Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-10-2016

(11-10-2016, 09:09 PM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote: Is anyone here experiencing a lot of deja vu while they run DMSI 2.5?

It's most likely the result of P4 and the reality bending tech. I talk about a similar phenomena in my journal.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 11-10-2016

(11-10-2016, 10:27 PM)Illumi Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 08:43 PM)Zeroxmachina Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 08:28 PM)Illumi Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 08:22 PM)Zeroxmachina Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 08:04 PM)Illumi Wrote: The crazy ones are just a part of it, just like in life you can't go though without struggles and problems.
Personally id rather date a crazy one then learn how to deal with it. Rather than avoiding it. Dancing in the rain not avoiding it

Ya'll think that celebrities dont have crazy fans?

I don't necessarily wanna date every chick that I have sex with a few times lol

You don't have to. Once you are done just leave her apartment or if its yours try to make her leave. Dont say i love you, dont buy presents, dont do boyfriend stuff.
Just hit and run, then they will know for sure you aint relationship material.

My friend who i call natural made that mistake, then he got a crazy on his back for weeks.

I don't actually do one night stands, unless it was that terrible. Nor do I 'kick chicks out',not part of my value system,plus this town ain't that big. I like the grey area, but I don't like manifested craziness.

If you dont do one night stands then whats the point of running DMSI?
2 night stands Tongue


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - robstar - 11-10-2016

(11-10-2016, 10:27 PM)Illumi Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 08:43 PM)Zeroxmachina Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 08:28 PM)Illumi Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 08:22 PM)Zeroxmachina Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 08:04 PM)Illumi Wrote: The crazy ones are just a part of it, just like in life you can't go though without struggles and problems.
Personally id rather date a crazy one then learn how to deal with it. Rather than avoiding it. Dancing in the rain not avoiding it

Ya'll think that celebrities dont have crazy fans?

I don't necessarily wanna date every chick that I have sex with a few times lol

You don't have to. Once you are done just leave her apartment or if its yours try to make her leave. Dont say i love you, dont buy presents, dont do boyfriend stuff.
Just hit and run, then they will know for sure you aint relationship material.

My friend who i call natural made that mistake, then he got a crazy on his back for weeks.

I don't actually do one night stands, unless it was that terrible. Nor do I 'kick chicks out',not part of my value system,plus this town ain't that big. I like the grey area, but I don't like manifested craziness.

If you dont do one night stands then whats the point of running DMSI?

To have sex repeatedly with girls you're attracted to? Or do you believe there's only one night stands or marriage?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 11-10-2016

I vote for one month stands Big Grin


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bits - 11-10-2016

(11-10-2016, 09:29 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 09:02 PM)bits Wrote: Yea I wouldn't just leave or kick out girls for 3 reasons, 1) it's just a dick move 2) ends any future hookups making it impossible for you to have any legitimate "abundance" 3) girls tell each other everything, suddenly a great hookup becomes "he used me and he's an asshole" and you'll never hookup with her friends

Very few women are crazy and the ones that are you can spot pretty quick, if a woman pushes for a relationship it's simply a matter a case of saying no. After a handful of hookups they push it that way but if you shut it down quick it will only be an issue 1 or 2 times in your lifetime if even that. I've had chicks annoy me with too many calls and texts but never any actual crazy behavior.

Dzemoo did it and it worked for him...

yea but he also approached multiple girls a day and agressively escalated within minutes, if you can copy dzemoos game like that then it can workout but otherwise you'll always be needy for sex rather than being able to call up 3 or 4 different girls who are ready to hookup whenever you want


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Illumi - 11-10-2016

(11-10-2016, 10:54 PM)robstar Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 10:27 PM)Illumi Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 08:43 PM)Zeroxmachina Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 08:28 PM)Illumi Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 08:22 PM)Zeroxmachina Wrote: I don't necessarily wanna date every chick that I have sex with a few times lol

You don't have to. Once you are done just leave her apartment or if its yours try to make her leave. Dont say i love you, dont buy presents, dont do boyfriend stuff.
Just hit and run, then they will know for sure you aint relationship material.

My friend who i call natural made that mistake, then he got a crazy on his back for weeks.

I don't actually do one night stands, unless it was that terrible. Nor do I 'kick chicks out',not part of my value system,plus this town ain't that big. I like the grey area, but I don't like manifested craziness.

