Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Ricardo - 11-06-2016

Shannon has already said that nsfm conflicts with the goal of DMSI so why introduce comflicts when we don't know why DMSI isn't working in the first place? Too many guys here have this limiting belief that guys must do all the chasing and with nsfm we are just getting further away from the goal of DMSI.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - robstar - 11-06-2016

(11-04-2016, 09:21 PM)Shannon Wrote: It's in there. May not stay in there after 3.0... it's counter to the program's goals.

Isn't the programs goal explicitly stated in the title? "Maximum sexual irresistibility"? Which is about more than just looks, and an aura. It also includes having a charming personality, knowing how to talk, touch etc. I'm not talking about pursuing women here, purely in the realm of being pursued, these things are all useful and would aid the programs goals. And there's also having the ability to take the relationship in whatever direction you want it after sex happens, which I'm sure is an ability everyone would love to have. I think if 3.0 makes it clear that nfsm takes away energy from the rest of the program it should be removed but if it doesn't and it only compliments it why not keep it?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - robstar - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 07:41 AM)Ricardo Wrote: Shannon has already said that nsfm conflicts with the goal of DMSI so why introduce comflicts when we don't know why DMSI isn't working in the first place? Too many guys here have this limiting belief that guys must do all the chasing and with nsfm we are just getting further away from the goal of DMSI.

It's not about chasing, even if a girl is super attracted and comes to you wanting sex, if you do or say something stupid, beta or socially retarded, she's gonna leave. We need to consider this realistically.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 11-06-2016

Agree 100% with Mr. Anderson. I also think it benefits Shannon's efforts greatly by having a wide variety of individuals with different philosophies to test this that way we can test every facet of DMSI in terms of its ability to improve seduction and its ability to get targets/attractive individuals to initiate the approach on the user. So having people like Catman who are dedicated to testing out the program's primary goal is beneficial until its been established and confirmed by Shannon that the primary goal (getting attractive people to approach the user) is unacheivable on a consistent basis.

Ricardo Wrote:Shannon has already said that nsfm conflicts with the goal of DMSI so why introduce comflicts when we don't know why DMSI isn't working in the first place? Too many guys here have this limiting belief that guys must do all the chasing and with nsfm we are just getting further away from the goal of DMSI.

I agree that until Shannon explicitly says "Sorry guys, it ain't possible" that we shouldn't completely abandon the program's primary goal which is to get attractive individuals to approach the user. The thing is that Shannon has already said that he expects multiple versions within the V3 series so having one version with NSFM in it can be beneficial later on IF Shannon discovers that the program's main goal is too lofty because then he can go back, check reports, and if it turns out NSFM was able to allow guys to improve their success with women...then hell, he'll still have a viable product that he can sell.

EDIT: I just saw Robstar's comment and I agree. That's my main concern when it comes to the "wait for her to approach" thing. Even if she approaches you have to be able to not screw things up. Believe me Catman and Ricardo, I want this shit too work just as much as you guys, so we're on the same page here guys Smile. I'm glad that you two are staying dedicated to seeing the program's goal to fruition. I'm only suggesting that we test alternatives.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 01:09 AM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:Let's keep DMSI focused on being pursued, not the pursuer.

I disagree with this, though I seem to be in the minority thinking this.

Despite the goal it's important to still be able to deal with the fears and stuff so you CAN talk to girls when you want and move it forward instead of being forced to be passive and wait for them to do it.

Or because of having a mentality of "they should be doing it with this program" that you're falling into. I've even seen it to the extreme of someone being like "Oh this woman come right next to me and smiled big at me but I did nothing because she's meant to do it with DMSI".

Maybe not exactly that but close.

Yes it would be cool having these attractive girls talk to me, I do get it occasionally. But I don't feel that the option to talk to them should be eliminated and it sounds like that is where some guys want it to head. Personally I don't, why not the ability for either.

As a side note, coincidentally from my experience as i've had less 'baggage' around initiating myself, for example when it just flows for me, or when some fear is cleared I actually have girls responding better and sometimes initiate with me without me having to. If you still have all the baggage and fear around initiating it also holds them back from initiating. Sounds weird I know, but i've found that's how it has worked.

Where did Shannon ever say the subliminal eliminates the option to speak to women?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 01:26 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 01:09 AM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:Let's keep DMSI focused on being pursued, not the pursuer.

I disagree with this, though I seem to be in the minority thinking this.

