Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - posh - 11-19-2016

(11-19-2016, 12:59 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-19-2016, 09:07 AM)Steven Wrote: Shannon,

November 21 2016 is almost here.

I had some ideas for DMSI v3.0.1 and I know some of this might seem nonsensical or illogical, but so are sexual decisions. So to me, it seems to fit right in.

Hey, Steve, thanks for the suggestions. I know you're trying to help. Just have the issue that the list is already so long I can't keep track of it, and I'm three days behind schedule now building MIR 2.1, still have to upgrade and build GPR14, and of course add a ton of stuff to DMSI from what is already in the list.

So at this point, I'll give you a metaphor. What happens when you our coffee in a coffee cup when it's full? Smile

This is why I said so long ago, no more additions and suggestions. I can't keep up, and then they get lost.

In fact things have been so bad that I am likely going to have to either stop adding after the 21st or release later than expected for DMSI 3.0.1. So I'll copy and paste your suggestions into the list, but I won't be reading them until after I have built 3.0.1, and then we'll see what is what. I appreciate your efforts to help, but I just have too much to do right now to add more to it.

Quote:1) The responders miss the user even if they haven't met the user

2) The responders are searching for and seeking out the user even if they don't know what they're looking for or what they're wanting

3) The longer they go with out sex with the user, the more the responders want to have sex with the user.

4) They wonder where the user is and what the user is doing.

5) They look at their phone and wonder what's taking the user so long to contact them.

6) They plan things they want to sexually do with the user.

7) Their minds keep defaulting back to thoughts of the user.

8) They feel warm when they think of the user or when something reminds them of the user.

9) They put the user in all their sexual fantasies

10) They substitute the user in all their pleasant sexual memories in place of the people they had sex with because they wish the user was the only sexual partner they ever had.

11) Every orgasm they have with the user is even more intense and longer lasting than the previous one.

12) Each orgasm they have with the user is easier to achieve than the previous one.

13) They can easily be on the cusp of orgasm (edging) for extended periods of time when they have sex with the user

14) When they masturbate, the most satisfying and fulfilling feelings and orgasms are those that include the user.

15) (I don't know how to best phrase this) The responders effectively deal with (nullify, assuage, etc.) all potential social and emotional barriers to having sex with the user, such as worries about what her friends think, fear of her reputation being sullied, fear of losing status, fears of being judged, inconsistent follow through, forgetfulness, life chaos, her work schedule, lack of motivation on her part, worries that she's not pretty enough, fear of rejection, etc. and they do so in such a way that it results in actual physical sex with the responders and the user.

16) The responders are actively searching for and seeking out the user even if they don't know the user

17) The responders have a feeling of destiny regarding the user and having sex with the user repeatedly

18) The responders have the "where have you been for all of my (sex) life" feeling about the user

19) The responders feel like everything they know and everything they have experienced points directly at having sex with the user repeatedly, like everything in their life has been leading up to it

20) The responders feel like having sex with the user is the most liberating experience ever and that it re-enforces their sense of independence and self-acceptance.

21) The responders crave the experience of feeling surrendered to the user, and actively seek it out and facilitate it.

22) The responders feel grateful about having sex with the user.

23) The responders can't imagine better sex than the sex with the user

24) The user fulfills and satisfies sexual needs, wants, and desires that the responders didn't even know they had and/or didn't even imagine were possible.

25) The responders desire sex with the user and only the user. All else just feel like second best.

I'm sure you could word them much better, but the concepts are there.

shannon these are excellent ideas by steven. I don't care if i have to wait till new years. Please put these in dmsi if possible

thanks


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 11-19-2016

(11-19-2016, 02:35 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:
(11-19-2016, 01:25 PM)Dmitry Wrote: NSFM is excellent sub, indeed. It made me awake all my seduction knowledge in just one, smooth flow stream. If DMSI V3.0.1 is equipped with NSFM... well, we have an Oscar nominee here, gentlemen! Let just rename it to Natural Seduction Aid Smile

I feel like I need NSFM as it is the missing ingredient in my arsenal right now. It'll make a huge difference to my results.

NSFM is easily one of my favorites. You'll love it Wolverine. It did pretty much everything Dmitry stated. Hoping that it gets included in V3.01. Theoretically, if the V3 sniper module works correctly and NSFM is also working correctly, it should translate to more capitalization on the user's part.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-19-2016

Only... NSFM is directly contradicting the rest of the DMSI program...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Ricardo - 11-19-2016

(11-19-2016, 03:24 PM)posh Wrote:
(11-19-2016, 12:59 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-19-2016, 09:07 AM)Steven Wrote: Shannon,

November 21 2016 is almost here.