If you dont do one night stands then whats the point of running DMSI?

To have sex repeatedly with girls you're attracted to? Or do you believe there's only one night stands or marriage?
The point is with DMSI one night stands are inevitable.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-10-2016

(11-10-2016, 07:44 PM)Zeroxmachina Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 07:46 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 07:41 AM)Steven Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 07:05 AM)Shannon Wrote: It is aimed at being similar in effect to Allo-THDOC and others, in effect a subliminal result like that of the "reset" pheromone(s). It's aimed at triggering the affected brain to decide that their previous classification of you is in error, and change it to "must **** - NOW."

#3 aims to cause them to perceive you as being their ideal sexual choice and higher value than they are in terms of status.
#4 aims to add to #3 by getting them to perceive you as being everything they want and need sexually, and in a sexual partner.
And #5, which I have not started working on, will be aimed at causing a "celebrity" level status enhancement, and causing them to see it as being "no big deal" to approach because there is already a familiarity and level of comfort present that would result from having already had amazing sex with the user, and being comfortable with approaching and initiating, regardless of the stunning nature of their status and good looks. This one is going to be very hard to pull off because it is sort of a self contradiction, but I will try.

1) So we have the TAC effect and now the Allo-THDOC effect. Can you put in the 3ß-Androstanediol effect(s) too? (I think that was the secret ingredient in the raved about and legendary A314 versions.)

One step at a time, my friend. I'm working on it.

Quote:2) I think you also mentioned that there was a classification of "must **** - NOW and FOREVER". Is that still in there?

In the wording that won the modeling runs. Maybe not exactly like that...

Quote:3) In terms of the aims being contradictory, it seems to me women (and even many people) live in an inner world of contradictions so I would expect you could pull this off.

We are certainly going to try.

Quote:4) Seems all these aims are consistent with a woman being sexually motivated. Higher value than themselves in status. Everything they want and need sexually and as a sexual partner. Familiarity. Comfort. And the celebrity status (which I'm guessing includes feelings of awe and admiration). I know logically this may appear as contradictions, but I think sex has a logic of it's own, and I think this all fits well together.

I may have to adjust some of that to be polymorphic in the future to keep it truly gender unspecified in user base, but we will take it as it comes.

Quote:Besides I don't think a woman is going to say "Hey! Wait a minute! Why do I think of this guy like my favorite celebrity yet it just feels so natural and normal?" Even if she does wonder, I think she'll be "too busy wanting to hold on to and enjoy the feelings and reinforcing those feelings to effectively maintain them". But then again, perhaps that should be added too just to be safe.

The reactions I am triggering are below the threshhold of consciousness at first, and they are not coming through the neo-cortex. The parts of the rain processing these are not capable of logic. That's why you say "sex has a logic of it's own". What you're saying is that women (and men probably are too) are in large part irrational when it comes to sex.

I haven't heard anyone suggest this(forgive me if I've missed it), but is it possible to put some sort of 'don't attract women who might become obsessed and try to kill us if we no longer want them' coding? All this stuff is awesome, but usually repeated sex leads to some sort of psychological/emotional/spiritual attachment,possibly even relationships, and women would probably see you as the 'best thing ever' if this thing is working at max potential.

Any way to weed out the crazy ones so they aren't going insane if we gotta part ways?

It is possible, but first we have to know what we need to dial back from. And it is unlikely that we can prevent it entirely. I don't want to limit the program and kill the result... I want to achieve the result and then lightly filter it.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-10-2016

(11-10-2016, 09:26 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: I think that potential program to make the affected have porno fantasies about you and cant stop think about you like this is taking it waay waay too far. I REALLY do Man! U asked in your journal what we thot. Isnt DMSI Already powerful as heck as it is!? I KNow yer tweaking and fine tuning this thang and trying things out but I think that one is taking it way to far. Ok , View and Opinion offered.
Keith.

Thank you, Keith, I appreciate your input. DMSI being powerful isn't making it do what it needs to do yet.

I have been forced on a number of occasions to use methods I did not want to use initially, and sometimes, resisted using for years, while developing the technology. In every case, it turned out to be the only way to achieve the necessary results. AND, it turned out to be a lot less bad than I had thought it would be - in many cases, not "bad" at all.

