Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 11-14-2016

Thank you, Shannon!

I understand the commitments you have, no worries. Of course I want as much packed into it as possible, just wasn't sure of a release date. If it's a few days before the end of the month that's awesome, if it's right at the end that's good, too.

I get that you have a laundry list for inclusion and most of it won't make it to V3.0.1, and we will need to test stuff in the world before many other things can be added etc. Especially since obviously there is a ton of other stuff, I saw the list that you said was like "40%" of what you have as notes, wow. I was just reporting on real life issues I've noticed on the program with certain girls I like and want to respond to the program resulting in periodic neediness, approval-seeking, and lack of self validation and sometimes even "chasing" girls to interact with them and it bugging me when they don't react the way I want them to.

But, as long as the removing limiting beliefs and removing self sabotage stuff we talked about as major hurdles for me in particular are added to V3.0.1, I'm happy. You said before I was a prime contributor to you seeing they were necessary, lmao, I'm glad to be of service as this will benefit me greatly as a result, haha. The inclusion of those alone will no doubt be a big improvement for me in results.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dmitry - 11-14-2016

Shannon, E2 includes "Automatic Self Training: Scripting designed to trigger your subconscious to automatically train itself to achieve the goal it is directed toward" and it rocks!. Does V3.0.1 include a similar option?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jason Capital - 11-14-2016

Shannon, the words per second WPS in DMSI is around 83,200 words at minimum to 1,000,000 words per second.

Therefore, if the main script of the DMSI considering the 1 hour, it would be 3600 seconds long. (1 x 60 Minutes x 60 Second = 3600 second).

And that would make the total words spoken per loop would be 299,520,000 words to 3,600,000,000 words.

So, that's a whole insanely long script. It would be 2.3744292237 year whole script if spoken at 4 words per second speed.

My question here is: 1) Does the whole script is that long enough, (which mostly answers my question that it is not) or it just repeating itself after Minimum Exposure Time of say 2 or 5 seconds.

2) Does the other modules from Naturalizer to KNX and all, form part of the main script or they are all different from the main script? Also, can you describe the words per second WPS is different from main script or is it just the same i.e. 83,200 to 1,000,000 words per second?

3) Can you tell us what is the length of the DMSI in the previous version? If it does not induce placebo or the trade secret violation?

4) Does the left and right side audio combined together create the 83200 WPS or is it just one side ear WPS 83200, making it 1,66,400 WPS?




RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-14-2016

(11-14-2016, 03:56 AM)Dmitry Wrote: Shannon, E2 includes "Automatic Self Training: Scripting designed to trigger your subconscious to automatically train itself to achieve the goal it is directed toward" and it rocks!. Does V3.0.1 include a similar option?

Yes. In multiple directions.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-14-2016

(11-14-2016, 06:32 AM)Jason Capital Wrote: Shannon, the words per second WPS in DMSI is around 83,200 words at minimum to 1,000,000 words per second.

Estimated at a top end of about 1,300,000 WPS, actually. That was with P3. I'm not sure how much the equivalent is in P4, and P5 would take that number off the scale because the scale no longer fits the data in terms of accurate representation.

Quote:Therefore, if the main script of the DMSI considering the 1 hour, it would be 3600 seconds long. (1 x 60 Minutes x 60 Second = 3600 second).

If. You don't know how long the main script is. Just the audio.

Quote:And that would make the total words spoken per loop would be 299,520,000 words to 3,600,000,000 words.

So, that's a whole insanely long script. It would be 2.3744292237 year whole script if spoken at 4 words per second speed.

It's not the script you're referring to, but the length of speech.

Quote:My question here is: 1) Does the whole script is that long enough, (which mostly answers my question that it is not) or it just repeating itself after Minimum Exposure Time of say 2 or 5 seconds.

I'm not sure I am understanding your question, but the audio takes a lot longer than seconds to begin repeating itself.

Quote:2) Does the other modules from Naturalizer to KNX and all, form part of the main script or they are all different from the main script? Also, can you describe the words per second WPS is different from main script or is it just the same i.e. 83,200 to 1,000,000 words per second?

The main script only deals with the program goals. The skeleton script is everything that supports the program goals within the rest of the script framework.

WPS refers to the whole script speed of input.
Quote:3) Can you tell us what is the length of the DMSI in the previous version? If it does not induce placebo or the trade secret violation?

That is not been anything of importance, so I did not take note.

Quote:4) Does the left and right side audio combined together create the 83200 WPS or is it just one side ear WPS 83200, making it 1,66,400 WPS?


The WPS is an overall estimate, not per-ear.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 11-14-2016

Hey Shannon!

I'll boil my question down:

Will the limiting beliefs programming, and self sabotage programming we talked about before as being key issues for me and for letting you know they are important additions to the script for results, be implemented in V3.0.1?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-14-2016

(11-14-2016, 03:36 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hey Shannon!

I'll boil my question down:

Will the limiting beliefs programming, and self sabotage programming we talked about before as being key issues for me and for letting you know they are important additions to the script for results, be implemented in V3.0.1?

I thought I answered that. Yes, if I can get them into it in time.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bogdy - 11-14-2016

(11-13-2016, 07:33 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-13-2016, 06:34 PM)maxx55 Wrote:
(11-13-2016, 05:59 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-13-2016, 03:29 PM)KingDavid93 Wrote: How much time would I need to take off between V1 and V3 of DMSI?

Also what are the optimal # of loops to run for V1 and do they need to be consecutive loops without taking a break?