Despite the goal it's important to still be able to deal with the fears and stuff so you CAN talk to girls when you want and move it forward instead of being forced to be passive and wait for them to do it.

Or because of having a mentality of "they should be doing it with this program" that you're falling into. I've even seen it to the extreme of someone being like "Oh this woman come right next to me and smiled big at me but I did nothing because she's meant to do it with DMSI".

Maybe not exactly that but close.

Yes it would be cool having these attractive girls talk to me, I do get it occasionally. But I don't feel that the option to talk to them should be eliminated and it sounds like that is where some guys want it to head. Personally I don't, why not the ability for either.

As a side note, coincidentally from my experience as i've had less 'baggage' around initiating myself, for example when it just flows for me, or when some fear is cleared I actually have girls responding better and sometimes initiate with me without me having to. If you still have all the baggage and fear around initiating it also holds them back from initiating. Sounds weird I know, but i've found that's how it has worked.

Well said! I feel like it is turning into this lazy route for many users. They see a girl hovering around and looking at them. "Oh I refuse to do anything, cause the goal of DMSI is supposed to get women to make a move on me." Are you really gonna cockblock yourself? Just make things easier for the both of you. Say hi to her. She is hoping you would, so make it happen.

No one said anything about not responding to women. Shannon's focus for the program is getting women to initiate, not getting the men to do nothing. He's just not promoting men to "do the work," not keeping them from it. Big difference.

Are people worried that, if approached, users will self-cockblock or mess up the opportunity that's presented, thus feeling the inclusion of Natural Seduction will help out? I don't know. I do know that I'll defer to Shannon's expertise. He's the man who writes the script!

Also, Wolverine, since you're a proponent of the "just do it," attitude - and repeatedly call people who aren't cold approaching lazy - how bout you just get laid already, or are you too lazy to escalate? Clearly everyone is at a different place with women, let's have a little leniency with those who aren't where we are, eh?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bits - 11-06-2016

I don't understand why the choice is so binary, isn't it possible to have both? Maximize DMSI to have women approach you, but also give you the ability to approach women?

If people want to hold back from approaching and judge the programs effectiveness based on it's goals then that's perfectly fair but I don't see how including NSFM would be a bad thing for DMSI.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - posh - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 09:21 AM)RTBoss Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 01:26 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 01:09 AM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:Let's keep DMSI focused on being pursued, not the pursuer.

I disagree with this, though I seem to be in the minority thinking this.

Despite the goal it's important to still be able to deal with the fears and stuff so you CAN talk to girls when you want and move it forward instead of being forced to be passive and wait for them to do it.

Or because of having a mentality of "they should be doing it with this program" that you're falling into. I've even seen it to the extreme of someone being like "Oh this woman come right next to me and smiled big at me but I did nothing because she's meant to do it with DMSI".

Maybe not exactly that but close.

Yes it would be cool having these attractive girls talk to me, I do get it occasionally. But I don't feel that the option to talk to them should be eliminated and it sounds like that is where some guys want it to head. Personally I don't, why not the ability for either.

As a side note, coincidentally from my experience as i've had less 'baggage' around initiating myself, for example when it just flows for me, or when some fear is cleared I actually have girls responding better and sometimes initiate with me without me having to. If you still have all the baggage and fear around initiating it also holds them back from initiating. Sounds weird I know, but i've found that's how it has worked.

Well said! I feel like it is turning into this lazy route for many users. They see a girl hovering around and looking at them. "Oh I refuse to do anything, cause the goal of DMSI is supposed to get women to make a move on me." Are you really gonna cockblock yourself? Just make things easier for the both of you. Say hi to her. She is hoping you would, so make it happen.

No one said anything about not responding to women. Shannon's focus for the program is getting women to initiate, not getting the men to do nothing. He's just not promoting men to "do the work," not keeping them from it. Big difference.

Are people worried that, if approached, users will self-cockblock or mess up the opportunity that's presented, thus feeling the inclusion of Natural Seduction will help out? I don't know. I do know that I'll defer to Shannon's expertise. He's the man who writes the script!

Also, Wolverine, since you're a proponent of the "just do it," attitude - and repeatedly call people who aren't cold approaching lazy - how bout you just get laid already, or are you too lazy to escalate? Clearly everyone is at a different place with women, let's have a little leniency with those who aren't where we are, eh?

Legit post I paid for dmsi which said it would make women approach and try to fuk me.