In this case, what I'm doing is not even sure to be possible. If it is, then we'll have to figure out how to adjust it for various reasons. But until we try it, how do we know if it is even possible? And without knowing that, what are we unable to know and do in other directions?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-10-2016

(11-10-2016, 09:29 PM)Rayhon Wrote: Shannon, your progress reports for DMSI 3.01 are getting me so excited!!

Around when do you think it will be released?

It should be apparent by now that I never release anything until I am happy with it. The answer to that question is, always has been and always will be...

when it's ready.

That's why you are willing pay me so much money for my products, as opposed to other "subliminals" out there... I take my time, and I do it right.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-10-2016

(11-10-2016, 10:22 PM)robstar Wrote: Shannon, if V2.5 doesn't have any healing modules.. Why oh why did I have an intensely vivid dream about hooking up with an ex and now have difficulty stopping thinking about her?

Because the program is force marching you through to achieve the goal, regardless of what it takes.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 11-10-2016

(11-10-2016, 10:22 PM)robstar Wrote: Shannon, if V2.5 doesn't have any healing modules.. Why oh why did I have an intensely vivid dream about hooking up with an ex and now have difficulty stopping thinking about her?

Hi Rob!

It's the same reason why I have progressed on this sub more than other versions, even though it has no healing.

Shannon has told me that it's because of the increased power of this sub. It having P3 and P4 pushing the words per second into the stratosphere. And the stiffened anti-resistance technology, enabling it to at times bulldoze issues you have and mimic clearing modules in it.

Overall, for me, V2.5 has been the first to begin to break through my issues despite having no clearing. It is making me very excited for V3.0.1. I think that might be the one for me at last. We shall see, I'll let the data see. I definitely feel changes from this one, though.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 11-10-2016

(11-10-2016, 11:25 PM)Illumi Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 10:54 PM)robstar Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 10:27 PM)Illumi Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 08:43 PM)Zeroxmachina Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 08:28 PM)Illumi Wrote: You don't have to. Once you are done just leave her apartment or if its yours try to make her leave. Dont say i love you, dont buy presents, dont do boyfriend stuff.
Just hit and run, then they will know for sure you aint relationship material.

My friend who i call natural made that mistake, then he got a crazy on his back for weeks.

I don't actually do one night stands, unless it was that terrible. Nor do I 'kick chicks out',not part of my value system,plus this town ain't that big. I like the grey area, but I don't like manifested craziness.

If you dont do one night stands then whats the point of running DMSI?

To have sex repeatedly with girls you're attracted to? Or do you believe there's only one night stands or marriage?
The point is with DMSI one night stands are inevitable.

Maybe, but I don't see the point of going only for ONS if that's what you meant previously. I see ONS as a waste of time, what can you possibly do in only one night VS 10 nights or more? To have sex with a girl more than once is more profitable that throwing her away after the first day. Unless she is crazy of course or so low value that you only want her for one night.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Illumi - 11-10-2016

(11-10-2016, 11:46 PM)Alpha360 Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 11:25 PM)Illumi Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 10:54 PM)robstar Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 10:27 PM)Illumi Wrote:
(11-10-2016, 08:43 PM)Zeroxmachina Wrote: I don't actually do one night stands, unless it was that terrible. Nor do I 'kick chicks out',not part of my value system,plus this town ain't that big. I like the grey area, but I don't like manifested craziness.

If you dont do one night stands then whats the point of running DMSI?

To have sex repeatedly with girls you're attracted to? Or do you believe there's only one night stands or marriage?
The point is with DMSI one night stands are inevitable.

Maybe, but I don't see the point of going only for ONS if that's what you meant previously. I see ONS as a waste of time, what can you possibly do in only one night VS 10 nights or more? To have sex with a girl more than once is more profitable that throwing her away after the first day. Unless she is crazy of course or so low value that you only want her for one night.
He was talking about not wanting women to think he wants a relationship. And i told him the best way to let women know that you are not bf material is that once you have sex, you leave or make her leave. I never said you can only have sex once, i just said that you dont have to stay over once you are done


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 11-10-2016

Hi Shannon!

I'm curious, is DMSI V3.0.1 still going to have the emotional shielding ported over from E2, or maybe it'll just be in the clearing version? That would be amazing, just in case we hit those bumps in the road so to speak. Especially while aggressively doing the forced march.

Also, is the release still on target by the end of the month? How are the agreements coming along for the two custom jobs? Congratulations on getting those by the way.