I had some ideas for DMSI v3.0.1 and I know some of this might seem nonsensical or illogical, but so are sexual decisions. So to me, it seems to fit right in.

Hey, Steve, thanks for the suggestions. I know you're trying to help. Just have the issue that the list is already so long I can't keep track of it, and I'm three days behind schedule now building MIR 2.1, still have to upgrade and build GPR14, and of course add a ton of stuff to DMSI from what is already in the list.

So at this point, I'll give you a metaphor. What happens when you our coffee in a coffee cup when it's full? Smile

This is why I said so long ago, no more additions and suggestions. I can't keep up, and then they get lost.

In fact things have been so bad that I am likely going to have to either stop adding after the 21st or release later than expected for DMSI 3.0.1. So I'll copy and paste your suggestions into the list, but I won't be reading them until after I have built 3.0.1, and then we'll see what is what. I appreciate your efforts to help, but I just have too much to do right now to add more to it.

Quote:1) The responders miss the user even if they haven't met the user

2) The responders are searching for and seeking out the user even if they don't know what they're looking for or what they're wanting

3) The longer they go with out sex with the user, the more the responders want to have sex with the user.

4) They wonder where the user is and what the user is doing.

5) They look at their phone and wonder what's taking the user so long to contact them.

6) They plan things they want to sexually do with the user.

7) Their minds keep defaulting back to thoughts of the user.

8) They feel warm when they think of the user or when something reminds them of the user.

9) They put the user in all their sexual fantasies

10) They substitute the user in all their pleasant sexual memories in place of the people they had sex with because they wish the user was the only sexual partner they ever had.

11) Every orgasm they have with the user is even more intense and longer lasting than the previous one.

12) Each orgasm they have with the user is easier to achieve than the previous one.

13) They can easily be on the cusp of orgasm (edging) for extended periods of time when they have sex with the user

14) When they masturbate, the most satisfying and fulfilling feelings and orgasms are those that include the user.

15) (I don't know how to best phrase this) The responders effectively deal with (nullify, assuage, etc.) all potential social and emotional barriers to having sex with the user, such as worries about what her friends think, fear of her reputation being sullied, fear of losing status, fears of being judged, inconsistent follow through, forgetfulness, life chaos, her work schedule, lack of motivation on her part, worries that she's not pretty enough, fear of rejection, etc. and they do so in such a way that it results in actual physical sex with the responders and the user.

16) The responders are actively searching for and seeking out the user even if they don't know the user

17) The responders have a feeling of destiny regarding the user and having sex with the user repeatedly

18) The responders have the "where have you been for all of my (sex) life" feeling about the user

19) The responders feel like everything they know and everything they have experienced points directly at having sex with the user repeatedly, like everything in their life has been leading up to it

20) The responders feel like having sex with the user is the most liberating experience ever and that it re-enforces their sense of independence and self-acceptance.

21) The responders crave the experience of feeling surrendered to the user, and actively seek it out and facilitate it.

22) The responders feel grateful about having sex with the user.

23) The responders can't imagine better sex than the sex with the user

24) The user fulfills and satisfies sexual needs, wants, and desires that the responders didn't even know they had and/or didn't even imagine were possible.

25) The responders desire sex with the user and only the user. All else just feel like second best.

I'm sure you could word them much better, but the concepts are there.

shannon these are excellent ideas by steven. I don't care if i have to wait till new years. Please put these in dmsi if possible

thanks

Forget NSFM, just put in these brilliant suggestions by Steven!!!!!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Ricardo - 11-19-2016

Shannon, don't waste time putting NSFM in with DMSI. It's totally contradictory and if people want to use NSFM then they can do so as a stand alone if they want to


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-19-2016

Guys, if Shannon says NSFM is contradictory, it's contradictory. Let's not do this begging for NSFM so he that he feels the need to build a version including it just to prove that it will fail and shut everyone up. It's a waste of everyone's time. Let's allow him to focus on the billion other additions he has planned.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ImFreeman - 11-19-2016

(11-19-2016, 04:16 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Guys, if Shannon says NSFM is contradictory, it's contradictory. Let's not do this begging for NSFM so he that he feels the need to build a version including it just to prove that it will fail and shut everyone up. It's a waste of everyone's time. Let's allow him to focus on the billion other additions he has planned.