I did no pay to be a cold approaching pu$$y begger.

High value men do not need to cold approach women


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bits - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 09:49 AM)posh Wrote: Legit post I paid for dmsi which said it would make women approach and try to fuk me.

I did no pay to be a cold approaching pu$$y begger.

High value men do not cold approach women

They don't cold approach the way most guys would approach 20 different women but they for sure do "warm approaches" where the woman makes it blatantly obvious like this:

[Image: 63MpxLN.gif]

If the guy doesn't approach she assumes he's rejecting her, if he does then she makes it very easy for him.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 09:49 AM)posh Wrote: Legit post I paid for dmsi which said it would make women approach and try to fuk me.

I did no pay to be a cold approaching pu$$y begger.

High value men do not cold approach women

First point, true.
Second point, kinda true -- but I get what you're saying.
Third point, dawg wtf???

Shannon already knows what the design goal is -- to get women to approach us instead of us having to do the work. And if you bought DMSI expecting that, you're very much entitled to your refund ONCE the final version comes out and IF it doesn't perform to expectations.

But... we don't have to lie about reality to get what we want.

Low value men don't cold approach women because they're too afraid of being shamed or ostracized for the attempt. High value men do whatever they want -- including approaching women because they don't fear any repercussions, plus they're so self-assured of their value that they know the woman won't reject the approach.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - posh - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 10:19 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 09:49 AM)posh Wrote: Legit post I paid for dmsi which said it would make women approach and try to fuk me.

I did no pay to be a cold approaching pu$$y begger.

High value men do not cold approach women

First point, true.
Second point, kinda true -- but I get what you're saying.
Third point, dawg wtf???

Shannon already knows what the design goal is -- to get women to approach us instead of us having to do the work. And if you bought DMSI expecting that, you're very much entitled to your refund ONCE the final version comes out and IF it doesn't perform to expectations.

But... we don't have to lie about reality to get what we want.

Low value men don't cold approach women because they're too afraid of being shamed or ostracized for the attempt. High value men do whatever they want -- including approaching women because they don't fear any repercussions, plus they're so self-assured of their value that they know the woman won't reject the approach.

Low value men do cold approach. Go to oxford street London and you will see low value pua pu$$y beggers going around approach women over and over again with no result. There was even vids of a virgin deformed guy cold approaching. Guess what women do not give him the time of day. Hes treated like trash.

If women like you enough they will approach you.

Do you see the likes of justin bieber and drake cold approach??? nah they get approached and the women would do anything to get their sperm. This is basic common sense


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bits - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 10:40 AM)posh Wrote: Low value men do cold approach. Go to oxford street London and you will see low value pua pu$$y beggers going around approach women over and over again with no result. There was even vids of a virgin deformed guy cold approaching. Guess what women do not give him the time of day. Hes treated like trash.

If women like you enough they will approach you.

Do you see the likes of justin bieber and drake cold approach??? nah they get approached and the women would do anything to get their sperm. This is basic common sense

Yes actually, I was at liv in Miami and saw Bieber approach of group of girls.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - posh - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 10:06 AM)bits Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 09:49 AM)posh Wrote: Legit post I paid for dmsi which said it would make women approach and try to fuk me.

I did no pay to be a cold approaching pu$$y begger.

High value men do not cold approach women

They don't cold approach the way most guys would approach 20 different women but they for sure do "warm approaches" where the woman makes it blatantly obvious like this:

[Image: 63MpxLN.gif]

If the guy doesn't approach she assumes he's rejecting her, if he does then she makes it very easy for him.

with a high value guy a woman knows she has to be the one that approaches or she won't get her man. Doing a stare isn't going to make justin bieber come over to her and approach her, especially a post prime woman like anna lol.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 10:40 AM)posh Wrote: Low value men do cold approach. Go to oxford street London and you will see low value pua pu$$y beggers going around approach women over and over again with no result. There was even vids of a virgin deformed guy cold approaching. Guess what women do not give him the time of day. Hes treated like trash.

If women like you enough they will approach you.

Do you see the likes of justin bieber and drake cold approach??? nah they get approached and the women would do anything to get their sperm. This is basic common sense

What's common sense is this:

You're being completely illogical here by relying on absolute outliers to make your arguments. You went from one end of the spectrum (a virgin deformed guy) to freaking Justin Bieber and Drake, skipping over the entire continuum of below average to average to above average men in the process.