sarge I think in your specific situation you need someone watching you interact with women in real-time because as it stands now it's extremely difficult to "diagnose" the issues you're experiencing without being there. One of the things that benefited me was having good friends around (some better than others) who could point certain things out when I missed them while I was out. As smart and wise as Shannon is there's only so much you can truly tell someone. I'm the same way in certain areas especially since I'm a tactile visual learner. Sometimes I literally need someone to point something out and break shit down. You may need the same.

Yeah I'm definitely like that too. Maybe I should ask my brother for his help. He's the only one I know who has at least some success with a girl.

Either that or work with a pua but that's expensive.

(11-23-2016, 06:03 AM)Shannon Wrote: Or you need to figure out what's going on with socializing.

I would definitely ask someone to wing you and see what they think. Might be good to recruit an attractive woman as well as a guy to do that.

I'm constantly beefing up the program, but if you have Asperger's or something along those lines, it will require an entirely different line of programming and instructions than would be used (and useful) for the general populace.

Let's see how 3.0.1 does for you.

(11-23-2016, 05:24 AM)Shannon Wrote:

Quote:Second, Should it okay if somebody accidentally swapped the stereo channel, L to R and R to L in masked?

Makes no difference.