There are several users here who have not developed basic flirting skills. For them (and i consider myself included) it would be very beneficial.

Not everybody here lost their virginity in a threesome RT, some are still virgins and still very undeveloped in that department

If a situation presents itself were to take advantage of it the user needs to take some charge and make at least a little bit 'happen' then NSFM will be useful.


It contradicts the goal? maybe the goal needs to be refocused. IMHO the goal is sex abundance with high value partners. We should strive to reach it and not be 'anal' about the way we reach it


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-19-2016

You guys are so focused on one goal and one way to it, it's no wonder you have these issues.

DMSI goal is to get others to approach and initiate. In the end, that is the goal and it's not changing unless I have no choice. I have that choice, because I know I can achieve that goal. Maybe not in 3.0, but I can and I will.

Even if NSFM can be added in a way that would enhance instead of detract, which may be possible, it is still training wheels for guys who are stuck in the paradigm that got them where they are now. It almost certainly won't be included in the final no matter what for that reason.

So if I can find a way to add it and enhance DMSI, I will try. If I run out of time, it may get passed over. There are several other much more important things to add still.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Ricardo - 11-19-2016

(11-19-2016, 05:02 PM)Shannon Wrote: You guys are so focused on one goal and one way to it, it's no wonder you have these issues.

DMSI goal is to get others to approach and initiate. In the end, that is the goal and it's not changing unless I have no choice.

If you don't like the goals of DMSI as Shannon intends or they don't fit your perceptions then don't use it. Why would anyone want to make things more difficult in the dating game than they need be?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Frosted - 11-19-2016

Shannon, I have a problem using persuasion and I'm not very charismatic. I want to be able to be really good at communication. AM6 has made me more dominant and able to walk away from situations I don't like, but I'm not very good at leading interactions skillfully into a direction I want. I don't know if that will come with more AM6, but I was wondering if there was a sub that would help me achieve this? Maybe BASE?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 11-19-2016

(11-19-2016, 05:12 PM)Frosted Wrote: Shannon, I have a problem using persuasion and I'm not very charismatic. I want to be able to be really good at communication. AM6 has made me more dominant and able to walk away from situations I don't like, but I'm not very good at leading interactions skillfully into a direction I want. I don't know if that will come with more AM6, but I was wondering if there was a sub that would help me achieve this? Maybe BASE?

What about WM? At least if it is related to women.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Frosted - 11-19-2016

Wm is too go with the flow, I'm looking to direct the energy not be directed by it.

I want to be more like Shannon's vibe vs a party guy who has no center.

Edit: btw Shannon, where did you get your speaking style from? Did you have it before or did you get it from BASE and AM?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 11-19-2016

I'm down with whatever works. If adding NSFM makes it work, cool. If not adding NSFM makes DMSI work, cool with that too. I'm sure nobody is going to complain if bombshells are directly soliciting them for sex. Tongue


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - wolverine_i_am - 11-19-2016

(11-19-2016, 04:44 PM)ImFreeman Wrote:
(11-19-2016, 04:16 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Guys, if Shannon says NSFM is contradictory, it's contradictory. Let's not do this begging for NSFM so he that he feels the need to build a version including it just to prove that it will fail and shut everyone up. It's a waste of everyone's time. Let's allow him to focus on the billion other additions he has planned.

There are several users here who have not developed basic flirting skills. For them (and i consider myself included) it would be very beneficial.

Not everybody here lost their virginity in a threesome RT, some are still virgins and still very undeveloped in that department

If a situation presents itself were to take advantage of it the user needs to take some charge and make at least a little bit 'happen' then NSFM will be useful.


It contradicts the goal? maybe the goal needs to be refocused. IMHO the goal is sex abundance with high value partners. We should strive to reach it and not be 'anal' about the way we reach it

Couldn't have said it any better. In the end, we can all agree we want sexual abundance. Whatever it takes to get there, let's be more flexible about it. If NSFM helps us get there faster, Shannon will decide in his experimentations. If not, so be it.

People are so obsessed with the idea of women having to all the work (the entire approach to seduction thing), that they're being so narrow-minded regarding the addition of things like NSFM, that could potentially assist us. Remember guys, sex is a two-way effort.

If NFSM doesn't get added to 3.0.1, I would even consider switching to it for a month or so, to enhance my flirting and seduction skills (I don't know when, but some time down the track).