Ideally, you would take 5+ days off of V1 through 2.3

2.4 would be 10 days

2.5 would be 16 days

3.x will be 21 days.

But realistically, nobody's going to do that.

Would it be detrimental to go straight from 2.4 to 3.0.1 when it comes out? I plan on taking like only 1 or 2 days off between.

I'm going to say that everyone should be at least 7 days off off DMSI previous versions before using it, and I'll put the word out when I release it. P3/P4 will keep it running in your head that long at least.

2.3 doesn't have p3 or p4 so no pause for it? Right?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-14-2016

(11-14-2016, 04:09 PM)bogdy Wrote:
(11-13-2016, 07:33 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-13-2016, 06:34 PM)maxx55 Wrote:
(11-13-2016, 05:59 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-13-2016, 03:29 PM)KingDavid93 Wrote: How much time would I need to take off between V1 and V3 of DMSI?

Also what are the optimal # of loops to run for V1 and do they need to be consecutive loops without taking a break?

Ideally, you would take 5+ days off of V1 through 2.3

2.4 would be 10 days

2.5 would be 16 days

3.x will be 21 days.

But realistically, nobody's going to do that.

Would it be detrimental to go straight from 2.4 to 3.0.1 when it comes out? I plan on taking like only 1 or 2 days off between.

I'm going to say that everyone should be at least 7 days off off DMSI previous versions before using it, and I'll put the word out when I release it. P3/P4 will keep it running in your head that long at least.

2.3 doesn't have p3 or p4 so no pause for it? Right?

Quote:Ideally, you would take 5+ days off of V1 through 2.3



RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 11-14-2016

Hey Shannon,

Remember a while ago when you told Swisston to say "Okay, I want and choose for this program to work for me...(the anti-resistance line)" and to imagine the script executing. I've been doing this for almost a month, but I want to make sure I'm doing it right. What exactly are we supposed to imagine? I personally imagine myself as having 100% of the sexual power in my world and think of girls approaching me, staring at me, feeling on me, asking me to have sex with them. Is this helpful or should I imagine something else?

Thanks!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-14-2016

(11-14-2016, 04:19 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Hey Shannon,

Remember a while ago when you told Swisston to say "Okay, I want and choose for this program to work for me...(the anti-resistance line)" and to imagine the script executing. I've been doing this for almost a month, but I want to make sure I'm doing it right. What exactly are we supposed to imagine? I personally imagine myself as having 100% of the sexual power in my world and think of girls approaching me, staring at me, feeling on me, asking me to have sex with them. Is this helpful or should I imagine something else?

Thanks!

You should be visualizing all of the goals of the program being achieved and having already been achieved.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-14-2016

(11-14-2016, 06:55 PM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: Shannon, I believe flac is lossless audio and can handle that enormous WPS.
But I think the problem is the hardware, I mean headphones, earbud, etc, especially low end.
Maybe in logic we need details that can produced through the hardware. So only the high end audio can produce the maximum WPS. So, just think about it, how can all that WPS can be produced from our hardware if the clarity is bad. I almost cannot imagine if wps all simulatetiously (lol I cant write that word) in one second. Does another word cant be heard correctly cause of stacking to another affirmations in the sub?

Jackson, you're trying to understand a sphere by looking at a circle. What I have done to achieve the WPS I have achieved is not limited by the number of samples per second, or the speakers or the microphone. And although you may not understand how I did it, I did it regardless.

Believe me, even with MP3, even with crappy speakers (that meet minimum frequency response specs), you get the full WPS if you follow the instructions.

I don't understand your question at the end.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dutchman610 - 11-14-2016

I believe sometimes you need to burn a bridge to stop further attacks. I did something close to what you did with your family Shannon. I always like to focus on the positive, and it's there if you're looking for it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-14-2016

(11-14-2016, 08:33 PM)Dutchman610 Wrote: I believe sometimes you need to burn a bridge to stop further attacks. I did something close to what you did with your family Shannon. I always like to focus on the positive, and it's there if you're looking for it.

Ultimately, in life, when people push too hard you can either give them what they want, or you can give them what they are asking for. In this case, they got what they were asking for, and while they're not necessarily aware of the cost yet, eventually they will be. And when they are, there will be a debt to repay for the treatment I have been given. I'm not vengeful and I'm not holding a grudge, but I will not stand for being manipulated and mistreated from anyone. And there are only so many times you can respond to that sort of crap with trying to be neutral and polite for the sake of family cohesion, when the party in question never wanted "family cohesion" in the first place.

I'm just hoping that some of them are a little more intelligent and capable of rational thinking than others. Because if the only effort that is made to rebuild this bridge is supposed to come from me, they're shit out of luck at this point. I'm done trying to be friendly in the face of insults, unprovoked attacks and G/S/F bullshit tactics designed to manipulate me. The gloves have come off, and there's no pulling punches anymore. I'm going to keep it real at any cost, now. They'll just have to deal with it.

And, if they want to rebuild the bridge that just burned, they had better damned well not come back only because someone told them I became a millionaire - because at that point, I'll give them what they originally wanted, tell them they blew it and traded in being in the good graces of their rich cousin for that, laugh at them for being morons, and then tell them to fuck off and get out of my life.

But... if some of them are more intelligent and rational thinking, and they try to build that bridge with me for the right reasons, and make a continuous effort instead of expecting me to do all the work... that may just be worth working with. I guess we shall see. At least I know the truth now.

I have no patience for bullshit anymore. Especially the kind I have received for the last few years from this branch.